|This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on December 21, 1992. Plaintiff and defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of the Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law. This Final Judgment shall not be evidence against or an admission by any party with respect to any issue of fact or law. Therefore, before the taking of any testimony and without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein, and upon consent of the parties, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, as follows:
This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of each of the parties consenting hereto. The Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted against the defendants under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
As used herein, the term:
(A) "airline" means any scheduled air passenger carrier as defined in 49 U.S.C. § 1301(3), its officers, directors, employees, agents, and any other persons acting on its behalf;
(B) "ATP" means the Airline Tariff Publishing Company;
(C) "change" means abandon, add, alter, modify, discontinue, drop, exchange, replace, substitute, switch, or transform;
(D) "coupon" means a coupon or similar voucher offering either a discount off existing fares or a special fare not otherwise available;
(E) "CRS" means computer reservation system;
(F) "defendants" means United Air Lines, Inc. and USAir, Inc.;
(G) "document" means all "writings and recordings" as that phrase is defined in Rule 1001(1) of the Federal Rules of Evidence;
(H) "fare" means the price charged for domestic passenger transportation by any airline, and any rules, restrictions, terms, or conditions governing the availability or use of any such price, but does not include any contract or other negotiated price or any coupon;
(I) "fare class" means a group of fares treated similarly for seat allocation purposes;
(J) "first ticket date" means the first date that a fare is available for sale;
(K) "footnote" means the mechanism used by ATP to store and transmit first ticket dates, last ticket dates, and other limitations on the use of a fare;
(L) "footnote designator" means an alphanumeric designator used to identify a footnote;
(M) "including" means including but not limited to;
(N) "last ticket date" means the last date that a fare is available for sale;
(0) "person" means any natural person, corporation, firm, company, sole proprietorship, partnership, association, institution, governmental unit, or other legal entity;
(P) "promotional fare" as used in Section V(C) means a new fare or group of new fares that, in conjunction with it first being offered for sale, is advertised as being available for purchase for a specified and limited period of time, provided that, where a group of fares is being so advertised, it shall be sufficient to provide a general description of included city or airport pairs and fare levels without specifically identifying each city or airport pair and fare level;
(Q) "relate to" means discuss, refer to, reflect, evidence, concern, or pertain to, in whole or in part;
(R) "tag" means a code used by an airline solely to identify a group of fares for similar processing by ATP; and
(S) "travel date" means a date that limits when a passenger may travel on a fare.
(A) This Final Judgment applies to the defendants and to each of their successors, assigns, and to all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them who shall have received actual notice of the Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise.
(B) Nothing herein contained shall suggest that any portion of this Final Judgment is or has been created for the benefit of any third party and nothing herein shall be construed to provide any rights to any third party.
Each of the defendants is enjoined and restrained from:
(A) Nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit any defendant from submitting its fare changes to ATP for processing, or disseminating to CRSs or other reservations systems rules that do not contain or describe any first ticket date, last ticket date, or planned or contemplated fare level.
(B) Nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit any defendant from engaging in communications with another airline when such communications are reasonably necessary to establish, implement, or modify a joint, code share, commuter, or other interline fare with that airline.
(C) Nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit any defendant from advertising that a promotional fare will cease to be available for purchase on a specified date or after a specified period of time, provided that such advertising occurs (i) in conjunction with the promotional fare first being offered for sale, (ii) in media of general circulation or through mass mailings, and (iii) in a manner designed to directly reach a meaningful number of potential consumers likely to purchase the promotional fare. In the event such advertising occurs, nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit the advertising defendant from otherwise disseminating information that such fare will cease to be available for purchase on the specified date or after the specified period of time.
After any airline disseminates a promotional fare with a last ticket date in any city or airport pair, nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit a defendant from promptly thereafter disseminating, without advertising, a new fare with the same fare level and restrictions and same last ticket date, in the same city or airport pair as that promotional fare, and from thereafter otherwise disseminating such information.
(D) Nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit any defendant from disseminating public statements regarding contemplated changes in fares, provided such statements describe neither effective dates nor the particular amounts or rules relating to particular city or airport pairs or sets of city or airport pairs.
(E) Nothing in this Final Judgment shall prohibit any defendant from advocating or discussing, in accordance with the doctrine established in Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961), and its progeny, legislative, judicial or regulatory actions, or governmental policies or actions.
(F) The dissemination of travel dates, in and of itself, does not constitute a violation of this Final Judgment.
(G) Nothing in this Final Judgment shall be construed to prohibit any defendant, in unilaterally determining its own fares, from considering all publicly available information relating to the fares of other airlines.
(H) Regardless of what fares any airline offers in any city or airport pair, offering any fare in the same or any other city or airport pair, in and of itself, does not constitute a violation of this Final Judgment.
(A) Each defendant is ordered to maintain an antitrust compliance program which shall include designating, within 30 days of entry of this Final Judgment, an Antitrust Compliance Officer with responsibility for accomplishing the antitrust compliance program and with the purpose of achieving compliance with this Final Judgment. The Antitrust Compliance Officer shall, on a continuing basis, supervise the review of the current and proposed activities of his or her defendant company to ensure that it complies with this Final Judgment. The Antitrust Compliance Officer shall be responsible for accomplishing the following activities:
(B) At any time, if a defendant's Antitrust Compliance Officer learns of any past or future violations of Section IV of this Final Judgment, that defendant shall, within 45 days after such knowledge is obtained, take appropriate action to terminate or modify the activity so as to comply with this Final Judgment.
(C) For each last ticket date placed in ATP or a CRS pursuant to Section V(C), each defendant shall retain (1) a record of the dates that such last ticket date was disseminated in the system and the specific fares and city or airport pairs to which the last ticket date was attached, and (2) either a representative copy or transcript of the advertisement that was used in conjunction with any such last ticket date and a record of the use of such advertising, or a representative copy or transcript of the advertisement of the promotional fare to which the defendant was responding. Such records and representative copies or transcripts shall be maintained in a manner that facilitates prompt retrieval and review of the documentation required by this section. These documents shall be retained for a period of three years from the first date any such advertising appeared or the first date any such last ticket date appeared in ATP or a CRS.
(A) Within 75 days after the entry of this Final Judgment, each defendant shall certify to the plaintiff whether it has designated an Antitrust Compliance Officer and has distributed the Final Judgment in accordance with Section VI above.
(B) For 10 years after the entry of this Final Judgment, on or before its anniversary date, each defendant shall file with the plaintiff a statement as to the fact and manner of its compliance with the provisions of Section VI.
(A) To determine or secure compliance with this Final Judgment and for no other purpose, duly authorized representatives of the plaintiff shall, upon written request of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, and on reasonable notice to any defendant made to its principal office, be permitted, subject to any legally recognized privilege:
(B) Upon the written request of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division made to any defendant's principal office, such defendant shall submit such written reports, under oath if requested, relating to any matters contained in this Final Judgment as may be reasonably requested, subject to any legally recognized privilege.
(C) No information or documents obtained by the means provided in Section VIII shall be divulged by the plaintiff to any person other than a duly authorized representative of the Executive Branch of the United States, except in the course of legal proceedings to which the United States is a party, or for the purpose of securing compliance with this Final Judgment, or as otherwise required by law.
(D) If at the time information or documents are furnished by any defendant to plaintiff, such defendant represents and identifies in writing the material in any such information or documents to which a claim of protection may be asserted under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and such defendant marks each pertinent page of such material, "Subject to claim of protection under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure," then 10 days notice shall be given by plaintiff to such defendant prior to divulging such material in any legal proceeding (other than a grand jury proceeding) to which that defendant is not a party.
FURTHER ELEMENTS OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT
(A) This Final Judgment shall expire ten years from the date of its entry.
(B) If, subsequent to the entry of this Final Judgment, a stipulated final judgment in this matter is filed with respect to another airline, or if this Final Judgment or a subsequently filed stipulated final judgment in this matter is modified in any respect, any defendant, in its sole discretion, may move this Court, and the Court shall grant such a motion, to substitute such stipulated final judgment or modified stipulated final judgment for this Final Judgment.
(C) Jurisdiction is retained by this Court for the purpose of enabling any of the parties to this Final Judgment to apply to this Court at any time for further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out or construe this Final Judgment, to modify or terminate any of its provisions, to enforce compliance, and to punish violations of its provisions.
(D) Entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest.
DATED: NOV 1 1993