[updated November 2008]
5-11.103
Notice of Case Initiation
|
When a United States Attorney's Office opens a file for an environmental
case or matter, the Office should enter the case or matter in the
Department's computerized case tracking system and identify the case type as
"environmental." If the case or matter involves a potential environmental
crime, but is not identified as "environmental" in the case tracking system
(for example, because of data entry limitations), that office should inform
the Environmental Crimes Section by telephone, by electronic mail, or in
writing. This notice by the United States Attorney's Office allows ECS to
better coordinate efforts nationwide (for example, by being able to alert
the United States Attorney's Office that the same defendant is being
prosecuted or the same issues are arising in another district) and to be
prepared to provide support, if necessary, to the United States Attorney's
Office. When ECS opens a file on a case or matter, the Section will notify
the United States Attorney's Office for the district in which the crime is
alleged to have occurred.
[updated November 2008]
5-11.104
Responsibility for Case Development and Prosecution
|
United States Attorneys' Offices have responsibility for the
investigation and prosecution of environmental crimes within their own
districts and the Environmental Crimes Section has responsibility for the
investigation and prosecution of environmental crimes on a nation-wide
basis. Cooperation and consultation between United States Attorneys' Offices
and ECS can make the most effective use of the Department's resources. Close
coordination is particularly vital in cases that present novel issues of law
(including the first case under a statute, provision, or regulation),
involve simultaneous investigations in multiple districts, involve
international or foreign policy implications, or are of an urgent or
sensitive nature. Often the United States Attorneys' Offices and ECS work
jointly on cases. When a United States Attorney's Office and ECS work
jointly on a case, the responsibility for that case shall be shared by those
two offices, in which case the two offices shall work and act together
through consultation and agreement. Neither office shall enter into a case
being handled solely by the other except by mutual consent.
[updated November 2008]
[cited in USAM 5-11.110]
5-11.105
Coordination of National Initiatives
|
Enforcement initiatives are valuable means of focusing prosecutorial
resources upon particular types of violations of federal laws. With respect
to environmental crimes, the expertise of ECS is especially critical during
the early phases of a national initiative when the issues involved may be
novel and coordination among districts may be essential.
[updated November 2008]
5-11.106
Foreign Vessel Matters; MOTR Protocols
|
Environmental crimes, including both pollution and wildlife crimes, may
involve the interdiction at sea of foreign-flagged vessels. Because such
actions may involve international treaties and laws and may adversely affect
the foreign relations of the United States, they are covered by the Maritime
Operational Threat Response (MOTR) Protocols which subsumes Presidential
Directive 27 of January 19, 1978, establishing a mandatory consultation
process among interested federal agencies for non- military incidents that
could have such an adverse effect (formerly referred to as the "PD-27
process").
In an environmental context, a potential maritime interdiction generally
will be initiated by the Coast Guard, which notifies the Department of
State, thereby setting in motion the coordination activities among the MOTR
agencies involved. A conference call among the interested MOTR agencies is
convened to discuss options and obtain interagency concurrence for an
approved course of action. ECS participates in the MOTR coordination
activities for situations involving potential pollution or wildlife crimes.
When a particular district will be affected by a foreign-flagged vessel
interdiction, that United States Attorney's Office is consulted. When MOTR
coordination activities are unable to achieve interagency consensus on the
course of action, the matter will be resolved by the White House. A proposed
MOTR action cannot proceed without either consensus among the agencies or a
resolution by the White House.
[added November 2008]
5-11.107
Other ECS Functions: Policy-Making; Support; Exchanging Case
Information; Information and Guidance Clearinghouse
In addition to its litigation activities, ECS has the
following responsibilities:
- Setting policy nationally for the prosecution of
environmental crimes, including both pollution crimes and
wildlife crimes;
- Providing training to United States Attorneys' Offices,
federal investigative agencies, state and local authorities,
law enforcement and regulatory personnel of foreign
governments, and others;
- Analyzing and commenting upon legislation that may affect
environmental crimes prosecution;
- Conducting liaison with foreign officials and with
organizations concerned with international environmental
violations; and
- Providing expertise, information, and support concerning
environmental prosecutions nationally, including providing a
clearinghouse of prosecution-related information and
materials.
With respect to the last of those functions, United States
Attorneys' Offices are encouraged to communicate with ECS early
in environmental investigations and prosecutions to benefit from
ECS' information and expertise and to provide ECS with
information about successes, obstacles, and strategies that ECS
may share with other prosecutors. United States Attorneys'
Offices also are encouraged to consult with ECS on indictments
and other matters with sufficient lead time for ECS to offer
meaningful input. In any event, United States Attorneys' Offices
should provide copies of indictments or informations in hard copy
or in electronic format as soon as possible, but in no event
later than five days after filing, and they should furnish ECS
with any associated press releases no later than they are
released to the media.
ECS maintains a website on the Department of Justice intranet
that includes electronic access to the Environmental Crimes
Manual, copies of various types of documents that have been filed
by federal environmental crimes prosecutors in cases around the
country, and a number of guidance documents, among other things.
In order to assist ECS in keeping that website up to date and in
providing users with the best possible materials, United States
Attorneys' Offices should furnish to ECS electronic (or hard)
copies of as-given jury instructions, motions, responses to
motions, and other documents that may be useful to federal
prosecutors nationwide.
ECS also periodically publishes the Environmental Crimes
Bulletin, which summarizes the status of various cases throughout
the United States and which is available on the Environmental
Crimes website. A valuable resource to other prosecutors
handling similar cases, this publication can be current and
useful only if federal prosecutors promptly furnish to ECS
information about their cases.
[added November 2008]
5-11.108
Notification of Case Resolutions
|
When ECS is not participating in a case, the United States Attorneys'
Offices shall provide ECS with notice of felony case resolutions by
providing ECS with copies of disposition documents (including any plea
agreements) as soon as possible, but in no event later than seven days after
entry of judgment, except as provided in
USAM 5-11.109 and
5-11.117.
[updated November 2008]
5-11.109
Voluntary Dismissals
|
If a United States Attorney's Office intends to voluntarily dismiss an
indictment, information, or complaint in a criminal case involving a felony
violation of any of the statutes identified in
USAM 5-11.101, except when a superseding indictment has been
returned or an information or a complaint has been filed against the same
defendant or when the individual defendant has died, notification of the
intent to dismiss shall be provided to ECS so that it is received no later
than seven days prior to dismissal. In any case handled exclusively by ECS,
the Section shall provide equivalent notice to the United States Attorney's
Office if voluntary dismissal is contemplated.
[updated November 2008]
[cited in USAM 5-11.108]
5-11.110
Declinations
|
When a United States Attorney's Office for the district in which the
crime is alleged to have occurred or ECS declines a felony case, either will
promptly advise the other of that action. If either office writes a
substantive memorandum to the file or to the investigative agency regarding
the declination, either office will promptly provide a copy of the
declination memorandum in either hard copy or electronic format to the other
office. Nothing in USAM 5-11.104
is intended to limit ECS' authority to
prosecute a case declined by a United States Attorney's Office after
consultation with that office, nor shall these provisions limit the
authority of a United States Attorney's Office to prosecute a case that ECS
has declined for reasons that ECS advises do not involve policy
considerations.
[updated November 2008]
5-11.111
Staffing
|
The appointment of Special Assistant United States Attorneys shall be
approved by the United States Attorney of the relevant district and the
Assistant Attorney General for the ENRD. In their approval process, the
United States Attorney and the Assistant Attorney General should seek to
insure sensible and efficient use of government resources.
[renumbered November 2008]
5-11.112
Parallel Proceedings
|
Because many of the environmental statutes specifically provide for
criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions (see, e.g., 33 U.S.C.
§ 1319(a), (b), (c), and (d)), this is an area of the law
especially susceptible to parallel proceedings. Such proceedings may be
appropriate, for example, when in the course of a civil case the government
receives evidence of deliberate violations of the law meriting criminal
prosecution or when a criminal investigation uncovers evidence of an
on-going violation causing environmental contamination that should be
stopped quickly through an injunctive action.
Although they may be appropriate in particular circumstances, parallel
proceedings must be handled carefully in order to avoid allegations of
improper release of grand jury material or abuse of civil process.
Therefore, in any case under any of the statutes identified in
USAM 5-11.101
in which parallel proceedings arise, the United States Attorney's Office may
find it useful to contact the Environmental Crimes Section for assistance in
coordinating the parallel proceedings. See also
USAM Chapter 1-12.000.
[updated November 2008]
5-11.113
Coordination with State Programs
Most states have environmental enforcement programs that overlap, in
whole or in part, with federal programs. United States Attorneys should
familiarize themselves with state environmental enforcement laws and state
enforcement officials. Particular attention should be directed toward the
following aspects of state-federal relations in the environmental
enforcement field:
- State enforcement agencies may be valuable sources of information on
suspected violations of federal environmental statutes. United States
Attorneys may be in a position to assist in apprizing state officials of the
nature of the federal enforcement program within the district or state and
in developing methods for exchanging information on suspected violations;
- State authorities often possess evidentiary materials that are relevant
to pending federal investigations and court proceedings. United States
Attorneys should be aware of the nature and extent of the states'
investigatory resources and should make provision in appropriate
circumstances for the exchange of information on pending cases with state
authorities;
- Frequently a particular activity constitutes a violation of both federal
and state laws. When state officials are proceeding with an environmental
enforcement case that may include violations of federal law, the United
States Attorney in the affected district should monitor that state activity.
If it appears that all federal interests in the case will be vindicated in
the state court action, action in federal court may be an unnecessary
duplication of effort. On the other hand, if federal interests will not be
protected completely in state court, federal proceedings may be warranted.
See also USAM 9-2.031 and
9-27.240.
- A number of United States Attorneys' Offices have found that task
forces, which include personnel from state and local agencies and from other
federal agencies, are very effective means of coordinating efforts with
state and local governments and making optimal use of available resources.
Task force formats vary among offices, and ECS can advise United States
Attorneys' Offices of other offices that are willing to share the lessons of
their experiences.
[updated November 2008]
5-11.114
Individual and Corporate Defendants
- Congress has demonstrated its intent that individuals, as well as
corporations, should be criminally prosecuted for violations of federal
environmental laws, see, e.g., 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(c)(6)
and 1362(5), thereby recognizing the fact that the unlawful acts or
omissions of corporations actually can be traced to individual officers or
employees. That Congressional intent should be given serious consideration
in the development of prosecutions for violations of the statutes identified
under USAM 5-11.101. Prosecution of a corporation is
not a substitute for the prosecution of criminally culpable individuals
within or without the corporation. Because a corporation can act only
through individuals, imposition of individual criminal liability may provide
the strongest deterrent against future corporate wrongdoing. Only rarely
should provable individual culpability not be pursued, even in the face of
offers of corporate guilty pleas. Absent those very rare circumstances,
prosecutors should not agree to accept a corporate guilty plea in exchange
for non-prosecution or dismissal of charges against individual officers and
employees. See
USAM Chapter 9.28.000 for specific guidance on federal
prosecution of business organizations.
- In any case against both a corporation and any of its individual
employees the willingness of the offending corporation to enter a guilty
plea is not a basis for declining to prosecute an individual. See also
USAM 9-16.050.
- EPA has adopted a policy that may affect cases involving voluntary
disclosure, cooperation, and compliance by potential defendants. During
their decision-making process in environmental crimes cases prosecutors
should take into account that policy and any departmental policy or policies
that may be relevant.
- [updated November 2008]
5-11.115
"Global Settlements"; Community Service
- Without the express approval of the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources Division, in any criminal case arising
under the statutes identified in
USAM 5-11.101 no plea agreement will be
negotiated which compromises the right of the United States to any civil or
administrative remedies under those statutes. Efforts by defendants to
effect such results may arise in the context of so-called "global
settlement" offers. See ENRD Directive 99-20 (April 20, 1999).
- Environmental crimes often can result in widespread degradation of the
environment and threaten the health and safety of entire communities. In
such circumstances, community service may be used in conjunction with
traditional criminal sentencing options, provided that the community
service comports with applicable law and furthers the purposes of
sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553. Community service is
authorized as a discretionary condition of probation under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3563(b)(12) and it is addressed in U.S.S.G.
§ 8B1.3.
United States Attorneys' Offices considering the use of
community service shall consult with ECS for guidance.
See USAM 9-16.325.
A guidance document addressing its use is available on the Environmental
Crimes intranet website.
- [updated November 2008]
5-11.116
Protecting Federal Interests in Plea Agreements
- All plea agreements in environmental crimes cases should include
language that protects the government's other enforcement options, making it
clear that the agreement (1) does not release from criminal liability any
person not specifically covered by it (and, particularly, corporate plea
agreements should not release any individuals from liability); (2) does not
apply to crimes committed in any other federal district; and (3) does not
provide or promise any waiver of any civil or administrative actions,
sanctions, or penalties that may apply, including, but not limited to,
penalties, claims for damages to natural resources, suspension, debarment,
listing, licensing, injunctive relief, or remedial action to comply with any
applicable regulatory requirement.
- [added November 2008]
5-11.117
Handling of Appeals
- All appeals in criminal cases arising under the statutes identified in
USAM 5-11.101 shall be handled as provided
for in USAM 5-8.300 and
Title 2. When a United States
Attorney's Office makes a request to handle an appeal, such a request will
be resolved by agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and the
Chief of the Appellate Section of the Environment and Natural Resources
Division. In jointly resolving such a request, the following factors, among
others, should be considered on a case-by-case basis and, if necessary,
discussed:
- The relative advantages of staffing the appeal with an Assistant United
States Attorney who tried the case or with an appellate lawyer who was not
involved in the trial;
- The relative advantages of the United States Attorney's local
perspective or the Environment and Natural Resources Division's national
perspective;
- Whether there are issues on which components of the government may have
differing viewpoints; and
- The available resources of each office, especially relative
to the briefing and argument schedule of the appeal.
- Copies of any draft briefs prepared by a United States Attorney's Office
on behalf of the government shall be forwarded to the Appellate Section in
sufficient time to allow review, comment, and approval by the Section and
the Assistant Attorney General. Copies of any draft brief prepared by the
Appellate Section shall be forwarded to the United States Attorney's Office
in sufficient time to allow review, comment, and approval by that office. In
any appeal, copies of all other briefs by other parties shall be promptly
forwarded by the United States Attorney's Office to the Appellate
Section.
- [updated November 2008]
[cited in USAM 5-11.108]
5-11.118
Notice of Appeals
- USAM 2-2.200
describes the manner in which United States Attorneys' Offices forward
notices of appeal or requests to take an appeal to the Environment and
Natural Resources Division. For environmental crimes, the Division
designates ECS as the unit to which such notices and requests should be
sent. ECS will forward the notices and requests to the Division's Appellate
Section.
- [renumbered November 2008]
5-11.119
Record on Appeal
- Whenever an appeal is taken in a case arising under any statute
identified in USAM 5-11.101 for which the
United States Attorney has taken primary trial level responsibility, and
that appeal is to be handled by the Environment and Natural Resources
Division, the United States Attorney is responsible for assembling and
transmitting to the ENRD Appellate Section those items which constitute the
record of the case at the trial court level.
- [updated November 2008]
5-11.120
Table of Notifications and Coordination
- The summary below, relating to coordination and approvals, is provided
for user convenience. For specific details, see the respective
provisions.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |