Harrisburg Man Indicted On Drug Trafficking And Firearms Charges
HARRISBURG – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced today that Gamarius Jones, age 23, of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, was indicted on April 25, 2018, by a federal grand jury on drug trafficking and firearms charges.
According to United States Attorney David J. Freed, the indictment alleges that Jones possessed with the intent to distribute crack cocaine on December 5, 12 and 21, 2017, in Dauphin County. The indictment also alleges that on February 12, 2018, in Dauphin County, Jones unlawfully possessed a .45 caliber Springfield handgun as a previously convicted felon.
The matter was investigated by the Harrisburg Police Department, the Office of Attorney General, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Assistant U.S. Attorney Scott R. Ford is prosecuting the case.
This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. Attorney General Jeff Sessions reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the Department’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S. Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective, locally-based strategies to reduce violent crime.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty for this offense is up to life in prison, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.
# # #