Due to the lapse in appropriations, Department of Justice websites will not be regularly updated. The Department’s essential law enforcement and national security functions will continue. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

Bergeron v. ATF, No. 13-00625, 2016 WL 1229050 (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2016) (Du, J.)

Date: 
Monday, March 28, 2016

Bergeron v. ATF, No. 13-00625, 2016 WL 1229050 (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2016) (Du, J.)

Re: Request for records concerning selection of ATF supervisor

Disposition: Granting defendant's motion to dismiss; denying plaintiff's motion for attorney fees and costs

  • Attorney Fees:  "The Court finds that, even with the limited record before it, the circumstances surrounding ATF's withholdings raise questions about whether the agency acted arbitrarily and capriciously."  "[Plaintiff] was required to engage in years of litigation to obtain documents."  "He successfully obtained much of the disputed material through both negotiations with ATF and a court order."  "While ATF is correct in pointing out that most of [plaintiff's] claims were resolved through joint discussions, such resolution does not mean that ATF's initial refusals do not raise questions about the agency's actions."  However, the court finds that "[plaintiff's] request for attorney's fees and costs is a post judgment determination that does not preclude granting ATF's motion to dismiss."  "Accordingly, the Court will grant Defendant's motion to dismiss because all substantive issues have been resolved."  Additionally, "[t]he Court will deny [plaintiff's] motion for attorney fees without prejudice so that he may serve and file a bill of costs in compliance with Local Rule 54-1."
Topic: 
Attorney Fees
District Court
Updated May 19, 2016