1905
Guidelines For INS Undercover OperationsPart 7.
Approval Procedures
|
7. APPROVAL PROCEDURES
- Approval by Central Office (Undercover Operations
Review
Committee and Commissioner or Associate Commissioner for Enforcement) with
Concurrence of United States Attorney or Strike Force Chief When
Circumstances
Are Present
- The Commissioner of the INS or the Associate Commissioner for
Enforcement
must approve the establishment, extension, renewal, or modification of an
undercover operation if there is a reasonable expectation that any of the
circumstances listed in paragraph IV(A) may occur.
- In such a case, the appropriate District Director or Chief Patrol Agent
shall submit the application to the INS Central Office through the
appropriate
Regional Office. See paragraph B, below. The Central Office may either
disapprove the application or recommend that it be approved. In cases, in
which
the Central Office recommends approval, the application shall be forwarded
to the
Undercover Operations Review Committee. If approved by the Undercover
Operations
Review Committee, the application shall be forwarded to the Commissioner or
the
Associate Commissioner for Enforcement. See paragraph D, below. The
Commissioner or Associate Commissioner for Enforcement may approve or
disapprove
the application.
- Applications to the Central Office
- Each application to the Central Office from a District Director or
Chief Patrol Agent recommending approval of the establishment, extension,
renewal, or modification of an undercover operation involving circumstances
listed in paragraph IV(A) shall be made in writing and shall include, with
supporting facts and circumstances:
- A description of the proposed undercover operation, including
the particular cover to be employed and any informants or other cooperating
private individuals who will assist in the operation; a description of the
criminal enterprise under investigation, and any individual known to be
involved;
and a statement of the period of time for which the undercover operation
would
be maintained;
- An inclusion of the information required by paragraph IV(B)(l)-(3) and a
statement as to why it is believed traditional investigative techniques will
not
achieve the desired results;
- A statement concerning which circumstances specified in paragraph IV(A)
are
reasonably expect to occur, what the operative facts are likely to be, and
why
the undercover operation merits approval in light of the circumstances,
including, for any foreseeable participation by an undercover employee or
cooperating private individual in any otherwise illegal activity which would
be
proscribed by federal, state, or local law as a felony or which would be
otherwise a serious crime -- except for the making of false representations
to
third parties in concealment of personal identity or true ownership of a
proprietary; the purchase of fraudulent documents; the purchase, ownership,
use,
or possession of stolen property or contraband; or the transportation or
concealment of illegal aliens when neither an undercover employee nor a
cooperating private individual is a major participant in the scheme to
transport
or conceal illegal aliens -- a statement why the participation is justified
by
the factors noted in paragraph F(l) below, and a statement of the federal
prosecutor's approval pursuant to paragraph F(2) below;
- A statement concerning proposed expenses;
- A statement that the United States Attorney or Strike Force Chief is
knowledgeable about the proposed operation, including the sensitive
circumstances
reasonably expected to occur; concurs with the proposal and its objectives
and
legality; and agrees to prosecute any meritorious case that is developed;
and
- The date by which a response to the application is necessary, and a
brief
explanation of why a response is needed by that date.
- In the highly unusual event that there are compelling reasons for not
advising either the United States Attorney or Strike Force Chief of the
proposed
undercover operation, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the
Criminal
Division, or other Department of Justice attorney designated by him, may
substitute for such person for purposes of any authorization or other
function
required by these guidelines. Where the Director or Chief Patrol Agent
determines that such substitution is necessary, the application to the
Central
Office shall include a statement of the compelling reasons, together with
supporting facts and circumstances, which are believed to justify that
determination. Such applications may only be authorized pursuant to the
procedures prescribed in paragraph C, below, whether or not consideration by
the
Undercover Operations Review Committee is otherwise required, and upon the
approval of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal
Division.
- An application for the extension, renewal, or modification of authority
to
engage in an undercover operation should also describe the results so far
obtained from the operation or a reasonable explanation of any failure to
obtain
significant results and a statement that the United States Attorney or
Strike
Force Chief favors the extension, renewal, or modification of
authority.
- Undercover Operations Review Committee
- There shall be an Undercover Operations Review Committee,
consisting
of enforcement employees and such other appropriate employees of the INS as
designated by the Commissioner and consisting of attorneys of the Department
of
Justice designated by the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the
Criminal
Division, to be chaired by the Associate Commissioner for Enforcement as the
Commissioner's designee.
- Upon receipt by the Central Office of a request for approval of an
undercover operation, the Committee will review the application. The
Justice
Department members of the Committee may consult with senior Department
officials
and the appropriate United States Attorney or Strike Force Chief as they
deem
appropriate. If the Committee concurs in the determinations contained in
the
application and finds that in other respects the undercover operation should
go
forward, see paragraph C(3) and (4), below, the Committee is authorized to
recommend to the Commissioner or Associate Commissioner for Enforcement, see
paragraph D, below, that approval be granted.
- In reviewing the application, the Committee shall carefully assess the
contemplated benefits of the undercover operation together with its
operating and
other costs. In assessing the costs of the proposed undercover operation,
the
Committee shall consider, where relevant, the following factors, among
others:
- The risk of harm to private individuals undercover employees;
- The risk of financial loss to private individuals and businesses and
the
risk of damage liability or other loss to the Government;
- The risk of harm to reputation;
- The risk of harm to privileged or confidential relationships;
- The risk of invasion of privacy;
- The degree to which the actions of undercover employees or cooperating
private individuals may approach the conduct proscribed in paragraph G,
below;
and
- The suitability of undercover employees' or cooperating private
individuals' participating in activity of the sort contemplated during the
undercover operation.
- The Committee shall examine the application to determine whether the
undercover operation is planned so as to minimize the incidence of sensitive
circumstances and to minimize the risks of harm and intrusion that are
created
by the circumstances. If the Committee recommends approval of an undercover
operation, the recommendation shall include a brief written statement
explaining
why the undercover operation merits approval.
- The Committee shall recommend approval of an undercover operation only
if
a majority of its members agree, provided that:
- If one or more of the designees of the Assistant Attorney
General in charge of the Criminal Division does not join in a recommendation
for
approval of a proposed undercover operation because of legal, ethical,
prosecutive, or Departmental policy considerations, the designee shall
promptly
advise the Assistant Attorney General and there shall be no approval of the
establishment, extension, renewal, or modification of the undercover
operation
until the Assistant Attorney General has had the opportunity to consult with
the
Commissioner;
- If, upon consultation, the Assistant Attorney General disagrees with a
decision by the Commissioner to approve the proposed undercover operation,
there
shall be no establishment, extension, renewal, or modification of the
undercover
operation until the Assistant Attorney General has had an opportunity to
refer
the matter to the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General.
- The Committee should consult the INS General Counsel's Office and the
Office of Legal Counsel or other appropriate division or office in the
Department
of Justice about any significant unsettled legal questions concerning
authority
for or the conduct of a proposed undercover operation.
- Approval by the Commissioner
- The Commissioner or Associate Commissioner for Enforcement shall have
the
authority to approve operations recommended for approval by the Undercover
Operations Review Committee. However, only the Commissioner may authorize a
proposed operation if a reasonable expectation exists that:
- There may be a significant risk of violence or physical injury to
individuals;
- A circumstance specified in paragraph IV(A)(14) or IV(A)(15) is
reasonably
expected to occur, in which case the undercover operation may be implemented
only
after the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General has specifically
approved
that aspect of the operation in accordance with applicable law.
- Duration of Authorization
- An undercover operation may not continue longer than is necessary
to
achieve the objective of the authorization. In any event, such an operation
shall not continue longer than six (6) months without new authorization to
proceed.
- Any undercover operation initially approved by a District Director,
Chief
Patrol Agent, or Regional Commissioner must be reauthorized at the next
higher
level if it lasts longer than six (6) months.
- Authorization of Participation in "Otherwise Illegal" Activity
- Notwithstanding any other provision of these guidelines, an undercover
employee or cooperating private individual shall not engage, except in
accordance
with this paragraph, in otherwise illegal activity.
- No official shall recommend or approve an undercover employee's or
cooperating private individual's planned or reasonably foreseeable
participation
in otherwise illegal activity unless the participation is justified in
order:
- to obtain information or evidence necessary for
paramount
prosecutive purpose;
- to establish and maintain credibility or cover with persons associated
with
the criminal activity under investigation; or
- to prevent or avoid the danger of death or serious bodily
injury.
- Participation in otherwise illegal activity which would be proscribed
by
federal, state, or local law as a felony or which would be otherwise a
serious
crime must be approved in advance by the Commissioner or the Associate
Commissioner for Enforcement on the recommendation of the Undercover
Operations
Review Committee pursuant to paragraphs A-D, above. The Commissioner's
approval
is required, however, for participation in any otherwise illegal activity
involving a significant risk of violence or physical injury to individuals.
Approval by the Commissioner or the Associate Commissioner for Enforcement
is not
required for the making of false representations to third parties in
concealment
of personal identity or the true ownership of a proprietary; the purchase of
fraudulent documents; the purchase, ownership, or possession of stolen
property
or contraband; or the transportation or concealment of illegal aliens when
neither an undercover employee nor a cooperating private individual is a
major
participant in the scheme to transport or conceal illegal aliens. Approvals
shall be recorded in writing.
- A recommendation to the Central Office for approval of participation in
such otherwise illegal activity must include the views of the United States
Attorney or Strike Force Chief on why the participation is warranted.
- Participation in the purchase of fraudulent documents; the purchase,
ownership, use, or possession of stolen property or contraband; or the
transportation of illegal aliens when neither an undercover employee nor a
cooperating private individual is a major participant in the scheme to
transport
illegal aliens must be approved in advance by the District Director or Chief
Patrol Agent. Approvals by such officials shall be recorded in writing.
- The INS shall take reasonable steps to minimize the participation of an
undercover employee or cooperating private individual in any otherwise
illegal
activity.
- An undercover employee or cooperating private individual shall not
participate in any act of violence, initiate or instigate any plan to commit
criminal acts, or use unlawful investigative techniques to obtain
information or
evidence (e.g., illegal wiretapping, illegal mail opening, breaking and
entering,
or trespass amounting to an illegal search).
- If it becomes necessary to participate in otherwise illegal activity
that
was not foreseen or anticipated, an undercover employee or cooperating
private
individual should make every effort to consult with the District Director or
Chief Patrol Agent. For otherwise illegal activity which would be a felony
or
which would be otherwise a serious crime, the District Director or Chief
Patrol
Agent can provide emergency authorization under paragraph IV(D), above. If
consultation with the District Director or Chief Patrol Agent is impossible
and
there is not an immediate and grave threat to life or physical safety
(destruction of property through arson or bombing is to be considered a
grave
threat to life or physical safety), an undercover employee or cooperating
private
individual may participate in the otherwise illegal activity so long as he
or she
does not take part in and makes every effort to prevent any act of violence.
A
report to the District Director or Chief Patrol Agent shall be made as soon
as
possible after the participation, and the District Director or Chief Patrol
Agent
shall submit a full report to the Central Office. The Central Office shall
promptly inform the members of the Undercover Operations Review Committee.
- Nothing in these guidelines prohibits establishing, funding, and
maintaining secure cover for an undercover operation by making false
representations to third parties in concealment of personal identity or the
true
ownership of a proprietary (e.g., false statements in obtaining driver's
licenses, vehicle registrations, occupancy permits, and business licenses)
when
such action is approved in advance by the appropriate District Director or
Chief
Patrol Agent.
- Nothing in paragraph F(5) or (6), above, prohibits an undercover
employee
or cooperating private individual from taking reasonable measures of
self-defense
in an emergency to protect his or her own life or the life of others against
wrongful force. Such measure shall be reported to the District Director,
Chief
Patrol Agent, United States Attorney, or Strike Force Chief as soon as
possible.
- If a serious incident of violence should occur in the course of the
criminal activity under investigation and an undercover employee or
cooperating
private individual participates in any fashion in such serious incident of
violence, the District Director or Chief Patrol Agent shall immediately
inform
the Central Office. The Central Office shall promptly inform the Assistant
Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division.
- Authorization for the Creation of Opportunities for Criminal
Activity
- Entrapment should be scrupulously avoided. Entrapment is the
inducement or encouragement of an individual to engage in criminal activity
in
which he or she would otherwise not be disposed to engage.
- In addition to complying with any legal requirements, before approving
an
undercover operation involving an invitation to engage in criminal activity,
the
approving authority should be satisfied that:
- The corrupt nature of the activity is reasonably clear
to potential subjects;
- There is a reasonable indication that the undercover operation
will reveal criminal activities; and
- The nature of any inducement is not unjustifiable in
view of the character of the criminal activity in which the individual
is invited to engage.
- Under the law of entrapment, inducements may be offered to an
individual
even though there is no reasonable indication that the particular individual
has
engaged, or is engaging, in the criminal activity that is properly under
investigation. Nonetheless, no such undercover operation shall be approved
without the specific written authorization of the Commissioner unless
the
Undercover Operations Review Committee determines (see paragraph C, above),
insofar as practicable, that either:
- there is a reasonable indication, based on information
developed through informants or other means, that the subject is engaging,
has
engaged, or is likely to engage in criminal activity of a similar type; or
- the opportunity for criminal activity has been structured so that there
is
reason for believing that persons drawn to the opportunity, or brought to
it, are
predisposed to engage in the contemplated criminal activity.
- In any undercover operation, the decision to offer an inducement to an
individual, or, to otherwise invite an individual to engage in criminal
activity,
shall be based solely on law enforcement considerations.
- Authorization of Investigative Interviews that Are Not Part of an
Undercover Operation
- Notwithstanding any other provision of these guidelines, routine
investigative interviews that are not part of an undercover operation
may
be conducted without the authorization of the Central Office and without
compliance with paragraphs IV(B) and (C) and V(A) and (B). These include
so-called "pretext" interviews in which an INS employee uses an alias or
cover
identity to conceal his or her relationship with the INS.
- However, this authority does not apply to an investigative interview
that
involves a sensitive circumstance listed in paragraph IV(A). Any
investigative
interview involving a sensitive circumstance -- even an interview that is
not
conducted as part of an undercover operation -- may only be approved
pursuant to
the procedures set forth in paragraphs V(A), (B), (C), and (D) (Applications
referred to Central Office) or pursuant to the emergency authority
prescribed in
paragraph IV(D) if applicable.
| |