Exhibit C Ron Roe Page 1 1
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE, INC., Defendant.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CA: 3:08cv1786 SB ORIGINAL |
30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF RON ROE Taken at: Woodward, Cothran & Herndon 440 Knox Abbott Drive, Suite 200 Cayce, South Carolina 29033 On Friday, August 22, 2008 REPORTER: GINA M. SMITH, CSR, RPR | 2
| 3
| 4
| 5
| 6
| 7 | 8
| 9
| 10
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | JOB NO. 204901c |
Page 34 1 | Q. | Did the $5,000 fee have anything to do with state law?
| 2 | A. | No, nor does the 2,500 fee.
| 3 | Q. | Does the commercial office requirement, is that
| 4 | | required by state law?
| 5 | A. | The term "commercial" is not. And previous state law,
| 6 | | they said "comply with the municipal zoning laws," but
| 7 | | that was left off the last time or last two times the
| 8 | | law was revised.
| 9 | Q. | Is the -- so is the current version of the South
| 10 | | Carolina Real Estate Law, is that something that
| 11 | | requires licensees to have commercial offices?
| 12 | A. | It does not.
| 13 | Q. | If you look at Article 4, that's the active
| 14 | | involvement requirement?
| 15 | A. | Right.
| 16 | Q. | That's at the bottom of page 2 of Government
| 17 | | Exhibit 9.
| 18 | A. | That's correct.
| 19 | Q. | What are the reasons for the -- what are the CMLS'
| 20 | | reasons for the active involvement requirement?
| 21 | A. | I probably can speak to that as well as anybody on the
| 22 | | MLS board.
| 23 | | When we were rewriting or updating the rules and
| 24 | | regulations, we looked at state law, and state law
| 25 | | requires a broker, I don't know, probably to do a |
Page 35 1 | | hundred different things.
| 2 | | We wanted to protect the consumer and, my belief,
| 3 | | to improve the professionalism of our industry.
| 4 | | Coming from a military background, I thought
| 5 | | professionalism and ethics was very, very important.
| 6 | | And we looked at state law, and we thought that,
| 7 | | at a minimum, the agent or company had an obligation,
| 8 | | legal obligation, to market, sell and close the
| 9 | | property.
| 10 | Q. | Are there any other reasons?
| 11 | A. | No. The reason was to improve the professionalism and
| 12 | | to abide by state law.
| 13 | | I mean, it's my belief -- and you can correct me
| 14 | | if I'm wrong -- that NAR and DOJ has already agreed .
| 15 | | that it's okay to have that verbiage in MLS agreements
| 16 | | now that the MLS member be actively involved
| 17 | | So I believe that's really not an issue anymore,
| 18 | | if DOJ and NAR has already agreed to that. And I may
| 19 | | be wrong. I just read things off a web site.
| 20 | Q. | What web site are you talking about?
| 21 | A. | It's one of those real estate web sites. I'm not sure
| 22 | | whether it's RIS Media or, you know, Real Trends,
| 23 | | or -- there's several web sites to report real estate
| 24 | | information.
| 25 | | I believe that was also told to me by the |
Page 80 1 | CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
| 2 |
| | 3 | I, GINA M. SMITH, CSR, RPR, Notary Public, do
| 4 | hereby certify that RON ROE was duly sworn by me on
| 5 | August 22, 2008, prior to the taking of the foregoing
| 6 | deposition; that said deposition was taken and transcribed
| 7 | under my supervision and direction; that the parties were
| 8 | present as stated; and that I am not of counsel for or in
| 9 | the employment of any of the parties to this action, nor am
| 10 | I interested in the outcome of this action.
| 11 | I do further certify that the foregoing 79 pages
| 12 | constitute a true and accurate transcript of the testimony.
| 13 | IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto subscribe my name this
| 14 | the 4th day of September 2008.
| 15 |
| 16 |
| 17 | _______________/s/________________
| 18 | GINA M. SMITH, CSR, RPR
| 19 | Notary Public
| 20 |
| 21 |
| 22 |
| 23 | My Commission Expires:
| 24 |
| 25 | July 23, 2013 | |