Skip to main content
Case

United States v. County of Lauderdale, et al.

Overview

(5th Cir.) – Appellant

  • Appellees conflate the question of whose conduct may comprise a pattern or practice under 34 U.S.C. 12601 with who may be sued for that pattern or practice
  • The judges are being sued in their official capacities as the officials responsible for administering the Lauderdale county youth court, not in their adjudicative roles
  • Applying Title VII’s co-employment doctrine in Section 12601 litigation could result in unnecessary complexity and nationwide inconsistency
  • Section 12601 of Title 34 applies to state-court judges responsible for the administration of juvenile justice
  • The youth court judges are not absolutely immune from this action
  • This court should reinstate the claims against Lauderdale County

Court of Appeals Decision, reported at 914 F.3d 960


Case Open Date
Case Name
United States v. County of Lauderdale, et al.
Topics
Access to Justice
Updated December 2, 2024