Case Document

Amended Complaint United States v. Dawn Properties (S.D. Miss.)

Date

Thursday, June 23, 2016

Document Type

Complaint

Attachments

Amended Complaint United States v. Dawn Properties (S.D. Miss.). 6/23/16

download complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:14cv224LG-JCG

DAWN PROPERTIES, INC.,

SOUTHERN CROSS CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY, INC.,

RIDGELAND CONSTRUCTION ONE, LLC,

THE BEACH CLUB, LLC,

THE BELMONT OF LAMAR, LLC,

GRAND BISCAYNE APTS., LLC,

SEAINN, LLC, and

IKE W. THRASH,

Defendants,

and

SUMMER MISS, LLC,

14510 LEMOYNE BOULEVARD, LLC,

LEXINGTON MILL MISSISSIPPI OWNER, LLC,

INN BY THE SEA HOME OWNERS

ASSOCIATION, INC., and

BELMONT BEEKWILDER, LLC,

Rule 19 Defendants,

and

14510 LEMOYNE BOULEVARD, LLC,

Cross-claimant,

GRAND BISCAYNE APTS., LLC and

IKE W. THRASH,

Cross-defendant and

Rule 19/20 Defendant to

Crossclaim.

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 25 2

The United States of America alleges:

1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619, and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (hereinafter, the "ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12213, and its implementing regulation, the ADA Standards for Accessible Design, 28 C.F.R. § 36.104; 28 C.F.R. Pt. 36 Appendix A (1991 ADA Standards for Accessible Design), as amended at 28 C.F.R. Pt. 36 Appendix D (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design) (hereinafter, the "ADA Standards"). This action is brought pursuant to Section 814(a) of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3614(a), and Section 308(a) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12188. Defendants -- the owners, developers, and builders of numerous residential apartment complexes -- have unlawfully discriminated against persons with disabilities under the Fair Housing Act and the ADA by failing to design and construct covered multifamily dwellings and associated places of public accommodation so as to be accessible to persons with disabilities.

Jurisdiction and Venue

2. The Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 3614(a) and 12188(b)(1)(B).

3. Venue is proper in this jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims alleged in this action occurred in this judicial district.

Subject Properties

4. The Lexington is an apartment complex located at 879 William Boulevard in Ridgeland, Mississippi. It consists of 27 two-story buildings, none of which has an elevator.

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 2 of 25 3

There are 216 apartment units, 108 of which are ground-floor units. The property has public and common use areas, including a clubhouse/leasing office, a mail facility, dumpsters, a picnic area, and a fenced-in open space that includes a pet litter area.

5. The Belmont (Biloxi) is an apartment complex located at 14801 Lemoyne Boulevard in Biloxi, Mississippi. It consists of 15 three-story buildings, none of which has an elevator. There are 180 apartment units, 60 of which are ground-floor units. The property has public and common use areas, including a leasing office which has a restroom, business center, laundry room, common area kitchen, lounge area, and fitness room; swimming pool; dumpsters; car care area; dog park and pet litter area; and a mail center.

6. The Belmont (Hattiesburg) is an apartment complex located at 147 98th Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. It consists of 11 three-story buildings and four two-story buildings, none of which has an elevator. There are 164 apartment units, 60 of which are ground-floor units. The property has public and common use areas, including a leasing office/clubhouse, a swimming pool, a mail facility, dumpsters, a playground, a gazebo, a pet play area, and a separate pet litter area.

7. The Grand Biscayne is an apartment complex located at 14510 Lemoyne Boulevard in Biloxi, Mississippi. It consists of 21 three-story buildings and eight two-story buildings, none of which has an elevator. There are 316 apartment units, 116 of which are ground-floor units. The property has public and common use areas, including a clubhouse/leasing office, a swimming pool, a mail facility, dumpsters, a playground, and a gazebo.

8. The Beach Club is an apartment complex located at 2012 West 2nd Street in Long Beach, Mississippi. It consists of 15 three-story and five two-story buildings, none of which has

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 3 of 25 4

an elevator. There are 220 apartment units, 80 of which are ground-floor units. The property has public and common use areas, including a clubhouse/leasing office, a swimming pool, a mail facility, dumpsters, a playground, and a picnic area.

9. Inn by the Sea is a condominium complex located at 900 Village Lane in Pass Christian, Mississippi. It consists of a single five-story building with at least one elevator serving all floors. The property has public and common use areas, including a swimming pool, a meeting facility, a fitness center, and a mailroom.

Defendants

10. Dawn Properties, Inc. ("Dawn") is a Mississippi corporation whose principal place of business is 59 at 98 Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. According to its website, located at www.dawnpropertiesinc.com, Dawn Properties, Inc., through its subsidiary Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc., has developed over 3,000 residential units in recent years. Dawn Properties, Inc. was an owner and/or developer of The Lexington and participated in the design and construction of the complex.

11. Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc. is a Mississippi corporation whose principal place of business is 59 at 98 Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. It was the developer, general contractor and/or builder of The Lexington and The Belmont (Biloxi), was a builder and financed construction at Inn by the Sea, and was an owner and/or developer, and the general contractor and/or builder of The Grand Biscayne and The Belmont (Hattiesburg). Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc. participated in the design and construction of these five complexes.

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 4 of 25 5

12. Ridgeland Construction One, LLC was a Delaware limited liability company, registered to do business in Mississippi, whose principal place of business was 1 S Ocean Boulevard, Suite 305 in Boca Raton, Florida. It was an owner and/or developer of The Lexington and participated in the design and construction of the complex.

13. The Beach Club, LLC is a Mississippi limited liability company whose principal place of business is 59 at 98 Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. It was an owner and/or developer of The Beach Club and participated in the design and construction of the complex.

14. The Belmont of Lamar, LLC was a Mississippi limited liability company whose principal place of business was 59 at 98 Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. It was an owner and/or developer of The Belmont (Hattiesburg) and participated in the design and construction of the complex.

15. Grand Biscayne Apts., LLC is a Mississippi limited liability company whose principal place of business is 59 at 98 Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. It was an owner and/or developer of The Grand Biscayne and participated in the design and construction of the complex.

16. Seainn, LLC is a Mississippi limited liability company whose principal place of business is 59 at 98 Place Boulevard in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. It was an owner and/or developer of Inn by the Sea and participated in the design and construction of the complex.

17. Ike W. Thrash, an individual, resides in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. He is a co-owner and is the president of Defendants Dawn Properties, Inc. and Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc. Mr. Thrash is or was an owner, principal, manager, and/or member of Defendants Ridgeland Construction One, LLC, The Beach Club, LLC, The Belmont of Lamar, LLC, Grand

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 5 of 25 6

Biscayne Apts., LLC, and Seainn, LLC. Mr. Thrash was also the principal of Lemoyne Apartments, LLC, a dissolved Mississippi limited liability company, which was the owner and/or developer of The Belmont (Biloxi). Mr. Thrash personally, either directly and/or indirectly, participated in the design and/or construction of all the Subject Properties described above. These actions included, but were not limited to: a. selecting, using, and modifying architectural plans that he knew or should have known would result in features that are inaccessible to people with disabilities;

b. making decisions about site layout and construction, including site density and topography;

c. directing the submission of permit applications for at least one property;

d. financing construction costs; and

e. selecting, hiring, and overseeing design and construction professionals, including architects, engineers, and contractors.

Rule 19 Defendants

18. Summer Miss, LLC is a Mississippi limited liability company whose principal place of business is 701 13th Street in Phenix City, Alabama. It is the current owner of The Belmont (Hattiesburg) and, in that capacity, is named as a necessary party to this lawsuit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 in whose absence complete relief cannot be afforded to the United States.

19. 14510 Lemoyne Boulevard, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company whose principal place of business is 14510 Lemoyne Boulevard in Biloxi, Mississippi. It is the current owner of The Grand Biscayne and, in that capacity, is named as a necessary party to this lawsuit

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 6 of 25 7

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 in whose absence complete relief cannot be afforded to the United States.

20. Lexington Mill Mississippi Owner, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company, registered to do business in Mississippi, whose principal place of business is 2929 Arch Street, 17th Floor, Cira Centre in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It is the current owner of The Lexington and, in that capacity, is named as a necessary party to this lawsuit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 in whose absence complete relief cannot be afforded to the United States.

21. Inn by the Sea Home Owners Association, Inc. is a Mississippi corporation whose principal place of business is 900 Village Lane in Pass Christian, Mississippi. It is the current owner of the common property at Inn by the Sea and, in that capacity, is named as a necessary party to this lawsuit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 in whose absence complete relief cannot be afforded to the United States.

22. Belmont Beekwilder, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company, registered to do business in Mississippi, whose principal place of business is 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400 in Wilmington, Delaware. It is the current owner of The Belmont (Biloxi) and, in that capacity, is named as a necessary party to this lawsuit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 in whose absence complete relief cannot be afforded to the United States.

Factual Allegations

23. Dawn Properties, Inc.’s website lists The Lexington, The Belmont (Biloxi), The Belmont (Hattiesburg), The Grand Biscayne, The Beach Club, and Inn by the Sea as properties that Dawn Properties, Inc. has owned and/or developed. Defendants Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc., Ridgeland Construction One, LLC, The Beach Club, LLC, The Belmont of

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 7 of 25 8

Lamar, LLC, Grand Biscayne Apts., LLC, and Seainn, LLC are all subsidiaries and/or affiliates of Dawn Properties, Inc. The Defendants’ pattern or practice of failing to design and construct dwellings, public and common-use areas, and associated places of public accommodation in compliance with the Fair Housing Act and the ADA, as alleged herein, may extend to other multifamily properties and, absent injunctive relief, to other multifamily properties that may be designed and constructed in the future.

Fair Housing Act Allegations

24. The Subject Properties described above were designed and constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991.

25. The Subject Properties described above are "dwellings" and contain "dwellings" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3602(b).

26. The Subject Properties described above contain "covered multifamily dwellings" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f).

27. The covered multifamily dwellings at the Subject Properties described above are subject to the accessibility requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f).

The Lexington

28. The inaccessible features at The Lexington include, but are not limited to:

a. amenities provided onsite (such as the clubhouse/leasing office, mail facility, dumpsters, and picnic area) have barriers and are not located on an accessible pedestrian route to all ground-floor covered units. For example, many of the amenities have: i. no connecting sidewalks or curb-cuts to ground-floor covered units;

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 8 of 25 9

ii. abrupt level changes greater than 1/4";

iii. excessive slopes that include cross slopes exceeding 2%; and/or

iv. running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features, and/or running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%;

b. designated disabled parking spaces lack proper signage, access aisles, and/or curb ramps;

c. breezeways leading to covered units do not have cane detection under the stairs and have one or more protruding objects in the form of wall mounted light fixtures;

d. ground-floor covered units have barriers on the approach walkway leading up to the primary entry door of the unit, including: multiple steps; abrupt level changes greater than 1/4"; and running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features, and/or running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%; and

e. the primary entry doors to all ground-floor covered units have knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware.

The Belmont (Biloxi)

29. The inaccessible features at The Belmont (Biloxi) include, but are not limited to:

a. amenities provided onsite (such as the clubhouse/leasing office, swimming pool, mail facility, car care center, dumpsters, business center, laundry room, fitness room, common kitchen and lounge area, dog park, and pet litter stations) have barriers and are not located on an accessible pedestrian route to all ground-floor covered units. For example, many of the amenities have:

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 9 of 25 10

i. no connecting sidewalks or curb-cuts to ground-floor covered units;

ii. abrupt level changes greater than 1/4";

iii. excessive cross slopes exceeding 2%; and/or

iv. excessive running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features and/or excessive running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%;

b. designated disabled parking spaces lack proper signage, access aisles, and/or curb ramps;

c. breezeways leading to covered units do not have cane detection under the stairs;

d. ground-floor covered units have one or more barriers in the approach walkway leading up to the primary entry door of the unit, including, but not limited to, one or more steps, abrupt level changes greater than 1/4" in the approach walk, and one or more protruding objects; and

e. the primary entry doors to ground-floor covered units have knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware.

f. the primary entry doors to ground-floor covered units have knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware; and

g. inaccessible features inside units include, but are not limited to, passage doors that lack a nominal clear opening width of 32"and inaccessible temperature controls and fireplace controls at a height greater than 48" above the finished floor.

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 10 of 25 11

The Belmont (Hattiesburg)

30. The inaccessible features at The Belmont (Hattiesburg) include, but are not limited to:

a. amenities provided onsite (such as the clubhouse/leasing office, swimming pool, mail facility, dumpsters, playground, gazebo, and pet play area) have barriers and are not located on an accessible pedestrian route to all ground-floor covered units. For example, many of the amenities have: i. no connecting sidewalks or curb-cuts to ground-floor covered units;

ii. abrupt level changes greater than 1/4";

iii. excessive slopes that include cross slopes exceeding 2%; and/or

iv. running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features, and/or running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%;

b. breezeways leading to covered units do not have cane detection under the stairs;

c. ground-floor covered units have barriers on the approach walkway leading up to the primary entry door of the unit, including running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features and/or running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%, and abrupt changes in level at the primary entry door greater than 1/4";

d. the primary entry doors to ground-floor covered units have knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware; and

e. inaccessible features inside units include, but are not limited to, passage doors that lack a nominal clear opening width of 32", inaccessible light switches at a

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 11 of 25 12

height greater than 48" above the finished floor, and inaccessible bathrooms and kitchens lacking sufficient maneuvering clearance.

The Grand Biscayne

31. The inaccessible features at The Grand Biscayne include, but are not limited to:

a. amenities provided onsite (such as the clubhouse/leasing office, swimming pool, mail facility, dumpsters, playground, and gazebo) have barriers and are not located on an accessible pedestrian route to all ground-floor covered units. For example, many of the amenities have: i. no connecting sidewalks or curb-cuts to ground-floor covered units;

ii. abrupt level changes greater than 1/4":

iii. excessive slopes that include cross slopes exceeding 2%; and/or

iv. running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features, and/or running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%;

b. breezeways leading to covered units do not have cane detection under the stairs;

d. the primary entry doors to all ground-floor covered units have knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware; and

e. inaccessible features inside units include, but are not limited to, passage doors that lack a nominal clear opening width of 32", inaccessible environmental

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 12 of 25 13

controls at a height greater than 48" above the finished floor, and inaccessible bathrooms and kitchens lacking sufficient maneuvering clearance.

The Beach Club

32. The inaccessible features at The Beach Club include, but are not limited to:

a. amenities provided onsite (such as the clubhouse/leasing office, swimming pool, mail facility, dumpsters, playground, and picnic area) have barriers and are not located on an accessible pedestrian route to all ground-floor covered units. For example, many of the amenities have: i. no connecting sidewalks or curb-cuts to ground-floor covered units;

ii. abrupt level changes greater than 1/4";

iii. excessive cross slopes exceeding 2%; and/or

iv. excessive running slopes exceeding 5% without ramp features and/or excessive running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%;

b. designated disabled parking spaces lack proper signage, access aisles, and/or curb ramps;

c. breezeways leading to covered units do not have cane detection under the stairs;

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 13 of 25 14

e. the primary entry doors to ground-floor covered units have knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware.

Inn by the Sea

33. The inaccessible features at Inn by the Sea include, but are not limited to:

a. the latch and lock of the gate into the swimming pool and barbeque are inaccessible and are at a height greater than 48" above the ground, and there is insufficient maneuvering clearance space on the pull side of the gate;

b. the top row of mailboxes is located at a height greater than 54" above the finished floor;

c. the opening of the Home Owners Association drop box is located at a height greater than 54" above the finished floor;

d. there is no pedestrian walkway from the building to the public street;

e. there are no accessible disabled parking spaces in the garage;

f. disabled parking spaces lack proper signage and lack an access aisle. Where there is an existing access aisle, there is no curb-cut; and

g. the curb-cuts leading up to the entry gates have running slopes exceeding 8.33%.

ADA Allegations

34. The leasing offices at The Lexington, The Belmont (Biloxi), The Belmont (Hattiesburg), The Grand Biscayne, and The Beach Club were designed and constructed for first occupancy after January 26, 1993, and are places of public accommodation within the meaning

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 14 of 25 15

of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181(7)(E) and 28 C.F.R. § 36.104. These areas, therefore, are required to meet the accessibility requirements of the ADA Standards.

35. The leasing offices at The Lexington, The Belmont (Biloxi), The Belmont (Hattiesburg), The Grand Biscayne, and The Beach Club are not designed and constructed so that they are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, as required by the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12183(a)(1). These leasing offices fail to comply with the ADA Standards.

36. The inaccessible features at The Lexington’s leasing office include, but are not limited to:

a. the walkway to the leasing office has a cross slope exceeding 2%;

b. the primary door to the leasing office has knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware; and

c. the disabled parking space in front of the leasing office lacks proper signage, has a curb ramp that encroaches on the access isle, and the parking space and access aisle has a running slope that exceeds 5%, or exceeds 8.33% without ramp features.

37. The inaccessible features at The Belmont’s (Biloxi) leasing office include, but are not limited to:

a. the primary doorway to the leasing office has an abrupt level change greater than 1/4" without ramp features;

b. the disabled parking space in front of the leasing office has a curb ramp with a cross slope exceeding 2%; and

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 15 of 25 16

c. the restroom in the leasing office has knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware and lacks required clearances and grab bars.

38. The inaccessible features at The Belmont’s (Hattiesburg) leasing office include, but are not limited to:

a. the walkway to the leasing office has excessive slopes that include a cross slope exceeding 2%, a running slope exceeding 5% without ramp features, and/or running slopes on ramps exceeding 8.33%;

b. the primary doorway to the leasing office has an abrupt level change greater than 1/4";

c. the primary door to the leasing office has knob-style hardware rather than the required lever-style hardware; and

d. the disabled parking space in front of the leasing office has a curb ramp encroaching on the access aisle with a cross slope exceeding 2%.

39. The inaccessible features at The Grand Biscayne’s leasing office include, but are not limited to:

a. the walkway to the leasing office does not connect with an accessible route and has one or more protruding objects in the form of wall mounted light fixtures;

b. the primary doorway to the leasing office has an abrupt level change greater than 1/4"; and

c. the disabled parking space in front of the leasing office lacks proper signage, and there is an abrupt level change greater than 1/4" at the curb-ramp.

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 16 of 25 17

40. The inaccessible features at The Beach Club’s leasing office include, but are not limited to:

a. the walkway to the leasing office does not connect with an accessible route;

b. the primary doorway to the leasing office has an abrupt level change greater than 1/4"; and

c. designated disabled parking spaces lack proper signage, access aisles, and/or curb ramps.

Fair Housing Act Claims

41. The United States re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth above.

42. The conduct of Defendants Dawn Properties, Inc., Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc., Ridgeland Construction One, LLC, The Beach Club, LLC, The Belmont of Lamar, LLC, Grand Biscayne Apts., LLC, Seainn, LLC, and Ike W. Thrash ("the Design and Construction Defendants") described above violates 42 U.S.C. §§ 3604(f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3)(C).

43. The Design and Construction Defendants violated 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C), and 24 C.F.R. § 100.205(c), by failing to design and construct covered multifamily dwellings in such a manner that:

a. the public use and common use portions of the dwellings are readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities;

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 17 of 25 18

b. all doors designed to allow passage into and within the dwellings are sufficiently wide to allow passage by persons who use wheelchairs for mobility; and

c. all premises within such dwellings contain the following features of adaptive design:

i. an accessible route into and through the dwelling;

ii. light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats, and/or other environmental controls in accessible locations; and

iii. usable kitchens and bathrooms, such that an individual using a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.

44. The Design and Construction Defendants, through the actions and conduct referred to in the preceding paragraph, have:

a. discriminated in the sale or rental of, or otherwise made unavailable or denied, dwellings to buyers or renters because of a disability, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(1) and 24 C.F.R. § 100.202(a);

b. discriminated against persons in the terms, conditions, or privileges of the sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with a dwelling, because of a disability, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(2) and 24 C.F.R. § 100.202(b); and

c. failed to design and construct dwellings in compliance with the accessibility and adaptability features mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(C) and 24 C.F.R. § 100.205.

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 18 of 25 19

45. The conduct of the Design and Construction Defendants described above constitutes:

a. a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of rights granted by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619; and/or

b. a denial to a group of persons of rights granted by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619, which denial raises an issue of general public importance.

46. Persons who may have been the victims of the Design and Construction Defendants’ discriminatory housing practices are aggrieved persons under 42 U.S.C. § 3602(i), and may have suffered injuries as a result of the conduct described above.

47. The conduct of the Design and Construction Defendants described above was intentional, willful, and taken in disregard of the rights of others.

ADA Claims

48. The United States re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations set forth above.

49. The conduct of Defendants Dawn Properties, Inc., Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc., Ridgeland Construction One, LLC, The Beach Club, LLC, The Belmont of Lamar, LLC, Grand Biscayne Apts., LLC, and Ike W. Thrash ("the ADA Defendants") described above constitutes:

a. a pattern or practice of discrimination within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b)(1)(B)(i) and 28 C.F.R. § 36.503(a); or

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 19 of 25 20

b. unlawful discrimination that raises an issue of general public importance within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b)(1)(B)(ii) and 28 C.F.R. § 36.503(b).

50. The ADA Defendants violated Title III of the ADA by designing and constructing places of public accommodation, including the leasing offices in multifamily dwellings, without ensuring that these places of public accommodation were readily accessible to persons with disabilities to the maximum extent feasible. See 42 U.S.C. § 12183(a)(1).

51. Persons who may have been victims of the ADA Defendants’ discriminatory conduct are aggrieved as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b)(2)(B), and may have suffered injuries as a result of the conduct described above.

52. The conduct of the ADA Defendants described above was intentional, willful, and taken in disregard of the rights of others.

Prayer for Relief

WHEREFORE, the United States prays that the Court enter an order that:

a. Declares that the conduct of the Design and Construction Defendants violates the Fair Housing Act;

b. Declares that the conduct of the ADA Defendants violates the ADA;

c. Enjoins the Design and Construction Defendants, their officers, employees, agents, successors, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them from: i. failing or refusing to bring the dwelling units and public and common-use areas at covered multifamily properties in which each defendant

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 20 of 25 21

was or is involved in the design and/or construction into full compliance with the Fair Housing Act;

ii. failing or refusing to conduct Fair Housing Act compliance surveys to determine whether the retrofits ordered in paragraph (i) above or otherwise performed comply with the Fair Housing Act;

iii. designing or constructing any covered multifamily dwellings and public and common-use areas in the future that do not comply with the Fair Housing Act; and

iv. failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to restore, as nearly as practicable, the victims of the Design and Construction Defendants’ unlawful practices to the position they would have been in but for the discriminatory conduct.

d. Enjoins the ADA Defendants, their officers, employees, agents, successors, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them from: i. failing or refusing to bring the public accommodations, including leasing offices and other public-use areas, at covered multifamily properties in which each defendant was or is involved in the design and/or construction, into full compliance with the ADA and the ADA Standards;

ii. failing or refusing to conduct ADA compliance surveys to determine whether the retrofits ordered in paragraph (i) above or otherwise performed comply with ADA and the ADA Standards;

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 21 of 25 22

iii. designing or constructing any public accommodations in the future that do not comply with the ADA and the ADA Standards; and

iv. failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to restore, as nearly as practicable, the victims of the ADA Defendants’ unlawful practices to the position they would have been in but for the discriminatory conduct.

e. Enjoins Rule 19 Defendants Summer Miss, LLC, 14510 Lemoyne Boulevard, LLC, Lexington Mill Mississippi Owner, LLC, Inn by the Sea Home Owners Association, Inc., and Belmont Beekwilder, LLC from engaging in conduct that denies access to the public and common use areas, the covered multifamily dwellings, or the public accommodations areas at the Subject Properties described in paragraphs 4 through 9 under their ownership or management, and from engaging in any other action to impede any retrofits required to bring the properties, covered multifamily dwelling units, and public and common use areas into compliance with the Fair Housing Act and the public accommodations areas into compliance with the ADA and the ADA Standards in a prompt and efficient manner while minimizing inconvenience to the residents and visitors at the properties and to the Rule 19 Defendants;

f. Awards monetary damages to all persons harmed by the discriminatory housing practices by the Design and Construction Defendants and the ADA

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 22 of 25 23

Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(B) and 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b)(2)(B), respectively;

g. Assesses a civil penalty against each Design and Construction Defendant in an amount authorized by the Fair Housing Act pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3614(d)(1)(C) to vindicate the public interest; and

h. Assesses a civil penalty against each ADA Defendant in the amount authorized by the ADA pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b)(2)(C) to vindicate the public interest.

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 23 of 25 24

The United States further prays for such additional relief as the interests of justice may require.

LORETTA E. LYNCH

Attorney General

/s/ Gregory Davis /s/ Vanita Gupta

GREGORY K. DAVIS VANITA GUPTA

United States Attorney Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Southern District of Mississippi Civil Rights Division

/s/ Pshon Barrett /s/ Sameena Shina Majeed

PSHON BARRETT SAMEENA SHINA MAJEED

Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Housing and Civil

Office of the United States Attorney Enforcement Section

for the Southern District of Mississippi

501 E. Court Street, Suite 4.430

Jackson, MS 39201 /s/ Mazen Basrawi

601-973-2842 MICHAEL S. MAURER

pshon.barrett@usdoj.gov Deputy Chief

JULIE J. ALLEN

MAZEN M. BASRAWI

KINARA A. FLAGG

AURORA R. BRYANT

Trial Attorneys

United States Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division

Housing and Civil Enforcement Section

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Northwestern Building

Washington, D.C. 20530

202-307-6275

202-514-1116 (fax)

julie.allen@usdoj.gov

mazen.basrawi@usdoj.gov

kinara.flagg@usdoj.gov

aurora.bryant@usdoj.gov

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 24 of 25 25

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 23, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing Amended Complaint with the Clerk of Court using the Court’s Electronic Filing System, which sent notification of such filing to counsel of record.

/s/ Mazen Basrawi Mazen Basrawi

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Case 1:14-cv-00224-LG-JCG Document 485 Filed 06/23/16 Page 25 of 25

Updated April 18, 2023