1: Introduction to Multidisciplinary Teams
Introduction
Although MDTs have been in existence for decades, they are only recently gaining widespread acceptance and adoption. Most of what we know about MDTs is based on experience rather than research, suggesting MDT practice may change with new knowledge. Elder abuse MDTs will continue to evolve as more communities utilize the model and gain experience with them.
Communities have differing geographies (rural, urban, suburban) and demographics. Any community can develop an MDT, even communities with limited resources that preclude the development of a complex MDT model, such as an Elder Abuse Forensic Center. The size and structure of an MDT will reflect the needs and resources of the community in which it is developed.
As will be discussed in detail, starting an MDT is challenging. Teamwork does not arise through the simple organization of professionals and calling the group a “team”. Because MDTs are so challenging to develop, it typically takes strong leadership to implement an MDT. There is frequently a charismatic and energetic leader in the community who advocates for a change in the system’s response to elder abuse, and who has the influence to obtain the cooperation from multiple agency heads. In some cases, it takes persuading a strong leader in the community that an MDT is needed.
A word of warning: Be flexible. An MDT may start out doing things one way, but over time may find that the protocol is no longer working for the team. In addition, there are times when a different structure will perform better than what was envisioned in the beginning. It is prudent to regularly obtain feedback from your MDT members.
Many MDTs feel compelled to expand into other arenas. The Toolkit item titled Additional MDT Activities details activities that other MDTs have undertaken. Over time, your MDT may identify needs in the community that the MDT may want to address. For example, in Texas, the MDT assigned a geriatric nurse practitioner for half a day per week to the adult protective services (APS) office as a resource for APS caseworkers. Innovative solutions like this are occurring all across the country.
Throughout this guide, older adults who have experienced abuse and are being served by elder abuse MDTs will be referred to as “client(s)”, or “MDT client(s)”. While the terminology used by each discipline or agency will vary (e.g., complainant, victim, patient, utilizer, etc.), “client” effectively encapsulates the relationship between older adults who have experienced abuse and the team serving them. The goal of using this terminology is to address the issue of elder abuse from a trauma-informed and person-centered approach, which are core values modeled in elder abuse MDTs. Other terms that will be used include "older adults who have experienced abuse” and “survivor”.
Defining a Multidisciplinary Team
Rooted in the biopsychosocial model, MDTs are defined as a group of people (comprised of representatives from three or more disciplines who work collaboratively), bound by a common purpose (the MDT has a shared goal and shared definition of the problem they are addressing), and is characterized by five elements:
- Shared Decision-Making
The entire team participates in the decision-making process, sharing information, and sharing successes. - Partnership
MDTs are characterized by a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or an Interagency Agreement (IAA). - Interdependency
Group and individual outcomes are influenced by the team. - Balanced Power
All members of the MDT have equal input and prohibit a single member from dominating the group. - Process
The development and use of protocols to introduce predictability and accountability into the case review process, including protocols for conflict resolution.
Types of Problems Addressed by Multidisciplinary Teams
MDTs are used in a number of fields (e.g., education, medicine, business, social services). There are many different types of MDTs that may serve older adults. For example:
- General teams that may serve older adults
- Hoarding teams
- Behavioral health teams
- Code enforcement teams
- Guardianship teams
- Teams that have a specific elder justice mission
- Elder fatality review teams
- Financial Abuse Specialist Teams (FAST)
- Elder abuse case review MDTs including E-MDTs and Elder Abuse Forensic Centers among other models
- Coordinated Community Response teams (CCRs)
There are many types of networks (see Definitions and Characteristics of Common Elder Abuse Networks). This guide focuses on elder abuse case review MDTs. Although the MDT concept is not new, there is growing recognition of the need for an MDT response to elder abuse. An MDT approach is person-centered and trauma-informed and is designed to correct for the shortcomings in the system (described below). In addition to system coordination, MDTs should seek to better understand the priorities and needs of their clients.
Elder abuse includes physical, sexual, or psychological abuse, as well as neglect, abandonment, and financial exploitation of an older person by another person or entity, that occurs in any setting (e.g., home, community, or facility), either in a relationship where there is an expectation of trust and/or when an older person is targeted based on age or disability (DOJ, 2014).
The Need for Multidisciplinary Teams
Elder abuse is receiving increased attention and with it greater societal awareness. Prevalence rates of community-dwelling older adults indicate that at least 10% of older adults have experienced some form of abuse in the past year, providing traction for this increased attention. However, the majority of elder abuse cases do not reach the attention of those charged with responding. Not only is it important to identify and respond to these cases based on honoring human rights, but also because of the consequences associated with elder abuse. For example, older adults have greater difficulty in recovering from physical injuries and financial loss, disrupted social relationships, psychological consequences, and have an increased risk for early mortality.
Reports of elder abuse come from a variety of sources, although most reports of abuse enter the system through either APS or law enforcement. Typically, the formal response to elder maltreatment belongs to APS, an agency that focuses on the protection of older adults.
The increased attention given to elder abuse reveals system-wide failures in the detection and care of older adults who have experienced abuse. Once in the system, these older adults, who frequently have numerous needs, may be exposed to multiple agencies. While they may initially be visited by APS or law enforcement, some will require a neuropsychologist to conduct a cognitive assessment, a physician to treat and document physical injuries, interviews with a prosecutor or law enforcement officer, and even a safe place to stay to avoid further abuse. Currently, multiple agencies simultaneously may be working on the same elder abuse case, with each agency working within its own silo, unaware of the interventions, strategies, and case planning being attempted by other agencies. This approach is neither person-centered nor responsive to the myriad needs that can arise in elder abuse cases.
An uncoordinated system is problematic because it can result in:
- System overload for the family
- Older adults who are in the middle of a traumatic experience being jostled from one place to another
- Less than optimal outcomes for elder abuse survivors
- Duplication of interviews and services
- A bureaucratized “one-size-fits-all” adversarial investigation
- Lack of communication between systems
- Conflicting recommendations
- A poor match between the family’s strengths/needs/problems and interventions
- Inequitable, inadequate, and fragmented service delivery that fails to address underlying problems
- Responding to the presenting problem without exploring possible polyvictimization
- Unintentionally re-traumatizing abuse survivors
In the face of these potential system failures, stakeholders instinctively think, “There’s got to be a better way!” And there is: A multidisciplinary team (MDT). Two key assumptions are that:
- Complex cases require a complex response.
- No single agency can address all the needs (e.g., physical, emotional, intellectual, familial, interpersonal, financial, social, and spiritual) of an older adult who has experienced abuse.
Benefits of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach
Working in unison, the strength of each agency can complement the others. Rather than each MDT partner working in a silo to serve older adults who have experienced abuse, an MDT can hold those individuals as a mutual client. Together, the agencies involved in the MDT can ensure that their clients do not fall through the cracks in the system (or systemic gaps) while addressing their range of needs. An MDT allows each agency’s strengths to shine, while sharing the burden of investigating and responding to complex elder abuse cases. For example, some older adults are distrustful of law enforcement, but law enforcement may be better able than APS to collect the evidence needed to forward a case to the criminal justice system. APS may be better able to empathize, build rapport and communicate with the client to ensure needed services are being offered. Furthermore, team members are able to provide support to one another, which may reduce the secondary trauma effects associated with these difficult cases. Ideally, the net result is a better outcome for older survivors of elder abuse.
Agencies that work collaboratively can produce better solutions for their clients, MDT members, and the community.
View The Value of Participating on Elder Abuse Multidisciplinary Teams (1 hour 15 min), featuring the Montgomery County Elder Abuse Team discussing the value of MDTs and performing a mock case review.
Successful partnerships can benefit MDT clients in the following ways:
- Conducting various in-home evaluations and interviews as a team lessens the burden of multiple interviews, while simultaneously gathering information on needed services for older survivors as well as evidence for possible prosecution.
- An MDT enhances the probability that no matter where a person enters the system, they have access to coordinated services.
- Older adults may receive concurrent services by many disciplines, and coordination of these services may reduce the number of systems they have to navigate.
- Collaboration promotes greater awareness of available services, and improves access to and receipt of services for MDT clients.
- Coordination creates an integrated array of services tailored to the individual’s multifaceted needs that can build upon the strengths of their support system.
- Collaboration produces creative solutions that no one agency could produce on its own.
- Working as an MDT provides informal social supports, enhanced monitoring, follow-up beyond the crisis period, potentially reducing the recurrence of elder abuse.
Successful partnerships can benefit MDT members in the following ways:
- Working collaboratively benefits each agency represented on the MDT, by building stronger professional relationships across agencies and disciplines, and facilitating more efficient case review by bringing professionals together to discuss and coordinate their response.
- Collaboration facilitates more effective and positive outcomes for clients by allowing each profession to focus on their specific role. For example, if health care professionals need to spend time being a social worker, then fewer medical needs may be attended to. But, if someone else can do the social work, then health care professionals can focus on the client’s medical needs.
- Responsibility for a case (ensuring safety, permanency, and well-being) is shared among the MDT members. This not only lends greater confidence to team members regarding case planning, but it may reduce liability risks due to the input of high-level agency representatives and qualified medical and legal consultants brought in where appropriate.
- Decisions regarding the client are better informed and reviewed prior to implementation.
- Every agency has legal and policy restrictions on their response to elder abuse. Understanding what each agency can and cannot do can relieve tensions between agencies that can occur when service expectations do not match with an agency’s role.
Through exposure to different disciplines, team members:
- Learn each other’s mandates and jargon.
- Broaden and enrich their understanding of elder abuse.
- Sharpen their professional skills to better manage and build cases.
- Access the pool of experts on the MDT to obtain assistance in resolving difficult cases.
- Learn how other professionals in the community handle similar situations thereby bolstering MDT members’ confidence.
- Instill confidence that the case is being handled the best way possible when they obtain validation from other team members.
- Enhance job satisfaction by promoting collegiality and motivation, while supporting one another by providing a safe place to vent frustration, relieve tension, and share feelings of helplessness.
- Extend and leverage interagency resources by reducing the financial and staff burden on individual agencies.
- Look to another team member if their agency does not have the resources a client needs.
- Identify service gaps and make system changes.
- Improve the ability of agencies to share information and track clients across agencies.
- Engage in group decision-making, thereby making fewer errors (potentially reducing legal risk).
- Back each other up, by explaining the importance of various disciplines to their client.
Successful partnerships can benefit communities in the following ways:
- Providing a forum for balancing the interests and perspectives of professionals from diverse disciplines, clients, and society through collaboration and coordination.
- Enhancing relationships among public and private service providers.
- Creating community responsibility for the safety of older adults.
- Strengthening families and other support systems, which strengthens communities.
- Creating a mechanism for raising awareness about elder abuse in the community.
- Creating a mechanism for hearing from a community about their needs through needs assessments and community partnerships.
- Extending the reach of limited resources within a community by creating a network of agencies who can build on their relationships to address related issues.
Tips for Coordinators
Understanding the benefits of MDTs can facilitate recruitment and retention of team members and it can help make the case for financial support. Consider including this information in your recruitment and onboarding materials to ensure team members and potential team members understand the opportunities and value of collaborating through an elder abuse MDT.
The increased attention on elder abuse has illuminated system failures that elder abuse MDTs were developed to address. The benefits of an MDT accrue to older adults who have experienced abuse, MDT members, and the community. However, no two MDTs will be alike. The size, structure, function, and member composition of an MDT will reflect the needs and resources of the community in which it is developed, as well as the needs of the clients they are serving.