Stroudsburg Man Indicted On Drug Trafficking Offenses
SCRANTON- The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced today that Jackie Johnson, age 31, of Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, was indicted on April 11, 2017, by a federal grand jury on drug trafficking charges. The indictment was unsealed on April 25, 2017, following Johnson’s initial appearance before United States Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito.
According to United States Attorney Bruce D. Brandler, the indictment alleges that Johnson distributed and possessed with the intent to distribute heroin on two occasions in July and August 2016, and cocaine in December 2016, in Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pennsylvania State Police. Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean A. Camoni is prosecuting the case.
This case was brought as part of a district wide initiative to combat the nationwide epidemic regarding the use and distribution of heroin. Led by the United States Attorney’s Office, the Heroin Initiative targets heroin traffickers operating in the Middle District of Pennsylvania and is part of a coordinated effort among federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who commit heroin related offenses.
Indictments are only allegations. All persons charged are presumed to be innocent unless and until found guilty in court.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty under federal law for this offense is 20 years of imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.
# # #