Skip to main content
Case Document

Plaintiff United States' Explanation of Consent Decree Procedures

Date
Document Type
Explanation of Consent Decree Procedures
Attachments
248519.pdf
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

SAPA HOLDING AB, and    

INDALEX HOLDINGS FINANCE, INC.  

                  Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)         

Civil Action No.: 1:09-cv-01424

Description: Antitrust

Judge: Richard J. Leon

Date Stamp: July 30, 2009



PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES'
EXPLANATION OF CONSENT DECREE PROCEDURES

Plaintiff United States of America ("United States") submits this short memorandum summarizing the procedures regarding the Court's entry of the proposed Final Judgment. This Judgment would settle this case pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(h) (the "APPA"), which applies to civil antitrust cases brought and settled by the United States.

  1. Today, the United States has filed a Complaint, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, proposed Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact Statement. The parties have agreed that the Court may enter the proposed Final Judgment following compliance with the APPA.
  2. The APPA requires that the United States publish the proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement in the Federal Register and in certain newspapers at least sixty (60) days prior to entry of the proposed Final Judgment. The notice will inform members of the public that they may submit comments about the proposed Final Judgment to the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (see 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(c)).
  3. During the sixty-day period, the United States will consider, and at the close of that period respond to, any comments that it has received, and it will publish the comments and the United States' responses in the Federal Register.
  4. After the expiration of the sixty-day period, the United States will file with the Court the comments and the United States' responses, and it may ask the Court to enter the proposed Final Judgment (unless the United States has decided to withdraw its consent to entry of the Final Judgment, as permitted by paragraph IV(A) of the Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, see 15 U.S.C. § 16(d)).
  5. If the United States requests that the Court enter the proposed Final Judgment after compliance with the APPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(e)-(f), then the Court may enter the Final Judgment without a hearing, provided that it concludes that the Final Judgment is in the public interest.

Dated: July 30, 2009 Respectfully submitted,


     PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:


_______________/s/________________
John F. Greaney, Esquire
Suzanne Morris, Esquire (D.C. Bar #461048)
Dando Cellini, Esquire
Warren A. Rosborough IV, Esquire
              (D.C. Bar #495063)
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division, Litigation II Section
1401 H Street N.W., Suite 3000
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-8518
Related Case
U.S. v. Sapa Holding AB and Indalex Holdings Finance, Inc.
Updated April 18, 2023