
In response to the Eight Circuit’s ruling, the Interior Department promulgated a new regulation requiring publication of notice of intent to take land into trust and giving a 30-day window of opportunity for judicial challenges to agency decisions to acquire land in trust. The United States then petitioned the Supreme Court for review of the Eighth Circuit’s decision. The Supreme Court granted the petition and vacated the Eight Circuit’s decision with instructions to vacate the District Court’s decision and remand the matter back to the Secretary. 519 U.S. 919 (1996).
Subsequently, the Tribe submitted a new trust application and the Interior Department again approved the Tribe’s request. South Dakota again challenged the Secretary’s authority to acquire lands into trust under Section 5 of the IRA. In 2004, a federal district court upheld Interior’s decision and rejected South Dakota’s constitutional and statutory challenges. The State again appealed to the Eighth Circuit urging it to hold, as it previously had, that Section 5 violated the non-delegation doctrine. Not only did the Eighth Circuit reject that invitation and uphold the District Court’s decision, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the State’s petition for certiorari.
Since then, district and circuit courts have consistently rejected non-delegation claims, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the issue in 2008.
South Dakota v. Department of Interior, 69 F.3d 878 (1995) decision.