McConnellsburg Man Charged With Distribution Of Child Pornography
HARRISBURG - The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced today that Clay Aaron Rasp, age 32, of McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania, was indicted on December 6, 2017, by a federal grand jury on charges relating to child pornography. The case was unsealed and Rasp is scheduled to appear before United States Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on December 21, 2017, for his initial appearance and arraignment.
According to United States Attorney David J. Freed, the indictment alleges that Rasp possessed and distributed child pornography between and including January 2017 and July 2017. The indictment also alleges that Rasp produced a morphed image of child pornography.
The Lower Heidelberg Police Department, the Pennsylvania State Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Chelsea Schinnour is prosecuting the case.
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc For more information about internet safety education, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc and click on the tab "resources."
Indictments are only allegations. All persons charged are presumed to be innocent unless and until found guilty in court.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty under federal law is 20 years of imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.
# # #