
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
FOXCROFT PARTNERSHIP;
WILFRED BARRY;
FOXCROFT MANAGEMENT AND
CONSTRUCTION, INC.; and
D'ABAR BUILDERS, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________
COMPLAINT
The United States of America alleges:
- This action is brought to enforce the Fair Housing Act,
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the
Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (the "Fair Housing Act"), 42
U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619.
Jurisdiction and Venue
- This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28
U.S.C. § 1345 and 28 U.S.C. § 3614(a).
- Venue is proper in that the claims alleged herein arose
in the Northern District of Illinois.
Subject Property
- Foxcroft Apartments (the "Complex") is an apartment
complex located on Foxcroft Road, Naperville, in the Northern
District of Illinois. The Complex consists of nine (9) buildings
containing a total of 180 dwelling units, as well as a rental
office and clubhouse. Forty-four of the apartments are located
on the ground floor.
- The apartments at the Complex and the adjoining
clubhouse were designed and constructed for first occupancy after
March 13, 1991. Each of the apartments is a dwelling within the
meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3602(b).
- Each of the 44 ground-floor apartments at the Complex
is a "covered multifamily dwelling" within the meaning of 42
U.S.C. § 3604(f)(7)(A) and is subject to the design and
construction requirements at 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C).
- The clubhouse is for the use of the residents of the
Complex. It falls within the public and common use space covered
by the design and construction requirements at 42 U.S.C. §
3604(f)(3)(C).
Defendants
- Defendant Foxcroft Partnership developed and owns
Foxcroft Apartments and is responsible for its design and
construction. Foxcroft Partnership has its principal place of
business in the Northern District of Illinois.
- Defendant Wilfred Barry, a managing partner of Foxcroft
Partnership, developed and owns Foxcroft Apartments and is
responsible for its design and construction. Mr. Barry resides
in the Northern District of Illinois.
- Defendant Foxcroft Management and Construction, Inc.
built a number of the buildings in the Complex and is responsible
for their design and construction. Foxcroft Management and
Construction, Inc. has its principal place of business in the
Northern District of Illinois.
- Defendant D'Abar Builders, Inc. built a number of the
buildings in the Complex and is responsible for their design and
construction. D'Abar Builders, Inc. has its principal place of
business in the Northern District of Illinois.
Fair Housing Act Pattern or Practice Claim
- The defendants have failed to design and construct
Foxcroft Apartments so that: (a) the public use and common use
portions are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with
disabilities; (b) all doors into and within the 44 ground floor
units are sufficiently wide to allow passage by persons who use
wheelchairs; (c) all premises within the 44 ground floor units
contain: (i) an accessible route into and through the dwelling;
(ii) electrical outlets, thermostats and other environmental
controls in accessible locations; and (iii) usable kitchens and
bathrooms such that an individual in a wheelchair can maneuver
about the space.
- The defendants, through the actions referred to in the
preceding paragraph, have:
- Discriminated in the rental, or otherwise made
unavailable or denied, dwellings to renters
because of handicap, in violation of 42 U.S.C. §
3604(f)(1); and
- Discriminated against persons in the terms,
conditions or privileges of rental of a dwelling,
or in the provision of services or facilities in
connection with a dwelling, because of handicap,
in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(2); and
- Failed to design and construct dwellings in
compliance with the accessibility features
mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C).
- The conduct of the defendants described above
constitutes:
- A pattern or practice of resistance to the full
enjoyment of rights granted by the Fair Housing
Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619; and
- A denial to a group of persons of rights granted
by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619,
which denial raises an issue of general public
importance.
- Persons who may have been the victims of the
defendants' discriminatory housing practices are aggrieved
persons as defined by 42 U.S.C. § 3602(i) and may have suffered
injuries as a result of the defendants' conduct described above.
- The defendants' conduct described above was
intentional, willful, and taken in disregard for the rights of
others.
WHEREFORE, the United States prays that the court enter an
order that:
- Declares that the defendants' policies and practices,
as alleged herein, violate the Fair Housing Act;
- Enjoins the defendants, their officers, employees,
agents, successors and all other persons in active concert or
participation with any of them, from:
- Failing or refusing, to the extent possible, to
bring the 44 ground floor units and public use and
common use areas of the Complex into compliance
with 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C);
- Failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps
as may be necessary to restore, as nearly as
practicable, the victims of the defendants'
unlawful practices to the position they would have
been in but for the discriminatory conduct; and
- Designing or constructing covered multifamily
dwelling in the future that do not contain the
accessibility and adaptability features required
by 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C);
- Awards such damages as would fully compensate each
person aggrieved by the defendants' discriminatory housing
practices for his or her injuries resulting from the defendants'
discriminatory conduct, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(B);
- Awards punitive damages to each person aggrieved by the
defendants' discriminatory housing practices because of the
intentional and willful nature of the defendants' conduct,
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(B); and
- Assesses a civil penalty against each defendant an
amount authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(C), in order to
vindicate the public interest.
The United States further prays for such additional relief
as the interests of justice may require.
|
JANET RENO Attorney General |
SCOTT R. LASSAR United States Attorney |
BILL LANN LEE Assistant Attorney General |
|
JOAN A. MAGAGNA Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section |
JOAN C. LASER Assistant United States Attorney 219 S. Dearborn Street Room 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 383-1857 |
TIMOTHY J. MORAN Deputy Chief ELIZABETH O. TUCCI Trial Attorney Housing & Civil Enforcement Section Civil Rights Division Department of Justice P.O. Box 65998 Washington, D.C. 20035-5998 (202) 514-4713 |
Document Filed: