DJ 202-PL 215 MAY 2 5 1993 John M. Barnett Executive Director Nebraska Polio Survivors Association P.O. Box 37139 Omaha, Nebraska 68137 Dear Mr. Barnett: This letter is in response to your letter requesting information about the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). I apologize for the delay in our response. The ADA authorizes the Department of Justice to provide technical assistance to individuals and entities having rights or obligations under the Act. This letter provides informal guidance to assist you in understanding the ADA's requirements. However, it does not constitute a legal interpretation or legal advice, and it is not binding on the Department. You ask several questions about the conditions under which a retail store owner must rearrange display racks to provide accessible aisles. You request a policy statement on when rearrangement of racks is not readily achievable. You also ask whether retail store owners need not rearrange racks if to do so would result in a significant loss of revenue, and whether the store owner has the option of either rearranging racks or providing a clerk to retrieve inaccessible items. "Readily achievable" means easily accomplishable and able to be carried out without much difficulty or expense. The definition of "readily achievable" in section 36.104 of the regulation states that the determination of whether an action is readily achievable should include consideration of several factors, including the overall financial and other resources of the covered entity. Section 36.304(f) of the regulation specifies that rearrangement of display racks is not readily achievable "to the extent that it results in a significant loss of selling or serving space." (As you point out, the reference to loss of revenue was not included in the final rule.) Aside from this regulation, the Department cannot issue a categorical cc: Records, Chrono, Wodatch, Bowen, Novich, FOIA Udd:Novich:Policy:215 01-02269 - 2 - statement on when rearrangement is or is not readily achievable. As stated in the preamble to the title III regulation, "[w]hether or not any of these measures is readily achievable is to be determined on a case-by-case basis in light of the particular circumstances presented and the factors listed in the definition of readily achievable (S 36.104)." You can find this discussion on page 35568 of the enclosed title III regulation and a list of the factors to be considered in whether removal is readily achievable an page 35594. You are also correct in your understanding that a retail store cannot satisfy ADA requirements by providing a clerk to retrieve inaccessible items if accessible rearrangement of display racks is readily achievable. Section 36.305 of the title III regulation specifies that alternatives to barrier removal may satisfy the statute only "[w]here a public accommodation can demonstrate that barrier removal is not readily achievable." I hope this information is useful to you. Sincerely, L. Irene Bowen Deputy Chief Public Access Section Enclosure Title III regulation 01-02270