|
|
|
(Current as of 9/2000) Bank Merger Competitive Review -- Introduction and Overview (1995)The banking agencies and the Department of Justice review the competitive impact of bank and
bank holding company mergers under the banking and antitrust laws to proscribe mergers that
would tend to substantially lessen competition. To speed this competitive review and reduce
regulatory burden on the banking industry, the banking agencies and the Department have
developed screens (attached as Screens A and B), to identify proposed mergers that clearly do
not have significant adverse effects on competition. In addition to the screens, the banking
agencies and the Department have identified information, described below in Section 2, which
has proven to be useful in analyzing the competitive effects of proposed mergers highlighted
by Screen A or Screen B.
Parties planning a merger transaction may wish to consult with the relevant banking agency or
the Department before submitting an application. Where a proposed merger causes a
significant anticompetitive problem, it is often possible to resolve the problem by agreeing to
make an appropriate divestiture. In such cases, it may be useful to discuss the matter with the
Department and the relevant regulatory agency. The Department seeks divestitures that will
resolve the loss of competition in the market. A divestiture will resolve the problem if it
ensures the presence of a strong and vigorous competitor that replaces the competition lost
because of the merger.
Banking Agencies
The banking agencies rely primarily on Screen A, which looks at competition in predefined
markets developed by the Federal Reserve. If the calculation specified in Screen A does not
result in a postmerger HHI over 1800 and an increase of more than 200, the banking agencies
are unlikely to further review the competitive effects of the merger.(1) If the result of the
calculation specified in Screen A exceeds the 1800/200 threshold, applicants may consider
providing additional information. See Section 2 for a description of the types of information
that may be relevant. Providing such information with a merger application can eliminate
delays in the review process and may avoid special requests for additional information.
Department of Justice
The Department initially reviews transactions using data from the banking agencies' screen,
Screen A. If a proposed merger exceeds the 1800/200 threshold in Screen A, applicants
should consider submitting the calculations set forth in Screen B.
In some cases, the Department may further review transactions which do not exceed the
1800/200 threshold in Screen A. This is most likely when Screen A does not reflect fully the
competitive effects of the transaction in all relevant markets, in particular lending to small and
medium-sized businesses. For example, the Department is more likely to review a transaction
involving two commercial banks if the postmerger HHI approaches 1800 and the HHI increase
approaches 200, and screen A includes thrifts which are not actively engaged in commercial
lending. In addition, the Department is more likely to review a transaction if the predefined
market in which the applicants compete is significantly larger than the area in which small
business lending competition may exist (e.g., the predefined market includes multiple counties,
or is significantly larger than an RMA in which the applicants are located). In such a case,
applicants should consider submitting the calculations set forth in Screen B. Often, the
Department will review the information in Screen B and find no need for further review of the
proposed merger.
If the calculation specified in Screen B results in an HHI over 1800 and an increase of over
200, applicants may consider providing additional information. See Section 2 for a description
of the types of information that may be relevant. Providing such information with a merger
application can eliminate delays in the review process and may avoid special requests for
additional information.
In some limited instances, the Department may examine a transaction in further detail even
though Screen A and Screen B do not identify anticompetitive problems. This is most likely to
occur when it appears that:
The Screens' market area does not fit the transaction. Sometimes the
geographic market used in the screens may not be an appropriate choice for analyzing
the particular merger involved. For example, the Screens' market area is a county, and
one merging institution is at the east end of one county and the other merging
institution is at the west end of the adjacent county. The institutions may in reality be
each other's most important competitors, but the screens would not reflect that fact. Or
the Screens' market area may be quite large, but the merger involves two institutions at
the center of the market. Institutions at the periphery of the market area may be very
improbable substitutes for the competition that would be lost in the transaction and thus
the transaction should be scrutinized in a narrower area to ensure that the relevant
geographic market is considered.
Specialized products are involved. Sometimes the merging institutions are
competitors for a specialized product and few of the institutions included in the Screens
compete in offering that product. For example, the Screens likely would not identify a
concentrated market for working capital loans to medium-sized commercial customers,
if the market area has many institutions but the merging institutions are two of only a
few institutions able to compete for such business.
In such cases, applicants may wish to submit additional information. See Section 2 for a
description of the types of information that may be relevant. Providing such information with
a merger application can eliminate delays in the review process and may avoid special requests
for additional information.
The Department and the banking agencies are likely to examine a transaction in more detail if
it exceeds the 1800/200 threshold in Screen A. The Department is also likely to examine the
effect of a proposed merger on competition for commercial loans if the transaction exceeds the
1800/200 threshold in Screen B. In instances where a screen highlights a transaction for
further review, the applicant may present additional information not considered in the screen.
In cases where either Screen A or Screen B highlights a transaction for further scrutiny,
additional information may establish a clearer picture of competitive realities in the market.
Such information may include:
evidence that the merging parties do not significantly compete with one another;
evidence that rapid economic change has resulted in an outdated geographic market
definition, and that an alternate market is more appropriate;
evidence that market shares are not an adequate indicator of the extent of competition
in the market, such as:
evidence that institutions in the market would be likely to expand current levels
of commercial lending. Such evidence might include current loan-to-deposit
ratios, recent hiring of new commercial loan officers, pending branch
applications or significant out-of-market resources that would be shifted into the
market in response to new loan opportunities;
evidence that a particular institution's market share overstates or understates its
competitive significance (such as evidence that an institution is rapidly gaining
or losing market share or that the institution is not competitively viable or is
operating under regulatory restrictions on its activities);
evidence concerning entry conditions, including evidence of entry by institutions within
the last two years and the growth of those institutions that have entered; evidence of
likely entry within the next two years, such as pending branch applications; and
expectations about potential entry by institutions not now in the market area and the
reasons for such expectations, including legal requirements for entry.
In cases where Screen B highlights a transaction for further scrutiny, applicants may consider
preparing an HHI worksheet for the market area using, instead of deposits, data from the
relevant Reports of Condition on commercial and industrial loans a) below $250,000 and b)
between $250,000 and $1,000,000. Such information can be a useful assessment of actual
competition for small business lending.(2)
Additional information that may be relevant includes evidence of competition from sources not
included in Screen B, such as:
evidence that a thrift institution is actively engaged in providing services to
commercial customers, particularly loans for business startup or working capital
purposes and cash management services;
evidence that a credit union has such membership restrictions, or lack of
restrictions, and offers such services to commercial customers that it should be
considered to be in the market;
evidence of actual competition by out-of-market institutions for commercial
customers, particularly competition for loans for business startup or working
capital purposes;
evidence of actual competition by non-bank institutions for commercial
customers, particularly competition for loans for business startup or working
capital purposes.
If the applicants believe that Screen B does not accurately reflect market concentration and
competitive realities in a particular area, they are encouraged to submit additional information
explaining the reasons for their belief. This information should include an HHI worksheet
which indicates the geographical area that should be covered, the institutions that should be
included, the method of calculating the market share of each institution (e.g., deposits,
branches, loans), and the reasons why this information is preferable to the information
supplied in Screen B. Inclusion of institutions outside the areas identified in Screen B should
be supported, wherever possible, by evidence of actual competition by these institutions. Such
alternative worksheets should be submitted in addition to, rather than in lieu of, the HHI
worksheets from Parts A and B.
Part A: Market Screen A
A.1. List areas. If there are offices of both(3) merging institutions(4) in any:
A.2. Calculate HHIs. For each area listed under item A.1, prepare an HHI worksheet (see
next page) covering all banks and thrifts in the area. Follow the instructions accompanying the
worksheet (including thrifts at 50 percent as explained in the instructions) to calculate the pre-merger and post-merger HHIs and the HHI increase. Prepare as many worksheets as there are
market areas listed above in Item A.1.
for preparing HHI Worksheets for Merger Screen A
Part B: Market Screen B
B.1. List areas. If there are offices of both(5) merging institutions(6) which make commercial loans(7)
in any:
B.2. Calculate HHIs. For each area listed under item B.1, prepare an HHI worksheet (see next
page) covering all commercial banks in the area. Follow the instructions accompanying the
worksheet to calculate the pre-merger and post-merger HHIs and the HHI increase. Prepare as
many worksheets as there are market areas listed above in Item B.1.
B.6. Commercial Loans. For each merging institution, report the outstanding balance of
commercial and industrial loans ("C&I loans") originated by offices in the market area.
Acquiring institution: ________________
Acquired institution: ________________
for preparing HHI Worksheets for Merger Screen B
1. However, if a proposed merger would result in a postmerger market share in excess of 35%, the
Federal Reserve is likely to review the transaction further.
2. In preparing such a market share table, parties may estimate another institution's commercial lending
in a given market by multiplying the institution's overall ratio of commercial loans to deposits by its deposits in
the relevant market, if market-specific information regarding that institution is unavailable. Applicants should
indicate which figures are actual and which are estimates.
3. This document is written for a situation in which only two institutions are involved. In a transaction
in which more than two institutions are involved, treat each reference to "both" or "two" institutions as if it
referred to "two or more" institutions.
4. Including their affiliates. All subsequent references to "institutions" include all affiliates.
5. This document is written for a situation in which only two institutions are involved. In a transaction
in which more than two institutions are involved, treat each reference to "both" or "two" institutions as if it
referred to "two or more" institutions.
6. Including their affiliates. All subsequent references to "institutions" include all affiliates.
7. As defined in the FDIC Report of Condition as "commercial and industrial loans," and in the OTS
Thrift Financial Report as "non-mortgage commercial loans."
|