ARCHIVED Skip navigation.To Contents     To Previous Page     To Next Page     To Publications Page     To Home Page

Production

Methamphetamine laboratory seizures in the Northern California HIDTA region have declined significantly since 2004, largely as a result of successful law enforcement operations and regulatory efforts to control precursor chemicals in the United States and Mexico. (See Table 1.) However, the number of methamphetamine superlabs seized in the region increased from 2006 (1) through 2008 (4). HIDTA officials have noted that some Mexican DTOs are circumventing California state precursor chemical restrictions by employing large numbers of individuals to purchase legal quantities of cold medications containing pseudoephedrine from local retailers across the HIDTA region.

Table 1. Methamphetamine Laboratory Seizures in the Northern California HIDTA Region, 2004-2008

Methamphetamine
Yield per
Production Cycle
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Less than 2 pounds 82 36 27 22 21
2 to 9 pounds 2 3 10 1 2
More than 10 pounds 7 6 1 2 4
Total 91 45 38 25 27

Source: Northern California High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area.

The Northern California HIDTA region is one of the most significant cannabis cultivation areas in the nation, and in some areas cultivation is increasing. According to Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program (DCE/SP) data, in 2008 more than 5.3 million cannabis plants were eradicated from illicit outdoor and indoor grow operations in California (see Table 2), of which 20 percent (1,053,946 plants) were eradicated in the Northern California HIDTA region. DCE/SP data also show that the total number of cannabis plants eradicated in the HIDTA region has increased in each of the last 5 years. (See Tables 2 and 3.) HIDTA officials also report that some cannabis cultivators exploit California's state medical marijuana laws (see California Proposition 215 text box) to conduct illegal grow operations.

Table 2. Top-Ranking States for Cannabis Plants Eradicated, 2004-2008

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
California 1,214,420 California 2,011,277 California 2,995,285 California 4,951,976 California 5,322,053
Kentucky 476,803 Kentucky 510,502 Kentucky 558,756 Kentucky 492,615 Washington 580,415
Tennessee 416,012 Tennessee 440,362 Tennessee 483,271 Washington 295,573 Tennessee 539,370
Hawaii 379,644 Hawaii 255,113 Hawaii 201,100 Oregon 277,766 Kentucky 353,170
Washington 134,474 Washington 136,165 Washington 144,181 Tennessee 178,322 West Virginia 146,553
Oregon 62,621 Arizona 113,523 Oregon 113,608 Hawaii 139,089 North Carolina 105,200

Source: Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program.

Table 3. Cannabis Plants Eradicated in the Northern California HIDTA Region, 2004-2008

County Outdoor Plants Indoor Plants
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Alameda 0 0 0 1,655 25,768 0 0 29,428 2,175 2,415
Contra Costa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,804
Lake 81,991 136,781 346,336 506,788 495,035 1,502 7,581 79 1,176 3,815
Marin 0 0 22,740 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monterey 11,077 23,498 49,893 91,817 94,004 521 157 1,451 812 216
San Francisco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,745 0 0
San Mateo 3,196 167 5,850 11,120 19,184 941 479 9,278 9,681 16,706
Santa Clara 6,026 82,106 125,690 178,878 176,502 0 0 383 834 7,606
Santa Cruz 1,627 11,449 42,836 12,219 30,368 525 3,521 1,038 5,815 8,844
Sonoma 19,884 107,631 124,395 122,350 145,132 2,195 11,049 9,740 7,770 20,547
Total 123,801 361,632 717,740 924,827 985,993 5,684 22,787 64,142 28,263 67,953

Source: Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program.

California Proposition 215

California Proposition 215 (California Compassionate Use Act of 1996, Health and Safety Code §11362.5) allows patients and primary caregivers to possess or cultivate cannabis for medical treatment, based on a physician's recommendation, exempting them from criminal laws that otherwise prohibit possession or cultivation of marijuana under state law. Legal protections are also provided to physicians who recommend the use of marijuana for medical treatment. Under Proposition 215, no prescription is needed to obtain marijuana for medicinal use. Patients may possess 8 ounces and 6 mature or 12 immature cannabis plants; possession of additional amounts of marijuana is permitted under this plan based on medical necessity.

In November 2008 the California Supreme Court further defined the role of a primary caregiver in the People v. Roger William Mentch, S148204, Ct.App. 6 H02878, Santa Cruz County, Superior Court No. 07429. The Supreme Court opined that the defendant, whose caregiving consisted principally of supplying marijuana, did not qualify as a primary caregiver under Proposition 215. To qualify as a primary caregiver, an individual must render assistance to provide daily life necessities in order to provide marijuana to a patient.

Source: California Secretary of State.

Mexican DTOs operate a majority of the large outdoor grow sites in the region; they generally establish such grow sites in counties that encompass extensive remote locations, public lands, and rural areas such as Lake, Santa Clara, and Sonoma Counties. (See Figure 2.) These counties rank among the top 10 counties in the state for cannabis cultivation. Mexican DTOs typically employ illegal aliens to tend crop sites, provide protection from intruders (including law enforcement officers), and harvest the cannabis. According to law enforcement officials, many of the illegal aliens working for Mexican DTOs are doing so as payment for their entry into the United States.

Figure 2. Cannabis Plants Eradicated, by Site and by HIDTA County, 2008

Map showing the number of cannabis plants eradicated, by site and by HIDTA county, in 2008.
d-link

Source: Drug Enforcement Administration San Francisco Field Division, Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program.

Public lands in remote areas of the region are increasingly used for outdoor cultivation, and law enforcement officials have noted that cannabis cultivators are protecting their grow sites through an increased presence of weapons, including high-caliber assault rifles. Additionally, the environmental damage caused by outdoor cannabis cultivation, particularly on public lands, is extensive. According to the National Forest System and California's Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP), law enforcement officers are encountering increasing numbers of dumpsites of highly toxic insecticides, chemical repellents, and other poisons. These toxic chemicals contaminate ground water, pollute watersheds, kill fish and other wildlife, and eventually enter residential water supplies. Redirecting natural water sources leads to erosion and impacts native vegetation.

Caucasian criminal groups and independent dealers are the predominant indoor cannabis cultivators in the HIDTA region and are also the primary producers of high-potency marijuana. Asian DTOs and criminal groups are becoming more involved with large-scale indoor cannabis cultivation and are beginning to produce significant quantities of high-potency marijuana in the region. Many of these traffickers commenced cannabis cultivation operations in the region over the past few years by establishing small indoor grow sites with limited marijuana production capabilities.

Indoor cannabis cultivators typically establish grow sites in multiple residences, often using hydroponic technology, sophisticated lighting, and irrigation systems. Indoor growers prefer the controlled environment because they can avoid intensified outdoor eradication efforts while achieving higher profits because of the year-round cultivation season; a new crop of higher-potency marijuana can be turned out every 90 days. Cannabis cultivators who operate large-scale indoor grows often modify electrical circuitry in the houses or bypass meters, creating hazardous conditions that can result in electrical shock or fire. In addition, they often use exhaust systems that are insufficient to vent the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide generated from cultivation activities. Moreover, as a result of the prolonged high humidity at indoor grow sites, the buildings that contain them can be rendered uninhabitable as a result of the growth of toxic molds. Additionally, grow sites are often booby-trapped to ward off thieves and law enforcement officers.

To Top     To Contents

 

Transportation

The extensive transportation infrastructure in northern California (which has connections to other regions of the country), particularly the interstate highway system, is routinely exploited by drug traffickers to transport drugs into and throughout the HIDTA region. (See Figure 1.) Several major highways provide traffickers with direct access to several routes to drug sources located in other areas of California as well as in Mexico and Canada. Additionally, this highway system enables traffickers to modify transportation routes, adapt to changes in source areas, and counteract law enforcement interdiction operations with limited interruption to supply.

Traffickers transport illicit drug shipments on Interstates 5 and 80 and other major highways that allow high-speed access to the north, south, and east. Mexican DTOs transport wholesale quantities of illicit drugs into the Northern California HIDTA region using private and commercial vehicles, often equipped with hidden compartments. Local law enforcement has identified several businesses that specialize in the modification of private and commercial delivery vehicles that transport illicit drugs throughout the HIDTA region. For example, in April 2008, law enforcement officers arrested four members of a Mexican DTO who used their local trucking business in Cotati (Sonoma County), California, as a cover for transporting and distributing drugs throughout California. Officers also seized approximately 29 pounds of ice methamphetamine, 1 ounce of cocaine, 1 pound of marijuana, three assault rifles, two shotguns, and three handguns. The estimated street value of the methamphetamine was approximately $1.3 million.

Traffickers also transport a variety of illicit drugs and drug proceeds into and through the HIDTA region through package delivery services and the mail system, particularly from foreign sources. One of only 13 Customs International Mail Branches in the country (and one of three in the western United States) is located in Oakland. The high volume of packages transiting the area, particularly from Asia, makes detection and interdiction efforts at these facilities extremely challenging for U.S. Customs officials.

The use of the Internet to purchase illicit drugs, particularly from foreign suppliers in Europe or Mexico, has also increased transportation by package delivery services and the mail system. The Internet has enabled independent dealers, who historically traveled to Mexico to obtain CPDs, steroids, or ketamine, to purchase these drugs online. The large number of online suppliers makes tracking illicit purchases through the Internet difficult. In addition, illicit drugs obtained online are commonly purchased through Internet pay accounts, which require only limited personal information, further hindering law enforcement efforts.


To Top     To Contents     To Previous Page     To Next Page

To Publications Page     To Home Page


End of page.