Due to the lapse in appropriations, Department of Justice websites will not be regularly updated. The Department’s essential law enforcement and national security functions will continue. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

White v. DOJ, No. 11-2045(RJL), 2013 WL 3466892 (D.D.C. July 9, 2013) (Leon, J.)

Date: 
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Re: Request for records pertaining to plaintiff Disposition: Granting defendant's motion for summary judgment
  • Adequacy of the Search:  "The Court is satisfied from [defendant's] description of the filing systems searched and the search methods employed that the Criminal Division conducted a search reasonably calculated to locate responsive records."  Defendant searched the offices identified by the plaintiff utilizing four variations of the plaintiff's name.  Defendant explained, "[e]ach section 'would have [searched its] own Automated Case Tracking System' . . . which 'is a comprehensive electronic database that stores records [as far back as 1978] related to investigations conducted by attorneys throughout [the Criminal Division].'"
  • Exemption 5/Attorney Work-Product Privilege:  The court finds that the Executive Office for United States Attorneys properly asserted Exemption 5 and the attorney work-product privilege to withhold in full 23 pages referred to it.  The records are described as "'documents . . . assembled by, or at the direction of, an attorney . . . made in the course of an investigation and in anticipation of one or more prosecutions.'" 
Topic: 
Adequacy of Search
District Court
Exemption 5
Updated August 6, 2014