Skip to main content

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch Delivers Remarks at Press Conference Announcing Lawsuit to Bring Constitutional Policing to Ferguson, Missouri


Washington, DC
United States

Remarks as prepared for delivery

Good afternoon and thank you all for being here.  I am joined by Vanita Gupta, head of the Civil Rights Division. 

Nearly a year ago, the Department of Justice released our findings in an investigation of the Police Department of Ferguson, Missouri.  Our investigation uncovered a community in distress, in which residents felt alienated from their own police force and their own local government.  The Ferguson Police Department’s violations were expansive and deliberate.  They violated the Fourth Amendment by stopping people without reasonable suspicion, arresting them without cause and using unreasonable force.  They made enforcement decisions based on the way individuals expressed themselves and unnecessarily escalated non-threatening situations.  These violations were not only egregious – they were routine.  They were encouraged by the city in the interest of raising revenue.  They were driven, at least in part, by racial bias and occurred disproportionately against African-American residents.  And they were profoundly and fundamentally unconstitutional.  These findings were based upon information received from Ferguson’s own citizens, from Ferguson’s own records and from Ferguson’s own officials.  And they demonstrated a clear pattern or practice of violations of the Constitution and federal law.

After announcing our findings one year ago, we began negotiations with the city of Ferguson on a court-enforceable consent decree that would bring about necessary police and court reform.  From the outset, we made clear that our goal was to reach an agreement to avoid litigation.  But we also made clear that if there was no agreement, we would be forced to go to court to protect the rights of Ferguson residents.  Painstaking negotiations lasted more than 26 weeks as we sought to remedy literally years of systematic deficiencies.  A few weeks ago, the Department of Justice and Ferguson’s own negotiators came to an agreement that was both fair and cost-effective – and that would provide all the residents of Ferguson the constitutional and effective policing and court practices guaranteed to all Americans.  As agreed, it was presented to the Ferguson City Council for approval or rejection.  And last night, the city council rejected the consent decree approved by their own negotiators.  Their decision leaves us no further choice.

Today, the Department of Justice is filing a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the city of Ferguson, Missouri, alleging a pattern or practice of law enforcement conduct that violates the First, Fourth and 14th Amendments of the Constitution and federal civil rights laws.  We intend to aggressively prosecute this case and I have no doubt that we will prevail.

The residents of Ferguson have waited nearly a year for their city to adopt an agreement that would protect their rights and keep them safe.  They have waited nearly a year for their police department to accept rules that would ensure their constitutional rights and that thousands of other police departments follow every day.  They have waited nearly a year for their municipal courts to commit to basic, reasonable rules and standards.  But as our report made clear, the residents of Ferguson have suffered the deprivation of their constitutional rights – the rights guaranteed to all Americans – for decades.  They have waited decades for justice.  They should not be forced to wait any longer.

Updated September 29, 2016