Skip to main content
Case Document

Order Establishing Procedure for Crime Victim Notification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771

Date
Document Type
Orders - Miscellaneous
Attachments
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  v.

SOLVAY S.A.,

                  Defendant.


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  v.

AKZO NOBEL CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL   
B.V.,

                  Defendant.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         


No. CR 06-0159 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER
ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURE FOR
CRIME VICTIM NOTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3771




No. CR 06-0160 MMC


On this date the Court considered the Motion to Establish Procedure for Crime Victim Notification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771, filed by the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. Having considered the Motion and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS that for any public court or parole proceeding involving the crime, or the release or escape of the accused in this case, the Antitrust Division may provide reasonable, accurate, and timely notice through its web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/atr, and through letters to lead counsel for the direct purchaser plaintiffs in the class action entitled In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, rather than individual notices to the crime victims of the hydrogen peroxide conspiracy.

Because there is a single victim of the sodium perborates conspiracy, it is practicable for the government to give direct notice to that victim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _March 24_, 2006
_______________/s/________________
United States District Judge
Related Case
U.S. v. Solvay S.A.
Updated April 18, 2023