DJ 202-PL-409 MAR 11 1993 Mr. W. E. Olson Engineering Supervisor CR/PL, Inc. P.O. Box 389 Nevada, Missouri 64772 Dear Mr. Olson: At the Access Board hearings in Washington on March 9, your representative stated in her testimony that I had said at the American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE) conference last year that a toilet seat height of 19 1/4" was acceptable under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). I spoke to her afterwards to clarify, as I had explained to you at our two-hour meeting in December 1992, what I had actually said: an owner of a recently-constructed building that is not subject to the new construction requirements is not necessarily required to replace all 19 1/4" toilet seats for purposes of complying with the ADA's barrier removal requirement. This issue had been raised at the ASPE conference by a member of the audience. He mentioned that the owner of a building constructed in 1990 or 1991 had just replaced all the toilets in the building, because they had seats at 19 1/4", rather than 19", and he was bringing the building up to new construction standards. In response, I said that existing buildings are subject to the requirement that barriers be removed if it is readily achievable to do so; and that, most likely, it would have been a wiser use of funds to make other types of changes to the building than to remove all the toilets when they were only 1/4" off the new construction standard. This statement does not relate to requirements or tolerances for new construction. Your representative seemed to understand my explanation after her testimony at the hearings. (An Access Board staff member who had also been at the ASPE meeting was present and cc: Records; Chrono; Wodatch; Blizard; Bowen. \udd\bowen\olson.ltr 01-01947 - 2 - confirmed my statements.) I would appreciate it if you would clarify this issue with other representatives of your company or your industry, if they are under the impression that this Department has stated that 19 1/4" height toilet seats are acceptable in new construction. At our meeting with you and others in December, we had also answered several of the same questions your company raised in your two letters and at the Access Board hearings. As our staff has explained to you recently, we will answer the remaining questions that you have posed, to the extent we are authorized to do so, as soon as our resources and workload allow. Sincerely, L. Irene Bowen Deputy Chief cc: Kathy Parker, Access Board Larry Roffee, Access Board 01-01948