You are here

Justice News

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Middle District of Pennsylvania

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, January 20, 2017

Pittston Man Guilty Of Conspiracy To Distribute Bath Salts

SCRANTON- The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced today that David Popish, age 38, of Pittston, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty on January 19, 2017, before Senior U.S. District Court Judge James M. Munley to participating in a conspiracy to distribute alpha-pvp, commonly known as “bath salts.”

 

According to United States Attorney Bruce D. Brandler, Popish admitted to conspiring with others to distribute the drug to customers in the Luzerne County area during 2014 and 2015.

 

Popish was one of seven people charged by a grand jury in August 2016. That indictment was the fourth wave of arrests connected to alpha-pvp distribution in Luzerne County. In all, 18 people have been charged in the case since July 2013, including the Texas-based principal supplier of the bath salts. Popish is the twelfth defendant to plead guilty in the case.

 

Judge Munley ordered a pre-sentence investigation to be completed and scheduled sentencing in the case for April 27, 2017.

 

The case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations, United States Postal Inspection Service, the Pennsylvania State Police, and local police from Luzerne County. Assistant United States Attorney Francis P. Sempa is prosecuting the case.

 

A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

 

The maximum penalty under federal law for this offense is 20 years’ imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.

 

# # #

Topic(s): 
Drug Trafficking
Updated January 20, 2017