1: Introduction to Multidisciplinary Teams

1: Introduction to Multidisciplinary Teams

 

Chapter 1: Summary

 

The increased attention given to elder abuse has illuminated system failures. MDTs were developed to address many of these system failures. Benefits of an MDT accrue to victims, MDT members, and to the community. However, no two MDTs will be alike. The size and structure of the MDT will reflect the needs and resources of the community in which it is developed.

Introduction

 

Although MDTs have been in existence for decades, they are only recently gaining wide-spread acceptance and adoption. Most of what we know about MDTs is based on experience rather than research, suggesting MDT practice may change with new knowledge. Elder abuse MDTs will continue to evolve as more communities utilize the model and gain experience with them.

Communities have differing political issues, geographies (rural, urban, suburban), and demographics. However, any community can develop an MDT, even communities with limited resources that preclude the development of a complex MDT model, such as an Elder Abuse Forensic Center. However, the size and structure of the MDT will reflect the needs and resources of the community in which it is developed.

As will be discussed in detail, starting an MDT is challenging. Teamwork does not arise through the simple organization of professionals and calling the group a “team.” Because MDTs are so challenging to develop, it typically takes strong leadership to implement an MDT. There is frequently a charismatic and energetic leader in the community that advocates for a change in the system response to elder abuse who is politically savvy and has the clout to obtain the cooperation from multiple agency heads. However, in some cases it takes persuading a strong leader in the community that an MDT is needed.

A word of warning: Be flexible. An MDT may start out doing things one way, but may find over time that the protocol is no longer working for the team. In addition, although it is the responsibility of the MDT Coordinator to bring the team together, there are times when a different structure will perform better. Always obtain feedback of your MDT members.

Finally, many MDTs feel compelled to expand into other arenas. The Toolkit item titled: Additional MDT Activities, details activities that other MDTs have seen fit to undertake.Over time, your MDT may identify needs in the community that the MDT may want to address. For example, in Texas, the MDT assigned a geriatric nurse practitioner for half a day per week to the APS office as a resource for APS caseworkers. There are innovative solutions like this occurring all across the country.

 

The Need for Multidisciplinary Teams

Elder abuse “includes physical, sexual or psychological abuse, as well as neglect, abandonment, and financial exploitation of an older person by another person or entity, that occurs in any setting (e.g., home, community, or facility), either in a relationship where there is an expectation of trust and/or when an older person is targeted based on age or disability” (DOJ, 2014).

Elder abuse is receiving increased attention and with it greater societal awareness. Community-dwelling prevalence rates indicating that 10% of older adults have experienced some form of abuse in the past year provide traction for this increased attention. However, the majority of elder abuse cases are not reaching the attention of those charged with responding. Not only is it important to identify and respond to these cases based on honoring human rights, but also because of the consequences associated with elder abuse. For example, older adults have greater difficulty in recovering from physical injuries and financial loss, and have an increased likelihood of early demise.

Reports of elder abuse come from a variety of sources, although most victims enter the system through either adult protective services (APS) or law enforcement. Typically, the formal response to elder maltreatment rests with APS, an agency that focuses on protection of the victim.

The increased attention given to elder abuse has illuminated system failures. Once in the system, victims, who frequently have numerous needs, may be exposed to multiple agencies. The victim initially may be visited by APS or law enforcement. Some victims will require a neuropsychologist to conduct a cognitive assessment, a physician to treat and document physical injuries, and interviews with a prosecutor. Currently, various agencies may be working on the same elder abuse case, although each agency works within their own silo. This approach is neither victim-centered nor responsive to the myriad of victim’s needs. Furthermore, it does not respond appropriately to the needs of perpetrators, which is increasingly being recognized.

 

An uncoordinated system is problematic because it frequently results in:

  • System overload for the family
  • Victims being jostled from one place to another
  • Less than optimal outcomes for victims
  • Duplication of interviews and services
  • A bureaucratized “one-size-fits-all” adversarial investigation
  • Lack of communication between systems
  • Conflicting recommendations
  • A poor match between the family’s strengths/needs/problems and interventions
  • Inadequate and fragmented service delivery that fails to address underlying problems
  • Responding to the presenting problem without exploring other possible victimizations

 

In the face of these system failures, stakeholders instinctively cry out “There’s got to be a better way!” And there is: A multidisciplinary team (MDT). The two key assumptions are that:

  • Complex cases require a complex response

  • No one system can address all the needs (physical, emotional, intellectual, familial, interpersonal, financial, social, cultural, and spiritual) of an older victim

 

Defining a Multidisciplinary Team

 

Rooted in the biopsychosocial model, MDTs are defined as a group of people (comprised of representatives from three or more disciplines who work collaboratively), bound by a common purpose (the MDT has a shared goal and shared definition of the problem they are addressing), and is characterized by five elements:

  • Shared Decision-Making
    The entire team participates in the decision making process, sharing information, and sharing successes.

 

  • Partnership
    MDTs are characterized by a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or an Interagency Agreement (IAA).

 

  • Interdependency
    Group and individual outcomes are influenced by the group.

 

  • Balanced Power
    All members of the MDT have equal input and prohibit a single member from dominating the group.

 

  • Process
    The development and use of protocols to introduce predictability and accountability into the case review process, including protocols for conflict resolution.

 

Types of Problems Addressed by Multidisciplinary Teams

MDTs are used in a number of fields (education, medicine, business, social services). There are many different types of MDTs geared towards the needs of older adults specifically. For example:

 

  • Elder fatality review teams

  • Hoarding teams

  • Mental illness teams

  • Code enforcement teams

  • Guardianship teams

  • Financial abuse specialist teams

  • Elder abuse teams

 

This guide focuses on elder abuse case review MDTs. Although the MDT concept is not new, there is growing recognition of the need for an MDT response to elder abuse. An MDT approach is victim-focused and designed to correct for the shortcoming described above. In addition to system coordination, MDTs should seek to better understand victims’ priorities and needs.

 

Benefits of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach

 

Working in unison, each system’s strength can complement the others. Together, the MDT can ensure that victims do not fall through the cracks while addressing their range of needs. An MDT allows each agency’s strengths to shine, while sharing the burden of investigating and responding to complex elder abuse cases. For example, some older adults are distrustful of law enforcement, but law enforcement may be better able than APS to collect the evidence needed to forward a case to the criminal justice system. APS may be better able to empathize with the victim and ensure needed services are being offered. Furthermore, team members are able to provide support to one another, which may reduce the secondary trauma effects associated with these difficult cases. Ideally, the net result is a better outcome for older victims.

Agencies that work collaboratively can produce better solutions for victims, MDT members, and the community.

Successful partnerships can benefit victims in the following ways:

  • Conducting various evaluations in-home as a team lessens the burden of multiple interviews for the alleged abuse victims, while simultaneously gathering information on needed services for older victims as well as evidence for possible prosecution.

  • An MDT enhances the probability that no matter where a victim enters the system, they have access to coordinated services.
  • As victims may receive concurrent services by many disciplines, coordination of these services may reduce the number of systems with which victims have to navigate.
  • Collaboration promotes greater awareness of available services, and improves access to and receipt of services for victims.
  • Coordination creates an integrated array of services tailored to the victim’s multifaceted needs that build upon the family’s strengths.

  • Collaboration produces creative solutions that no one agency could produce on their own.
  • Working as an MDT provides informal social support for victims, enhanced monitoring and follow-up beyond the crisis period, potentially reducing the recurrence of elder abuse.
  • Collaboration facilitates more effective and positive outcomes for clients. For example, if health care professionals need to spend time being a social worker, then fewer medical needs may be attended to, but if someone else can do the social work, then health care professionals can focus on the medical needs of the client.

 

Working collaboratively benefits each agency represented on the MDT. Successful partnerships can benefit MDT members in the following ways:

  • Responsibility for a case (ensuring safety, permanency, and well-being) is shared among the MDT members. This not only lends greater confidence to team members regarding case planning, but it may reduce liability risks due to the input of high-level agency representatives and qualified medical and legal consultants brought in when appropriate. Decisions regarding the client are better informed and reviewed prior to implementation.
  • Every agency has legal and policy restrictions on their response to elder abuse that other agencies may be able to fill if the need is known.

  • MDT members may back each other up, pointing out the importance of various MDT disciplines to victims.
  • Through exposure to different disciplines, team members:
     
    • Learn each other’s mandates and jargon,
    • Broaden and enrich their understanding of elder abuse, and
    • Sharpen their professional skills to better manage and build cases.
  • MDT members can access the pool of experts on the MDT to obtain assistance in resolving difficult cases.
  • MDT member’s confidence can be bolstered by learning how other professionals in the community handle similar situations.
  • MDTs can instill confidence that the case is being handled the best way possible by obtaining validation from other team members.

     

  • MDTs can enhance job satisfaction by promoting collegiality and motivation, while supporting one another by providing a safe place to vent frustration, relieve tension, and share feelings of helplessness.
     

  • MDTs extend and leverage interagency resources in part by reducing the financial and staff burden on individual agencies.

     

  • If one agency does not have the resources a victim needs, someone else on the MDT likely does.

  • MDTs can identify service gaps and make system changes.
  • MDTs improve the ability of agencies to share information and track families across agencies.

     

  • Through group decision making, fewer errors are made (potentially reducing legal risk).

     

Successful partnerships can benefit communities in the following ways:

  • Providing a forum for balancing the interests and perspectives of professionals from diverse disciplines, clients, and society.
  • Enhancing relationships among public and private service providers.
  • Creating community responsibility for victim safety.
  • Strengthening families, which strengthens communities.
  • Extending the reach of limited resources within a community.