This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
PEORIA DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC. and
AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION,   

                  Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No. 94-1026

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
WITH PROVISIONS OF APPA

Plaintiff, United States of America, hereby certifies that it has complied with the provisions of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(d) and states:

l. The proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement were filed on January 19, 1994;

2. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(b), the proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement were published in the Federal Register on February 11, 1994, Vol. 59 Fed. Reg. No. 29;

3. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(c), a summary of the terms of the proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement were published:

(a) in The Washington Post, a newspaper of general circulation in the District of Columbia, during the period February 13, 1994 through February 19, 1994, and

(b) in The Quad-City Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the Central District of Illinois, during the period February 24, 1994 through March 2, 1994;

4. The 60-day comment period specified in 15 U.S.C. § 16(b) commenced on February 24, 1994, and terminated on April 25, 1994;

5. The United States received no comments from members of the public concerning the proposed Final Judgment;

6. Defendants have complied with the requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 16(g);

7. Pursuant to the Stipulation filed on January 19, 1994, and 15 U.S.C. § 16(e), the Court may enter the Final Judgment after it determines that the Judgment serves the public interest;

8. Plaintiff's Competitive Impact Statement demonstrates that the proposed Final Judgment satisfies the public interest standard of 15 U.S.C. § 16(e);

9. An original Final Judgment captioned for the Peoria Division of the Central District of Illinois and otherwise in the form to which the parties have stipulated is lodged herewith to be available for the Court to sign; and

10. Plaintiff requests that this Court now enter the Final Judgment, without any hearing, and is authorized by counsel for Defendants to state that Defendants join in this request.

Dated:

  Respectfully submitted,

_______________/s/________________
HOWARD J. PARKER
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046
San Francisco, CA 94102