Skip to main content

Fillingham v. DOJ, No. 15-1623, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39932 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2016) (Herlong, Jr., S.J.)

Date

Fillingham v. DOJ, No. 15-1623, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39932 (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2016) (Herlong, Jr., S.J.)

Re: Request for records concerning plaintiff

Disposition: Dismissing plaintiff's complaint without prejudice; denying plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

  • Litigation Considerations:  The court finds that "[plaintiff] has been repeatedly advised why his action is not in proper form and he has failed to comply with the court's orders."  "Based on the foregoing, after a thorough review of the magistrate judge's Report and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge['s] . . . Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein."  The court relates that the "Magistrate Judge . . . recommends dismissing the complaint without prejudice because [plaintiff] has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with three separate court orders directing him to bring this action into proper form."
Court Decision Topic(s)
District Court opinions
Litigation Considerations, Supplemental to Main Categories
Updated January 20, 2022