|This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.07-60183 CR-Dimitrouleas
The Grand Jury charges that:
COUNT ONEDESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE
1. UWE BANGERT is hereby indicted and made a defendant on the charge contained in this Indictment.
2. Beginning at least as early as 1999 and continuing until as late as May 2007, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Broward and Monroe Counties in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, co-conspirators of the defendant,
did enter into and engage in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by rigging bids, fixing prices, and allocating market shares for sales of marine hose in the United States and elsewhere. The combination and conspiracy was in unreasonable restraint of interstate and foreign trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1).
3. The defendant, UWE BANGERT, joined and participated in the charged conspiracy from at least as early as December 2000 until at least July 31, 2002.
4. The charged combination and conspiracy consisted of a continuing agreement, understanding and concert of action among the defendant, UWE BANGERT, and co-conspirators, the substantial terms of which were to rig bids, fix prices and allocate market shares for sales of marine hose in the United States and elsewhere.MEANS AND METHODS OF THE CONSPIRACY
5. For the purpose of forming and carrying out the charged combination and conspiracy, the defendant, UWE BANGERT, and co-conspirators did those things that they combined and conspired to do, including, among other things:
6. From at least as early as December 2000 until at least July 2002, the defendant, UWE BANGERT, was an executive of a German company which had acquired a marine hose manufacturer based in Grimsby, England. During the period set forth in this Indictment, this United Kingdom company sold marine hose to customers in the United States and elsewhere.
7. Various corporations and individuals, not made defendants in this Indictment, participated as co-conspirators in the offense charged herein and performed acts and made statements in furtherance thereof.TRADE AND COMMERCE
8. Marine hose is a flexible rubber hose used to transfer oil between tankers and storage facilities and/or buoys. During the period covered by this Indictment, the conspirator firms shipped marine hose in a continuous and uninterrupted flow of interstate and foreign commerce to companies located in states and countries outside the place of origin of the shipments. In addition, substantial quantities of related equipment, as well as payments for marine hose, traveled in interstate and foreign commerce. The victims of this conspiracy included companies involved in the off-shore extraction and/or transportation of petroleum products and the United States Department of Defense.
9. During the period covered by this Indictment, the business activities of the defendant, UWE BANGERT, and his co-conspirators in connection with the manufacture and/or sale of marine hose that are the subject of this Indictment were within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce. During the conspiracy, the defendant, UWE BANGERT, and co-conspirators sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of marine hose and related products.JURISDICTION AND VENUE
10. The combination and conspiracy charged in this Indictment was carried out, in part, within the Southern District of Florida within the five years preceding the return of this Indictment.
All in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Section 1.