|This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.|
RICHARD B. COHEN
Attorneys for the United States
DISTRICT OF OREGON
The United States of America, acting through its attorneys, charges:I.
DESCRIPTION OF DEFENDANT AND CO-CONSPIRATORS
1. BEST TREE SERVICE, INC. (BEST) is made a defendant on the charge stated below.
2. BEST is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Washington with its principal place of business in Ephrata, Washington. During the period covered by this Information, BEST bid on brush clearing services solicitations offered by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), an agency of the United States Department of Energy, for brush clearing work in and around BPA transmission line right-of-ways located in the District of Oregon and elsewhere.
3. Various corporations and individuals, not made defendants in this Information, participated as co-conspirators in the offense charged herein and performed acts and made statements in furtherance of it.
4. Whenever in this Information reference is made to any act, deed, or transaction of any corporation, the allegation means that the corporation engaged in the act, deed, or transaction by or through its officers, directors, employees, agents, or other representatives while they were actively engaged in the management, direction, control, or transaction of its business or affairs.II.
DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE
5. Beginning at least as early as March 1996 and continuing at least until September 1998, the exact dates being unknown to the United States, in the District of Oregon and elsewhere, BEST and one or more co-conspirators, did unlawfully, knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate and agree together and with each other to defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing and defeating the lawful bidding system used by the BPA, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. They did so by devising a scheme to deceive the BPA into believing that BEST and a competing co-conspirator were independent of one another and were independently determining and submitting bids to the BPA for brush clearing projects. In fact, BEST and the co-conspirator were affiliated and were allocating and submitting non-competitive bids to the BPA for brush clearing projects.III.
OVERT ACTS IN FURTHERANCE OF CONSPIRACY
6. In furtherance of the conspiracy described in this Information, and in order to effect the objects thereof, BEST and co-conspirators committed overt acts in the District of Oregon and elsewhere, including but not limited to the following:
a. not revealing to the BPA that between March 1996 and August 1997 Best had a contractual relationship with a co-conspirator company that limited competition between BEST and that co-conspirator in acquiring brush clearing work from the BPA;
b. not revealing to the BPA that in August 1997 the owners of the co-conspirator company obtained decision-making control of BEST; and
c. meeting and agreeing with representatives of the co-conspirator company to allocate and suppress competition on bids for BPA brush clearing projects in eastern Washington and Oregon.
ALL IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 371