
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF JANESVILLE, IOWA,
Defendant.
____________________________________
CONSENT DECREE
The United States initiated this action on November 5, 2004, to enforce the provisions of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601, et seq. The United States alleges that the Defendant City of Janesville made housing unavailable on the basis of national origin, race and color in violation of Section 3604(a) of the Fair Housing Act when it decided in January, 2000 to deny the re-zoning request of private developers Cindy and Kennith Kuhr ("the Kuhrs") for the construction of "The Arbors," a 116-lot manufactured home development in Janesville.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND ALLEGATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
The United States contends that were this case to proceed to trial, it would present evidence as follows:
Between 1998-2000, Kennith and Cindy Kuhr, a married couple, were seeking to become developers of a manufactured home community in Iowa. In the Spring of 1998, the Kuhrs secured an option to purchase two parcels of land, partially within and immediately outside the City of Janesville boundary, on which they planned to construct The Arbors. Under their plan, the Kuhrs would have owned and managed The Arbors, while individual home owners would have paid monthly lot rent to the Kuhrs.
In response to the proposed development by the Kuhrs, the City of Janesville passed an ordinance establishing a Planned Residential Development (PRD) District on November 2, 1998. The passage of this ordinance by the city council was unanimous. In addition, the Kuhrs requested the City annex part of the land under contract by the developers that was outside of the City limits. Again, this action was prompted by the proposed development. The vote by the city council on the annexation was three to one in favor with one council member absent. The proposed annexation was approved on June 7, 1999.
The Kuhrs' plan for The Arbors, however, required a further amendment to re-zone the property on which it would stand from Residential and Agricultural zones to the PRD District under the City's zoning ordinance. On December 6, 1999, six of the property owners whose land was located near the proposed site of the Arbors, filed a written protest with the City regarding the Kuhrs' request for re-zoning. The submission of the landowners' objection triggered the application of an Iowa state law requiring that zoning amendments be passed by a three-fourths majority, instead of a simple majority, vote of the City Council.
The City of Janesville's Planning and Zoning Commission met on October 13, November 10, and December 8, 1999, regarding the proposed re-zoning of the real estate under option by the Kuhrs and the proposed site of the development. At most, if not all, of the meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Janesville area residents attended and objected to the proposed change in the zoning for numerous reasons, which the United States contends included the national origin, race and/or color of The Arbors' prospective residents.
On December 8, 1999, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission, having failed to vote on the re-zoning application, referred the matter to the Janesville City Council (hereinafter "the City Council") without recommendation.
The City Council then met and rejected the proposed re-zoning classification on January 10, 2000, by a vote of two against and three in favor of re-zoning. Melodie Despard and Tracy Meyer voted against the re-zoning request. As a result of the City's action, the Kuhrs did not purchase land in Janesville for a manufactured home development and The Arbors was not constructed.
The United States contends that the foregoing supports a finding by the Court that the City violated the Fair Housing Act when it denied the Kuhrs' re-zoning request on the basis of the national origin, race and/or color of the prospective residents of The Arbors, in violation of 42 U.S.C. §3604(a).
COMPROMISE
The City has denied and continues to deny any racial motivation or improper motives. The City contends that the reason the project in question was not supported was for legitimate/nondiscriminatory reasons. While the City is prepared to defend this action through litigation, the City realizes that such litigation will be expensive. The City prefers to use its resources in more productive endeavors. Accordingly, the City waives service of the summons and complaint in this action.
The United States also desires to avoid costly and protracted litigation and agrees that the claims against Defendant should be settled and resolved without litigation. The United States believes that the allegations in its Complaint justify the remedies agreed to by the parties and set forth below. Therefore, Defendant and the United States have agreed to the entry of this Consent Decree:
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
I. DEFINITIONS
1. The following terms when used in this Consent Decree, in addition to terms defined elsewhere in the Decree, shall have the following meanings:
II. GENERAL NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS
2. Defendant shall not take any action that unlawfully:
III. ZONING ORDINANCE AND RE-ZONING APPLICATION PROCESS
3. The City agrees that Section 17.09 of Ordinance #220 of its Code of Ordinances be changed to provide that the super-majority requirement is only triggered when the Planning and Zoning Commission votes against a re-zoning request. In the event the Planning and Zoning Commission simply fails to act, takes no position, or there is a tied vote on the proposed re-zoning and sends the matter to the City Council, the simple majority requirement, absent the filing of any petition and protest shall only be required. In this connection, the City of Janesville agrees to prepare and pass modifications to its existing Ordinance No. 220 amending the City's code of ordinances as required by this provision within sixty (60) days of the date of entry of this Decree.
IV. FAIR HOUSING TRAINING
4. Within ninety (90) days of the entry of this Decree, the Defendant shall provide training with respect to the requirements of the Consent Decree and the Fair Housing Act for all members of the Janesville City Council, all members of the Janesville Planning and Zoning Commission, the Mayor, the City Clerk and staff personnel at the City Clerk's office, and the Public Works Director, as described below:
V. FAIR HOUSING OUTREACH PLAN
5. The City shall undertake a Fair Housing Outreach Plan to inform Multi-family Housing developers and the general public that the City supports the development of Affordable Housing and Multi-family Housing opportunities in the City of Janesville and its surrounding communities.
6. Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date of the Agreement, the City shall submit to the United States for approval a Fair Housing Outreach Plan. If the United States does not object to the Plan within ten (10) days of receipt, the City shall immediately proceed to implement the Plan. The City shall include in the Fair Housing Outreach Plan the following:
7. The City's Fair Housing Outreach Plan shall, among other outreach activities, require the City to:
VI. COMPLIANCE
8. Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of the Decree, Defendant shall designate a City employee or official to receive complaints of alleged housing discrimination against the City, and coordinate the City's compliance with this Decree. The designated person shall maintain copies of this Consent Decree, the HUD Complaint form and the HUD pamphlet entitled "Are you a victim of housing discrimination?" (HUD official form 903 and 903.1, respectively) and make these materials freely available to anyone, upon request, without charge, including all persons making housing discrimination complaints to the City. Defendant shall notify the United States of the name, address, telephone number and title of the designated person.9. For the duration of the Decree, Defendant shall prepare and submit to the United States biannual reports that detail all actions it has taken to fulfill its obligations under the Consent Decree. Defendant shall submit its first Compliance Report to the United States six months from the date of entry of the Decree, and subsequent reports every six (6) months thereafter for the duration of the Decree, except that the final report shall be delivered to the United States not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of this Decree.
10.Defendant shall include the following information in the Compliance Reports:
11. Defendant shall maintain all records relating to the implementation of, and compliance with, all provisions of this Decree, including, but not limited to, all records related to re-zoning applications for the duration of the Consent Decree. The United States shall have the opportunity to inspect and copy any records maintained as required by this Decree after giving reasonable notice to Defendant.
VII. MONETARY DAMAGES AND CIVIL PENALTY
12. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §3614(d), within ten (10) days after the Effective Date of the Decree, the Defendant shall pay monetary damages by forwarding to the United States a check payable to Kennith and Cindy Kuhr in the amount of $45,000. In consideration for said monetary damages, the Kuhrs shall sign the release attached to this Decree as Attachment A prior to receiving payment.
13. Within ten (10) days after the Effective Date of the Decree, Defendant shall deliver to the United States a check for $10,000 made payable to the United States Treasury as a civil penalty under 42 U.S.C. §3614(d)(1)(C).
VIII. DURATION OF DECREE
14. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant for purposes of this civil action, and subject matter jurisdiction over the claims in this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345, and 42 U.S.C. § 3614(b).
15. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the duration of this Consent Decree to enforce the terms of the Decree, after which time the case shall be dismissed with prejudice. The United States may move the Court to extend the duration of the Decree in the interests of justice.
16. This Consent Decree shall remain in effect for four (4) years from the Effective Date of the Decree in order to provide the Defendant with sufficient time to implement the policies and procedures required by this Decree.
17. The parties and their attorneys agree to work cooperatively with one another and in good faith. They further agree to use their best efforts to effectuate the purposes of the Decree and to resolve informally any differences regarding interpretation of, and compliance with, the Decree prior to bringing such matters to the Court for resolution.
18. The parties shall have the right to seek from the Court modifications of the Consent Decree to ensure that its purposes are fully satisfied, provided that any request for a modification has been preceded by good faith negotiations between the parties and is based upon an unforeseen inability to perform or a material and substantial change in circumstances.
IX. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE
19. Any time limits for performance imposed by this Consent Decree may be extended by mutual written agreement of the parties.
THE PARTIES CONSENT TO THE ENTRY OF THIS CONSENT DECREE AS INDICATED BY THE SIGNATURES OF COUNSEL BELOW:
FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES:
Charles W. Larson, Sr. United States Attorney Northern District of Iowa By:___________________________ Stephanie J. Wright Assistant U.S. Attorney Post Office Box 74950 Cedar Rapids, IA 52407-4950 Stephanie Wright Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the United States Attorney Hach Building Suite 400 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 (319) 363-0091 (phone) (319) 363-1990 (fax) |
___________________________ R. Alexander Acosta Assistant Attorney General Steven H. Rosenbaum Chief Keisha Dawn Bell Deputy Chief Lori K. Wagner Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Housing & Civil Enforcement Section Mailing Address: 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-5998 Street Address: 1800 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 305-3107 Facsimile: (202) 514-1116 |
FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF JANESVILLE:
|
________________________ Kevin R. Rogers, Esq. Swisher & Cohrt, P.L.C. 528 West Fourth Street Waterloo, Iowa 50701 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1200 Waterloo, Iowa 50704-1200 Telephone: (319) 232-6555 Facsimile: (319) 232-4835 |
___________________________ Gary J. Boveia, Esq. City of Janesville Attorney Boveia Law Firm 208 First Avenue, S.E. Waverly, Iowa 50677-5900 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 691 Waverly, Iowa 50677-5900 Telephone: (319) 352-5900 Facsimile: (319) 352-2500 |
It is ORDERED this ___ day of November , 2004.
__________________________________
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of Iowa
Eastern Division