Due to the lapse in appropriations, Department of Justice websites will not be regularly updated. The Department’s essential law enforcement and national security functions will continue. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

Marino v. DOJ, No. 12-865, 2013 WL 5979753 (D.D.C. November 12, 2013) (Collyer, J.)

Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Re: Request for "variety of records that [plaintiff] believes will both exonerate him and show government misconduct" Disposition: Denying without prejudice defendant's motion to dismiss, or alternatively, defendant's motion for summary judgment
  • Litigation Considerations, Adequacy of Search:  The court is "[u]nable to find that the defending federal agencies conducted adequate searches, reasonably calculated to identify responsive records."  The court finds that "[defendant's] motion largely is premature" because "[s]ome agencies did not conduct any search for responsive records while others performed searches only partially responsive to [plaintiff's] requests."  The court finds that "[a]s far as the record shows, [several defendant components] failed to conduct any search in response to [plaintiff's] requests," other defendant components "ignor[ed]" the fact that plaintiff "revised his FOIA requests and expressly limited the search fees he was willing to incur to $1,000.00," and other defendant components "read [plaintiff's] FOIA [request] in narrow and divergent ways."
Adequacy of Search
District Court
Litigation Considerations
Updated August 6, 2014