[The following is the full text of the Department of Justice fee waiver policy guidance memorandum issued to the heads of all federal departments and agencies on Jan. 7, 1983, by Jonathan C. Rose, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Policy.]
Because of some confusion and inconsistency among different agencies in the administration of
the fee waiver provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.
The Department of Justice remains committed to encouraging agencies to waive FOIA search and duplication fees where the disclosure of requested information will primarily benefit the general public. In such cases, the granting of a waiver is in the public interest. However, it must also be noted that federal agencies are obligated to safeguard the public treasury by refusing to provide search and duplication services at reduced or no cost under circumstances in which waivers are not provided for by the statute. Thus, all agency personnel should be aware of the dual policy objectives embodied in the statutory fee waiver provisions: (1) the fostering of disclosure of nonexempt agency records where it will primarily benefit the general public, and (2) the preservation of public funds where there will be insufficient public benefit derived from disclosure. See Burriss v. Central Intelligence Agency, 524 F. Supp. 448, 449 (M.D. Tenn. 1981). Fee waivers must not be granted simply because it is the course of least resistance but, rather, only where the statutory standard is met.
Decisions on fee waiver requests are matters committed to the exercise of sound agency
discretion. See Lybarger v. Cardwell, 577 F.2d 764, 766 (1st Cir. 1978). Judicial application of
this principle has resulted in the upholding of such agency determinations unless they are found
to be "arbitrary and capricious." See, e.g., Diamond v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 548 F.
Supp. 1158, 1160 (S.D.N.Y. 1982); Sellers v. Webster, 2 GDS
First, an agency must determine whether there is a genuine public interest in the subject matter of
the documents for which a fee waiver is sought; absent such a public interest, there is no basis for
granting a waiver. See Newsome v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1 GDS
The second factor which agencies must examine is the value to the public of the records
themselves. A fee waiver is appropriate only if the disclosable contents of the records are in fact
informative on the issue found to be of public interest. See, e.g., Common Cause v. Internal
Revenue Service, 1 GDS
A third factor to be considered is whether the requested information is already available in the public domain. This factor is one that occasionally is overlooked. Agency personnel should ascertain whether material being considered for a fee waiver has been published or is otherwise available on the public record. Where requested information is already in the public domain, particularly in an agency's public reading room, the denial of a fee waiver is appropriate. See, e.g., Blakey v. Department of Justice, 549 F. Supp. 362, 364-65 (D.D.C. 1982).
Fourth, while the identity of a FOIA requester is usually not a proper factor
for agencies to consider in granting or denying access, it should be considered
in acting on a request for a fee waiver. See Mahler v. United States Bureau
of Prisons, 2 GDS
The final criterion requires an assessment, based upon information provided by the requester as
well as information independently available to the agency, of any personal interest of the
requester reasonably expected to be benefited by disclosure. Such interests of course include any
commercial interest, as well as the interests of first-party requesters in records pertaining to
themselves and the interests of parties seeking records for use in litigation. See, e.g., Dorta v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, 3 GDS
In conclusion, we again urge agencies to conduct thorough reviews of all fee waiver requests, on a case-by-case basis, and to grant waivers or reductions only in those cases in which the requester establishes that the disclosure of the information will primarily benefit the general public. Only then can the public be assured that government agencies are honoring the Congressional mandate to disclose records at reduced or no charge where their release primarily benefits the general public, while in other cases preventing "a drain upon agency appropriations that Congress never intended." Blakey v. Department of Justice, 549 F. Supp. at 365.
Go to: FOIA Update Home Page