Brestle v. Lappin, No. 11-1771, 2013 WL 5486623 (D.D.C. Oct. 3, 2013) (Rothstein, J.)

Date: 
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Re: Request for certain communications among Bureau of Prison (BOP) employees Disposition: Granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on issue of segregability
  • Segregability:  In response to the court's prior order, defendant reviewed the application of Exemption 7(C) and determined that it "'was used too extensively' . . . and that only 'insular words, i.e., the names and other identifying factors' should have been redacted."  The court finds from defendant's supplemental declaration and "its examination of the redacted pages that defendant has released all reasonably segregable portions of responsive pages to plaintiff."
Topic: 
District Court
Segregability
Updated August 6, 2014