Skip to main content
Case Document

[Proposed] Order Denying Comptel's Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Comptel's Motion to Intervene, or in the Alternative to Participate as Amicus Curiae

Date
Document Type
Orders - Miscellaneous
Attachments
215086.pdf
215086.wpd
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

SBC Communications, Inc. and
AT&T Corp.,

                  Defendants.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

Verizon Communications Inc. and
MCI, Inc.,

                  Defendants.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         

Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02102 (EGS)

Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02103 (EGS)



ORDER DENYING COMPTEL'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF COMPTEL'S MOTION TO
INTERVENE, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO PARTIPATE AS AMICUS CURIAE

Upon consideration of COMPTEL's Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum in Support of COMPTEL's Motion for Leave to Intervene, or in the Alternative to Participate as Amicus Curiae, as well as all other relevant papers filed in relation to this motion, it is hereby ORDERED that COMPTEL's motion is DENIED.

Dated: _____________ _______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Related Case
U.S. v. SBC Communications Inc. and AT&T, Corp.
Updated April 18, 2023