Skip to main content
Case Document

Motion to Substitute Modified Final Judgment for Original Final Judgment

Date
Document Type
Modification/Termination Papers
Attachments
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and
CITICASTERS, INC.,

                  Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
No. C-1-96-757

Judge Weber

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
MODIFIED FINAL JUDGMENT
FOR ORIGINAL FINAL JUDGMENT


The United States hereby moves the Court to substitute the proposed Modified Final Judgment, attached to the Stipulation filed today, for the original Final Judgment, filed with the Court on August 5, 1996. The parties have agreed that the proposed Modified Final Judgment filed with the Court shall supersede the original proposed Final Judgment. The Final Judgment was modified in order to clarify the obligation of Jacor Communications under Section IX of the Judgment to file notice with the Department of Justice for certain types of transactions.

Although not strictly required to do so under the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (15 U.S.C. § 16)("APPA"), the United States will shortly publish notice of the proposed Modified Final Judgment. This will serve to restart the 60-day public comment period provided for by the APPA. After the expiration of the sixty-day period, the United States will file with the Court the comments, the Government's responses, and a Motion For Entry of the Final Judgment [15 U.S.C. § 16(d)]. At that time, pursuant to the APPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(e)-(f), the Court may enter the Modified Final Judgment without a hearing, if it finds that the Modified Final Judgment is in the public interest.

Attorneys for the defendants do not object to this Motion.

DATED: September 12, 1996

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

_______________________________
NANCY M. GOODMAN
Assistant Chief
Telecommunications Task Force
_______________________________
ANDREW S. COWAN
Attorney
Telecommunications Task Force

U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
555 4th Street N.W., Room 8104
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 514-5621

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
United States Attorney

By:________________________
JAN M. HOLTZMAN
Ohio Bar #0017949
Assistant United States Attorney
Rm. 220 Potter Stewart Federal Courthouse
5th & Walnut Streets
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
(513) 684-3711

 
Updated April 18, 2023