UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE HOME CITY ICE COMPANY,
Defendant.
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
Criminal No. CR-1-07-140
FILED UNDER SEAL
Lifted 6/17/08
Filed: 6/17/08
Violation: 15 U.S.C. § 1
|
PLEA AGREEMENT
The United States of America and The Home City Ice Company ("defendant"),
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ohio, hereby
enter into the following Plea Agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(B)
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Fed. R. Crim. P."):
RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT
- The defendant understands its rights:
- to be represented by an attorney;
- to be charged by Indictment;
- as a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ohio,
to decline to accept service of the Summons in this case, and
to contest the jurisdiction of the United States to prosecute
this case against it in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio;
- to plead not guilty to any criminal charge brought against it;
- to have a trial by jury, at which it would be presumed not guilty
of the charge and the United States would have to prove every
essential element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt
for it to be found guilty;
- to confront and cross-examine witnesses against it and to subpoena
witnesses in its defense at trial;
- to appeal its conviction if it is found guilty; and
- to appeal the imposition of sentence against it.
AGREEMENT TO PLEAD GUILTY
AND WAIVE CERTAIN RIGHTS
- The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the rights set out
in Paragraph 1(b)-(g) above. The defendant also knowingly and voluntarily
waives the right to file any appeal, any collateral attack, or any
other writ or motion, including but not limited to an appeal under
18 U.S.C. § 3742, that challenges the sentence imposed by the
Court if that sentence is consistent with or below the applicable
guidelines range in Paragraph 8 of this Plea Agreement, regardless
of how the sentence is determined by the Court. This agreement does
not affect the rights or obligations of the United States as set forth
in 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Nothing in this paragraph, however, shall
act as a bar to the defendant perfecting any legal remedies it may
otherwise have on appeal or collateral attack respecting claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct. Pursuant
to Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b), the defendant will waive indictment and
plead guilty at arraignment to a one-count Information to be filed
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
The Information will charge the defendant with participating in a
conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by agreeing with
other packaged ice manufacturers to allocate customers and territories
in southeastern Michigan and the Detroit, Michigan metropolitan area,
beginning at least as early as January 1, 2001 until July 17, 2007,
in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
- The defendant, pursuant to the terms of this Plea Agreement, will
plead guilty to the criminal charge described in Paragraph 2 above
and will make a factual admission of guilt to the Court in accordance
with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, as set forth in Paragraph 4 below.
FACTUAL BASIS FOR OFFENSE CHARGED
- Had this case gone to trial, the United States would have presented
evidence sufficient to prove the following facts:
- For purposes of this Plea Agreement, the "relevant period" is
that period beginning at least as early as January 1, 2001 until
July 17, 2007. During the relevant period, the defendant was a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ohio and
was doing business in multiple states with its principal place
of business in Cincinnati, Ohio. During the relevant period, the
defendant was a producer of packaged ice in multiple states and
was engaged in the sale of packaged ice. Packaged ice is marketed
as a high-grade ice for human consumption and is sold in varying
sizes, blocks, big bags and small bags. The high volume sizes
are big bags, which range from 20 pounds to 25 pounds and small
bags, which typically contain 7 pounds of packaged ice.
- The parties agree that the defendant employed more than 200,
but less than 1000 individuals.
- During the relevant period, the defendant, through its officers
and employees, but primarily through its deceased vice-president
of sales and marketing, participated in a conspiracy among packaged
ice producers, the primary purpose of which was to allocate customers
and territories of packaged ice sold in southeastern Michigan
and the Detroit, Michigan metropolitan area. In furtherance of
the conspiratorial activity, the defendant, through its officers
and employees, primarily through its deceased vice president of
sales and marketing, engaged in discussions and attended meetings
with representatives of other packaged ice producers. During these
discussions and meetings, agreements were reached to allocate
customers and territories of packaged ice to be sold in southeastern
Michigan and the Detroit, Michigan metropolitan area.
- Pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2R1.1 and U.S.S.G. §1B1.3, the
parties agree that the defendant's volume of commerce affected
by its conspiratorial conduct was at least $100 million.
- uring the relevant period, packaged ice sold by one or more
of the conspirator firms, and equipment and supplies necessary
to the production and distribution of packaged ice, as well as
payments for packaged ice, traveled in interstate commerce. The
business activities of the defendant and its co-conspirators in
connection with the production and sale of packaged ice affected
by this conspiracy were within the flow of, and substantially
affected, interstate trade and commerce.
- Acts in furtherance of this conspiracy were carried out within
the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. At least one
of the conspiratorial meetings or discussions described above
took place in Cincinnati, Ohio, which is located within the Southern
District of Ohio.
POSSIBLE MAXIMUM SENTENCE
- The defendant understands that the statutory maximum penalty which
may be imposed against it upon conviction for a violation of Section
One of the Sherman Antitrust Act is a fine in an amount equal to the
greatest of:
- $100 million (15 U.S.C. § 1);
- twice the gross pecuniary gain the conspirators derived from
the crime (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) and (d)); or
- twice the gross pecuniary loss caused to the victims of the
crime by the conspirators (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c)
and (d)).
- In addition, the defendant understands that:
- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c)(1), the Court
may impose a term of probation of at least one year, but not more
than five years;
- pursuant to §8B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines
("U.S.S.G.," "Sentencing Guidelines," or "Guidelines") or 18 U.S.C.
§§ 3563(b)(2) or 3663(a)(3), the Court may order it
to pay restitution to the victims of the offense; and
- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B), the Court
is required to order the defendant to pay a $400 special assessment
upon conviction for the charged crime.
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
- The defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory,
not mandatory, but that the Court must consider the Guidelines in
effect on the day of sentencing, along with the other factors set
forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining and imposing sentence.
The defendant understands that the Guidelines determinations will
be made by the Court by a preponderance of the evidence standard.
The defendant understands that although the Court is not ultimately
bound to impose a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range,
its sentence must be reasonable based upon consideration of all relevant
sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Pursuant
to U.S.S.G. §1B1.8, the United States agrees that self-incriminating
information that the defendant provides to the United States pursuant
to this Plea Agreement will not be used to increase the volume of
affected commerce attributable to the defendant or in determining
the defendant's applicable Guidelines range, except to the extent
provided in U.S.S.G. §1B1.8(b).
SENTENCING AGREEMENT
- Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(B), the United States agrees
to recommend to the sentencing judge that the applicable Guidelines
fine range is between $24 million and $48 million, apart from any
motion that the United States in its sole discretion may file as described
in Paragraph 10. The defendant understands that the sentence to be
imposed on it is within the sole discretion of the Court and that
it will have no right to withdraw its plea of guilty, once it has
been entered. The United States cannot and does not make any promises
or representations as to what sentence the defendant will receive,
and is free to recommend any specific sentence to the Court. However,
the United States will inform the Probation Office and the Court of
(a) this Agreement; (b) the nature and extent of the defendant's activities
with respect to this case and all other activities of the defendant
which the United States deems relevant to sentencing; and (c) the
nature and extent of the defendant's cooperation with the United States.
In so doing, the United States may use any information it deems relevant,
including information provided by the defendant both prior and subsequent
to the signing of this Agreement. The United States reserves the right
to make any statement to the Court or the Probation Office concerning
the nature of the criminal violation charged in the attached Information,
the participation of the defendant therein, and any other facts or
circumstances that it deems relevant. The United States also reserves
the right to comment on or to correct any representation made by or
on behalf of the defendant, and to supply any other information that
the Court may require.
- The defendant understands that the Court will order it to pay
a $400 special assessment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B),
in addition to any fine imposed;
- the United States will not oppose the defendant's request that
the sentence be paid in installments as directed by the Court
and with interest accruing under 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(1)-(2);
and
- both parties will recommend that no term of probation be imposed,
but the defendant understands that the Court's denial of this
request will not void this Plea Agreement.
- The parties agree that they are not aware at this time of any aggravating
or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately
taken into consideration by the U.S. Sentencing Commission in formulating
the Sentencing Guidelines justifying a departure pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§5K2.0. The parties agree not to seek or support any sentence
outside of the Guidelines range nor any Guidelines adjustment for
any reason that is not set forth in this Plea Agreement.
- If the United States determines that the defendant has provided
substantial assistance in any investigation or prosecution, and has
otherwise fully complied with all of the terms of this Plea Agreement,
it will file a motion, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §8C4.1, advising
the sentencing judge of all relevant facts pertaining to that determination
and requesting the Court to impose a fine departing from the lower
end of the guideline range of $24 million to $48 million in light
of the factors set forth in U.S.S.G. §8C4.1(b)(1)-(3). The defendant
acknowledges that the decision whether it has provided substantial
assistance in any investigation or prosecution is within the sole
discretion of the United States. It is understood that, should the
United States determine that the defendant has not provided substantial
assistance in any investigation or prosecution, or should the United
States determine that the defendant has violated any provision of
this Plea Agreement, such a determination will release the United
States from any obligation to file a motion pursuant to U.S.S.G. §8C4.1,
but will not entitle the defendant to withdraw its guilty plea once
it has been entered. The defendant further understands that, whether
or not the United States files a motion pursuant to U.S.S.G. §8C4.1,
the sentence to be imposed on it remains within the sole discretion
of the sentencing judge.
- In light of the availability of civil causes of actions available
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15, the United States agrees that it
will not seek a restitution order for the offense charged in the Information.
DEFENDANT'S COOPERATION
- The defendant will cooperate fully and truthfully with the United
States in the prosecution of this case, the conduct of the current
federal investigation of violations of federal antitrust and related
criminal laws involving the sale of packaged ice in the United States,
any other federal investigation resulting therefrom, and any litigation
or other proceedings arising or resulting from any such investigation
to which the United States is a party ("Federal Proceeding"). The
ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the defendant shall include,
but not be limited to:
- producing to the United States all non-privileged documents,
information, and other materials wherever located, in the possession,
custody, or control of the defendant, requested by the United
States in connection with any Federal Proceeding;
- using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful
cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement,
of the current directors, officers, and employees of the defendant
as may be requested by the United States, including making these
persons available at the defendant's expense, for interviews and
the provision of testimony in grand jury, trial, and other judicial
proceedings in connection with any Federal Proceeding.
- The ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of each person described
in Paragraph 12(b) above will be subject to the procedures and protections
of this paragraph, and shall include, but not be limited to:
- producing all non-privileged documents, including claimed personal
documents, and other materials, wherever located, requested by
attorneys and agents of the United States;
- making himself or herself available for interviews, not at the
expense of the United States, upon the request of attorneys and
agents of the United States;
- responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United
States in connection with any Federal Proceeding, without falsely
implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information,
subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C.
§ 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503,
et seq.);
- otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any non-privileged
material or information not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph
that he or she may have that is related to any Federal Proceeding;
- when called upon to do so by the United States in connection
with any Federal Proceeding, testifying in grand jury, trial,
and other judicial proceedings fully, truthfully, and under oath,
subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621),
making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court
proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§
401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et
seq.); and
- agreeing that, if the agreement not to prosecute him or her
in this Plea Agreement is rendered void under Paragraph 15(c),
the statute of limitations period for any Relevant Offense as
defined in Paragraph 15(a) will be tolled as to him or her for
the period between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement
and six (6) months after the date that the United States gave
notice of its intent to void its obligations to that person under
the Plea Agreement.
GOVERNMENT'S AGREEMENT
- Upon acceptance of the guilty plea called for by this Plea Agreement,
and subject to the cooperation requirements of Paragraph 12 of this
Plea Agreement, the United States agrees that it will not bring further
criminal charges against the defendant for any act or offense committed
before the date of this Plea Agreement that was undertaken in furtherance
of an antitrust conspiracy involving the sale of packaged ice in the
United States or undertaken in connection with any investigation of
such a conspiracy. The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not
apply to civil matters of any kind, to any violation of the federal
tax or securities laws, or to any crime of violence.
- The United States agrees to the following:
- Upon the Court's acceptance of the guilty plea called for by
this Plea Agreement and the imposition of its sentence and subject
to the exceptions noted in Paragraph 15(c), the United States
will not bring criminal charges against any current director,
officer, or employee of the defendant for any act or offense committed
before the date of this Plea Agreement and while that person was
acting as a director, officer, or employee of the defendant that
was undertaken in furtherance of an antitrust conspiracy involving
the sale of packaged ice in the United States or undertaken in
connection with any investigation of such a conspiracy ("Relevant
Offense");
- Should the United States determine that any current or former
director, officer, or employee of the defendant may have information
relevant to any Federal Proceeding, the United States may request
that person's cooperation under the terms of this Plea Agreement
by written request delivered to counsel for the individual (with
a copy to the undersigned counsel for the defendant) or, if the
individual is not known by the United States to be represented,
to the undersigned counsel for the defendant;
- If any person requested to provide cooperation under Paragraph
15(b) fails to comply with his or her obligations under Paragraph
13, then the terms of this Plea Agreement as they pertain to that
person, and the agreement not to prosecute that person granted
in this Plea Agreement, shall be rendered void;
- Except as provided in Paragraph 15(e), information provided
by a person described in Paragraph 15(b) to the United States
under the terms of this Plea Agreement pertaining to any Relevant
Offense, or any information directly or indirectly derived from
that information, may not be used against that person in a criminal
case, except in a prosecution for perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621),
making a false statement or declaration (18 U.S.C. §§
1001, 1623), or obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503,
et seq.);
- If any person who provides information to the United States
under this Plea Agreement fails to comply fully with his or her
obligations under Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement, the
agreement in Paragraph 15(d) not to use that information or any
information directly or indirectly derived from it against that
person in a criminal case shall be rendered void;
- If the Court does not accept the defendant's plea of guilty
for any reason, any statement provided by an individual identified
by the United States in Paragraphs 12 (b) or 15(b) made between
the signing of this agreement and any determination by the Court
to reject it will be treated as statements provided by that individual
pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, Fed. R. Evid. 408 and Fed. R.
Evid. 410;
- The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not apply to civil
matters of any kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities
laws, or to any crime of violence; and
- Documents provided under Paragraphs 12(a) and 13(a) shall be
deemed responsive to outstanding grand jury subpoenas issued to
the defendant.
- The defendant understands that it may be subject to administrative
action by federal or state agencies other than the United States Department
of Justice, Antitrust Division, based upon the conviction resulting
from this Plea Agreement, and that this Plea Agreement in no way controls
whatever action, if any, other agencies may take. However, the United
States agrees that, if requested, it will advise the appropriate officials
of any governmental agency considering such administrative action
of the fact, manner, and extent of the cooperation of the defendant
as a matter for that agency to consider before determining what administrative
action, if any, to take.
REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL
- The defendant has been represented by counsel and is fully satisfied
that its attorneys have provided competent legal representation. The
defendant has thoroughly reviewed this Plea Agreement and acknowledges
that counsel has advised it of the nature of the charge, any possible
defenses to the charge, and the nature and range of possible sentences.
VOLUNTARY PLEA
- The defendant's decision to enter into this Plea Agreement and
to tender a plea of guilty is freely and voluntarily made and is not
the result of force, threats, assurances, promises, or representations
other than the representations contained in this Plea Agreement. The
United States has made no promises or representations to the defendant
as to whether the Court will accept or reject the recommendations
contained within this Plea Agreement.
VIOLATION OF PLEA AGREEMENT
- The defendant agrees that, should the United States determine in
good faith, during the period that any Federal Proceeding is pending,
that the defendant has failed to provide full and truthful cooperation,
as described in Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, or has otherwise
violated any provision of this Plea Agreement, the United States will
notify counsel for the defendant in writing by personal or overnight
delivery or facsimile transmission and may also notify counsel by
telephone of its intention to void any of its obligations under this
Plea Agreement (except its obligations under this paragraph), and
the defendant shall be subject to prosecution for any federal crime
of which the United States has knowledge including, but not limited
to, the substantive offenses relating to the investigation resulting
in this Plea Agreement. The defendant agrees that, in the event that
the United States is released from its obligations under this Plea
Agreement and brings criminal charges against the defendant for any
offense referred to in Paragraph 14 of this Plea Agreement, the statute
of limitations period for such offense will be tolled for the period
between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement and six (6)
months after the date the United States gave notice of its intent
to void its obligations under this Plea Agreement.
- The defendant understands and agrees that in any further prosecution
of it resulting from the release of the United States from its obligations
under this Plea Agreement, because of the defendant's violation of
the Plea Agreement, any document, statement, information, testimony,
or evidence provided by it or any individual identified by the United
States pursuant to paragraphs 12(b) or 15(b) to attorneys or agents
of the United States, federal grand juries, or courts, and any leads
derived therefrom, may be used against it in any such further prosecution.
In addition, the defendant unconditionally waives its right to challenge
the use of such evidence in any such further prosecution, notwithstanding
the protections of Fed. R. Evid. 408 and Fed. R. Evid. 410.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
- This Plea Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
United States and the defendant concerning the disposition of the
criminal charge in this case. This Plea Agreement cannot be modified
except in writing, signed by the United States and the defendant.
- The undersigned is authorized to enter this Plea Agreement on behalf
of the defendant as evidenced by the Resolution of the Board of Directors
of the defendant attached to, and incorporated by reference in, this
Plea Agreement.
- The undersigned attorneys for the United States have been authorized
by the Attorney General of the United States to enter this Plea Agreement
on behalf of the United States.
BY: _______________/s/________________
THOMAS E. SEDLER
President, Chief Executive Officer
The Home City Ice Company
BY: _______________/s/________________
RALPH W. KOHNEN, ESQ.
[OH 0034418]
Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800
Cincinnati, OH 45202-3957
E-mail: kohnen@taftlaw.com
Counsel for The Home City Ice Co.
Dated: October 18, 2007
|
BY: _______________/s/________________
KEVIN C. CULUM
[3460- MT]
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
Carl B. Stokes U.S. Court House
801 W. Superior Ave., 14th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44113-1857
Telephone: 216-687-8415
Fax: 216-687-8423
E-mail: kevin.culum@usdoj.gov
BY: _______________/s/________________
MICHAEL A. ROBERTS, ESQ.
[OH 0047129]
Graydon, Head & Ritchey LLP
511 Walnut Street, Suite 1900
Cincinnati, OH 45202-3157
E-mail: mroberts@graydon.com
Counsel for The Home City Ice Co.
Dated: October 18, 2007
|
|