You are here

Justice News

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Western District of Virginia

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Former City of Norton Parks and Recreation Maintenance Supervisor Sentenced in Federal Court

Michael Lintz Admitted to Coercing Women on Probation to Performing Sex Acts, Lying in Federal Court

Abingdon, VIRGINIA – The former Maintenance Supervisor of the City of Norton Parks and Recreation Department, who previously admitted to coercing women who were on state probation to perform sexual favors for him and lying in federal court, was sentenced today in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia in Abingdon, Acting United States Attorney Rick A. Mountcastle announced today.

 

Michael Todd Lintz, 52, of Norton, Va., previously pled guilty to one count of obstruction of justice and one count of using his authority to engage in coercive sexual relations with a female victim, willfully depriving her of her right to bodily integrity. Today in District Court, Lintz was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and 3 years of supervised release thereafter. Lintz was also ordered to pay a fine of $10,000.

 

According to a written proffer of facts filed previously, Lintz supervised individuals assigned to perform community service pursuant to a court order, or by referral from a state probation and parole officer. During his employment with the City of Norton, Lintz ensured that he supervised primarily female workers assigned to Parks and Recreation. Lintz monitored the community service time worked by the individuals under his supervision, and reported the hours they worked to state probation and parole officers. If Lintz reported to a state probation officer that an individual did not perform the required number of community service hours, that individual could be violated on their probation conditions and could have to serve time in jail. Lintz used his authority and official position to coerce female community service workers into providing him with sexual favors, the exchange of which he either alluded or explicitly promised could result in favorable outcomes with their court-ordered supervision. Lintz knew that some of these female community service workers could be subjected to jail sentences for failing to perform community service and used that information to his advantage. Specific instances of this conduct are related in more detail below.

 

In July 2015, Lintz began supervising the community service of Female Worker 1 (“FW1”), who was referred by a state probation and parole officer. FW1 had a significant number of community service hours to perform. When FW1 first started working with Lintz, she was told by other female workers that Lintz would be interested in trading sexual favors in exchange for community service hours. Lintz began contacting FW1 about personal matters outside of working hours, calling her and texting her while she was not at work. Lintz made sexual comments on a daily basis to FW1, and gave her a sexual nickname that he called her in front of other community service workers. Lintz showed FW1 pornography on his phone. Lintz took FW1 back to his home on several occasions, and displayed video pornography to her on the television in his home during working hours. Lintz used his authority and official position to coerce FW1 into providing him with sexual favors on three separate occasions, which are detailed below.

 

In or about August 2015, while he was supervising her on community service, Lintz approached FW1 shortly after 4:00 pm, after all other workers had left for the day, to ask her to perform oral sex on him. FW1 agreed, and she performed oral sex on Lintz in the back room of the Parks and Recreation Office. In exchange for this sexual act, FW1 believes Lintz allowed her to claim she had worked one week of community service during a time when she took off to care for an ill family member.

 

In or about August 2015 to September 2015, while he was supervising her on community service, Lintz took FW1 to his home during working hours. He brought her to his carport, closed the blinds, and asked her to perform oral sex on him. Lintz commented to FW1 that he was going to hate to see her finish her community service, as he wanted to engage in oral sex with FW1 every day. Lintz told FW1 that if she continued to engage in oral sex with him, she would finish her community service early.

 

September 16, 2015, FW1 appeared in federal court in Abingdon, Virginia, on charges of conspiring to distribute a controlled substance. At the request of FW1’s mother, Lintz testified as a witness at FW1’s detention hearing. Under oath before the United States Magistrate Court, Lintz stated that FW1 had worked all of her hours and testified from the time cards he had completed for FW1. Under oath, Lintz denied having any personal relationship with FW1, and represented himself to be only her community service supervisor. Lintz did not advise the court that he had previous sexual encounters with FW1 in the weeks leading up to his testimony. In releasing FW1 on bond, the Court noted that Lintz’s testimony had been particularly persuasive.

 

Within days, Lintz approached FW1 and told her that, if it had not been for his testimony, she would have been in jail. Lintz then asked FW1 for oral sex and FW1 complied, as she felt he was implying she “owed” him for his testimony on her behalf. Lintz did not give FW1 any additional community service hours beyond the 45 hours she initially received.

 

In August 2015, Lintz began supervising the community service of Female Worker 3 (“FW3”), who was referred by a state probation and parole officer. FW3 had a significant number of community service hours to perform. On one occasion in February 2016, while he was supervising her on community service, Lintz brought FW3 back to his home to watch a pornographic video on his television during working hours. Lintz told FW3 that he wanted to show that particular pornographic video to FW1. While at his home, Lintz told FW3 he would like to show her his genitals, and described what it would be like to have sex with him. Audio recordings captured Lintz making these comments to FW3. On a separate occasion in February 2016, while he was supervising her on community service, Lintz discussed an arrangement with FW3 to exchange sexual favors for falsifying community service hours. Audio recordings captured Lintz making these comments to FW3.

 

The defendant’s known course of relevant conduct spans more than seven years and involves at least seven victims targeted by defendant.

 

The investigation of the case was conducted by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Erin M. Kulpa prosecuted the case for the United States.

Updated February 21, 2017