Due to the lapse in appropriations, Department of Justice websites will not be regularly updated. The Department’s essential law enforcement and national security functions will continue. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

Negley v. DOJ, No. 15-1004, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56844 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2018) (Boasberg, J.)

Date: 
Tuesday, April 3, 2018

Negley v. DOJ, No. 15-1004, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56844 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2018) (Boasberg, J.)

Re: Request for certain file concerning plaintiff

Disposition: Granting defendant's motion for summary judgment

  • Litigation Considerations, Adequacy of Search:  The court notes that "[t]he only question [it] must ask is whether, pursuant to [plaintiff's] Fourth FOIA Request, the FBI has properly identified the [requested file]."  "On review, [the court finds that] it is obvious that the agency has found the elephant [plaintiff] has been hunting, and the agency's inconsistencies in describing that file's contents do not cast doubt on that conclusion."  "The Court . . . credits the Government's claim that it has found the requested file[.]"  Responding to plaintiff's argument, the court finds that "'[m]ere speculation that as yet uncovered documents may exist does not undermine the finding that the agency conducted a reasonable search for them.'"
Topic: 
Adequacy of Search
District Court
Litigation Considerations
Updated July 3, 2018