Skip to main content


Applicable Law | Pleadings | Representation | Time Limits for Filing | Exhaustion & Jurisdiction | Discovery | Burdens of Proof | Hearing | Relief | Right to Further Review | Mediation

Do I have a right to a hearing before the Director of OARM on the merits of my request for corrective action?
No. You are not automatically entitled to a hearing on your request for corrective action. A hearing may be held at the discretion of OARM where you have presented a legal claim supported by sufficient evidence of a triable issue of fact. Notably, however, during the course of the proceedings on your request for corrective action, either party may request (or OARM may order) a conference with the Director of OARM to address matters such as the status of the case, jurisdiction, discovery, etc.

How do I request a hearing before the Director of OARM?
A request for a hearing must be made in writing to the Director of OARM, submitted no later than 5 calendar days after the close of merits briefing, and shall:

  • Include a list of all agreed upon material facts;
  • Identify any disputed material issues of fact that need resolution through testimonial evidence; and
  • State that the other party has been consulted and either agrees or disagrees with the need for a hearing.

If neither party requests a hearing, or if a hearing is requested, but not granted, OARM will set a schedule for briefing on the merits.

Are hearings held in-person or via telephone or videoconference?
Generally, the parties, the witnesses, and the Director/Assistant Director of OARM shall attend hearings in-person. However, OARM in its discretion, may hold the hearing in whole or in part by telephone, videoconference, or in-person at OARM's hearing/conference room (or designated alternate hearing site). Among the factors OARM will consider in deciding whether to hold a hearing in whole or in part by videoconference or telephone are:

  1. The distance that Complainant and/or Complainant's representative must travel to access video-teleconferencing equipment;
  2. A comparison of the total costs of holding an in-person, video, or telephonic hearing;
  3. The distance the parties and their witnesses would have to travel to appear in person; and
  4. Whether appearance by videoconference or telephone of the parties and their respective witnesses would unduly prejudice Complainant and/or the FBI.
Updated March 15, 2023