Due to the lapse in appropriations, Department of Justice websites will not be regularly updated. The Department’s essential law enforcement and national security functions will continue. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

Nat'l Sec. Counselors v. CIA, No. 11-442, 2014 WL 551325 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2014) (Collyer, J.)

Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Re: Motion for attorney's fees resulting from request for records concerning Mandatory Declassification Review as well as third party's FOIA request Disposition: Denying plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees
  • Attorney's Fees, Threshold Issues:  The court finds that "there is no client separate from [plaintiff]" and that "his status as a pro se attorney renders him ineligible for an award of attorney's fees."  The court explains that "[t]he record shows little, if any, distinction between [plaintiff] and National Security Counselors."  The court states that "[t]he organization was not a legal entity distinct from [plaintiff]," "every critical leadership role in the organization belongs to [plaintiff]," "[d]espite its formal incorporation, the record contains no evidence that National Security Counselors publicly identifies itself as an incorporated entity, or in any other way distinct from [plaintiff]," and "[w]ith the exception of [one] purpose, i.e., to represent clients in security or privacy-related proceedings, none of the organization's activities involves a traditional attorney-client relationship."  The court notes that "without a true client, the Government is under no obligation to subsidize self-serving activity."
Attorney Fees
District Court
Updated August 6, 2014