You are here

Justice News

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Middle District of Pennsylvania

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Former Solicitor Pleads Guilty To Theft Of $105,000 Township Escrow Fund

SCRANTON - The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that the former Solicitor for Hazle Township, Luzerne County, pleaded guilty today to the theft of approximately $105,586 from the township.

According to United States Attorney Peter Smith, Charles Pedri, age 64, of Hazleton, entered a guilty plea before United States Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehlachick in Scranton to a Criminal Information which charged Pedri with theft from a program receiving federal funds. Pedri was the Solicitor for Hazle Township at the time of the theft.

As set forth in the Criminal Information, Hazle Township required a company which was developing a project in the Humboldt Industrial Park in the township to complete certain specific improvements to the property, pursuant to land development ordinances.  As security for the completion of the improvements, the company and Hazle Township entered into an escrow agreement.

Pedri, in his capacity as Hazle Township Solicitor, signed the agreement as escrow agent.  The company then paid to Hazle Township the sum of $105,586 to be held in escrow as security for the completion of the improvements.  Pedri, as escrow agent, deposited the funds into his law office account. Thereafter, Pedri began withdrawing the funds held in trust and converted the funds to his own personal use.  The investigation revealed that, between December 2012 and November 2013, Pedri wrote checks payable to himself, which were drawn on the Township funds.  By November 2013, the funds were gone. 

Upon completion of the improvements in May 2014, the company requested that Hazle Township return the escrowed funds.  Over a period of approximately eight months, Pedri made misrepresentations to representatives of the company regarding the status of the funds and failed to make payment. In January 2015, after the company informed Pedri it intended to file a law suit, Pedri admitted that he had converted the funds to his own use.

The investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Robert J. O’Hara.

Pedri will appear for sentencing before Senior United States District Court Judge Richard P. Conaboy at a date to be scheduled.

A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

In this case, the maximum penalty which can be imposed under federal law is ten years of imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a $250,000 fine.

Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.


# # #

Financial Fraud
Updated July 14, 2016