Skip to main content

Farkas v. Office of the Special Inspector Gen., No. 13-309, 2014 WL 5320540 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2014) (Fox, J.)

Date

Farkas v. Office of the Special Inspector Gen., No. 13-309, 2014 WL 5320540 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2014) (Fox, J.)

Re: Request for records concerning plaintiff

Disposition: Denying plaintiff's motion to compel

  • Litigation Considerations:  "The court construed [plaintiff's] Motion to Compel to be asking the court to reopen the case, and either enforce the settlement agreement or restore the case to the active docket."  The court holds that "[b]ased on the information contained in the Government's response and exhibits thereto, . . . reopening this case pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) is not warranted, because there has not been a breach of the Settlement Agreement."  "Although the pace of the document production has not been satisfactory to [plaintiff], the court does not find that any of the circumstances indicate that the Government has failed to comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement."
     
Court Decision Topic(s)
District Court opinions
Litigation Considerations, Supplemental to Main Categories
Updated January 29, 2015