Government Exhibit P3254-R [Non-designated testimony redacted]
| 00007 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | VIDEOGRAPHER: The Court Reporter today is |
| 4 | Dawn M. Hart of LegaLink San Francisco. I will now |
| 5 | swear in the witness. |
| 6 | Thereupon --- |
| 7 | WILLIAM POLLIE |
| 8 | having been duly sworn, testified as follows: |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Q Good morning, Mr. Pollie. |
| 12 | A Good morning, Mr. Yates. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00013 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Q And when you left Integral Systems in |
| 19 | approximately '91 or '92 where did you go? |
| 20 | A I went to a company called SAP. |
| 21 | Q And for how long were you with SAP? |
| 22 | A Through September 2001. |
| 23 | Q And what positions did you hold at SAP? |
| 24 | A Variety of positions in product management, |
| 25 | direct sales, global sales, strategic account |
| 00014 |
| 1 | management, and management positions; Vice-President |
| 2 | of Field Operations for SAP. |
| 3 | Q Your last position was Vice President of |
| 4 | Field Operations for SAP? |
| 5 | A Yes. |
| 6 | Q And what did you do as the Vice President of |
| 7 | Field Operations for SAP? |
| 8 | A I ran a particular industry sector for SAP |
| 9 | in the field and operation which had consulting, |
| 10 | presales, sales targeted at an industry sector that we |
| 11 | were growing. |
| 12 | Q And what sector was that? |
| 13 | A Financial services and insurance, brokerage. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00015 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Q So in approximately September of 2001 SAP |
| 17 | did not have a fully developed CRM product; is that |
| 18 | your understanding? |
| 19 | A It was fairly new, yes. |
| 20 | Q And what about today, do you have an |
| 21 | understanding of SAP's CRM product offering today? |
| 22 | A Not in detail, no. |
| 23 | Q And you left SAP in approximately September |
| 24 | of 2001? |
| 25 | A Yes. |
| 00016 |
| 1 | Q And who did you join? |
| 2 | A Microsoft Business Solutions-Great Plains. |
| 3 | At the time it was called Microsoft Great Plains |
| 4 | Business Solutions. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00018 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Q Sure. At or about the time you joined |
| 18 | Microsoft Business Solutions, did Microsoft Business |
| 19 | Solutions have a direct sales force? |
| 20 | A Not to my understanding, no. |
| 21 | Q What kind of sales force did it have? |
| 22 | A All of Microsoft Business Solutions |
| 23 | activities were delivered through a partner |
| 24 | organization. |
| 25 | Q But your title was U.S. Sale -- Vice |
| 00019 |
| 1 | President of U.S. Sales? |
| 2 | A Yes. |
| 3 | Q What were your duties and responsibilities |
| 4 | in or about September of 2001? |
| 5 | A To manage a, a group of Microsoft employees |
| 6 | that assisted our partners in providing software |
| 7 | services and product to, to customers. |
| 8 | Q And how would the Microsoft salespeople |
| 9 | assist the partners in that role? |
| 10 | A In a variety of ways, by providing them |
| 11 | assistance in pricing data and by providing them |
| 12 | assistance in access to Microsoft resources that might |
| 13 | provide them detailed product information that they |
| 14 | needed, to help them monitor and control their |
| 15 | pipeline and activities, to assist them in sales |
| 16 | techniques, sales training, product training. |
| 17 | Q So is it fair to say that the partners acted |
| 18 | as an extension of the Microsoft sales force? |
| 19 | A I think it's safe to say that the Microsoft |
| 20 | partners were the sales force and were not necessarily |
| 21 | an extension of, but the sales force for Microsoft |
| 22 | Business Solutions. |
| 23 | Q Did you meet with customers of Microsoft |
| 24 | Business Solutions in or about September of 2001? |
| 25 | A Yes. |
| 00020 |
| 1 | Q And did salespeople at Microsoft Business |
| 2 | Solutions working under you meet with customers in |
| 3 | approximately September of 2001? |
| 4 | A Microsoft Business Solution employees met |
| 5 | with customers. They weren't necessarily called |
| 6 | salespeople. They're called partner account managers, |
| 7 | they're called business development managers. So from |
| 8 | a clarification point of view, yes, my staff did meet |
| 9 | with customers, but they were not called salespeople. |
| 10 | Q And what position do you hold with Microsoft |
| 11 | Business Solutions today? |
| 12 | A I'm a General Manager within Microsoft |
| 13 | working in the enterprise business sector. |
| 14 | Q What is the enterprise business sector? |
| 15 | A The enterprise business sector are -- is |
| 16 | comprised of Microsoft's corporate account customers, |
| 17 | as well as some of the larger, more strategic |
| 18 | customers in Microsoft as well. |
| 19 | Q What are corporate account customers? |
| 20 | A Corporate account customers are, are |
| 21 | Microsoft -- is Microsoft's description of the way |
| 22 | they tier the number of accounts for coverage |
| 23 | purposes. So that these representatives in the |
| 24 | classic Microsoft point of view are provided certain |
| 25 | coverage models to make sure that these customers are, |
| 00021 |
| 1 | maintain a high level of satisfaction with their |
| 2 | partners and with the performance of the products. |
| 3 | Q And is there -- you said they're tiered in |
| 4 | some way. Is there any kind of threshold in terms of |
| 5 | numbers of PCs, or annual revenue, or number of |
| 6 | employees that's used in order to obtain a space |
| 7 | within the corporate account space within Microsoft? |
| 8 | A I know that there is a way for them to |
| 9 | determine the number of accounts and the coverage, but |
| 10 | I'm not intimate with the detail on the actual |
| 11 | specific requirements on what makes somebody a |
| 12 | corporate account and what makes someone -- I think it |
| 13 | does vary and there are some exceptions made based on |
| 14 | opportunity or high profile of accounts, level of, |
| 15 | level of business revenue, those kinds of things. |
| 16 | Q Can you give me some examples of exceptions |
| 17 | that have been made for high profile accounts? |
| 18 | A I think if there's a particular account |
| 19 | that's, has a very high PC count let's say, but isn't |
| 20 | necessarily a high revenue account, the customer may, |
| 21 | may require further service capabilities, in which |
| 22 | case they provide a higher coverage model for that |
| 23 | account. That could be one example. |
| 24 | Q And what kinds of companies are you involved |
| 25 | with within the enterprise business sector? |
| 00022 |
| 1 | A Just as clarification purpose, myself person |
| 2 | personally? |
| 3 | Q Yes. |
| 4 | A Accounts that are asking for executive |
| 5 | representation of Microsoft Business Solutions from a |
| 6 | strategic point of view, how Microsoft views their |
| 7 | acquisition of the Great Plains in the division |
| 8 | organizations, and how we, we provide services to our |
| 9 | partners and support to our partners to make them |
| 10 | successful. |
| 11 | Q Can you give me some examples of the kinds |
| 12 | of companies that you're involved with on that basis? |
| 13 | A Certainly. Companies like Ingersoll-Rand, |
| 14 | companies like Home Bank Corporation, United Missouri |
| 15 | Bank, Merial Corporation, Bound, Bound Global, Chanel, |
| 16 | as examples. |
| 17 | Q In -- what is, what -- what is your |
| 18 | involvement, for example, with Ingestible-Rand? What |
| 19 | do you do with them? |
| 20 | A What do I do with them? |
| 21 | Q Yes. |
| 22 | A I have a -- fairly regular communications |
| 23 | with their global CIO regarding their relationship |
| 24 | with Microsoft Business Solutions and the partners |
| 25 | that are servicing their accounts; work with them on |
| 00023 |
| 1 | putting programs together for executive briefings, |
| 2 | making sure they're aware of our current state of |
| 3 | product, as well as our investment in particular |
| 4 | product that could be of interest to them for the |
| 5 | future, keeping them up-to-date on relationships we're |
| 6 | forming with other partners and other products that |
| 7 | are out in the marketplace that they might find |
| 8 | interesting. |
| 9 | Q And has Ingestible-Rand purchased any |
| 10 | Microsoft Business Solutions software products? |
| 11 | A Yes. |
| 12 | Q What have they purchased? |
| 13 | A They've purchased a product called Navision. |
| 14 | Q And what is Navision? |
| 15 | A Navision is an accounting and core back |
| 16 | office accounting system that's being used, that's |
| 17 | available on a global basis. |
| 18 | Q And how is Ingestible-Rand using it to your |
| 19 | knowledge? |
| 20 | A Ingestible-Rand has a project by which |
| 21 | they're implementing the Navision product at their |
| 22 | bobcat dealers. So they're very small, five- to |
| 23 | six-user type of operations, but it's a way for them |
| 24 | to standardize the back office among the various |
| 25 | bobcat dealerships around the world. |
| 00024 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Q What about Bound Global, what's your |
| 20 | understanding of what products from -- they have |
| 21 | purchased from Microsoft Business Solutions? |
| 22 | A Bound Global has purchased our Axapta |
| 23 | product. |
| 24 | Q Do you know where that product has been |
| 25 | implemented? |
| 00025 |
| 1 | A The implementation resides in the New York/ |
| 2 | New Jersey area. |
| 3 | Q Is that Bound Global's headquarters? |
| 4 | A Bound Global is part of Bound. And for |
| 5 | Bound Global, yes, that is their headquarters. |
| 6 | Q What is Bound Global's business, if you |
| 7 | know? |
| 8 | A Bound Global's business is to provide |
| 9 | translation services. They are a Microsoft supplier |
| 10 | in that they do a lot of the translation services for |
| 11 | a number of Microsoft products around the world, and |
| 12 | provide those kinds of services to other companies as |
| 13 | well. |
| 14 | Q And you say that the Microsoft Axapta |
| 15 | product has been implemented in the New York/New |
| 16 | Jersey area by Bound Global? |
| 17 | A It resides there, yes. |
| 18 | Q Does it service other Bound Global locations |
| 19 | throughout the United States? |
| 20 | A Yes. I believe there's seven different |
| 21 | countries running on that instance today. |
| 22 | Q When you say there's seven countries running |
| 23 | on that instance, what do you mean? |
| 24 | A They're providing service, financial |
| 25 | accounting, application software functionality to, I |
| 00026 |
| 1 | believe it's six or more countries around the world |
| 2 | from their facility in New York covering approximately |
| 3 | 35 to 40 users. |
| 4 | Q And how, how do the users in other countries |
| 5 | obtain access to the Axapta application? |
| 6 | A I believe through a dial-in network, |
| 7 | although I'm not sure. |
| 8 | Q What's your understanding of which countries |
| 9 | are being serviced by the Axapta application in the |
| 10 | New York/New Jersey area? |
| 11 | A I'm not sure of the details. |
| 12 | Q What is Axapta? |
| 13 | A Axapta is a - an application software |
| 14 | package that was acquired as part of the Microsoft |
| 15 | acquisition of Navision in Cope - out of Denmark, and |
| 16 | it is a, another application edition of products that |
| 17 | Microsoft Business Solution sells and markets through |
| 18 | its partner organizations. |
| 19 | Q What's the target market of Axapta if you |
| 20 | know? |
| 21 | A Axapta fits very well in markets where |
| 22 | customers have international requirements, and it is |
| 23 | also targeted at locations in the manufacturing sector |
| 24 | because of its functionality versus other editions of |
| 25 | Microsoft Business Solutions. It's -- it has a more |
| 00027 |
| 1 | robust manufacturing functionality. |
| 2 | Q When you say it has a more robust |
| 3 | manufacturing functionality, what do you mean? |
| 4 | A The Axapta product, through the acquisition, |
| 5 | provided Microsoft Business Solutions a product which |
| 6 | has some of the functionality associated with |
| 7 | production planning, manufacturing, bill of material |
| 8 | management, inventory management, most of the discreet |
| 9 | type of manufacturing, very simple bill of material, |
| 10 | assembly-type of work that many companies require in |
| 11 | the market in the manufacturing sector. |
| 12 | Q And when you say that Axapta is -- fits |
| 13 | well, or has international capabilities, what do you |
| 14 | mean? |
| 15 | A Axapta is a product that is available and |
| 16 | supported in many countries around the world. And in |
| 17 | comparison to our Great Plains product -- |
| 18 | (Interruption.) |
| 19 | A In comparison with our Great Plains or |
| 20 | Solomon products, it is a product that is offered in |
| 21 | far more countries than currently the Solomon and |
| 22 | Great Plains product are supported. |
| 23 | Q Do you know in how many countries -- let me |
| 24 | withdraw the question. |
| 25 | Do you have an understanding of the, whether |
| 00028 |
| 1 | Axapta has functionality in 30 or more countries? |
| 2 | A I have seen documentation that relates the |
| 3 | availability of Axapta, implementation of Axapta in |
| 4 | approximately that amount of countries, provided |
| 5 | either through localized support or through direct |
| 6 | Axapta support. |
| 7 | Q When you talk about localized support versus |
| 8 | direct Axapta support, what do you mean? |
| 9 | A There are some countries where partners have |
| 10 | taken the responsibility to localize and to provide |
| 11 | functionality for local regulatory requirements for |
| 12 | the Axapta product that is not Microsoft intellectual |
| 13 | property or owned -- or owned by Microsoft. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Q And you also mentioned Chanel. What's your |
| 20 | understanding of what Microsoft Business Solutions |
| 21 | product has been sold the Chanel? |
| 22 | A Chanel is using the Axapta product in a very |
| 23 | decentralized approach, targeting a number of small |
| 24 | remote operations that they own on a worldwide basis. |
| 25 | Q Is Axapta used by Chanel in the United |
| 00029 |
| 1 | States? |
| 2 | A No. |
| 3 | Q Where is it used, to your knowledge? |
| 4 | A There is an implementation that's going on |
| 5 | today in Europe, and one that's being planned in the |
| 6 | Asia-Pacific region. |
| 7 | Q Do you know who is implementing Axapta for |
| 8 | Chanel? |
| 9 | A A partner of ours is doing most of the work, |
| 10 | a company by the name of Columbus IT. |
| 11 | Q And what is Columbus IT? |
| 12 | A Columbus IT is a certified Microsoft Axapta |
| 13 | business partner that has implementation resources, as |
| 14 | well as project people that implement Microsoft. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00030 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Q Can you describe the financial management |
| 6 | modules that are provided with Axapta? |
| 7 | A The Axapta financial management system |
| 8 | consists much of the modules that you described; |
| 9 | general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, |
| 10 | fixed assets, traditional accounting applications that |
| 11 | are required in most small, medium, and large |
| 12 | corporate account-type of structures. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00035 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Q I've read in some publications that |
| 22 | Microsoft Business Solutions hopes to grow its annual |
| 23 | sales to approximately $10 billion a year by 2010. Is |
| 24 | that true? |
| 25 | A I really can't, can't state that for the |
| 00036 |
| 1 | record. |
| 2 | Q Have you seen a Business Week article in |
| 3 | which Jeff Rakes made a statement like that? |
| 4 | A Yes, I have. |
| 5 | Q And is it your understanding that, that |
| 6 | Microsoft has publicly stated that it plans to grow |
| 7 | the revenues of Microsoft Business Solutions to |
| 8 | approximately $10 billion a year by year 2010? |
| 9 | A I've read that article, yes. |
| 10 | Q Have you discussed those plans with anyone |
| 11 | within Microsoft? |
| 12 | A Yes. |
| 13 | Q With whom? |
| 14 | A With my direct management, my team. |
| 15 | Q Who is your direct management? |
| 16 | A I work for the General Manager in charge of |
| 17 | enterprise sales operations. |
| 18 | Q And who's that? |
| 19 | A Phil Sorgen. |
| 20 | Q And you mentioned your team. Who's on your |
| 21 | team? |
| 22 | A I have two direct -- or one direct report |
| 23 | and 17 members of a virtual team that are employed |
| 24 | throughout the United States. |
| 25 | Q Who - |
| 00037 |
| 1 | A And when I say my team, I should clarify |
| 2 | that to say my virtual team. |
| 3 | Q Your virtual team. Those are people in |
| 4 | various geographic locations throughout the United |
| 5 | States who report up to you? |
| 6 | A They don't report directly to me. They |
| 7 | report to the local geography. |
| 8 | Q And how -- how are they part of your team if |
| 9 | they report to the local geography? |
| 10 | A It's a virtual team that I helped build from |
| 11 | a community point of view; common objectives, common |
| 12 | goals, common job responsibilities around the |
| 13 | Microsoft Business Solutions products. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00040 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Q Within the enterprise group, do you focus on |
| 15 | the GSM clients -- this is you personally -- or the |
| 16 | CAS, the corporate accounts-based clients? |
| 17 | A I don't focus on either. I help our |
| 18 | partners in specific situations where they require |
| 19 | some Microsoft leadership support based on who they're |
| 20 | talking to on the opportunity. I really don't focus |
| 21 | on either. |
| 22 | Q So it could vary. If a partner comes to |
| 23 | you -- |
| 24 | A Could vary. |
| 25 | Q -- with a GSM prospect that they need you |
| 00041 |
| 1 | your assistance with, you'll help them on that? |
| 2 | A Correct. |
| 3 | Q And if it's a corporate accounts-based |
| 4 | prospect, you'll help them with that, too? |
| 5 | A Correct. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Q Are you involved in selling anything other |
| 12 | than Microsoft Business Solution products to these |
| 13 | enterprise clients? |
| 14 | A No. |
| 15 | As a clarification -- |
| 16 | Q Sure. |
| 17 | A -- when you say selling, I'm in -- I'd just |
| 18 | like to clarify that that means assisting -- in our |
| 19 | methodology, helping the partner sell to that account. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00043 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Q And what's your involvement at Deloitte? |
| 20 | A I participated in an executive briefing with |
| 21 | their global CIO who has a number of our Navision |
| 22 | product installations in Europe for some of their very |
| 23 | small firms that are doing some back office accounting |
| 24 | work. |
| 25 | |
| 00044 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Q Do you have any understanding concerning |
| 13 | whether there's any sort of relationship between |
| 14 | Deloitte and Microsoft for implementation of Microsoft |
| 15 | Business Solution products? Any sort of alliance or |
| 16 | anything like that? |
| 17 | A Can we clarify that; for the United States? |
| 18 | Q Yes. |
| 19 | A I'm not aware of any on Deloitte or on |
| 20 | Accenture. |
| 21 | Q How about Kapp, Gemini, Ernst & Young? |
| 22 | A We have begun working with Sogetti, which I |
| 23 | believe is part of CGEY. My understanding is they're |
| 24 | part of CGEY. |
| 25 | Q And how about Bearing Point? |
| 00045 |
| 1 | A I'm not aware of the details of that |
| 2 | relationship. |
| 3 | Q Do you have an understanding one way or the |
| 4 | other concerning whether there is a relationship |
| 5 | between Microsoft and Bearing Point concerning |
| 6 | Microsoft Business Solution products? |
| 7 | A My awareness is that we're pursuing a more |
| 8 | aggressive relationship with Bearing Point, but I |
| 9 | don't know the details of the relationship at this |
| 10 | point. |
| 11 | Q Do you know who is in charge of managing |
| 12 | that relationship? |
| 13 | A I believe it's being pursued by Carla |
| 14 | Heimbigner. |
| 15 | Q And who is she? |
| 16 | A She works in our partner recruiting area out |
| 17 | of Redmond. |
| 18 | Q Do you have interactions with Ms. |
| 19 | Heimbigner? |
| 20 | A On occasion, yes. |
| 21 | Q Have you learned anything from her about the |
| 22 | relationship between Microsoft and Bearing Point for |
| 23 | Microsoft Business Solution products? |
| 24 | A While it has come up in conversation, I'm |
| 25 | not aware of the details behind the relationship. |
| 00046 |
| 1 | Q What have you learned in conversation? |
| 2 | A That she was actively pursuing Bearing Point |
| 3 | to establish a practice around Microsoft Business |
| 4 | Solutions. |
| 5 | Q Did she say -- did you have an understanding |
| 6 | of why? |
| 7 | A Microsoft Business Solution is always |
| 8 | looking for partners that have very high reputations |
| 9 | in the market, that have familiarity with company |
| 10 | business needs, and are able to interpret those |
| 11 | business needs into business solutions through |
| 12 | application software. |
| 13 | Q Is it your understanding that Ms. Heimbigner |
| 14 | has met with Bearing Point about this relationship? |
| 15 | A Yes. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00048 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Q And on a day-to-day basis, can you describe, |
| 5 | if you can generalize, you know, how often you are |
| 6 | actually meeting with clients or potential clients? |
| 7 | A On average, I probably talk to two to three |
| 8 | clients per week either via phone, conference call, or |
| 9 | face-to-face with a client. Probably meet with two to |
| 10 | three partners per week to help them review their |
| 11 | pipeline and their strategy around particular sales |
| 12 | efforts in the CAS space, and the rest education, |
| 13 | training. |
| 14 | Q And the -- your virtual team, are they -- do |
| 15 | they report up to you in some fashion? |
| 16 | A In a dotted-line basis, correct. |
| 17 | Q And do you receive reports from them about |
| 18 | whether they've met with potential clients? |
| 19 | A Yes. |
| 20 | Q And is it your understanding -- let me back |
| 21 | up for a second. This virtual team, are they |
| 22 | organized in any sort of vertical fashion or |
| 23 | geographical fashion? Why don't you tell me how |
| 24 | they're organized. |
| 25 | A Geographic fashion. |
| 00049 |
| 1 | Q Geographic. And are there various regions |
| 2 | throughout the country? |
| 3 | A Microsoft is organized by district, and |
| 4 | there are representatives in most, if not all, |
| 5 | districts that focus on MBS as a solution specialty |
| 6 | area. |
| 7 | Q And when you talk about MBS as a solution |
| 8 | specialty area, what do you mean? |
| 9 | A The role that the Microsoft Business |
| 10 | Solution people play are what's called solution sales |
| 11 | specialists. Within each district, there are solution |
| 12 | sales specialists that focus on Office, Windows, SQL |
| 13 | Server, and Microsoft Business Solutions has its own |
| 14 | solution specialists where an account manager will get |
| 15 | involved in an account and has ultimate ownership. A |
| 16 | solution specialist will help out with specific |
| 17 | opportunities around certain product lines. |
| 18 | Q And is there any sort of vertical focus of |
| 19 | the -- to the Microsoft sales force? |
| 20 | A No -- excuse me. Let me clarify that. |
| 21 | Microsoft Business Solutions sales force? |
| 22 | Q Yes. |
| 23 | A There is not. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00050 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Q Sure. I'm trying to figure out if -- well, |
| 13 | let's back up for one second. It's your understanding |
| 14 | that there are, there are salespeople who focus on |
| 15 | selling what you call classic Microsoft products, |
| 16 | Windows, SQL Server, things like that. There are |
| 17 | salespeople who focus on particular industry |
| 18 | verticals? |
| 19 | A (Nods head.) |
| 20 | Q Is that correct? |
| 21 | A That's correct. |
| 22 | Q And what I'm trying to figure out is, do you |
| 23 | have an understanding one way or the other concerning |
| 24 | whether those salespeople also participate in efforts |
| 25 | to sell Microsoft Business Solutions products? |
| 00051 |
| 1 | A If there's an opportunity identified by the |
| 2 | Microsoft classic vertical sales representative, they |
| 3 | have the opportunity to call in the geographic sales |
| 4 | specialist for Microsoft Business Solution where that |
| 5 | account resides for assistance if they need help, |
| 6 | providing a Microsoft Business Solutions partner, or |
| 7 | helping them evaluate whether there's an opportunity |
| 8 | where Microsoft Business Solution has the opportunity |
| 9 | to fit. |
| 10 | Q Are these, these people who are, who are -- |
| 11 | who focus on a particular industry vertical, are they |
| 12 | trained in any way concerning the Microsoft Business |
| 13 | Solutions product offerings? |
| 14 | A At a very high level, a 101-type of context |
| 15 | regarding Microsoft Business Solutions. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Q How many people are there who focus on |
| 23 | assisting partners in selling Microsoft Business |
| 24 | Solution software products? |
| 25 | A In the enterprise sector? |
| 00052 |
| 1 | Q Yes. |
| 2 | A Seventeen. |
| 3 | Q And how many in the SMS&P sector? |
| 4 | A Don't know the exact head count. |
| 5 | Q Can you give me an estimate? |
| 6 | A The only estimate I have is last year, or |
| 7 | the year before the reorganization, there were |
| 8 | approximately 190 people that focused on assisting |
| 9 | partners in selling Microsoft Business Solutions in |
| 10 | the organization that I was responsible for. |
| 11 | Q This was prior to the July -- |
| 12 | A Prior to the July. |
| 13 | Q -- reorganization? |
| 14 | A Yes. |
| 15 | Q And these 17 people report up to you? |
| 16 | A Dotted line. |
| 17 | Q And what about enterprise salespeople who |
| 18 | focus on the classic Microsoft products, are they |
| 19 | trained in the Microsoft Business Solutions products |
| 20 | in any way? |
| 21 | A Some better than others that have taken the |
| 22 | initiative. Most are at a level of a 101-type of |
| 23 | Microsoft Business Solution level. |
| 24 | Q When you say a 101-type of level, what do |
| 25 | you mean? |
| 00053 |
| 1 | A Core introduction to the products, where |
| 2 | they were acquired from, how they fit from a strategic |
| 3 | point of view, high level strategy documents, high |
| 4 | level functionality documents. |
| 5 | Q And have you ever received an inquiry from |
| 6 | any of the classic enterprise Microsoft sales force |
| 7 | concerning a potential opportunity and they've asked |
| 8 | you to come in as more of a specialist in the |
| 9 | Microsoft Business Solutions products? |
| 10 | A Yes, I've received requests like that. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00054 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Q Now have you heard the term mid market? |
| 15 | A Yes. |
| 16 | Q What's your understanding of the meaning of |
| 17 | that term? |
| 18 | A It varies from, from everyone you talk to. |
| 19 | There is -- my understanding of mid market is there's |
| 20 | a large group of the center of the pyramid that makes |
| 21 | up most of the corporations in America that everyone |
| 22 | is going about discussing in terms of the underserved |
| 23 | requirements and the ability for those companies to |
| 24 | grow and start to now take upon themselves some of the |
| 25 | benefits that only the larger corporations were able |
| 00055 |
| 1 | to take on with some of these advanced techniques and |
| 2 | functionality that were provided only by the large |
| 3 | corporations in the past. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00057 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | Q Do you consider the corporate accounts space |
| 3 | to be mid market space at all? |
| 4 | A Do I personally? |
| 5 | Q Yes. |
| 6 | A The corporate account space has many of the |
| 7 | characteristics that are prevalent in many of the mid |
| 8 | market accounts, yes. |
| 9 | Q And were you working with any mid market |
| 10 | customers prior to July of last year? |
| 11 | A Yes. |
| 12 | Q And based upon that experience, do you have |
| 13 | a sense concerning whether mid market customers are |
| 14 | attempting to obtain the kinds of functionality that |
| 15 | you say only used to be available to the very largest |
| 16 | companies? |
| 17 | A I, I say -- I said there are some |
| 18 | functionality that the mid market companies are very |
| 19 | interested in adopting that were only available to |
| 20 | large companies before, and the answer to that is yes. |
| 21 | Q And what kind of functionality is that? |
| 22 | A Connections through the Internet to be able, |
| 23 | be able to bid and reply to bids from very large |
| 24 | contract and suppliers, the ability to communicate |
| 25 | electronically with your suppliers, the ability |
| 00058 |
| 1 | through EDI or other techniques, the ability to do |
| 2 | electronic banking and fund management -- funds of |
| 3 | management for being able to deal on a more |
| 4 | international basis. Those kinds of things are good |
| 5 | examples of functions that were only available for |
| 6 | large corporations that smaller companies now can take |
| 7 | advantage of. |
| 8 | Q And how about integrating the supply chain |
| 9 | with the financial aspects of the company, is that |
| 10 | something that the mid market companies are more and |
| 11 | more interested in? |
| 12 | A I think so, yes. I think that most of those |
| 13 | companies are single location, single organization, |
| 14 | and see some efficiencies in, in a software package |
| 15 | that allows for visibility across the entire chain of |
| 16 | order to cash. |
| 17 | Q And as the world economy becomes more |
| 18 | global, are companies in the mid market increasingly |
| 19 | interested in multilanguage, multicurrency |
| 20 | capabilities in their software? |
| 21 | A I -- I don't know if I'm qualified to answer |
| 22 | that. It would be my opinion that they would be, yes. |
| 23 | Q Have you seen that in your experience at |
| 24 | Microsoft Business Solutions? |
| 25 | A I think there is a greater -- what I've seen |
| 00059 |
| 1 | in my experience in Microsoft Business Solution is a |
| 2 | greater awareness from the mid marketplace that there |
| 3 | is a global economy out there that has potential for |
| 4 | their products and services, yes. |
| 5 | Q And in your experience, are there mid market |
| 6 | clients of Microsoft Business Solutions interested in |
| 7 | software that provides multilanguage, multicurrency |
| 8 | capabilities? |
| 9 | A More of the multicurrency situation, the |
| 10 | ability to transact with companies located in other |
| 11 | parts of the world, but rarely did we see |
| 12 | opportunities that necessitated a multilanguage-type |
| 13 | of functionality. |
| 14 | Q How about for instance Chanel, is that a mid |
| 15 | market company in your view? |
| 16 | A No, I think, I think it is classified as a |
| 17 | corporate account, a CAS-based account, and I think it |
| 18 | has the name recognition and the brand recognition |
| 19 | that entitles it to certain special treatments in |
| 20 | terms of customer sat. and some other things. |
| 21 | Q It's the perfume and the high-end clothing |
| 22 | manufacturer, that's the company we're talking about? |
| 23 | A Correct. |
| 24 | Q Were they interested in the multilanguage, |
| 25 | multicurrency capabilities of Axapta? |
| 00060 |
| 1 | A Yes. |
| 2 | Q Is that one of the reasons you understood |
| 3 | they purchased Axapta? |
| 4 | A Yes. |
| 5 | Q And Microsoft is selling Axapta globally, |
| 6 | correct? |
| 7 | A Yes. |
| 8 | Q How about Bound Global, they've implemented |
| 9 | Axapta here in the New York/New Jersey area of the |
| 10 | United States, correct? |
| 11 | A Uh-huh. |
| 12 | Q But it's my understanding from your |
| 13 | testimony that that implementation of Axapta is |
| 14 | supporting five, six, seven other countries; is that |
| 15 | correct? |
| 16 | A That's correct. |
| 17 | Q Were they interested to your knowledge in |
| 18 | the multilanguage/multicurrency capabilities of |
| 19 | Axapta? |
| 20 | A Yes. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00063 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Q Was Microsoft Business Solutions successful |
| 6 | in selling through partners a product to Indianapolis |
| 7 | Motor Speedway? |
| 8 | A Yes. |
| 9 | Q Which product? |
| 10 | A Great Plains. |
| 11 | Q And what about sports teams? Philadelphia |
| 12 | Eagles, was the Microsoft successful in selling a |
| 13 | product to them through partners? |
| 14 | A Yes. |
| 15 | Q Which product? |
| 16 | A I'm not sure. |
| 17 | Q Any other sports teams that you're aware of |
| 18 | in which, which have bought Microsoft Business |
| 19 | Solution software products? |
| 20 | A Most of the NFL teams today use Microsoft |
| 21 | Business Solutions; Great Plains, Solomon, Division. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00064 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Q What other -- are there any other high- |
| 6 | profile, larger opportunities that Mr. Malme was |
| 7 | responsible for other than the sports teams and the |
| 8 | Indianapolis Motor Speedway? |
| 9 | A His team was responsible for Esselte, his |
| 10 | team was responsible for the initial conversations at |
| 11 | Ingersoll-Rand, his team was responsible for the |
| 12 | Division work we did at a division of Bound, Bound |
| 13 | Global, a small division of Bound, his team was |
| 14 | responsible for engagements at the Phoenix Suns, some |
| 15 | of the other organizations out there. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00065 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Q Mr. Pollie, we've had marked as Exhibit 1449 |
| 17 | a, I think a far more legible copy of the document |
| 18 | bearing Bates Nos. 4144 through 4153. The power |
| 19 | points are now normal sized. Do you see that? |
| 20 | A Yes. |
| 21 | Q Exhibit 1449, is that a document you |
| 22 | received on or about April 22, 2003? |
| 23 | A Yes. |
| 24 | Q And you received it from Mr. Malme? |
| 25 | A Yes. |
| 00066 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | Q What was the discussion within Microsoft |
| 00067 |
| 1 | Business Solutions concerning corporate sales | |
| 2 | acceleration in or about April 2003? | |
| 3 | A We were discussing the addition of head | |
| 4 | count that might result in increased amounts of | |
| 5 | revenue and positioning our products in the | |
| 6 | divisional/departmental solutions in the enterprise | |
| 7 | market. | |
| 8 | Q When you're talking about positioning the | |
| 9 | products in the divisional -- divisional solutions in | |
| 10 | the enterprise market, what do you mean? | |
| 11 | A The focus of our initiatives in the | |
| 12 | enterprise market are targeted at very targeted spoke | |
| 13 | type opportunities within a major corporation, much | |
| 14 | like the situation at Bound or Chanel or others we've | |
| 15 | been discussing. We are not serving as the core | |
| 16 | enterprise system, but much of a remote location or a | |
| 17 | departmental or a divisional solution where the needs | |
| 18 | are very much akin to a very small mid market account | |
| 19 | as an example. | |
| 20 | Q Now, I understand that you've been involved | |
| 21 | with a company called ? | REDACTED |
| 22 | A Yes. | |
| 23 | Q That's an eight or $9 billion advertising | |
| 24 | holding company? | |
| 25 | A Yes. | |
| 00068 |
| 1 | Q And I understand you've had discussions | |
| 2 | concerning an Axapta implementation at one of their | |
| 3 | subsidiaries called ? | REDACTED |
| 4 | A Yes. | |
| 5 | Q And was the discussion concerning that | REDACTED |
| 6 | Axapta would be the business application software that | |
| 7 | would be run at ? | REDACTED |
| 8 | A No. | |
| 9 | Q What was it? | |
| 10 | A We are presenting a solution in the | |
| 11 | Microsoft Business Solutions offering by the name of | |
| 12 | Solomon. Solomon is a product that's designed to | |
| 13 | account for professional service needs. Many | |
| 14 | organizations in the construction professional service | |
| 15 | time and material billing environment use our Solomon | |
| 16 | product. | |
| 17 | Q Was -- have there been any discussions with | |
| 18 | concerning the use of Axapta? | REDACTED |
| 19 | A In the past there have been some evaluations | |
| 20 | of all the Microsoft Business Solution products, | |
| 21 | including Axapta and including the Great Plains | |
| 22 | product as well. | |
| 23 | Q Is either Axapta or Great Plains, has either | |
| 24 | one of those been implemented at any company? | REDACTED |
| 25 | A has implemented Great Plains at a | REDACTED |
| 00069 |
| 1 | few of their locations. | |
| 2 | Q Do you know which ones? | |
| 3 | A The corporate headquarters is using Great | |
| 4 | Plains and one of their small divisions called DOS is | |
| 5 | also in the midst of implementing Great Plains as | |
| 6 | well. | |
| 7 | Q What's the corporate headquarters of | REDACTED |
| 8 | using Great Plains for? | |
| 9 | A Ten, fifteen users, just integrating core | |
| 10 | financials just at a high level. As you mentioned, | |
| 11 | they're a holding company so they have very limited | |
| 12 | production or any other kind of capabilities. So | |
| 13 | they're using it as a financial reporting system at | |
| 14 | the corporate level to consolidate some data. | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | Q So Great Plains is the corporate accounting | |
| 00070 |
| 1 | software that's in use at corporate | REDACTED |
| 2 | headquarters? | |
| 3 | A It's in use at corporate | REDACTED |
| 4 | headquarters. I'm not aware of any others. | |
| 5 | Q And where is corporate headquarters? | REDACTED |
| 6 | A In New York. | |
| 7 | Q New York. Have you met with the Chief | |
| 8 | Financial Officer of ? | REDACTED |
| 9 | A Yes. | |
| 10 | Q Have you discussed the Great Plains product | |
| 11 | with him? | |
| 12 | A Yes. | |
| 13 | Q Is he happy with it? | |
| 14 | A Yes. | |
| 15 | Just from a clarification point of view, | |
| 16 | again, it's very small Great Plains implementation of | |
| 17 | 15, 20 users that is being supported through a | |
| 18 | partner, and the partner has implemented that system | |
| 19 | for a number of years in a very contained environment. | |
| 20 | Q And who's the partner? | |
| 21 | A A company by the name of Altara. | |
| 22 | Q And Altara -- what is Altara? | |
| 23 | A It's a Microsoft Business Solutions partner | |
| 24 | based out of New Jersey, one of our leading partners | |
| 25 | that is in charge of reselling the Microsoft Business | |
| 00071 |
| 1 | Solution products and implementing those products to | |
| 2 | customers all around the northeast. She has also | |
| 3 | offices in Denver and a few other places as well. | |
| 4 | Q And when's the last time you had a | |
| 5 | discussion with the Chief Financial Officer of | REDACTED |
| 6 | concerning Great Plains software product? | |
| 7 | A Within the past two months. | |
| 8 | Q And what was your discussion about? | |
| 9 | A The discussion was about Microsoft Business | |
| 10 | Solutions playing a greater role in in terms | REDACTED |
| 11 | of a standard way for to roll out accounting, | REDACTED |
| 12 | core accounting software. And the way that they're | |
| 13 | organized, they have 1400 independent agencies. | |
| 14 | They're very small agencies with one to two to three | |
| 15 | users. is very interested in using the | REDACTED |
| 16 | product, or evaluating the use of the product in those | |
| 17 | agency and company roles where Microsoft Business | |
| 18 | Solution could become the standard for across | REDACTED |
| 19 | the corporation. | |
| 20 | Q And that would be across all of | REDACTED |
| 21 | subsidiaries? | |
| 22 | A Potentially. | |
| 23 | Q Has any decision been made to your | |
| 24 | knowledge? | |
| 25 | A No decision, no final decision has been | |
| 00072 |
| 1 | made, no. | |
| 2 | Q But there have been discussions with the CFO | |
| 3 | of about having a Microsoft Business Solution | REDACTED |
| 4 | software product as the standard across all the | |
| 5 | companies? | REDACTED |
| 6 | A Yes. | |
| 7 | Q And what's your understanding of the size of | |
| 8 | , in terms of revenue or employees? | REDACTED |
| 9 | A My internal briefing is much more | |
| 10 | surrounding the total number of users that would be | |
| 11 | involved in implementing a successful site at | REDACTED |
| 12 | which currently targets approximately two to 300 total | |
| 13 | users of our product, our Solomon product for core | |
| 14 | financial accounting systems as a spoke in the | REDACTED |
| 15 | wheel. | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 00074 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Q Now you talked about the use of Great Plains |
| 25 | in a distributed fashion. What do you mean by that? |
| 00075 |
| 1 | A The way we have consistently positioned |
| 2 | Microsoft Business Solutions in the market is as a, a |
| 3 | business solution for independent business units of |
| 4 | major corporations, very small divisions or one-off |
| 5 | business units that have a requirement for an |
| 6 | accounting back office application. |
| 7 | Q And can you explain what -- I'm not sure I |
| 8 | understood your answer. When you're talking about a |
| 9 | distribute implementation, are you talking about |
| 10 | various spoke implementations throughout a larger |
| 11 | enterprise? |
| 12 | A Many organizations today have a variety of |
| 13 | small business units that have a variety of systems in |
| 14 | place. It's not uncommon to talk to a large |
| 15 | corporation where they have 14 or 15 different general |
| 16 | ledgers implemented along with their core ERP system |
| 17 | which is provided by an Oracle, an SAP or a |
| 18 | PeopleSoft. In many cases our target in talking to |
| 19 | that account is finding a way for Microsoft Business |
| 20 | Solutions to be positioned as a solution for those |
| 21 | independent divisions or locations to provide back |
| 22 | office accounting functionality. |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00076 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Q Going back to Exhibit 1449, Mr. Pollie, |
| 5 | there's some bullet points under the power point. Do |
| 6 | you see that? |
| 7 | A Which page are you on? |
| 8 | Q Excuse me, 4146. |
| 9 | A Yes. |
| 10 | Q Same page we were on earlier. |
| 11 | The first bullet point says position MBS |
| 12 | solutions in GSM accounts when these solutions meet |
| 13 | customer's needs. Do you see that? |
| 14 | A Uh-huh. |
| 15 | Q Do you have an understanding of what that |
| 16 | means, sir? |
| 17 | A My understanding is that when a large |
| 18 | corporation is looking for a mid market solution to |
| 19 | service some of their remote locations and small |
| 20 | division subsidiary location needs, that we would |
| 21 | entertain the discussion with those GSM accounts in |
| 22 | order to provide our product demonstrations through |
| 23 | partners to have them evaluate it. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00079 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Q Did the Microsoft U.S. corporate accounts |
| 25 | space and GSM account managers have a quota for |
| 00080 |
| 1 | Microsoft Business Solution products in fiscal year |
| 2 | '04? |
| 3 | A No. |
| 4 | Q Do they currently? |
| 5 | A They were assigned a quota at a MS U.S. CAS |
| 6 | level, which was based on a team base quota for the |
| 7 | entire geography for CAS. No GSM quota was assigned. |
| 8 | Q What was the CAS quota if you recall? |
| 9 | A It -- it differed based on various |
| 10 | geographies and the amount of corporate accounts that |
| 11 | were present in, and as well as the existing accounts |
| 12 | that were generating some maintenance revenues and |
| 13 | some other factors. |
| 14 | Q What is a sales quota? |
| 15 | A It's an objective by which a salesperson is |
| 16 | measured by. |
| 17 | Q Is it fair to say that the Microsoft U.S. |
| 18 | CAS salespeople needed to sell a certain amount of |
| 19 | Microsoft Business Solution products in order to meet |
| 20 | their quota? |
| 21 | A The Microsoft CAS salespeople worked closely |
| 22 | with the SSP and the partners within the district that |
| 23 | they identified to generate opportunities and revenues |
| 24 | in MBS within the geographic district. It was a |
| 25 | team-based quota such that the total district was |
| 00081 |
| 1 | responsible for generating a specific team-based |
| 2 | number, of which the entire team participated in |
| 3 | evangelizing MBS to customers and to partners and to |
| 4 | just in general seminar participations and such that |
| 5 | Microsoft Business Solutions had these divisional-type |
| 6 | of spoke solutions for companies that were evaluating |
| 7 | that kind of opportunity. |
| 8 | Q So is it fair to say that each of the 17 |
| 9 | geographies had a quota for Microsoft Business |
| 10 | Solution software products? |
| 11 | A Yes. |
| 12 | Q And the quota would vary depending upon how |
| 13 | many CAS accounts were within the particular region? |
| 14 | A Correct. |
| 15 | Q And the salespeople were measured by the |
| 16 | sales of Microsoft Business Solution products to the |
| 17 | CAS accounts within the region? |
| 18 | A CAS accounts and where appropriate, we would |
| 19 | provide coverage to certain industry accounts and GSM |
| 20 | accounts. As shareholders of the company, we wanted |
| 21 | to make sure those accounts, if there was a fit that |
| 22 | arose, that we were servicing those accounts from a |
| 23 | satisfaction point of view. But the quotas, the |
| 24 | focus, the marketing was all derived and dedicated at |
| 25 | the CAS space accounts. |
| 00082 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Q Sure. I'm trying to figure out, I believe |
| 7 | you said that if there was an appropriate fit within |
| 8 | the GSM, within the GSM space, if some vertical |
| 9 | specialist brought some sort of GSM opportunity that |
| 10 | people believed was appropriate, that that would be |
| 11 | pursued by the CAS salespeople? |
| 12 | A No. Let me clarify that. If as an example |
| 13 | Deloitte and Touche came in and said, we have a number |
| 14 | of Navision locations. We want to talk to Microsoft |
| 15 | about setting up an executive briefing. The Microsoft |
| 16 | Business Solution representative in the geography |
| 17 | where Deloitte and Touche resides would assist the |
| 18 | Microsoft GSM rep in setting up the appropriate |
| 19 | resources and presentations and partners that could |
| 20 | assist Deloitte in finding out the information they |
| 21 | were looking for. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00085 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Q And Axapta, what's the target market of |
| 11 | Axapta? |
| 12 | A Axapta, as I mentioned earlier, is a product |
| 13 | that is targeted at manufacturing-based companies, |
| 14 | companies with manufacturing functionality, and some |
| 15 | of the international location from a spoke perspective |
| 16 | where a company needs international divisions or |
| 17 | locations that could be fulfilled by Axapta. |
| 18 | Q Is Axapta targeted at companies with up to a |
| 19 | billion dollars a year in annual revenue? |
| 20 | A That's possible, depending on the complexity |
| 21 | of the organization or the number of users or |
| 22 | employees, or it really depends on the complexity. |
| 23 | Q Is it targeted at corporate accounts-based |
| 24 | customers? |
| 25 | A If, if the requirements and the partners |
| 00086 |
| 1 | believe Axapta would be a strong fit, yes. |
| 2 | Q And you mentioned earlier a company called |
| 3 | Esselte? |
| 4 | A Yes. |
| 5 | Q Are you familiar with that company? |
| 6 | A Yes, a little bit. |
| 7 | Q And Axapta is being implemented in that |
| 8 | company, right? |
| 9 | A Yes. |
| 10 | Q And when did that implementation start? |
| 11 | A The licensing of the Axapta product to |
| 12 | Esselte took place in June of 2003. |
| 13 | Q And is Axapta currently been implemented at |
| 14 | Esselte? |
| 15 | A To my knowledge it is, yes. |
| 16 | Q And is it being implemented across the |
| 17 | world? |
| 18 | A To my knowledge there are international |
| 19 | locations. I don't know about around the world. |
| 20 | Q What international locations are you |
| 21 | familiar with at Esselte? |
| 22 | A I'm not particularly privy to any particular |
| 23 | ones. |
| 24 | Q Is Axapta being implemented in the United |
| 25 | States for Esselte? |
| 00087 |
| 1 | A I don't recall. |
| 2 | Q Do you know -- do you know how many |
| 3 | employees Esselte has? |
| 4 | A I know that Esselte is looking at rolling |
| 5 | out approximately 15 different locations, or we |
| 6 | licensed the product to accommodate for up to 15 |
| 7 | locations of use of the Axapta product which could |
| 8 | accommodate as many 3,000 users. It also -- you know, |
| 9 | all across those 15 locations. It's really up to |
| 10 | Esselte how they're deploying it. I'm not privy to |
| 11 | how -- what the latest status is. |
| 12 | Q Can Axapta support up to over 3,000 users? |
| 13 | A Up to 15 locations I believe that there's a |
| 14 | good possibility that it can support those users. |
| 15 | Q You sold it Esselte based on the fact that |
| 16 | it could support that many users over that many |
| 17 | locations, correct? |
| 18 | A Correct. |
| 19 | Q And -- |
| 20 | A But this is a situation where Esselte is |
| 21 | going to be, just as clarification point, we are not |
| 22 | looking at one 3,000-user system. We're looking at 15 |
| 23 | systems with maybe 200 users at a maximum stretched |
| 24 | out over those 15 locations. |
| 25 | |
| 00088 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Q And it's your understanding Axapta is being |
| 20 | implemented at 15 different locations across Esselte? |
| 21 | A It's my understanding that the license |
| 22 | accommodated for Esselte to have the opportunity to |
| 23 | implement Axapta to up to 15 locations for 3,000 |
| 24 | users. |
| 25 | Q And how many -- |
| 00089 |
| 1 | A But I don't know how they're going to |
| 2 | actually deploy the product, or if they are currently |
| 3 | implementing all 15, or one at a time. I'm not privy |
| 4 | to that information. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00091 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | Q Do you have a recollection or an | |
| 6 | understanding of the amount of consulting revenue that | |
| 7 | Microsoft expects to receive or has received from | |
| 8 | Esselte? | |
| 9 | A In the initial review, we were looking at | |
| 10 | somewhere in excess of $ in consulting | REDACTED |
| 11 | revenue associated with billable services to Esselte, | |
| 12 | but I have no information on what is actually billed | |
| 13 | to the client or what is the current, current status | |
| 14 | of that. | |
| 15 | Q But the projections were for more than $ | REDACTED |
| 16 | in consulting revenue? | REDACTED |
| 17 | A Associated with the project, that's correct. | |
| 18 | Q Do you know whether Microsoft gave Esselte | |
| 19 | any discount off any the list price for the Axapta | |
| 20 | product? | |
| 21 | A I believe that based on the commitments of | |
| 22 | our larger clients, there are discount processes that | |
| 23 | were set up to accommodate Esselte, which I believe | |
| 24 | they did qualify for, yes. | |
| 25 | | |
| 00092 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Q I'd like you to take a look at what's |
| 19 | previously been marked as Exhibit 1420. |
| 20 | A (Reviewing.) |
| 21 | I'm familiar with this. |
| 22 | Q You've seen Exhibit 1420 before? |
| 23 | A Yes. |
| 24 | Q What is Exhibit 1420, sir? |
| 25 | A This Exhibit originally started out as a, as |
| 00093 |
| 1 | a partner request from -- for a press release. The |
| 2 | partner was asking us to provide just the approval to |
| 3 | allow them to tout what, at the time and still is, the |
| 4 | largest single Microsoft Business Solution sales |
| 5 | opportunity, and then we took this and posted it |
| 6 | actually on our web. |
| 7 | Q So Exhibit 1420 is posted on the Microsoft |
| 8 | web site? |
| 9 | A From what I can see here, it is the |
| 10 | Microsoft Business Solutions web site that's listed |
| 11 | here. |
| 12 | Q And Exhibit 1420 concerns the sale of |
| 13 | Microsoft Business Solutions Axapta to Esselte? |
| 14 | A Yes. |
| 15 | Q And it's titled Billion Dollar Manufacturer |
| 16 | To Deploy Microsoft Business Solution System Across |
| 17 | Four Continents. Do you see that? |
| 18 | A Yes. |
| 19 | Q And it refers to support -- Microsoft Axapta |
| 20 | supporting 3,000 concurrent users in their daily work. |
| 21 | Do you see that? |
| 22 | A Yes, I see that. |
| 23 | Q Is it your understanding that Microsoft |
| 24 | Axapta will support 3,000 concurrent users in their |
| 25 | daily work at Esselte? |
| 00094 |
| 1 | A It will not support 3,000 concurrent users |
| 2 | on a single implementation or system. The |
| 3 | clarification on the 3,000 concurrent users as we |
| 4 | discussed is that we licensed the product to run 3,000 |
| 5 | users over 15 installation -- over 15 implementation |
| 6 | sites with the idea that we would not exceed two to |
| 7 | 300 users at any particular one instance. |
| 8 | Q And do you have an understanding concerning |
| 9 | whether the statement that Esselte's a billion-dollar |
| 10 | manufacturer is accurate? |
| 11 | A I believe that's accurate. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Q And you are, you are quoted in Exhibit 1420, |
| 19 | correct? |
| 20 | A My name appears here as, under this quote, |
| 21 | that's correct. But I -- a partner wrote this on my |
| 22 | behalf. We reviewed it, sent it to our internal |
| 23 | public relations folks for draft. I did change the -- |
| 24 | I wrote the first sentence which states, we're excited |
| 25 | to work with our partners to deliver a comprehensive |
| 00095 |
| 1 | solution that truly meets the needs of Esselte's |
| 2 | business. The second part of that question was not |
| 3 | something I wrote, but wound up sending through the |
| 4 | process for approval and it was published. |
| 5 | Q So you reviewed what the partner provided to |
| 6 | you? |
| 7 | A That's correct. |
| 8 | Q And you agreed with it and approved it? |
| 9 | A I don't agree with it in the way it's worded |
| 10 | here. I did pass it on for approval, but I think this |
| 11 | is an example of perhaps a little overzealous reaction |
| 12 | to the Esselte sale. And also, when the deal took |
| 13 | place in June and when this was published, the |
| 14 | organization had changed dramatically and people were |
| 15 | in completely different roles in September of 2003. |
| 16 | So that this one sort of got through the process |
| 17 | without maybe going through some of the review it |
| 18 | should have gone through. But there was a change in |
| 19 | our public relations department, there was a change in |
| 20 | my job, there was a change in the partner, you know, |
| 21 | sort of publishing this release for -- and then our |
| 22 | using it internally. |
| 23 | Q But you reviewed it and -- |
| 24 | A I do recall reviewing this statement and |
| 25 | passing it on to public relations for their drafting. |
| 00096 |
| 1 | Q And the statement you're referring to is |
| 2 | this is a great example of how Microsoft Axapta can |
| 3 | scale to meet even the most complex requirements of |
| 4 | billion-dollar manufacturing businesses operating in |
| 5 | multiple countries around the world? |
| 6 | A I don't believe that is a -- that could be |
| 7 | interpreted as a misleading example of -- |
| 8 | Q Have you asked that the Microsoft web site |
| 9 | be corrected to -- so that this, this customer example |
| 10 | is changed? |
| 11 | A No, I've not. |
| 12 | Q Are there any plans to change it? |
| 13 | A Yes. |
| 14 | Q When is it going to be changed? |
| 15 | A As soon as I can. |
| 16 | Q What's it going to say? |
| 17 | A I think this is a great example of how |
| 18 | Microsoft Axapta can meet complex requirements. I |
| 19 | mean this, this particular sentence gives the |
| 20 | impression that Microsoft Business Solutions is, is |
| 21 | meeting a very complex sort of large billion-dollar |
| 22 | manufacturing corporation, when in effect what we're |
| 23 | actually doing is licensing of a product to be used in |
| 24 | 15 remote locations -- |
| 25 | Q But that's -- |
| 00097 |
| 1 | A -- 200 users, and using very valuable |
| 2 | partners to deliver on some of this complex |
| 3 | functionality. |
| 4 | Q So the functionality is complex in Axapta, |
| 5 | right? |
| 6 | A The complex -- the functionality that's |
| 7 | being delivered to, to the Esselte account could not |
| 8 | be delivered solely through Axapta. |
| 9 | Q Because partners are adding value from -- |
| 10 | A Partners are adding specific products to the |
| 11 | customer, as well as third-party partners have -- it's |
| 12 | referenced here that Microsoft Axapta functionality |
| 13 | with lean manufacturing module offered by eBECS. |
| 14 | EBECS is a third party ISV product that the company is |
| 15 | going to use for a majority of their manufacturing. A |
| 16 | majority of their manufacturing in Esselte will not |
| 17 | even be done through Axapta, nor could it be done |
| 18 | through Axapta. But -- |
| 19 | Q So there was a gap, and the partners are |
| 20 | filling the gap, right? |
| 21 | A There is a gap, and the customer has decided |
| 22 | to allow a -- to evaluate and allow a third-party |
| 23 | product to do manufacturing functionality that is not |
| 24 | currently present or planned to be present in the |
| 25 | Axapta product. |
| 00098 |
| 1 | Q And the Deloittes and the Bearing Points of |
| 2 | the would do gap analyses concerning SAP products, |
| 3 | right? |
| 4 | A I would assume so, sure. |
| 5 | Q And they have to figure out ways to get from |
| 6 | 75 or 80 percent fulfilling the client's functional |
| 7 | needs to as much as the client wants, right? |
| 8 | A If they're contracted to do that. But in |
| 9 | this particular case, we have a client that's in the, |
| 10 | in the marketplace. Most customers would -- are |
| 11 | looking for -- very complex customers would not settle |
| 12 | for an Axapta product that didn't have all of the |
| 13 | functionality delivered in its entirety. In this |
| 14 | particular case, because we're rolling it out over 15 |
| 15 | or 20 locations at a very small user level, the client |
| 16 | were willing and familiar to use a third-party product |
| 17 | to conduct a majority of its manufacturing |
| 18 | functionality. |
| 19 | Q So Esselte decided that because of its |
| 20 | business structure, it could meet its needs through |
| 21 | Axapta, right? |
| 22 | A Esselte determined that while Axapta -- that |
| 23 | Axapta would be a fit for the divisional locations for |
| 24 | the planned -- or the potential 15 rollout sites only |
| 25 | if it could supplement that product through a third- |
| 00099 |
| 1 | party decision that it determined it could make based |
| 2 | on its organizational structure. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00100 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Q If I can get you to turn back for a moment |
| 6 | to what's been marked as Exhibit 1449, and still on |
| 7 | Page 4151, the page we were looking at before lunch. |
| 8 | And the portion of that page which is the box entitled |
| 9 | MBS Positioning. |
| 10 | A Yes. |
| 11 | Q We talked about corporate, we spent a little |
| 12 | bit of time talking about the corporation portion of |
| 13 | that graph. And above is major, and above that is |
| 14 | global and strategic. Do you see that? |
| 15 | A Yes. |
| 16 | Q And then the bubble to the right of that |
| 17 | says Microsoft value delivered by hub and spoke |
| 18 | integrated and distributed solutions. Do you see |
| 19 | that? |
| 20 | A Yes. |
| 21 | Q Do you have an understanding of what an |
| 22 | integrated solution that Microsoft Business Solutions |
| 23 | might provide to the global, strategic, major space |
| 24 | might be? |
| 25 | A I don't have specific definitions involved |
| 00101 |
| 1 | with what an integrated solution is. |
| 2 | Q How about a distributed solution? |
| 3 | A Don't know what Mr. Malme was driving here |
| 4 | as well. |
| 5 | Q Is a distributed solution a situation like |
| 6 | Esselte in which Esselte is implementing, or the |
| 7 | client is implementing various versions of Axapta |
| 8 | around the world? |
| 9 | A It's my understanding Esselte is |
| 10 | implementing various implementations of Axapta in |
| 11 | individual locations around the world. |
| 12 | Q Okay. And is that a distributed solution? |
| 13 | A I don't know if it qualifies for what you |
| 14 | describe as distributed. |
| 15 | Q Do you have an understanding based upon your |
| 16 | years at SAP and at Microsoft concerning what a |
| 17 | distributed solution business application solution is? |
| 18 | A My understanding of a centralized versus a |
| 19 | distributed environment allow a customer to look at a |
| 20 | central location where all processing is achieved for |
| 21 | the total corporation versus one in which they may |
| 22 | install one or multiple different vendor solutions at |
| 23 | other locations around the world; the second one being |
| 24 | distributing the systems to other locations. |
| 25 | Q And based on your experience, do some |
| 00102 |
| 1 | corporations choose a distributed model as opposed to |
| 2 | a centralized model? |
| 3 | A Some corporations are organized in a fashion |
| 4 | that would accommodate a distributed solution, |
| 5 | although I've never met a client that organizes its |
| 6 | company or its software -- or organizes its company |
| 7 | around a software or a business solution. |
| 8 | Q But they -- the company may be set up in a |
| 9 | way that that can be addressed by a distributed |
| 10 | solution? |
| 11 | A I think the company is set up prior to any, |
| 12 | any solution being -- |
| 13 | Q Sure. |
| 14 | A -- being brought to, to evaluate. |
| 15 | Q Absolutely. Absolutely. What I'm trying to |
| 16 | figure out is, the company -- you're talking about |
| 17 | companies which are organized in a certain way, and |
| 18 | those kind of companies, I think you your testimony |
| 19 | is, that a distributed solution might be appropriate |
| 20 | for those companies? |
| 21 | A A company which is organized in such a way |
| 22 | where they have small and medium size divisions, |
| 23 | organizations, independent business units that they |
| 24 | own and operate or are a controlling interest of in |
| 25 | many cases can use our products in that environment. |
| 00104 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | A |
| 4 | Q What about a hub and spoke solution, what is |
| 5 | that? |
| 6 | A A hub and spoke solution is really the, the |
| 7 | focus that we've been describing where Microsoft |
| 8 | Business Solutions is positioned in all of these |
| 9 | sectors, corporate, major, strategic, global, as being |
| 10 | a spoke in an operation that traditionally would |
| 11 | communicate with a large Tier 1-type of solution at a |
| 12 | main headquarters or major manufacturing facility |
| 13 | where it's either not cost-effective or in certain |
| 14 | situations, not technically feasible to implement a |
| 15 | large complex solution in an organization which would |
| 16 | be overkill in a very small division or department. |
| 17 | So in looking at these spokes, traditionally |
| 18 | they're being maintained today by many different |
| 19 | general ledgers and financial accounting system, many |
| 20 | of those vendors being out of business for many years, |
| 21 | off support, and Microsoft Business Solution is really |
| 22 | looking to, to offer a standard operating solution for |
| 23 | those small spokes that are out surrounding the major |
| 24 | hub location for that company. |
| 25 | Q And in the corporate account space, can |
| 00105 |
| 1 | Microsoft Business Solutions Axapta, for instance, |
| 2 | serve as the hub ERP product? |
| 3 | A In the corporate accounts space, it is -- |
| 4 | depends on the complexity of the account, the number |
| 5 | of users, the size of the business, the business |
| 6 | processes that they're looking to implement. |
| 7 | Q How many -- |
| 8 | A Traditionally we don't target the hub |
| 9 | location as our business. |
| 10 | Q How many users can Axapta accommodate? |
| 11 | A I don't know the specifics on the |
| 12 | benchmarking on absolute, and it would depend again on |
| 13 | the particular business process that was being |
| 14 | implemented at the customer that would impact the |
| 15 | benchmarking of what it could and could not support. |
| 16 | Q Are you aware that Axapta has been |
| 17 | benchmarked at 3900 users? |
| 18 | A I've read materials based on one particular |
| 19 | business process that was, was benchmarked, although I |
| 20 | don't believe the statistics based in what I've seen |
| 21 | in real-life situations for some of the customers. |
| 22 | Q Are you aware of any Axapta users who have |
| 23 | more than, more than 1,000 concurrent users at the |
| 24 | moment? |
| 25 | A No, I'm not. |
| 00106 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Q Going back to Exhibit 1420, the piece from |
| 8 | the Microsoft web site entitled Billion Dollar |
| 9 | Manufacturer To Deploy Microsoft Business Solution |
| 10 | System Across Four Continents, and going back to your |
| 11 | quote at the bottom of the first page of Exhibit 1420. |
| 12 | A Yes. |
| 13 | Q Can Axapta scale to meet the most complex |
| 14 | requirements of billion-dollar manufacturing |
| 15 | companies? |
| 16 | A I don't believe that statement is accurate, |
| 17 | and I don't think that is neither the public, nor the |
| 18 | internal intent of our target markets or where we're |
| 19 | going after marketing for Axapta or supporting Axapta. |
| 20 | Q Well, I understand it may not be your target |
| 21 | market, but Axapta is -- was purchased by Esselte to |
| 22 | operate across four continents, right? |
| 23 | A Esselte licensed the product to operate in |
| 24 | up to 15 locations for 3,000 users. It was -- the |
| 25 | complexity of large manufacturing accounts extends |
| 00107 |
| 1 | beyond numbers of users or business process. We are |
| 2 | not really geared from a product functionality point |
| 3 | of view to handle tremendously complex manufacturing. |
| 4 | As I stated earlier for the record, this would not be |
| 5 | an account we could offer satisfaction to without |
| 6 | them, Esselte, making a decision consciously to do |
| 7 | most of their manufacturing through the third-party |
| 8 | product eBECS. So Axapta is not scalable to meet the |
| 9 | most complex business requirements. |
| 10 | Q But it is in conjunction with the eBECS |
| 11 | product, right? |
| 12 | A For the Esselte situation they believe that |
| 13 | it would provide the functionality that they're |
| 14 | willing to accept and implement to meet their |
| 15 | particular needs, which they believe are complex, the |
| 16 | partner believes are complex, but in general, I -- |
| 17 | I -- again to answer your question, the Axapta product |
| 18 | as it stands is not geared to meet complex business |
| 19 | requirements of complex manufacturing. |
| 20 | Q There are a variety of independent software |
| 21 | vendors who sell products that are complimentary with |
| 22 | Axapta, right? Like the eBECS solution? |
| 23 | A Yes, there's a variety of ISVs that work |
| 24 | with our products, with Oracle, with SAP, with |
| 25 | PeopleSoft, correct. |
| 00108 |
| 1 | Q And the eBECS product, that works with |
| 2 | Axapta? |
| 3 | A The eBECS product is a niche manufacturing |
| 4 | for lean software that works in conjunction with our |
| 5 | Axapta product, yes. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00112 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Q Now, can you tell me, what is Convergence? |
| 23 | A Convergence is Microsoft Business |
| 24 | Solutions's annual user conference held for the past |
| 25 | few years in Orlando, Florida. It's a session by |
| 00113 |
| 1 | which users can exchange ideas and set up networking | |
| 2 | with each other. It's an educational session where | |
| 3 | executives and leaders from Microsoft and Microsoft | |
| 4 | Business Solutions present strategy, visioning, | |
| 5 | individual meetings with customers to thank them for | |
| 6 | business and to understand their strategy as a | |
| 7 | business, see where Microsoft can help. | |
| 8 | Q Now, is this a Microsoft conference or | |
| 9 | Microsoft Business Solutions conference? | |
| 10 | A It's traditionally been a Microsoft Business | |
| 11 | Solution conference. This year there was more of a | |
| 12 | presence of some of the Microsoft Technology, as well | |
| 13 | as the Microsoft Business Solutions. It's targeted at | |
| 14 | Microsoft Business Solution clients. | |
| 15 | Q And it took place in this March in Orlando? | |
| 16 | A March 2004 in Orlando. | |
| 17 | Q And did you meet any corporate account space | |
| 18 | or GSM customers at Convergence? | |
| 19 | A Yes. | |
| 20 | Q Do you recall who you -- with whom you met? | |
| 21 | A I'm trying to think. | |
| 22 | I met with which is a CAS | REDACTED |
| 23 | customer; I met with Bound Global, I met with Chanel, | |
| 24 | I met with -- they're not a CAS customer, but | |
| 25 | I think -- those are the ones I can recall offhand. | REDACTED |
| 00118 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | Q And you recall meeting with | REDACTED |
| 20 | Corporation at Convergence in March of this year? | |
| 21 | A Yes. We had a dinner meeting where I had | |
| 22 | the opportunity to interact with them and a brief | |
| 23 | offline conversation for five or ten minutes with the | |
| 24 | gentleman that attended. | |
| 25 | | |
| 00120 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | Q Do you have an understanding that Miss | |
| 19 | Tudela was attempting to sell Corporation | REDACTED |
| 20 | Axapta for use in Mexico, Australia and Honduras? | |
| 21 | A There were, there were three separate | |
| 22 | evaluations going on with two separate partners in | |
| 23 | Honduras, Mexico and Australia, and the company asked | |
| 24 | for us to get involved and tell us more about the | |
| 25 | product offering because three of their divisions were | |
| 00121 |
| 1 | reporting in that it was a very attractive product for | |
| 2 | their independent business units. And those are the | |
| 3 | three I believe Miss Tudela was really focusing on as | |
| 4 | part of this visit by the client. | |
| 5 | Q And is -- does Axapta have functionality to | |
| 6 | support operations in Mexico, Australia and Honduras? | |
| 7 | A We have partners in each of those areas | |
| 8 | that, that are able -- that have the ability to | |
| 9 | implement the Axapta product in those three locations, | |
| 10 | that's correct. | |
| 11 | Q And the -- either the Axapta product or | |
| 12 | through partners has the localizations necessary for | |
| 13 | Mexico, Australia and Honduras? | |
| 14 | A I'm not positive how that's, how that's | |
| 15 | attained. | |
| 16 | Q Miss Tudela says that she's hoping to widen | |
| 17 | the scope worldwide. Do you see that? | |
| 18 | A Yes. | |
| 19 | Q And then she says, this is the objective? | |
| 20 | A Yes. | |
| 21 | Q Do you have an understanding concerning | |
| 22 | whether Miss Tudela wanted to sell Axapta to | REDACTED |
| 23 | Corporation on a worldwide basis? | |
| 24 | A After the briefing document and | |
| 25 | conversations with Miss Tudela, we discussed that | |
| 00122 |
| 1 | there are many locations that have a common separation | |
| 2 | that is exhibited in Honduras, Mexico and Australia | |
| 3 | that would also be potential opportunities for the | |
| 4 | future should we be successful in these other remote | |
| 5 | locations. It was her intent to prove that through | |
| 6 | successful implementations of those, that we could | |
| 7 | have the opportunity to be evaluated for those other | |
| 8 | locations as well. | |
| 9 | Q What other locations was she referring to? | |
| 10 | A I don't have specific knowledge of where, | |
| 11 | where and how many there are. | |
| 12 | Q Locations inside the United States? | |
| 13 | A There are some locations in the United | |
| 14 | States, yes. | |
| 15 | Q And your understanding is | REDACTED |
| 16 | Corporation is headquartered in Alabama? | |
| 17 | A Yes. | |
| 18 | Q If you rum to Page 8748 of Exhibit 1450, | |
| 19 | sir. | |
| 20 | is a page entitled | REDACTED |
| 21 | Participant Profile, correct? | |
| 22 | A Yes. | |
| 23 | Q And it says current scope ERP Axapta | |
| 24 | opportunity for Mexico, Australia and Honduras? | |
| 25 | A Yes. | |
| 00123 |
| 1 | Q That's consistent from your understanding | |
| 2 | your discussions with Miss Tudela? | |
| 3 | A Yes. | |
| 4 | Q And also with Corporation? | REDACTED |
| 5 | A From conversations with Corporation, | REDACTED |
| 6 | that's correct, Mexico, Australia and Honduras | |
| 7 | locations. | |
| 8 | Q And potential scope includes ERP Axapta | |
| 9 | worldwide to include U.S. subsidiaries? | |
| 10 | A Potential scope is an optimistic | |
| 11 | representation of what the total opportunity would be | |
| 12 | on a worldwide, multilocation basis should | REDACTED |
| 13 | Corporation say, we want all of our remote locations | |
| 14 | to install the Axapta product line. | |
| 15 | Q And it's 2000 to 2500 users is the potential | |
| 16 | scope? | |
| 17 | A It appears that that's the estimate that's | |
| 18 | currently in this document listed out over multiple -- | |
| 19 | five different divisions, and I'm unsure -- five | |
| 20 | different lines of business, five different divisions, | |
| 21 | and I'm not sure exactly how many locations that would | |
| 22 | represent on a worldwide basis. There are five | |
| 23 | separate business divisions that operate autonomously. | |
| 24 | Q Inside ? | REDACTED |
| 25 | A Yes. | |
| 00124 |
| 1 | Q So this is another company that's organized | |
| 2 | in sort of a distributed fashion? | |
| 3 | A It would be , the | REDACTED |
| 4 | ones that are listed here, , | REDACTED |
| 5 | being the one that's probably the | REDACTED |
| 6 | most well-known. | |
| 7 | Q And according to Miss Tudela's summary | |
| 8 | report to you on in advance of Convergence, | REDACTED |
| 9 | has over a billion dollars in annual sales? | REDACTED |
| 10 | A That's what appears here. | |
| 11 | Q And more than 15,000 employees worldwide? | |
| 12 | A That's what appears here as well. | |
| 13 | Q And did you have any discussions with | |
| 14 | about -- Corporation about | REDACTED |
| 15 | implementing Axapta ERP on a worldwide basis? | |
| 16 | A We certainly -- actually had brought | REDACTED |
| 17 | up to us that they would like to find a way to get | |
| 18 | their other divisions up with a more standard sort of | |
| 19 | solution offering potentially with Microsoft, but | |
| 20 | they're also evaluating many different other vendors | |
| 21 | as well. | |
| 22 | Q What other vendors? | |
| 23 | A They're looking at, I believe it's J.D. | |
| 24 | Edwards, they're looking at -- other than J.D. Edwards | |
| 25 | I'm not sure exactly all the different vendors they're | |
| 00125 |
| 1 | looking at. |
| 2 | Q J.D. Edwards has been acquired by |
| 3 | PeopleSoft? |
| 4 | A That's right. |
| 5 | Q So they're looking at PeopleSoft; is that |
| 6 | fair? |
| 7 | A It's fair to say that, yes. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00126 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | Q And do you have an understanding from your | |
| 9 | conversations with where they were interested | REDACTED |
| 10 | in potentially implementing Axapta, Axapta in the long | |
| 11 | term? | |
| 12 | A We focused on Mexico, Australia and | |
| 13 | Honduras. | |
| 14 | Q Did you have any discussions about | |
| 15 | implementing it worldwide, including the U.S. | |
| 16 | subsidiaries? | |
| 17 | A It was mentioned in their system overview of | |
| 18 | their organization structure that there would be other | |
| 19 | remote opportunities that are running older | |
| 20 | Legacy-based systems that were not supported anymore. | |
| 21 | Q When you say remote opportunities what do | |
| 22 | you mean? | |
| 23 | A Distributed divisions of one of these five | |
| 24 | business units, independent operating sort of | |
| 25 | remote -- more of the spoke examples we mentioned | |
| 00127 |
| 1 | earlier where they have a plant or a factory in a | |
| 2 | remote location that provides either strictly | |
| 3 | manufacturing or strictly distribution or strictly | |
| 4 | warehousing to service some of these particular | |
| 5 | business units. | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | Q Now, the estimated value of the sale | REDACTED |
| 21 | to the MBS ecosystem is listed at to $ | REDACTED |
| 22 | Axapta worldwide, right? | |
| 23 | A That's what I read here, yes. | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 00132 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | Q Did you have any discussions with | REDACTED |
| 19 | about deploying a hub and spoke system in which | |
| 20 | everything was going to be Axapta? | |
| 21 | A At the spoke level we have been having | |
| 22 | conversations about having an Axapta spokes around a | |
| 23 | centralized hub. | |
| 24 | Q And did you have any discussions with | |
| 25 | that -- concerning having Axapta as the | REDACTED |
| 00133 |
| 1 | centralized hub? |
| 2 | A No, we've not. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | | 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00134 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | Q So at Indianapolis Motor Speedway they've | |
| 14 | implemented Great Plains as the hub? | |
| 15 | A They have one location, one operation, so -- | |
| 16 | there are no real spokes. So it's one implementation. | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | Q What did you tell Corporation about | REDACTED |
| 25 | the Axapta product when you met with them? | |
| 00135 |
| 1 | A They were, they were interested in our | |
| 2 | investment strategy around Axapta, where we were | |
| 3 | positioning the Axapta product, how it was working in | |
| 4 | the hub and spoke model, what divisions of | |
| 5 | international companies had deployed Axapta | |
| 6 | successfully in remote operations operating in a | |
| 7 | spoke-type environment. We talked about partner | |
| 8 | selection and how Microsoft supports its partners in | |
| 9 | delivering those solutions, how we were working | |
| 10 | closely with their two partners that they had been | |
| 11 | engaged with so far. | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | Q Do you recall what sort of functionality | |
| 23 | Corporation was interested in in Axapta? | REDACTED |
| 24 | A Core financial systems operating in Mexico, | |
| 25 | Australia, and Honduras. | |
| 00136 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Q What do you recall about the business |
| 18 | processes at the various locations? |
| 19 | A Pretty straightforward single location |
| 20 | processes, core financial functionality added to some |
| 21 | basic inventory and storage-type requirements. |
| 22 | Q How was the information going to be |
| 23 | transmitted from Honduras, Australia and Mexico to |
| 24 | Alabama? |
| 25 | A I don't have specific knowledge of that. |
| 00137 |
| 1 | And just as a point of clarity, the hundred | |
| 2 | users that were allocated for Honduras, Mexico and | |
| 3 | Australia were split among those three locations. | |
| 4 | Q So 33 users or so each? | |
| 5 | A Approximately, yes, at the most. | |
| 6 | And nothing has been finalized with | REDACTED |
| 7 | as a corporation, so they are not a current MBS user. | |
| 8 | Q They're still a prospective client? | |
| 9 | A Correct. | |
| 10 | Q And what about the 2,000 to 2500 users | |
| 11 | that's in the potential scope according to Miss | |
| 12 | Tudela, how are those distributed, do you know? | |
| 13 | A Don't know specifics. | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 00142 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Q Do you have an understanding of why Mr. |
| 12 | Wagner wanted to brief you on the prospects that he |
| 13 | was entertaining at dinner at the Convergence |
| 14 | conference? |
| 15 | A Peter and I discussed using the Microsoft |
| 16 | Business Solution event at Convergence as a way by |
| 17 | which he can introduce some of his largest clients |
| 18 | within the region to what Microsoft Business Solutions |
| 19 | is, what the products are, what the strategies are, |
| 20 | chance to listen to keynote executives. In many cases |
| 21 | we bring key clients that have never heard of |
| 22 | Microsoft Business Solutions to these kind of events |
| 23 | for information purpose so they can gather data about |
| 24 | who we are and what we do. In this particular case, |
| 25 | I've not heard, met, or seen anything further about |
| 00143 |
| 1 | that I can recall since the original E-mail | REDACTED |
| 2 | came out. | |
| 3 | Q Mr. Wagner's E-mail says that is a | REDACTED |
| 4 | global leading textile manufacturer with 15,000 | |
| 5 | employees, right? | |
| 6 | A That's what it says yes. | |
| 7 | Q Plus 1,000 consecutive user Axapta | |
| 8 | opportunity? | |
| 9 | A I believe that stands for concurrent. | |
| 10 | Q So over 1,000 concurrent users Axapta | |
| 11 | opportunities is what represents to Mr. | REDACTED |
| 12 | Wagner at least? | |
| 13 | A I'm not specifically sure how many | |
| 14 | locations, how many divisions, how many departments, | |
| 15 | how many separate subsidiaries or independent business | |
| 16 | units could be made up within , but he is | REDACTED |
| 17 | stating here from his estimating purposes that's the | |
| 18 | kind of opportunity that he presents. | |
| 19 | Q And you've never had any discussions with | |
| 20 | Mr. Wagner about the opportunity? | REDACTED |
| 21 | A It has not risen to my attention as an | |
| 22 | account that he has asked me to participate in | |
| 23 | personally. | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 00145 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | Q How about , are you familiar | REDACTED |
| 3 | with them? | |
| 4 | A I've, I've heard the name, and I've met them | |
| 5 | in a previous meeting. | |
| 6 | Q And where was this previous meeting? | |
| 7 | A In Chicago, at a Microsoft Business Solution | |
| 8 | event. It was a seminar that was held. | |
| 9 | Q In January of 2003? | |
| 10 | A It was at a particular event where Steve | |
| 11 | Ballmer came into Chicago for meetings with some of | |
| 12 | our key partners and key clients in the Chicago area. | |
| 13 | If that's what you're referring to -- | |
| 14 | Q That is. | |
| 15 | A -- that is the meeting, yes. | |
| 16 | Q And Mr. Burgum was also there? | |
| 17 | A Yes. | |
| 18 | Q Did you meet with at that | REDACTED |
| 19 | meeting in Chicago? | |
| 20 | A I met with them individually over coffee, | |
| 21 | but did not have a formal meeting with | REDACTED |
| 22 | Q Did Mr. Ballmer meet with them? | |
| 23 | A I don't recall. | |
| 24 | Q What did you learn about | REDACTED |
| 25 | software needs at the meeting in Chicago? | |
| 00146 |
| 1 | A , for the conversations I had, | REDACTED |
| 2 | was looking to find a way to simplify they business, | |
| 3 | to reduce the number of business processes, to look at | |
| 4 | ways by which they could standardized around an | |
| 5 | easier-to-use, simpler system on some of their | |
| 6 | locations and divisions around the United States and | |
| 7 | around the world. | |
| 8 | Q Now, now, I think, an eight or | REDACTED |
| 9 | $9 billion a year company? | |
| 10 | A I think we were talking to a very -- a much | |
| 11 | smaller piece of that that specialized in some of the | |
| 12 | exhausts and brakes and some of the other things I | |
| 13 | think that they do in aftermarket. | |
| 14 | Q Is that ? | REDACTED |
| 15 | A It says that here, although I can't | |
| 16 | specifically verify that. | |
| 17 | Q You're referring to Exhibit 1451? | |
| 18 | A Yes, I am. | |
| 19 | Q And according to Exhibit 1451, | REDACTED |
| 20 | is a $1 billion division of ? | REDACTED |
| 21 | A That's what it says here as well. | |
| 22 | Q And that's Mr. Wagner's report to you? | |
| 23 | A Yes. | |
| 24 | Q And do you know if has | REDACTED |
| 25 | bought Axapta for implementation at any locations? | |
| 00147 |
| 1 | A I do not have a specific recollection that | |
| 2 | it has. | |
| 3 | Q Is an example of a spoke | REDACTED |
| 4 | in a hub and spoke situation? | |
| 5 | A is an example of a division of | REDACTED |
| 6 | a large corporation which in itself is made up of | |
| 7 | multiple, multiple business units which in turn have | |
| 8 | multiple, multiple spokes on top of that, whereas we | |
| 9 | get further down from the division level to the | |
| 10 | subdivision level to the spoke level present | |
| 11 | opportunities for a mid market solution that is easy | |
| 12 | to implement and very simple for some of the remote | |
| 13 | distribution and locations that they might have in | |
| 14 | their organization structure. | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | Q But the target market of Axapta is up to a | |
| 23 | billion dollars a year in annual revenue, correct? | |
| 24 | MS. BLIZZARD: Objection. Misstates the | |
| 25 | testimony. | |
| 00148 |
| 1 | A Yeah, the target market for Axapta is based |
| 2 | on customer requirements and fit, not necessarily on |
| 3 | dollar values. I think we find that most of the -- |
| 4 | Q Go ahead. |
| 5 | A -- most of the organizations can't be |
| 6 | recognized for complexity based on mere dollar values. |
| 7 | Q Why not? |
| 8 | A It -- my opinion, there could be a very, |
| 9 | very complex very small account, or very, very large |
| 10 | dollar volume account that could be very simple in |
| 11 | nature as well. |
| 12 | Q Tell me about the very small complex |
| 13 | account. |
| 14 | A There are some accounts that we're not a |
| 15 | good fit for and that require multiple solutions |
| 16 | outside of our core product for some unique business |
| 17 | requirements that they may choose to implement within |
| 18 | their organizations. |
| 19 | Q Give me some examples. |
| 20 | A A small community bank that is looking for a |
| 21 | system that does direct deposit accounting and complex |
| 22 | banking transactions or treasury transactions. Very |
| 23 | small dollar volume account that we could not service |
| 24 | because of the specific vertical function or banking |
| 25 | functions that they have that are not part of any of |
| 00149 |
| 1 | our products. |
| 2 | Q What software could serve them? |
| 3 | A I think there are, there are -- I can't |
| 4 | speculate to which ones that are prevalent, but there |
| 5 | are a lot of software packages that specialize in |
| 6 | banks. |
| 7 | Q What -- Name some. |
| 8 | A I don't know any specifically. |
| 9 | Q I'm not sure I understand the example, then. |
| 10 | If you can't tell me what would serve them, I just |
| 11 | don't understand how you could -- |
| 12 | A I know that I don't -- I know that I don't |
| 13 | serve them. I'm not necessarily looking at the |
| 14 | companies that do. |
| 15 | Q How do you know you couldn't serve them if |
| 16 | you don't know what can serve them? |
| 17 | A My products don't do the functions that they |
| 18 | require. |
| 19 | Q And what's the dollar revenue of the kind of |
| 20 | examples you're thinking of? |
| 21 | A Could be $100 million regional bank. |
| 22 | Q So there are $100 million regional banks |
| 23 | that can't be served by Axapta or any Microsoft |
| 24 | Business Solution product? |
| 25 | A Correct. |
| 00150 |
| 1 | Q And are there $3 million companies with, as |
| 2 | you call it, simple processes that could be served by |
| 3 | Axapta? |
| 4 | A Three million dollar? |
| 5 | Q Three billion. |
| 6 | A Potentially could be, but I can't speculate |
| 7 | that dollar values are necessarily a symbol of |
| 8 | complexity. |
| 9 | Q What else is a symbol of complexity to you? |
| 10 | A The products we have are not designed to, to |
| 11 | allow for global visibility of inventory, or supply |
| 12 | chain, or as we discussed earlier, the ability to look |
| 13 | across an organization for factory optimization or |
| 14 | product optimization. |
| 15 | Q How about -- let's just focus -- you're |
| 16 | talking about supply chain and other things. Let's |
| 17 | talk about core financials. What in core financials |
| 18 | does Axapta not have in terms of complex |
| 19 | functionality? |
| 20 | A Treasury management, hedging, companies that |
| 21 | deal in multiple strategies regarding foreign |
| 22 | exchange, conversion rates and dealings with very |
| 23 | sophisticated treasury management functionality; cash |
| 24 | projections, investment strategies, things that large |
| 25 | corporate hubs traditionally require that are dealing |
| 00151 |
| 1 | with large volumes of money on a daily basis. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Q Do you recall seeing any documents stating |
| 14 | that the target market for Axapta is up to $1 billion? |
| 15 | A I've heard that number mentioned in |
| 16 | conversations, in briefings and conversations in the |
| 17 | past as being one of many characteristics that are, |
| 18 | that are being listed about a target market. |
| 19 | Q What are the other characteristics of the |
| 20 | target market for Axapta? |
| 21 | A Locations of large corporations that have |
| 22 | simplistic business needs that are accommodated by the |
| 23 | Axapta product, manufacturing locations that are |
| 24 | single location in nature, some of the international |
| 25 | remote divisions that we've discussed in our earlier |
| 00152 |
| 1 | testimony as being the targets. |
| 2 | Q And does Esselte fall outside of the target |
| 3 | market of Axapta? |
| 4 | A I can't speculate on whether it does. |
| 5 | Q Do you know whether or not it has simple or |
| 6 | complex needs for financial management software? |
| 7 | MS. BLIZZARD: Objection. Vague. |
| 8 | A Don't know specifically. |
| 9 | Q When you talk about simplistic needs, what |
| 10 | do you mean? |
| 11 | A Companies that don't require the, the large |
| 12 | scale manufacturing or supply chain or international |
| 13 | treasury or specific vertical functionality that's |
| 14 | associated with a lot of the larger Tier 1 solutions |
| 15 | that, that we typically refer those clients to. |
| 16 | Q Now, the vertical functionality, Microsoft |
| 17 | partners with ISVs who provide vertical functionality |
| 18 | as a bolt-on to its products, right. |
| 19 | A That's true, but in a situation in dealing |
| 20 | in large corporations, a large -- most of our partners |
| 21 | are very, very small partners with very, very limited |
| 22 | product depth and scope. Most large companies that |
| 23 | I've dealt with, getting back to your question about |
| 24 | complexity, do not want to deal with multiple points |
| 25 | of failure in dealing with multiple solutions, |
| 00153 |
| 1 | multiple partners, multiple vendors, especially in the |
| 2 | situations where large businesses do not want to rely |
| 3 | on very small ISV partners as part of an overall |
| 4 | corporate solution or a hub solution. They want the |
| 5 | support and product to be delivered by one publisher |
| 6 | in most cases. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00156 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | Q Do you recall whether Mr. Ballmer met with | |
| 7 | at the meeting in Chicago? | REDACTED |
| 8 | A Yes, he did. | |
| 9 | Q If you look at specific outcomes that will | |
| 10 | occur if the meeting is successful -- do you see that | |
| 11 | heading? | |
| 12 | A Yes, I do. | |
| 13 | Q To the right it says, No. 1, | REDACTED |
| 14 | will make Axapta its ERP choice for its U.S. | |
| 15 | locations. Do you see that? | |
| 16 | A Yes, I do. | |
| 17 | Q Did you have an understanding before the | |
| 18 | meeting in Chicago that one of the goals of the | |
| 19 | meeting was to have make Axapta its ERP | REDACTED |
| 20 | choice for its U.S. locations? | |
| 21 | A I received this briefing document prior to | |
| 22 | the meeting in Chicago so I recall reading the | |
| 23 | document and understanding that that was the | |
| 24 | conversation that we were hoping to lead | REDACTED |
| 25 | to. | |
| 00157 |
| 1 | Q And you received Exhibit 1452 in advance of | |
| 2 | the meeting on January 21, 2003? | |
| 3 | A Yes. | |
| 4 | Q And you read it at that time? | |
| 5 | A Yes. | |
| 6 | Q And is it fair to say that Microsoft | |
| 7 | Business Solutions is still having discussions with | |
| 8 | about Axapta product -- the Axapta | REDACTED |
| 9 | product? | |
| 10 | A Not as formal, but yes, we are having | |
| 11 | discussions with | REDACTED |
| 12 | Q So is it fair to say that the sales puree, | |
| 13 | at least with , has been an extended one, | REDACTED |
| 14 | over a year's time? | |
| 15 | A Yes. Not much has changed if anything since | |
| 16 | this meeting and prior to today. | |
| 17 | Q Do you have an understanding concerning | |
| 18 | whether has bought any Axapta products | REDACTED |
| 19 | for any of its locations? | |
| 20 | A Other than what I've read here, I have no | |
| 21 | specific understanding of what they have done other | |
| 22 | than a pilot location in Italy which is represented | |
| 23 | here. | |
| 24 | Q And Item 3 in specific outcomes that will | |
| 25 | occur if the meeting is successful is | REDACTED |
| 00158 |
| 1 | will implement Axapta in its worldwide locations also |
| 2 | known as One World System. Do you see that? |
| 3 | A I see that, yes. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Q If I can ask you to turn briefly to Page |
| 24 | 3640. There's a reference there to CDI Corporation. |
| 25 | Do you see that? |
| 00159 |
| 1 | A If I could have just a moment to review. |
| 2 | Q Certainly. |
| 3 | A (Reviewing.) |
| 4 | Okay. |
| 5 | Q All right. Have you ever met with any |
| 6 | representatives of CDI Corporation? |
| 7 | A Yes, I have. |
| 8 | Q On how many occasions? |
| 9 | A Six to eight different occasions. |
| 10 | Q Were you involved in the sale of Microsoft |
| 11 | Business Solutions software products to CDI |
| 12 | corporation? |
| 13 | A I was involved in supporting partner |
| 14 | meetings and presentations, as well as executive |
| 15 | presentations at CDI Corporation. |
| 16 | Q And based on those meetings, did you have an |
| 17 | understanding that CDI had, had attempted to implement |
| 18 | an SAP ERP system? |
| 19 | A Yes, I have. |
| 20 | Q And that they were unable to implement the |
| 21 | SAP ERP system? |
| 22 | A Yes. |
| 23 | Q And that instead they decided to purchase |
| 24 | Microsoft Great Plains? |
| 25 | A That's correct. |
| 00160 |
| 1 | Q And do you have an understanding one way or |
| 2 | the other concerning CDI's annual revenues? |
| 3 | A It states here that it's approximately $1.4 |
| 4 | billion. |
| 5 | Q Do you know if that's correct? |
| 6 | A I don't know if specifically that's correct. |
| 7 | Q Do you know approximately how many employees |
| 8 | CDI has? |
| 9 | A Not specifically. Other than what I read |
| 10 | here. |
| 11 | Q And in Exhibit 1452 it says 24,000? |
| 12 | A That's correct. |
| 13 | Again, just from a point of clarification, |
| 14 | the SAP implementation was discontinued. The Great |
| 15 | Plains product was not replacing all of the locations |
| 16 | where SAP had, had focused its implementation efforts. |
| 17 | Great Plains was implemented in a small division of |
| 18 | CDI. The other divisions returned to the systems |
| 19 | prior to their -- that they used prior to attempting |
| 20 | to implement SAP. |
| 21 | Q Was Great Plains installed, or implemented |
| 22 | at CDI's corporate headquarters? |
| 23 | A I'm not sure. |
| 24 | Q Do you know where CDI is headquartered? |
| 25 | A Philadelphia. |
| 00161 |
| 1 | Q Do you know how CDI is organized in terms of |
| 2 | whether it has many subsidiaries or if it's a highly |
| 3 | centralized company? |
| 4 | A It's an organization with many different |
| 5 | business units focusing on different parts of the |
| 6 | staffing business; technical -- technical consulting |
| 7 | staffing, engineering, and construction staffing for |
| 8 | assistance in building cable towers and lines for |
| 9 | telecom communications companies; Management |
| 10 | Recruiters, which is a recruiting agency, and Today's |
| 11 | Staffing, which is a similar, we had mentioned one |
| 12 | earlier Kelly Services, a typical staffing company |
| 13 | for temporary help. |
| 14 | Q But this is a professional services staffing |
| 15 | company for, for engineers and people like that? |
| 16 | A They're different divisions that specialize |
| 17 | in -- one division would have technical consulting, |
| 18 | one would have very -- there's at least six different |
| 19 | business units that I'm aware of that are separate and |
| 20 | distinct parts of CDI Corporation. |
| 21 | Q And what's your understanding of where Great |
| 22 | Plains was implemented at CDI? |
| 23 | A We discussed the core financial applications |
| 24 | of CDI and how Great Plains could match with those |
| 25 | core back office financial systems. |
| 00162 |
| 1 | Q And was Great Plains installed as the core |
| 2 | back office financial software for CDI? |
| 3 | A For a small portion of CDI that |
| 4 | implementation was successful. |
| 5 | Q And was there an attempt to install Great |
| 6 | Plains more broadly? |
| 7 | Not that I'm aware of. |
| 8 | And it's your understanding -- do you have |
| 9 | an understanding concerning whether CDI is using Great |
| 10 | Plains as its core financial system for the entire |
| 11 | corporation? |
| 12 | A No, I do not have specific knowledge of |
| 13 | whether they're doing that. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00170 |
| 1 | Q If you turn the page, Page 172 of Exhibit |
| 2 | 1453, sir. Are you familiar with the implementation |
| 3 | of Microsoft-Great Plains at Six Flags? |
| 4 | A Not in detail, not in intimate detail, no. |
| 5 | Q What's your understanding? |
| 6 | A I have met with, with executives from Six |
| 7 | Flags that touted the implementation as being a very |
| 8 | successful use of the financial systems at, at Six |
| 9 | Flags. |
| 10 | Q And is it your understanding that Microsoft- |
| 11 | Great Plains is the core financial system in use at |
| 12 | Six Flags? |
| 13 | A I can't specifically state that. |
| 14 | Q Do you have an understanding concerning |
| 15 | where Microsoft-Great Plains is in use at Six Flags? |
| 16 | A No personal specific knowledge, no. |
| 17 | Q Who at Six Flags have you met with? |
| 18 | A One of the controllers who attended one of |
| 19 | our Microsoft briefings in Redmond as part of a summit |
| 20 | where we had a chance to have lunch. |
| 21 | Q Were you involved in any way in the, in the |
| 22 | sale, in the effort to help the partners sell the |
| 23 | Microsoft-Great Plains to Six Flags? |
| 24 | A No. |
| 25 | |
| 00172 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | Q Did you have any discussions with | REDACTED |
| 15 | about rolling out Microsoft Business Solutions | |
| 16 | products on a worldwide basis? | |
| 17 | A At any time? | |
| 18 | Q Yes. | |
| 19 | A Yes, I have. | |
| 20 | Q And what has your discussion been, sir? | |
| 21 | A Microsoft has met with regarding a | REDACTED |
| 22 | traditional hub and spoke-type environment in that | |
| 23 | is made up in actuality 1400 different | REDACTED |
| 24 | agencies, very small in nature. as a | REDACTED |
| 25 | corporation is a holding company for the revenue | |
| 00173 |
| 1 | streams associated with those . They | REDACTED |
| 2 | believe that the Microsoft Business Solutions products | |
| 3 | in the nature of being a Tier 2-type of product line | |
| 4 | would allow for them to roll these out in the various | |
| 5 | divisions around, and locations around the country in | |
| 6 | a very simple and easy-to-use way. | |
| 7 | Q Would the plan as you understand it be to | |
| 8 | use Microsoft Business Solution products at all of | |
| 9 | various subsidiaries and agencies? | REDACTED |
| 10 | A has shared with us in meetings that | REDACTED |
| 11 | they would like to get as much standardization across | |
| 12 | their various agencies and locations as possible, but | |
| 13 | they have not stated any, or are they in a position in | |
| 14 | many cases to offer a mandate to all of their | |
| 15 | locations to implement. | |
| 16 | Q There's a reference to a, or a corporate | |
| 17 | communication within that the only ERP | REDACTED |
| 18 | solutions to be considered are Microsoft Business | |
| 19 | Solution ERP solutions? | |
| 20 | A Yes. | |
| 21 | Q Are you aware that the CFO of or | REDACTED |
| 22 | someone else has sent out such a communication? | |
| 23 | A I was aware that a communication was | |
| 24 | discussed. I have no specific knowledge of that | |
| 25 | communication itself. | |
| 00174 |
| 1 | Q What did you learn about the communication? | |
| 2 | A That the global CFO was endorsing the | |
| 3 | Microsoft Business Solution product as a choice of the | |
| 4 | corporation at the high level as a product that should | |
| 5 | be evaluated by anyone considering a move to a | |
| 6 | different back office financial accounting system. | |
| 7 | Q And are you aware of discussions concerning | |
| 8 | the potential use of a Microsoft Business Solution ERP | |
| 9 | product at the -- at subsidiary called ? | REDACTED |
| 10 | A I am aware that discovery and presentations | |
| 11 | are planned at through our tower. | REDACTED |
| 12 | Q And what's your, what's your understanding | |
| 13 | of the progress of those discussions? Are they | |
| 14 | preliminary or are they more advanced? | |
| 15 | A I believe that will be evaluating | REDACTED |
| 16 | PeopleSoft, Oracle and Microsoft Business Solution in | |
| 17 | a series of presentations that are due to occur in the | |
| 18 | next 30 to 60 days. | |
| 19 | Q And it's your understanding -- what's your | |
| 20 | understanding concerning what Microsoft Business | |
| 21 | Solutions software product will be evaluated by ? | REDACTED |
| 22 | A My understanding from conversations with the | |
| 23 | partner is that Microsoft Business Solutions will be | |
| 24 | representing its Solomon product for professional | |
| 25 | services. | |
| 00176 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | Q Have you learned anything from either of | |
| 19 | those individuals about the number of locations over | |
| 20 | which operates? | REDACTED |
| 21 | A No, I've not. | |
| 22 | Q Do you have any understanding? | |
| 23 | A I have a core understanding that the Solomon | |
| 24 | product has been asked to support somewhere between | |
| 25 | three to 400 total back office financial users for | |
| 00177 |
| 1 | as part of this evaluation process. | REDACTED |
| 2 | Q And do you have an understanding concerning | |
| 3 | whether the Solomon product can support between three | |
| 4 | and 400 back office users? | |
| 5 | A We have put the necessary MBS resources in | |
| 6 | place to do the evaluation, and plan to let them know | |
| 7 | whether or not we believe that that product can reach | |
| 8 | the levels given the particular transactions that | REDACTED |
| 9 | plans to process with us. | |
| 10 | Q And what kinds of transactions is it do you | |
| 11 | understand wants to process? | REDACTED |
| 12 | A Core financial transactions and a variety of | |
| 13 | time entry-type of transactions, hours charged to | |
| 14 | specific creative projects and very, very simple sort | |
| 15 | of three hours on this project, two hours on this | |
| 16 | project, four hours on that project. | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 00178 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | Q To your understanding there's going to be no | |
| 9 | discussion of, or potential use by of MBS | REDACTED |
| 10 | products on a corporate-wide basis for all 57,000 | |
| 11 | employees? | |
| 12 | A Oh, no, no. The discussions are not around | |
| 13 | 57,000 Microsoft Business Solution users in any way, | |
| 14 | shape or form. The discussions with , even in | REDACTED |
| 15 | high-level discussions on a worldwide basis have | |
| 16 | estimates ranging from 2500 to 3,000 total users over | |
| 17 | approximately 350 different locations; being the | REDACTED |
| 18 | largest single user of the product in a particular | |
| 19 | location. And if you do some quick math of looking at | |
| 20 | 2500 to 3,000, subtracting two or 300, and then | |
| 21 | spreading the rest over 350 locations, you get a sense | |
| 22 | for the size of maybe ten users, five to ten users per | |
| 23 | location based on the requirements for core | |
| 24 | financials. | |
| 25 | Q Is this an -- is another example of | REDACTED |
| 00179 |
| 1 | a distributed company that can be served by Microsoft | |
| 2 | Business Solutions software products? | |
| 3 | A I don't tend to like the term distributed. | |
| 4 | I think is an example of a highly | REDACTED |
| 5 | decentralized organization that has run their business | |
| 6 | with, with 1400 separate small companies, each of | |
| 7 | which compete with each other in many cases for the | |
| 8 | same piece of advertising business. They have set up | |
| 9 | the organization in such a way that they track and | |
| 10 | monitor each of the progress financially of 1400 | |
| 11 | agencies that roll up into 350 or so separate business | |
| 12 | units, that roll up into six to seven major business | |
| 13 | towers that they focus on as a business entity, and | |
| 14 | have a very highly decentralized approach to running | |
| 15 | their business. | |
| 16 | Q Have you heard of a company called Helmeric | |
| 17 | & Payne? | |
| 18 | A Yes, I have. | |
| 19 | Q And are they using a Microsoft Business | |
| 20 | Solution software product? | |
| 21 | A Yes, they are -- they have signed to license | |
| 22 | the Axapta product line. | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 00181 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Q And what is your understanding, if you have |
| 15 | one, of how Helmeric & Payne's business? |
| 16 | A In the opportunities I've had to meet with |
| 17 | personnel from Helmeric & Payne, we have an |
| 18 | organization that is a very remote oil rig operation |
| 19 | management task on their hands where they actually |
| 20 | have very remote oil rigs that are set up on various |
| 21 | oceans and seas of which they are running financial |
| 22 | and project software-type of requirements. |
| 23 | Q And where have you met with these people |
| 24 | from Helmeric & Payne? |
| 25 | A At Convergence, at a Customer Appreciation |
| 00182 |
| 1 | event in New Orleans, and most recently had the chance |
| 2 | to, to talk to one of the personnel at an initial |
| 3 | meeting of the Axapta user group meeting. |
| 4 | Q And do you have an understanding from those |
| 5 | interactions where they're using Axapta? |
| 6 | A Other than what I've shared with you in |
| 7 | terms of their business being this remote oil rig |
| 8 | drilling operations, very decentralized operations, I |
| 9 | have no specific knowledge of their implementation. |
| 10 | Q Do you have any knowledge concerning whether |
| 11 | they have implemented Axapta at their corporate |
| 12 | headquarters in Texas? |
| 13 | A No, I do not. |
| 14 | Q The E-mail from Mr. Bender that's on Pages |
| 15 | 9339 over to 9340 talks about the relationship between |
| 16 | Microsoft and PeopleSoft. Do you see that? |
| 17 | A Yes, I do. |
| 18 | Q And are you aware of anyone at PeopleSoft |
| 19 | raising any issues in terms of competition between |
| 20 | PeopleSoft and Microsoft? |
| 21 | A No, I've not. |
| 22 | Q You never heard that PeopleSoft was upset |
| 23 | that Microsoft had taken business away from it at |
| 24 | Helmeric & Payne? |
| 25 | A I was not directly informed of any, any of |
| 00183 |
| 1 | that from PeopleSoft at all. |
| 2 | Q And there's a note, focus on anti Oracle. |
| 3 | Is there an anti Oracle focus at Microsoft Business |
| 4 | Solutions? |
| 5 | A No, there's not. |
| 6 | Q Would Microsoft Business Solutions prefer to |
| 7 | see a customer buy Microsoft SQL Server over Oracle's |
| 8 | database? |
| 9 | A As a shareholder, I think that each employee |
| 10 | would, would prefer to have Microsoft technologies be |
| 11 | the platform of choice by its clients. |
| 12 | Q There's a reference to, Mr. Bender says, we |
| 13 | were very honest about the fact that MBS would move |
| 14 | upstream. You see that? |
| 15 | A Yes, I do. |
| 16 | Q Have you heard anyone at Microsoft talk |
| 17 | about Microsoft Business Solutions moving upstream? |
| 18 | A Not in those words, no. |
| 19 | Q Have you heard it in other words? |
| 20 | A I've heard that Microsoft is providing |
| 21 | greater visibility to its corporate accounts, that |
| 22 | these products have a place, as most Tier 2 vendors |
| 23 | have a place in larger corporations that have remote |
| 24 | or decentralized organizations, whereby many of these |
| 25 | corporations had never heard of Great Plains or |
| 00184 |
| 1 | Microsoft Business Solutions in the past. |
| 2 | Q You refer to Tier 2 vendors. Who are you |
| 3 | talking about? |
| 4 | A Traditionally in the market Tier 1 vendors |
| 5 | and Tier 2 vendors, Tier 2 vendors specifically in |
| 6 | most of the analyst reports refer to Microsoft |
| 7 | Business Solutions, a J.D. Edwards, a Sage, a Mapics, |
| 8 | pPics-type of product line as being more of a Tier 2 |
| 9 | solution. |
| 10 | Q And Tier 1? |
| 11 | A Being more to an SAP, Oracle, PeopleSoft, |
| 12 | Siebel. |
| 13 | Q I2? |
| 14 | A In the past, perhaps. |
| 15 | Q Manugistics? |
| 16 | A Probably not. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00186 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Q Exhibit 1456 indicates that Esselte has |
| 17 | 3,000 professional users? |
| 18 | A I see that, yes. |
| 19 | Q Is that consistent with your understanding? |
| 20 | A Yes, it is. |
| 21 | Q And has 15 instances of the application? |
| 22 | A I see that as well. |
| 23 | Q Is that consistent with your understanding? |
| 24 | A Yes, it is. |
| 25 | Q And has total net revenue before maintenance |
| 00187 |
| 1 | of support to Microsoft of $ .Do you see | REDACTED |
| 2 | that? | |
| 3 | A I, I don't understand what that means, and | |
| 4 | nor is it a number that I've seen in any kind of net | |
| 5 | revenue numbers for Microsoft. | |
| 6 | Q Do you have an understanding of the net | |
| 7 | revenue to Microsoft from Esselte? | |
| 8 | A Not specific. | |
| 9 | Q Can you give me a ballpark? | |
| 10 | A a little over a | REDACTED |
| 11 | dollars. | REDACTED |
| 12 | Q And that's just license revenue you're | |
| 13 | talking about? | |
| 14 | A Correct. | |
| 15 | Q And there's also going to be support and | |
| 16 | maintenance? | |
| 17 | A Yes. | |
| 18 | Q And what's the projection for those? | |
| 19 | A Don't know specifically. | |
| 20 | Q And we talked earlier about some | |
| 21 | professional consulting fees? | |
| 22 | A Yes. Microsoft is providing some assistance | |
| 23 | to our partners there, yes. | |
| 24 | Q And what's the projected amount of | |
| 25 | professional consulting fees to Microsoft? | |
| 00188 |
| 1 | A We discussed earlier on the record that we | |
| 2 | were projecting in the early estimates somewhere | |
| 3 | around $ over the course of the project. | REDACTED |
| 4 | Q And this notes that the Esselte deal is at | |
| an overall discount. Do you see that? | REDACTED |
| 6 | A Yes, I do see that. | |
| 7 | Q Do you have an understanding one way or the | |
| 8 | other whether that is accurate? | |
| 9 | A No understanding whether it's accurate. | |
| 10 | Q Do you have any understanding of -- | |
| 11 | concerning the discount that was given to Esselte? | |
| 12 | A I understand that Microsoft pricing is from, | |
| 13 | from pricing, in terms of a customer that's looking | |
| 14 | for a broad-reaching agreement with Microsoft, is | |
| 15 | primarily priced in a way that is very different than | |
| 16 | the traditional marketplace prices by user. | |
| 17 | Q What do you mean by that? | |
| 18 | A Most ERP companies are pricing by users, | |
| 19 | where Microsoft Business Solutions has a -- an | |
| 20 | instance charge which tends to draw dramatic increases | |
| 21 | in price for companies that are looking to install | |
| 22 | more instances over their organization versus a | |
| 23 | traditional single site implementation that we | |
| 24 | traditionally deal with on a regular basis. | |
| 25 | | |
| 00191 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Q Setting aside any conversations you may have |
| 11 | had with counsel for Microsoft, have you had any |
| 12 | communications with anyone else at Microsoft |
| 13 | concerning testimony given by Microsoft in the United |
| 14 | States versus Oracle case? |
| 15 | A No, I've not. |
| 16 | As a point of clarification, I have |
| 17 | responded to questions raised by the field in the |
| 18 | classic Microsoft organization, as well as our field |
| 19 | organization regarding a blurb in USA Today which |
| 20 | quoted Doug Burgum regarding this case. |
| 21 | Q And what did that say? |
| 22 | A I don't know the specifics as it -- to |
| 23 | paraphrase it was stating that Microsoft -- his |
| 24 | position was Microsoft was not entering the enterprise |
| 25 | space and did not see that as for a two- to |
| 00192 |
| 1 | three-year-type of window, I believe is what the |
| 2 | paraphrase was. |
| 3 | Q And what did you tell the field |
| 4 | organization? |
| 5 | A I told them that, that we should continue on |
| 6 | our track of approaching enterprises and CAS-based |
| 7 | accounts based on our strategy of providing spoke- |
| 8 | based solutions, to continue to evangelize the message |
| 9 | of Microsoft Business Solution having a role as a Tier |
| 10 | 2 provider in most large corporations around the world |
| 11 | that have decentralized underserved locations, and |
| 12 | that that was really all we were at liberty to comment |
| 13 | on regarding the case. So it was business as usual, |
| 14 | basically. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Q Going back to Exhibit 1457, sir, this |
| 22 | appears to be a discussion about proposed marketing |
| 23 | messages because of concerns that Mr. Hemler has |
| 24 | had -- received from prospects with respect to |
| 25 | Microsoft's testimony that, quote, we aren't, we |
| 00193 |
| 1 | aren't going after large enterprises. Do you see |
| 2 | that? |
| 3 | A Yes, I see that. |
| 4 | Q And Miss Kloster's response to Mr. Hemler's |
| 5 | E-mail says, we've always positioned our target market |
| 6 | as being small mid market, as of a year ago started to |
| 7 | include the corporate account space. Do you see that? |
| 8 | A Yes, I do. |
| 9 | Q Was there a change in the marketing |
| 10 | philosophy of Microsoft in or about March of 2003 to |
| 11 | extend the target market to include the corporate |
| 12 | account space? |
| 13 | A I think in July of 2003 we made the |
| 14 | commitment to bring on board these 17 CAS solution |
| 15 | sales specialists to be located in the district to |
| 16 | provide that marketplace a greater understanding of |
| 17 | our products, our solutions and our strategy. But |
| 18 | prior to that time, there was no dedicated resources |
| 19 | that would allow those CAS-based customers access on a |
| 20 | regular basis to Microsoft presentations or dedicated |
| 21 | resources. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00194 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Q And Ms. Kloster's E-mail is March 15, 6:03 |
| 8 | p.m. Mr. Hemler responds to that E-mail, and in his |
| 9 | response he proposes a message which says, quote, our |
| 10 | recent sworn statement to the U.S. Justice Department |
| 11 | was intended to define our plans with respect to which |
| 12 | customer segments we will proactively market our ERP |
| 13 | solutions. It is not intended to say our products are |
| 14 | not suitable for larger enterprises. To the contrary, |
| 15 | Axapta had the flexibility and scalability needed to |
| 16 | address enterprise ERP demands such as those, |
| 17 | brackets, customer. Do you see that? |
| 18 | A Yes, I do. |
| 19 | Q Have you ever had any discussions with |
| 20 | Mr. Hemler about that? |
| 21 | A Not directly. But I don't agree with his -- |
| 22 | I don't understand what his reference to sworn |
| 23 | statements or his comments regarding the flexibility |
| 24 | and scalability necessary to address enterprise scale |
| 25 | ERP demands. This is not something I would write or |
| 00195 |
| 1 | nor do I understand his references to any, any |
| 2 | testimony or sworn statements. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00196 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Q Have you ever heard any concerns expressed |
| 12 | by any Microsoft Business Solution customers or |
| 13 | prospective customers that, their concern that they |
| 14 | might be topping out with Axapta or other Microsoft |
| 15 | Business Solution product? |
| 16 | A Yes, I have. |
| 17 | Q And when have you heard those kind of |
| 18 | concerns? |
| 19 | A Usually in group discussions and seminars, |
| 20 | and one to many locations there's usually a question |
| 21 | that has to do with, I though Microsoft-Great Plains |
| 22 | was only for five-user organizations, I had thought |
| 23 | Axapta was only available in Europe. There's a lot of |
| 24 | people who have very, very limited knowledge of |
| 25 | Microsoft Business Solution and the role we can play |
| 00197 |
| 1 | in decentralized organizations. |
| 2 | Q What do you tell them? |
| 3 | A I talk to them a little bit about how we |
| 4 | have been able to successfully implement some of these |
| 5 | smaller decentralized hubs for organizations with |
| 6 | Great Plains, with Axapta, that with we have |
| 7 | successful implementations of 100, 200 users, and that |
| 8 | you know, depending on the size, complexity and scope |
| 9 | of the project, we'd be happy to talk to the client |
| 10 | about their particular needs. |
| 11 | Q Are you aware of any Axapta implementations |
| 12 | with four or 500 consecutive users? |
| 13 | A Yes, I am. |
| 14 | Q Where? |
| 15 | A A company called Old Castle. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00198 |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 4 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | Q Is Microsoft Business Solutions selling | |
| 11 | through partners Axapta to organizations with up to $5 | |
| 12 | billion a year in annual revenue? | |
| 13 | A I think we have examples of a Great Plains | |
| 14 | implementation at where is a $6 | REDACTED |
| 15 | billion company but we have a, one of the ad agencies | |
| 16 | that's using Microsoft Business Solutions product. So | |
| 17 | the answer to that is we are selling to and | REDACTED |
| 18 | they're $6 billion, but we're selling to them, from a | |
| 19 | clarification point of view, at a very small agency | |
| 20 | level, five to ten, fifteen users. | |
| 21 | Q Well, it's not really the agency level, is | |
| 22 | it? It's the headquarters level. | |
| 23 | A No, we have other locations that are at the | |
| 24 | agencies in addition to the corporate use of the Great | |
| 25 | Plains product at the agency level. | |
| 00199 |
| 1 | Q Do you think that Axapta has the flexibility |
| 2 | and scalability to address enterprise scale at ERP |
| 3 | demands? |
| 4 | A Sorry. Could you repeat the question? |
| 5 | Q Sure. I'm just essentially reading from Mr. |
| 6 | Hemler's proposed statement and I'm wondering if you |
| 7 | believe -- if you agree that Axapta has the |
| 8 | flexibility and scalability needed to address |
| 9 | enterprise scale ERP demands. |
| 10 | A Axapta -- it would depend again on the |
| 11 | customer's particular functional requirements, their |
| 12 | need for specific functionality, the complexity of |
| 13 | their organization and the number of users that they |
| 14 | are planning to implement. In the right cases, Axapta |
| 15 | is a great fit for a department or division of -- or |
| 16 | remote location of a decentralized company, but in no |
| 17 | way is it robust enough to service the complex |
| 18 | centralized locations of a large enterprise account. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00201 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Q And what's the effort there, if you know? |
| 24 | A Pat is one individual in the Microsoft |
| 25 | Business Solution team that's, that had taken on the |
| 00202 |
| 1 | responsibility of working closely together, helping |
| 2 | our, our not-for-profit teams and state and local |
| 3 | Government teams identify partners that have been |
| 4 | successful in marketing to that marketplace in the |
| 5 | past for our -- we have a separate team in the |
| 6 | vertical team that focuses on not-for-profit, state |
| 7 | and local Government. |
| 8 | Q Are there other vertical teams within |
| 9 | Microsoft Business Solutions? |
| 10 | A Yes, they are. |
| 11 | Q And what are those? |
| 12 | A The ones I can recall include automotive, |
| 13 | financial services, health care, as examples. |
| 14 | Q Do you have an understanding of why there |
| 15 | are -- why there's a public sector vertical, |
| 16 | automotive vertical, health care vertical and other |
| 17 | ones you can't recall? |
| 18 | A Specifically no, no definitive direction on, |
| 19 | on -- maybe if you rephrase the question. |
| 20 | Q Sure. I'm just trying to figure out if you |
| 21 | understand what's the strategy behind having people |
| 22 | who are focused on particular segments of the market. |
| 23 | A Microsoft has set up these vertical accounts |
| 24 | to provide selected vertical accounts better ratioed |
| 25 | coverage with people that are understanding of their |
| 00203 |
| 1 | particular business needs and -- as it pertains to |
| 2 | Microsoft infrastructure, architecture, database and |
| 3 | classic Microsoft requirements that are necessary to |
| 4 | run their infrastructures. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00204 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Q If you turn to Page 4 of the power point, |
| 16 | sir. It has a Bates No. 3312. There's a reference |
| 17 | this page appears to be entitled something next big |
| 18 | thing. Do you see that? |
| 19 | A Barely, I can read it out, yes. |
| 20 | Q And it contains excerpts from April 2003 |
| 21 | Business Week article? |
| 22 | A That's what it says, yes. |
| 23 | Q And it talks about Mr. Rakes's quote that |
| 24 | Microsoft will bring 10 billion in revenue from this |
| 25 | emerging market by year 2010? |
| 00205 |
| 1 | A I see that. |
| 2 | Q Is that consistent with your recollection of |
| 3 | the public statements made by Mr. Rakes concerning the |
| 4 | growth potential for Microsoft Business Solutions? |
| 5 | A I've heard that statement before, yes. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00216 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Q Let me ask a first question. The Microsoft |
| 14 | fiscal year runs from when to when? |
| 15 | A From July -- approximately July through |
| 16 | June. |
| 17 | Q Okay. So when you say there was a target |
| 18 | for fiscal '04 that would be from July '03 to the |
| 19 | following June'04? |
| 20 | A Correct. |
| 21 | Q So we're approaching the end of fiscal '04 |
| 22 | at this time? |
| 23 | A Yes, we are. |
| 24 | Q And fiscal '05 would start approximately |
| 25 | July of this year? |
| 00217 |
| 1 | A Yes. |
| 2 | Q Okay. And I believe you testified that |
| 3 | there was a team-based sales quota for the CAS space |
| 4 | for fiscal year '04. Do you recall that testimony? |
| 5 | A Yes. |
| 6 | Q And I believe you also testified that there |
| 7 | was not a quota for the GSM area for MBS products? |
| 8 | A That's correct. |
| 9 | Q Okay. Why was that? Why was there a sales |
| 10 | quota for CAS and not for GSM? |
| 11 | A We anticipated a majority of our efforts to |
| 12 | be based in, in the corporate accounts segment where |
| 13 | there was teams in place that could sell along with us |
| 14 | side-by-side from a coverage point of view and the |
| 15 | partners were already engaged in those accounts. Our |
| 16 | experience in revenue from the prior year showed that |
| 17 | a majority of the revenue, once we did look at the |
| 18 | segmentation, was derived from that corporate accounts |
| 19 | space for Microsoft Business Solution products as a |
| 20 | primary factor. |
| 21 | Q And I think you also testified that your |
| 22 | targets for these CAS quotas, you were going to fall |
| 23 | short in fiscal '04. Do you recall that? |
| 24 | A Yes. |
| 25 | Q Do you remember what the revenue target was? |
| 00218 |
| 1 | A Approximately , a little over $ | REDACTED |
| 2. | | REDACTED |
| 3 | Q And do you know what the current projected | |
| 4 | revenue is for fiscal '04? | |
| 5 | A We are targeting somewhere in the 43, | |
| 6 | aggressively $ attainment in that space. | REDACTED |
| 7 | Q Why do you believe Microsoft didn't make the | |
| 8 | CAS quota? | |
| 9 | A I think, I think it was a very aggressive | |
| 10 | growth rate associated with that, with that -- maybe | |
| 11 | overestimated the market spend around our products in | |
| 12 | that space. We also you underestimated the amount of | |
| 13 | exposure and sales and marketing and confidence | |
| 14 | building that we would create around our products in | |
| 15 | those, in that space. | |
| 16 | Q Could you pull out what was marked as | |
| 17 | Defense 1449. | |
| 18 | A Okay. | |
| 19 | Q I think you testified, and please correct | |
| 20 | me, that this was a planning document developed for | |
| 21 | fiscal '04 planning in around April of 2003? | |
| 22 | A Yes. | |
| 23 | Q Was the plan that's in here formally | |
| 24 | adopted? | |
| 25 | A Not in specific terms, no. | |
| 00219 |
| 1 | Q Okay. | |
| 2 | A Some of this was used to ultimately | |
| 3 | determine the reporting structures and some of the | |
| 4 | high level resource planning around it. But this -- | |
| 5 | this was not formally adopted in its current state. | |
| 6 | Q Was the primary purpose of this document, | |
| 7 | then, for discussion? | |
| 8 | A Yes. | |
| 9 | Q Okay. Could you turn to Bates No. 4150. | |
| 10 | At the chart at the top, do you see where it | |
| 11 | says fiscal year '04 and revenue, and it appears to | |
| 12 | say , do you see that? | REDACTED |
| 13 | A Yes. | |
| 14 | Q Would that correspond to $ ? | REDACTED |
| 15 | A In this particular, yes, it would. | |
| 16 | Q And I believe you just said that the actual | |
| 17 | target that you ended up settling on for fiscal '04 | |
| 18 | was a little over $ ? | REDACTED |
| 19 | A Yes. | |
| 20 | Q Going down that fiscal '04 column, the -- do | |
| 21 | you see where it says 17 MBS BSMs? | |
| 22 | A Yes. | |
| 23 | Q What are those? | |
| 24 | A They wound up being what we have been | |
| 25 | discussing as solution sales specialists. Those are | |
| 00220 |
| 1 | the people deployed within the geographic regions or |
| 2 | geographic districts within the Microsoft Enterprise |
| 3 | organization that instead of being called BSMs, they |
| 4 | are actually called solution sales specialist, SSPs. |
| 5 | Q And are those the 17 people on the virtual |
| 6 | team that have a dotted-line reporting to you that |
| 7 | we've been discussing? |
| 8 | A Yes. |
| 9 | Q The one below that MBS TSs, what are those? |
| 10 | A A TS within Microsoft is a technical |
| 11 | solution presales resource whereby if a partner or an |
| 12 | account needs some additional assistance in |
| 13 | understanding the particular detailed functionality |
| 14 | within a product, those resources are made available |
| 15 | in the Microsoft classic organization. There's TSs |
| 16 | for SQL, there's TSs for Windows, for Office. It was |
| 17 | originally planned to have resources dedicated in that |
| 18 | role in capacity for MBS in the enterprise space. |
| 19 | Q Was, was the number of 9 adopted as the plan |
| 20 | for fiscal'04? |
| 21 | A The number that was actually adopted in FY |
| 22 | '04 was zero. |
| 23 | Q The next line below that says Microsoft core |
| 24 | GTM. What's that? |
| 25 | A It was, the initial discussion was around a |
| 00221 |
| 1 | Microsoft Business Solution go to market leadership |
| 2 | team that wound up being myself and one other person |
| 3 | to help build the community and to oversee the hiring |
| 4 | and some of the training associated with the MBS |
| 5 | solution people in the field. |
| 6 | Q So was the fiscal '04 plan number there then |
| 7 | two, one person plus yourself? |
| 8 | A It was originally four from a head count |
| 9 | perspective. We redeployed one of those to become |
| 10 | another resource in the enterprise that would be |
| 11 | targeted at FY '05 technical solutions specialty, and |
| 12 | one open position still remains in that organization |
| 13 | structure that reports to me that hasn't been filled. |
| 14 | Q Okay. So -- and I want to make sure I'm not |
| 15 | double counting here. Is -- if I take this 17 plus |
| 16 | the two for Microsoft Corporate GTM and to get 19 , |
| 17 | would that represent the total number of resources |
| 18 | deployed in fiscal '04 to help partners with the sales |
| 19 | in the enterprise area? |
| 20 | A The total number that was actually approved |
| 21 | was 21; 17plus the 4. |
| 22 | Q Okay. And of those 21, how many of those |
| 23 | positions were filled? |
| 24 | A Nineteen |
| 25 | Q Nineteen, okay. In terms of the revenue |
| 00222 |
| 1 | shortfall for fiscal '04, when did you first become |
| 2 | aware that the group was not going to meet its revenue |
| 3 | target? |
| 4 | A We probably knew fairly early in the fiscal |
| 5 | year. Probably midyear we knew for sure that, that |
| 6 | the revenue target was very aggressive and probably |
| 7 | not going to be attained. |
| 8 | Q What steps were taken when you realized you |
| 9 | weren't going to meet this target to potentially |
| 10 | correct the situation? |
| 11 | A We tried to increase the, the marketing |
| 12 | effort around hub and spoke targeting for cities, |
| 13 | doing some direct mail, working together closely with |
| 14 | partners to hold more seminars targeted at distributed |
| 15 | solutions, decentralized autonomous-based |
| 16 | organizations that were looking to, to replace their |
| 17 | outdated or off-maintenance solutions. We early on |
| 18 | were not at full strength from a head count |
| 19 | perspective so we did not achieve the full17 field |
| 20 | resources until the 6th of April from being at a full |
| 21 | staff point of view, and a majority of those |
| 22 | resources, probably 13 to 14, were with Microsoft or |
| 23 | in their current role for less than six months as a |
| 24 | total. So we had a very new team that was brought on |
| 25 | board to help us here. |
| 00223 |
| 1 | Q So if I was trying to get a sense of the |
| 2 | total number of resources deployed to help MBS |
| 3 | enterprise sales through partners, the, the 21 |
| 4 | allocation would be very high then, because you're |
| 5 | saying not all those positions were filled until late |
| 6 | in the year? |
| 7 | A Yes, that's accurate. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00227 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Q In the first paragraph, about oh, six or |
| 16 | seven lines down, there's a sentence that says, I do |
| 17 | believe a real part of the problem today, is that |
| 18 | there are no boundaries, so everyone seems to believe |
| 19 | we should go for a lot of things, including geo |
| 20 | expansion in all big markets, multiples lines in more |
| 21 | countries than we can afford, et cetera, et cetera, et |
| 22 | cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Do you see that line? |
| 23 | A Yes, I do. |
| 24 | Q Do you agree with what Mr. Ayala says here, |
| 25 | that this is a problem today for MBS? |
| 00228 |
| 1 | MR. YATES: Objection. Lacks foundation. |
| 2 | A My opinion is that there are very -- since |
| 3 | Microsoft Business Solutions markets almost, or |
| 4 | markets exclusively through partner organizations, |
| 5 | there are various levels of competence within the |
| 6 | partners and a variety of approaches and strategies |
| 7 | that these partners take. I think that the partners |
| 8 | are very excited to have a broad range of products |
| 9 | that they can now resell to the marketplace. I think |
| 10 | many of them still have yet to uncover all of the |
| 11 | intricacies of the products in each particular country |
| 12 | that we have localized or through partner offerings |
| 13 | and I think that is, has caused some confusion in the |
| 14 | channel in terms of how far to go in terms of talking |
| 15 | to certain customers about where, where we can take |
| 16 | the products. So I would agree with the statement |
| 17 | that it would be very welcome in the channel and in |
| 18 | the MBS support team to have specific boundaries set |
| 19 | about the way we engage with customers. |
| 20 | Q What sort of confusion do you believe has |
| 21 | been generated in the channel? |
| 22 | A I think for some of our channel partners, |
| 23 | the CRM product line, the MBS product line in the |
| 24 | Axapta division are very new to them. They're |
| 25 | learning a lot of those products and functions as they |
| 00229 |
| 1 | go. For some, as they get a new customer, it's a case |
| 2 | of they don't know what they don't know and wind up |
| 3 | encountering certain functional issues or client |
| 4 | perceptions of the product that are not what they |
| 5 | expected during the implementation, and it resulted |
| 6 | really because it's the first time the partner has |
| 7 | implemented that particular product line in a live |
| 8 | situation. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00235 |
| 1 | Q What about Old Castle, have you heard of any |
| 2 | problems with scalability at Old Castle? |
| 3 | A In brief discussions with Old Castle, I was |
| 4 | informed that they were considering adding more users |
| 5 | to their existing Axapta implementations and were in |
| 6 | discussions regarding how the product would |
| 7 | accommodate additional users. I don't know if that |
| 8 | was concern or just conversations and evaluation. |
| 9 | Q Okay. I think you testified earlier, and |
| 10 | please correct me if I'm wrong, but what I wrote down |
| 11 | was concerning this benchmark that's come up several |
| 12 | times for Axapta of something like over 3,000 users. |
| 13 | I believe you said that you didn't believe the |
| 14 | statistic represented a real world situation. Do you |
| 15 | remember that testimony? |
| 16 | A Yes. |
| 17 | Q Okay. What do you mean by that? |
| 18 | A I don't believe I -- I believe what I stated |
| 19 | was that benchmarks would vary depending on the kinds |
| 20 | of transaction and the -- how the transaction was |
| 21 | used; a user that publishes strict financial |
| 22 | transactions on a debit and credit basis versus a user |
| 23 | that does very sophisticated business process order to |
| 24 | cash, some other processes. And I have not been privy |
| 25 | to the detail behind the benchmarking statistics, but |
| 00236 |
| 1 | I think I represented also that there's hardware |
| 2 | considerations, database considerations, network |
| 3 | considerations that would impact that as well. I -- I |
| 4 | don't see Axapta customers with 3900 users, nor do I |
| 5 | really believe that statistic for a real life |
| 6 | situation. |
| 7 | Q Do you believe that telling that statistic |
| 8 | to users is misleading? |
| 9 | A I think that in a real world situation it |
| 10 | could be determined as misleading if the -- there's |
| 11 | not full disclosure in terms of how the benchmark was |
| 12 | conducted, in what circumstances with what |
| 13 | transactions, and full disclosure in terms of the |
| 14 | details that were used to calculate that benchmark. |
| 15 | Q I want to give you something that was |
| 16 | previously marked as Government 169, and actually I'm |
| 17 | probably going to make reference to Defense 1457, if |
| 18 | you want to find that in your stack. |
| 19 | Let me state for the record that Government |
| 20 | 169 is Bates labeled MSOP sub 8484. It's an E-mail |
| 21 | from Andrea Harrison dated March 17th, 2004, subject |
| 22 | MBS in press regarding Oracle, PeopleSoft-DOJ. It's |
| 23 | to Mr. Pollie among others, produced by Microsoft in |
| 24 | the course of this investigation. |
| 25 | A (Reviewing.) |
| 00237 |
| 1 | Okay. |
| 2 | Q Do you recall receiving this E-mail? |
| 3 | A Yes, I do. |
| 4 | Q And who's Andrea Harrison? |
| 5 | A Andrea Harrison is part of our business and |
| 6 | marketing organization out of Redmond. |
| 7 | Q So who does she report to? |
| 8 | A Andrea Harrison reports to -- I'm not |
| 9 | specifically sure who she reports to. |
| 10 | Q Give me a sense of what her job is. |
| 11 | A It's, as I understand it, it's a buffer |
| 12 | between the business field organization as a business |
| 13 | and marketing organization, and the business group, |
| 14 | which is represented by Doug Burgum and the -- or the |
| 15 | BG. |
| 16 | Q As you see in the first paragraph she has a |
| 17 | sentence there, we want to be clear that our target |
| 18 | market strategy has not changed. We remain committed |
| 19 | to delivering business applications to small mid |
| 20 | market and corporate businesses worldwide. Do you see |
| 21 | that? |
| 22 | A Yes, I do. |
| 23 | Q What is your understanding of that sentence? |
| 24 | A That we have a strategy that targets small, |
| 25 | medium and CAS-based accounts where there's a, a |
| 00238 |
| 1 | reasonable fit for our product lines from a product |
| 2 | functionality point of view. And I think she goes on |
| 3 | to say that it's really the -- targeted at the spokes |
| 4 | for highly decentralized, highly autonomous |
| 5 | organizations as being the primary goal of the |
| 6 | enterprise group. |
| 7 | Q And does she do that description -- in the |
| 8 | next paragraph down there's three bullets. There's a |
| 9 | bullet that says, divisions of large enterprises, |
| 10 | typically companies with 1,000 to 5,000 employees. |
| 11 | Think of this in terms of a hub and spoke model where |
| 12 | Microsoft is targeting the spoke and not the hub of an |
| 13 | organization. There are about 16,000 companies |
| 14 | worldwide in this category. Is that what you mean? |
| 15 | A Yes. |
| 16 | Q Do you agree with the statements in this |
| 17 | E-mail about the target markets for MBS products? |
| 18 | A I think it's very difficult to put a |
| 19 | particular either employee count or dollar value or, |
| 20 | or business, maybe, perhaps, description on -- in |
| 21 | describing what specifically are good fits for the |
| 22 | product. As I've testified earlier, it really is, in |
| 23 | this business for our products, a very case-by-case |
| 24 | basis to ensure that the client is a good fit for our |
| 25 | products. And I believe that employee size doesn't |
| 00239 |
| 1 | necessarily dictate whether or not the product would |
| 2 | be a fit. But I think from a marketing point of view, |
| 3 | I think establishing the total pool of accounts that |
| 4 | a, in some way from a marketing sense so that they can |
| 5 | do some analyzing of the markets and the revenue and |
| 6 | the size of the ERP spend and IT spend, it's probably, |
| 7 | you know, one way that a company could evaluate it. |
| 8 | Q It says at the top in bold, she's put to the |
| 9 | U.S. subsidiary field, field managers who can forward |
| 10 | this information to their teams per Legal and PR -- |
| 11 | that's probably public relations. Do you see that? |
| 12 | A Yes. |
| 13 | Q Did you do anything with this E-mail such as |
| 14 | forwarding it? |
| 15 | A Yes. I forwarded it on to the 17 people in |
| 16 | the field as a follow-up to a phone conversation that |
| 17 | we had. |
| 18 | Q And what was discussed on that phone |
| 19 | conversation? |
| 20 | A As I testified earlier, we had just a |
| 21 | briefing regarding some of the press that had come out |
| 22 | regarding some statements that had been made in some |
| 23 | publications regarding our focus in the enterprise, |
| 24 | and reassured them that it was business as usual, |
| 25 | still the targets were large decentralized parts of |
| 00240 |
| 1 | larger corporations and that should be the message |
| 2 | that they could -- should continue to relate to the |
| 3 | clients. |
| 4 | Q And we were discussing Defense 1457. Was -- |
| 5 | A And just as a point of clarity, I think it |
| 6 | was asked earlier if I produced any document to my |
| 7 | field team that I wrote and sent out to my team |
| 8 | regarding this issue. |
| 9 | Q Uh-huh. |
| 10 | A And I answered that question as no. But |
| 11 | just as a point of clarity, this was forwarded on, but |
| 12 | not written by me, to the field team. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00241 |
| 1 | Q Okay. When we were discussing Defense 1457, |
| 2 | you were asked some questions about the sentence that |
| 3 | says -- it's in the middle paragraph, to the contrary |
| 4 | Axapta has the flexibility and scalability needed to |
| 5 | address enterprise scale ERP demands. Do you recall |
| 6 | those questions? |
| 7 | A Partially, yes. |
| 8 | Q Okay. And I believe you said in response -- |
| 9 | please correct me if I'm wrong -- that in, in no way |
| 10 | is Axapta robust enough to serve a Fortune 50 account. |
| 11 | Do you recall that testimony? |
| 12 | A I believe just from a point of clarification |
| 13 | point of view, I was asked what I would define as a, |
| 14 | as the largest enterprise account and I believe my |
| 15 | response was from a -- at least I understood the |
| 16 | question, what was an example of the largest |
| 17 | enterprise account, and I believe I responded to sort |
| 18 | of a Fortune 50 account would be what I would consider |
| 19 | to be the largest. I -- I don't want for the record |
| 20 | to say that No. 51 is something that Microsoft |
| 21 | Business Solutions is targeting or can provide service |
| 22 | to. I think, again, it gets back to the specific |
| 23 | functionality that the company requires on whether or |
| 24 | not our product would be a good fit. And I don't |
| 25 | believe that, based on some of the functionality that |
| 00242 |
| 1 | I've experienced in the Tier 1 market that Microsoft |
| 2 | Business Solutions should either be targeted or is a |
| 3 | candidate for success at a hub location of a large |
| 4 | corporation. |
| 5 | Q When you say the Tier 1 market there, are |
| 6 | you thinking of any demarcation between that market |
| 7 | and the Tier 2 market in terms of the customer |
| 8 | characteristics? |
| 9 | A I'm thinking more in terms of the amount of |
| 10 | experience, infrastructure, partner training, system |
| 11 | integrator support, years in providing successful |
| 12 | solutions to very large corporations, and |
| 13 | functionality that they've incorporated in their |
| 14 | product that these large customers have worked with |
| 15 | them to produce over many, many years as more of the |
| 16 | demarcation. Not necessarily the size of the |
| 17 | customer, but -- |
| 18 | Q And that list that you just went through, |
| 19 | are you saying that all of those things are things |
| 20 | that the Tier 1 players possess and that the Tier 2 |
| 21 | players generally do not? |
| 22 | A I would say that's -- I could apply that |
| 23 | specific -- I can't speak for any other Tier 2, but I |
| 24 | can speak to these are things that MBS is years away, |
| 25 | perhaps, from, from having that these other companies |
| 00243 |
| 1 | have worked years to, to make part of their company's |
| 2 | business value proposition to large corporations. |
| 3 | Q Okay. There was some discussion about what |
| 4 | it meant for Microsoft to be the prime. Do you recall |
| 5 | those discussions? |
| 6 | A Some of those, yes. |
| 7 | Q Okay. Do you have a sense in the past year |
| 8 | of how often Microsoft has been the prime contractor |
| 9 | for a deal? |
| 10 | A It's been a very rare occurrence and one |
| 11 | that we discourage. Really just a handful of the |
| 12 | total new customers are, or customer adds have been |
| 13 | requested by clients as being a necessity for them to |
| 14 | continue doing business with Microsoft in the |
| 15 | conversations on, on the software solution. And it |
| 16 | usually is, just as a point of clarification, involves |
| 17 | a case where the customer specifically requests that |
| 18 | Microsoft step in and take a lead responsibility in |
| 19 | certain aspects of the project or in certain cases |
| 20 | where there's multiple partners. And in some cases |
| 21 | the partners that are involved have actually requested |
| 22 | that Microsoft come in and assist them in coordinating |
| 23 | the overall relationship between the multiple partners |
| 24 | that the client is dealing with and when to -- and |
| 25 | when I say partners, I mean resellers. I don't mean |
| 00244 |
| 1 | ISVs or third-party programs. I just mean the core of |
| 2 | Microsoft resellers. But very few. |
| 3 | Q Very few in the last year? |
| 4 | A Yes. |
| 5 | Q Do you have a sense of how many Microsoft |
| 6 | intends to do in the next year? |
| 7 | A We are trying to move entirely away from |
| 8 | doing any. Our going-in position based on some |
| 9 | guidelines and things that we've been evaluating and |
| 10 | looking into is really an offer of last resort, when |
| 11 | it means the difference between winning and losing the |
| 12 | business in the customer's mind, what -- will we |
| 13 | consider it. |
| 14 | Q Okay. If you can pull out 1420 which is the |
| 15 | Esselte printout, web page printout. |
| 16 | A Yeah, I've read that enough. I think I've |
| 17 | memorized that one. |
| 18 | Q Okay. I'm going to go to the sentence |
| 19 | you've probably memorized the most. |
| 20 | A Yeah, I think -- |
| 21 | Q The sentence that says, this is a great |
| 22 | example of how Microsoft Axapta can scale to meet even |
| 23 | the most complex requirements of billion-dollar |
| 24 | manufacturing businesses operating in multiple |
| 25 | countries around the world. Do you recall that |
| 00245 |
| 1 | sentence? |
| 2 | A Yes, I do. |
| 3 | Q I believe your prior testimony was that you |
| 4 | felt that sentence could be misleading. Do you recall |
| 5 | that? |
| 6 | A Yeah, it -- it's something that slipped |
| 7 | through the cracks in terms of overall proofreading |
| 8 | and things that should have gone on around that |
| 9 | statement. I think it could be interpreted in ways |
| 10 | that it was not meant to be portrayed. |
| 11 | Q And what are those ways that it could be |
| 12 | interpreted that were not intended? |
| 13 | A And again, I -- I did not read this -- I did |
| 14 | not write this, this full statement. I wrote the |
| 15 | first sentence of the statement, and it was written by |
| 16 | one of our partners who was very excited about having |
| 17 | closed Esselte and wanted to get the word out to the |
| 18 | marketplace. |
| 19 | Again, your question specifically was which |
| 20 | part of it could be misinterpreted; is that correct? |
| 21 | Q Yes, or what would be misleading about it? |
| 22 | A I think the part that says this is a true |
| 23 | cooperative effort, I think that is, that speaks for |
| 24 | itself. That's fine. We're entities excited to work |
| 25 | with our partners to deliver a comprehensive solution |
| 00246 |
| 1 | that meets the unique need of Esselte business. I |
| 2 | think that's fine. I think the third part is, the |
| 3 | great example of how Microsoft-Axapta can scale to |
| 4 | meet the most complex requirements of billion-dollar |
| 5 | manufacturing businesses operating in multiple |
| 6 | countries around the world, particularly because it |
| 7 | could be misinterpreted because it doesn't reference |
| 8 | the fact that it's looking at 15 separate potential |
| 9 | implementation sites. It doesn't mention the fact |
| 10 | that a majority of the manufacturing function that we |
| 11 | reference here as being complex requirements are not |
| 12 | handled by the Axapta product itself. It's a decision |
| 13 | that the client made to, to actually do the majority |
| 14 | of its manufacturing, its complex manufacturing with |
| 15 | products that were not Microsoft. So I think that |
| 16 | that leads you to believe that it's all done by the |
| 17 | Axapta product when in fact it's -- it's not 3,000 |
| 18 | users in one location, and it's not all the |
| 19 | manufacturing requirements of this account done |
| 20 | through the core Axapta product line. |
| 21 | Q Is it your understanding that Esselte has, |
| 22 | quote, the most complex requirements? |
| 23 | A I'm not privy to the specific requirements |
| 24 | within Esselte. I can say that in the marketplace |
| 25 | lean manufacturing is an advanced technique of |
| 00247 |
| 1 | controlling inventory and controlling manufacturing |
| 2 | that requires a very good support system underneath it |
| 3 | and lots of discipline executed internally to provide |
| 4 | that kind of technique of manufacturing. |
| 5 | Q And the lean manufacturing model module, |
| 6 | that's the piece that would be provided by eBECS? |
| 7 | A That's correct. |
| 8 | Q And does Microsoft have any control over |
| 9 | eBECS? |
| 10 | A No. |
| 11 | Q Does Microsoft own any of the intellectual |
| 12 | property, if you will, of the eBECS lean manufacturing |
| 13 | model? |
| 14 | Not to my understanding. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00250 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Q So let's do it in terms of vendors. And I |
| 21 | believe the Tier 1 vendors for financials, who would |
| 22 | you say that the Tier 1 vendors are for financials? |
| 23 | A I would say that it's been described in |
| 24 | market terminology from research firms and analysts |
| 25 | that Tier 1 vendors traditionally are compiled of |
| 00251 |
| 1 | Oracle, PeopleSoft, SAP, Siebel are the ones most |
| 2 | commonly mentioned in that category. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Q So if we were just looking for a financial |
| 7 | management product, the Tier 1 vendors would be |
| 8 | Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP? |
| 9 | A That's the way it's described, yes. |
| 10 | Q Do you have an understanding of the lack of |
| 11 | functionality that Axapta -- that those Tier 1 vendors |
| 12 | have in the financial management area? |
| 13 | MR. YATES: Objection. Lacks foundation as |
| 14 | to any company other than SAP in light of the |
| 15 | witness's testimony. |
| 16 | A I can relate to some experience that I have |
| 17 | at SAP and from a competitive positioning when I was |
| 18 | competing for SAP in that marketplace. Axapta lacks a |
| 19 | lot of core, for lack of terminology, let's call it |
| 20 | hub functionality that a lot of those vendors would |
| 21 | provide for. I think I referenced items like treasury |
| 22 | management, core intercompany transactions between -- |
| 23 | financial postings between different companies that an |
| 24 | organization may, may look to account for is not part |
| 25 | of the core Axapta product. It does not have a |
| 00252 |
| 1 | robust -- if you consider human resources as part of |
| 2 | your question in core financial management -- |
| 3 | Q Let's -- I'll ask the human resources in a |
| 4 | minute. Just for financial you mentioned treasury |
| 5 | management and core financial trans -- intercompany |
| 6 | transaction. Are there any others that come to mind? |
| 7 | A Some sophisticated foreign trips, foreign |
| 8 | currency transactions, swap rates, transactions done |
| 9 | in multiple currencies, some of the more sophisticated |
| 10 | financially related transactions. |
| 11 | Q I believe I wrote down when you were |
| 12 | discussing this before something called cash |
| 13 | projections. Would that be an area that, additional |
| 14 | area that Axapta does not have, core hub |
| 15 | functionality? |
| 16 | A Yeah. I think I said cash flow projections |
| 17 | based on positions in various -- not just currencies, |
| 18 | but those kind of sophisticated financial transactions |
| 19 | that are typically handled at a corporate treasury |
| 20 | type of function is the best way to describe that |
| 21 | group of transactions where there's a corporate |
| 22 | treasury department within a corporation. |
| 23 | Q And now turning to the core HR functions |
| 24 | that Axapta lacks that would be required by these hub |
| 25 | enterprises as we've defined that term, what HR |
| 00253 |
| 1 | functionality do you think it lacks? |
| 2 | MR. YATES: Objection. Vague. |
| 3 | THE WITNESS: Pardon? |
| 4 | MR. YATES: You may answer if you |
| 5 | understand. |
| 6 | A Just from limited exposure in the U.S. |
| 7 | market, the product is not in full support compliance |
| 8 | in the areas such as EEO reporting, it does not have |
| 9 | an integrated payroll product as part of its offering |
| 10 | for the U.S. In terms of taxing and regulatory |
| 11 | support, it lacks a lot of U.S. regulatory HR |
| 12 | reporting that is traditionally supplied by other |
| 13 | vendors that have U.S.-based HR offerings. |
| 14 | Q Okay. |
| 15 | A And no payroll system, obviously. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 00254 |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Q Mr. Pollie, I just a few follow-up questions |
| 11 | to Ms. Blizzard's examination. You were talking about |
| 12 | Esselte and I believe it's the eBECS, is that a supply |
| 13 | chain piece of software? |
| 14 | A I -- |
| 15 | MS. BLIZZARD: (Inaudible.) |
| 16 | A I believe it's more specific to lean |
| 17 | manufacturing software requirements. |
| 18 | Q Is lean manufacturing part of a core |
| 19 | financial package in your definition? |
| 20 | A No. |
| 21 | Q It's something outside of that? |
| 22 | A It's part of what I would consider to be a |
| 23 | logistics offering. |
| 24 | Q And you were talking about in response to |
| 25 | some of Ms. Blizzard's questions about treasury |
| 00255 |
| 1 | manage -- management, intercompany transactions. Do | |
| 2 | you recall that last question and the answers? | |
| 3 | A Yes. | |
| 4 | Q Are you aware of any independent software | |
| 5 | vendors or partners that provide any treasury | |
| 6 | management packages? | |
| 7 | A I'm not aware of any that we've, we've come | |
| 8 | across in our conversations with MBS. | |
| 9 | Q And going back to Exhibit 1449, sir, and | |
| 10 | specifically the Corporate Sales Acceleration page | |
| 11 | which is Page 4150. Ms. Blizzard asked some questions | |
| 12 | and she said there was some sort of a shortfall in | |
| 13 | terms of meeting the projections and you answered that | |
| 14 | there was. It's true, is it not, though, sir, that | |
| 15 | Microsoft Business Solutions essentially doubled its | |
| 16 | sales in the Cas base from to projected | REDACTED |
| 17 | to $ in fiscal year '04? | REDACTED |
| 18 | A The baseline that was calculated here was | |
| 19 | not the ultimate baseline that was carried forward | |
| 20 | into -- from a FY '03 total. The baseline that was | |
| 21 | carried forward from an FY '03 total actually moved | |
| 22 | from $ to closer to as the | REDACTED |
| 23 | established baseline. | |
| 24 | Q When you say the established baseline, what | |
| 25 | do you mean, sir? | |
| 00256 |
| 1 | A In regards to your question about how | |
| 2 | revenue would progress, it was based on a $ | REDACTED |
| 3 | total to a projection of , rather than a $ | REDACTED |
| 4 | total. | REDACTED |
| 5 | Q So fiscal year '03 CAS sales by Microsoft | |
| 6 | Business Solutions were approximately ? | REDACTED |
| 7 | A Approximately . | REDACTED |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | |
Pollie 05-26-04
|