Government Exhibit 3009
| 00001 | | 1 | IN RE: | | 2 | THE MATTER OF ORACLE'S PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF PEOPLESOFT | | 3 | CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND NO. 22722 | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | Washington, D.C. | | 8 | Tuesday, December 16, 2003 | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | Videotaped Deposition of KEITH BLOCK, a witness | | 14 | herein, called for examination in the above-entitled matter, | | 15 | pursuant to notice, taken at the offices of the United States | | 16 | Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, 600 E Street NW, | | 17 | Suite 9500, Washington, D.C, 20530, beginning at 10:10 A.M. | | 18 | before Christina Anderson Smith, RPR, a Registered | | 19 | Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the | | 20 | District of Columbia. | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00005 | | 1 | PROCEEDINGS | | 2 | (10:10 A.M.) | | 3 | (Government's Exhibit 1 was | | 4 | marked for identification.) | | 5 | EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | | 6 | BY MR. SCOTT: | | 7 | Q. All right, sir. Could you state your name | | 8 | for the record, please. | | 9 | A. Keith Block. | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00006 | | 1 | Q. All right. So now you understand that we'll | | 2 | be asking you a series of questions today designed to | | 3 | elicit information pursuant relating to the proposed | | 4 | acquisition of PeopleSoft by Oracle. | | 5 | A. Right. | | 6 | Q. And you are required to, as you are under | | 7 | oath, to respond to those questions as truthfully as | | 8 | possible. | | 9 | A. Uh-huh. | | 10 | Q. You have to say yes or no for the record. | | 11 | A. Yes. | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00010 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | Q. All right, sir. Could you give us -- tell us | | 19 | who you're currently employed by. | | 20 | A. Oracle Corporation. | | 21 | Q. All right, sir. And what's your work | | 22 | address? |
| 00011 | | 1 | A. 1000 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts. | | 2 | Q. And how long have you been with Oracle? | | 3 | A. Since 1986. | | 4 | Q. All right, sir. And very briefly, could you | | 5 | describe your educational background? | | 6 | A. I have a Bachelor's and a Master's Degree from | | 7 | Carnegie-Mellon University. | | 8 | Q. And what are those degrees in? | | 9 | A. Bachelor's Degree in Information Systems and a | | 10 | Master's Degree in Management and Public Policy. | | 11 | Q. All right, sir. Beginning in 1986 and coming | | 12 | forward to today, could you describe for me briefly the | | 13 | positions you've held at Oracle. | | 14 | A. Sure. I started out with Oracle consulting as | | 15 | a consultant, and worked my way up through the | | 16 | management chain holding various management positions, | | 17 | running geographic practices; got promoted to vice | | 18 | president, moved up the vice president chain running | | 19 | industry-specific practices, the CPG industry | | 20 | particularly. And about a year ago I was asked to run | | 21 | both the licensed sale software sales organizations | | 22 | North America, as well as the North American consulting |
| 00012 | | 1 | organization. | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00014 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | Q. All right, sir. And the current position | | 7 | that you hold, your title is what? | | 8 | A. Executive Vice President North America. | | 9 | Q. And your duties and responsibilities, could | | 10 | you describe those briefly for us? | | 11 | A. I'm responsible for the software sales in the | | 12 | North American commercial account base, as well as the | | 13 | consulting, both government and commercial, in North | | 14 | America. | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | Q. You may have said this earlier, so I | | 20 | apologize. When did you take the -- when did you -- | | 21 | were you put in this position? | | 22 | A. Approximately a year ago. |
| 00025 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | Q. All right, sir. Now, then you said under | | 17 | the -- in addition to the strategic accounts, there's | | 18 | an applications group? | | 19 | A. Uh-huh. | | 20 | Q. You have to say yes or no for her. | | 21 | A. Yes. I'm sorry. | | 22 | Q. And the applications group, could you |
| 00026 | | 1 | describe for me, first of all, who is in charge of it, | | 2 | and then under that person how it's organized. | | 3 | A. Okay. Paul Ciandrini is responsible for the | | 4 | applications group. And he has an eastern North | | 5 | American applications group, a western North American | | 6 | applications group, and he has responsibility for the | | 7 | applications business group which I mentioned earlier. | | 8 | Q. And that applications -- how does that | | 9 | applications business unit relate to Mr. Ciandrini's | | 10 | sales efforts? | | 11 | A. They're deep product experts, and so they'd be | | 12 | brought in on a sales cycle to demonstrate deep product | | 13 | knowledge or competitive knowledge. | | 14 | Q. So, this group would have, under Mr. | | 15 | Ciandrini, salesmen, I take it, that go out and call on | | 16 | individual accounts? | | 17 | A. Yes, that's correct. | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00120 | | 1 | | | 2 | Q. All right. Well, let me ask you this. | | 3 | Describe for me, in as much detail as you can, what the | | 4 | software that will be sold to smaller companies, mid | | 5 | market companies, the term is used in your documents, | | 6 | will consist of? | | 7 | A. For applications? | | 8 | Q. Yes, sir. | | 9 | A. Any company or entity of any size is -- can | | 10 | buy the entire E-Business Suite modules within the | | 11 | E-Business Suite, the functional groupings -of the | | 12 | E-Business Suite. We don't change the software. It's | | 13 | the same software. We don't have different versions of | | 14 | the software based on company size. | | 15 | Q. Are you putting together a version or a | | 16 | package of the software to sell to smaller companies? | | 17 | A. It's not really a software package. | | 18 | Q. Well, what is it? | | 19 | A. What differentiates it is pre-configured set | | 20 | ups, versions, pre-configured set ups. These are | | 21 | service offerings that wrap around the same software, | | 22 | so -- and just as a point of clarification, again, that |
| 00121 | | 1 | offering, not software, that offering, could be sold to | | 2 | a company or entity of 15 million that's a stand alone | | 3 | entity, or it could be a division of GE, General Motors, | | 4 | Boeing, pick it. But the software is the software is | | 5 | the software. We don't modify the software. | | 6 | Q. Then what is it you're doing when you put | | 7 | together this offering? | | 8 | A. Right. | | 9 | Q. What's the purpose of it? | | 10 | A. The offering is to give customers, certain | | 11 | customers, a set of pre-configured software, which oh, | | 12 | by the way, is the same software. It's just configured, | | 13 | pre-configured, as opposed to drawing on a larger | | 14 | project, an opportunity to implement as quickly as | | 15 | possible. | | 16 | Q. When you say pre-configured software, what | | 17 | does that mean? | | 18 | A. Those pre-configured set ups that I talked | | 19 | about earlier, so there'd be a standard chart of | | 20 | accounts in the general ledger module. | | 21 | Q. So they will be standard set ups in this | | 22 | offering as opposed to the customer having -- when they |
| 00122 | | 1 | implement the software, doing customized versions of | | 2 | say general ledger, that type thing? | | 3 | A. That's generally right. | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00125 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | Q. Do you understand what's meant by a solution | | 6 | in a box? | | 7 | A. Solution in a box to me would be a | | 8 | pre-configured pre-set up solution. | | 9 | Q. Now is the ERP software that you sell to | | 10 | larger companies, would you consider that a solution in | | 11 | a box? | | 12 | A. The ERP software that we sell to any company | | 13 | is not a solution in a box. | | 14 | Q. Is the package that you're putting together | | 15 | now to sell to companies that have simpler needs, would | | 16 | you consider this a solution in a box with your | | 17 | pre-configured set ups? | | 18 | A. I'm sorry. Could you ask the question again. | | 19 | Q. You said you're currently putting together | | 20 | some application software to sell to companies with | | 21 | simpler needs, right? Under Mr. Ciandrini? He is | | 22 | putting together some package like that, or at least is |
| 00126 | | 1 | responsible for a number of people doing it, right? | | 2 | A. Uh-huh. | | 3 | Q. Yes. | | 4 | A. That's correct. | | 5 | Q. Would you consider what he's doing to be a | | 6 | solution in a box? | | 7 | A. What Paul is heading up is a solution in a | | 8 | box. | | 9 | Q. And by solution in a box, we mean what again? | | 10 | A. Pre-configured set ups of the software. So | | 11 | it's the same software, it's just pre-configured and set | | 12 | up. | | 13 | Q. Does the pre-configuring of the software, the | | 14 | solution in a box have any implications regarding the | | 15 | time and expense of implementing it? | | 16 | A. Yes, it does. | | 17 | Q. In what way? | | 18 | A. A typical project, broadly speaking, would | | 19 | include several phases to it. There would be a strategy | | 20 | phase, a requirements definition phase, a design phase, | | 21 | a set up and configuration phase, several phases after | | 22 | that, build, transition, production, change, management, |
| 00127 | | 1 | all that good stuff. | | 2 | You still can go through all those phases | | 3 | with set ups in a box. But you can cut down the | | 4 | time to do that because you can cut pieces out of | | 5 | the strategy phase of a project or the set up and | | 6 | configuration phase of a project or the requirements | | 7 | phase of a project by essentially giving a | | 8 | customer -- here's your set up, here's your system, | | 9 | make some minor modifications and you can go. | | 10 | Q. So using a set up in a box would be faster | | 11 | and cheaper for a customer to implement if they used | | 12 | the pre-configured set ups? | | 13 | A. It would certainly cut down on the labor and | | 14 | time to go live, yes. | | 15 | Q. And for, say, your -- in the package for | | 16 | the -- that you're -- for pre-configured set ups that | | 17 | you're working on now, you haven't worked out the | | 18 | pricing of it, I take it, from what you said earlier. | | 19 | A. No. | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00128 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | Q. And you said earlier that you wouldn't | | 21 | consider the ERPs, the enterprise software that you | | 22 | sell to be a solution in a box, correct? |
| 00129 | | 1 | A. Stand alone? No. | | 2 | Q. What is different from -- well, first of all, | | 3 | what do you mean by the term stand alone in your last | | 4 | answer? | | 5 | A. Stand alone means it's just the software. | | 6 | There is no set up or configuration, it's just the | | 7 | software that's on the CD. That's it. | | 8 | Q. Is that generally how you sell the enterprise | | 9 | software? | | 10 | A. Yes, it is. | | 11 | Q. As a stand alone? | | 12 | A. Yes, it is. | | 13 | Q. What is different between the stand alone ERP | | 14 | software and the solution in a box? | | 15 | A. The solution in a box would include the | | 16 | pre-configured set ups. Again, for an example, if you | | 17 | have the general ledger, it would have a chart of-- a | | 18 | pre-configured chart of accounts. | | 19 | Q. And the stand alone software, ERP software | | 20 | would not have a pre-configured set up of accounts? | | 21 | A. That's correct. | | 22 | Q. Why? |
| 00130 | | 1 | A. We don't sell it that way. | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00131 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | Q. And the reason that you're standardizing -- | | 13 | doing standardized configurations in the out of the box | | 14 | solution in a box package is because you perceive that | | 15 | there are some customers who would want the software | | 16 | sold in such a manner; is that accurate? | | 17 | A. Yes. | | 18 | Q. And what's the basis of that? | | 19 | Why do you think that? | | 20 | A. There are examples of other companies in the | | 21 | market who have been able to do this, so we have been | | 22 | able to see that there's receptivity to it. Like |
| 00132 | | 1 | Salesforce.com. We've also -- customers are always | | 2 | interested in implementing faster, cheaper, less | | 3 | expensive ways. So if you can give them something | | 4 | that's pre-configured and set up, they're always going | | 5 | to be interested in that. | | 6 | Q. Now, you sell the stand alone ERP software, | | 7 | as I understand it, without pre-configured set ups like | | 8 | you have in your solution in a box, correct? | | 9 | A. We sell it stand alone without the solution in | | 10 | a box. | | 11 | Q. And without -- and by that statement, that | | 12 | means that your stand alone ERP software does not have | | 13 | pre-configured -- pre-configured aspects to it that the | | 14 | solution in a box does have? | | 15 | A. That's correct. | | 16 | Q. And so would it be a fair statement that the | | 17 | reason you sell the ERP software, stand alone software | | 18 | without the number of pre-configured aspects to it that | | 19 | are in the solutions in a box is because you understand | | 20 | customers, some customers want the ERP stand alone | | 21 | software without all those pre-done configurations? | | 22 | A. That's correct. |
| 00133 | | 1 | Q. And what's the basis for that? | | 2 | Why do you think that? | | 3 | A. They may want their-- they may want their | | 4 | unique needs. They may feel their business is special. | | 5 | They may have something proprietary, competitive | | 6 | advantage. Could be a number of things. And they may | | 7 | use it -- if we ever gave them or included it, they may | | 8 | use it as a jump start to a project. | | 9 | Q. They may use what as a jump start to a | | 10 | project? | | 11 | A. Pre-configured set ups. | | 12 | Q. Typically, the folks that you sell the stand | | 13 | alone ERP software to today, though, don't buy the | | 14 | pre-configured set ups that you have in the solution in | | 15 | a box product? | | 16 | A. It's not bundled together. | | 17 | Q. And do you have -- can you identify any | | 18 | instances where you were selling the stand alone ERP | | 19 | software where people, in order to jump start the | | 20 | project, as you put it, also ask for the solution in a | | 21 | box product? | | 22 | A. Well, they're not aware of the solution in the |
| 00134 | | 1 | box product. | | 2 | Q. Why is that? | | 3 | A. Well, it's not really generally available to | | 4 | the market yet. | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00138 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | Let me ask this. Are you familiar with | | 15 | the process by which sales of stand alone ERP | | 16 | enterprise software are made by Oracle? | | 17 | A. Yes. | | 18 | Q. And how much do you get involved in the sales | | 19 | process? | | 20 | A. I'm typically active in a discrete number of | | 21 | opportunities playing an executive sponsorship role and | | 22 | doing executive selling. |
| 00139 | | 1 | Q. What is meant by executive sponsorship role | | 2 | in executive selling? | | 3 | A. A lot of customers want to sit across from an | | 4 | executive and understand what the high level value | | 5 | proposition is, what Oracle brings to the table, or on | | 6 | risk mitigation, about demonstrating return on | | 7 | investment for the client in a corporate commitment. | | 8 | Q. Are you also in a position where you are kept | | 9 | apprised as of transactions as they're ongoing as to | | 10 | what's in the pipe line, what's likely to come in, | | 11 | what's likely not to come in, that type of thing? | | 12 | A. I track a discrete number of sales pursuits. | | 13 | And I also get overall pipe line information and | | 14 | forecast information. | | 15 | Q. Now, as the process goes forward in selling | | 16 | an account, do you also become involved in discussions | | 17 | regarding price? | | 18 | A. Typically not. And if I do, it's usually at | | 19 | the end of a sale cycle. | | 20 | Q. How is the pricing for your products, your | | 21 | application software licensing done? | | 22 | A. It can be done on a suite basis. There's a |
| 00140 | | 1 | standard set of prices for the suite. It can be done on | | 2 | an employee basis, number of employees. | | 3 | Q. So I take it there is a list price for the | | 4 | products that you sell? | | 5 | A. Yes, there is. | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00142 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | Q. Now, is the pricing for the -- is it typical | | 21 | for, in the pricing of the applications that you folks | | 22 | sell, for there to be some discounting off of the list |
| 00143 | | 1 | price, however that list price is computed? | | 2 | A. Yes. | | 3 | Q. And what are the -- are there set or standard | | 4 | discounts that can be given by different levels of | | 5 | personnel at Oracle? | | 6 | A. Yes. | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | Q. At what levels are there approvals for | | 13 | discounts? | | 14 | A. I believe there's a discount approval level | | 15 | before me, below me. There may be more to be candid | | 16 | with you. And there is one above me. | | 17 | Q. All right. And what's your level of discount | | 18 | that you're authorized to go to? | | 19 | A. I believe it's 70 percent. | | 20 | Q. And that would be 70 percent off the list | | 21 | price? | | 22 | A. Right. |
| 00144 | | 1 | Q. And the -- who above you has the authority? | | 2 | A. Safra Catz. | | 3 | Q. And what is her level of authority? | | 4 | A. Unlimited. | | 5 | Q. And the one below you, who is that? | | 6 | A. That would be my direct reports. | | 7 | Q. Including Mr. Ciandrini? | | 8 | A. Yes. | | 9 | Q. And what is his level of discount authority? | | 10 | A. I don't know. I believe it's 55 percent, but | | 11 | I don't know. | | 12 | Q. All right, sir. And then -- and the process, | | 13 | I take it, in order for someone to get -- take a | | 14 | discount up to your level of authority, they have to | | 15 | come to you and seek your dispensation on doing that? | | 16 | A. Yes, or my proxy, yes. | | 17 | Q. Under what circumstances or what types of | | 18 | things would lead you to authorize a discount up to | | 19 | your level of 70 percent? | | 20 | A. It could be a variety of factors. It could be | | 21 | the customer's budget. In today's world the customer is | | 22 | driving 99.9 percent of the pricing decisions anyway. |
| 00145 | | 1 | It could be recognition of a significant investment over | | 2 | time by an existing customer, so we want to reward them | | 3 | for their investment in our products. It could be a | | 4 | competitive situation. It could be budgetary | | 5 | constraints. But again, primarily -the customer | | 6 | dictates the price right now. | | 7 | Q. A request for approval to a discount at your | | 8 | level, do they generally come to you in writing? | | 9 | A. They always do. They actually go to an | | 10 | account called KB license approvals. | | 11 | Q. This is an electronic account, something on | | 12 | the computer? | | 13 | A. Yes. | | 14 | Q. KB license approval? | | 15 | A. Yeah. KB underscore license approvals. | | 16 | Q. Is that just for ones where your approval is | | 17 | sought, or is that all license approvals and discounts? | | 18 | A. Anything that needs to go to my level. | | 19 | Q. And who maintains that electronic account? | | 20 | A. Rich Blotner. | | 21 | Q. And what's Mr. Blotner's title and role in | | 22 | the company? |
| 00146 | | 1 | A. He's part of the operations group. | | 2 | Q. All right. You said that sometime you will | | 3 | try to reward in giving larger discounts a customer's | | 4 | investment over time. What did you mean by that? | | 5 | A. We have some customers who have invested a lot | | 6 | of money in our technology. They may have bought tens | | 7 | of millions of dollars worth of software, and they may | | 8 | have bought it at a lower discount, and we may reward | | 9 | them for their loyalty. | | 10 | Q. And you said that sometimes you will discount | | 11 | because of a competitive situation. What did you mean | | 12 | by that? | | 13 | A. It's a buyer's market right now. And since | | 14 | the turn of the century, candidly, it has been. So it's | | 15 | very very competitive. Customers have limited IT spend, | | 16 | and so it's -- we're all competing. Everybody is | | 17 | competing very aggressively, all software vendors. | | 18 | Q. All right, sir. Now, in addition to selling | | 19 | application software, do you typically sell some type | | 20 | of maintenance or support contract? | | 21 | A. Yes, we do. | | 22 | Q. And how is that priced? |
| 00147 | | 1 | A. It's 22 percent of the discounted price of the | | 2 | software. | | 3 | Q. All right. And why that number as opposed to | | 4 | 23, 24 or something else? | | 5 | A. You know, I couldn't begin to answer that | | 6 | question. | | 7 | Q. Who set the number? | | 8 | A. The Oracle pricing committee. | | 9 | Q. And what is that committee made up of? Who | | 10 | is that committee made up of? | | 11 | A. I don't know all eight members of the | | 12 | committee. It's development, some key stakeholders, | | 13 | Safra, some other folks, some people in business | | 14 | practices who work for Safra. | | 15 | Q. The maintenance support contracts, what type | | 16 | of services are provided to the customer under those, | | 17 | generally speaking? | | 18 | A. There's standard support, which allows | | 19 | customers to -- I would lump it up into two categories. | | 20 | One is that that they receive update rights, so you | | 21 | mentioned earlier something about, you know, 1158 as a | | 22 | version of the product. Well, the customers are |
| 00148 | | 1 | entitled under their support agreement to get 1159 and | | 2 | other point releases as well as new versions of the | | 3 | product. | | 4 | They also get supported from -- if there's | | 5 | an issue with the software, or a customer needs | | 6 | help, they can log products, product issues or | | 7 | technical requests to resolve the issues. They can | | 8 | speak to a support customer representative to help | | 9 | solve those issues. | | 10 | Q. Do the -- do most of your customers, if not | | 11 | all of your customers, buy a maintenance and support | | 12 | contract when they buy your application software? | | 13 | A. Yes. | | 14 | Q. Which is it, most or all? | | 15 | A. All. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 00159 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16 | Q. You've used the term partners in reference to | | 17 | them. Do you have some type of formal relationship | | 18 | with the Accentures, Bearing Points of the world that | | 19 | lead them to promote your software? | | 20 | A. One of the things that they actually pride | | 21 | themselves on is being vendor neutral. So if you go | | 22 | talk to Accenture or DeLoitte or Bearing Point they'll |
| 00160 | | 1 | tell you, hey, you know we only act in the best interest | | 2 | of the customer, and we're not going to promote | | 3 | somebody's software over somebody else. Now, that's | | 4 | what they'll say, and that's their stated objective. | | 5 | That's why customers go to them to do evaluations. | | 6 | Q. What type of relationship do you have with | | 7 | them that would lead you to call them partners? | | 8 | A. Partner is one of the most over used words in | | 9 | the business world, as you probably know. But, we | | 10 | would -- we have a very good relationship with them. | | 11 | Sometimes we have a contractual agreement so that when | | 12 | we work together these are the terms and conditions of | | 13 | the agreement. A master services agreement. Mostly | | 14 | with our consulting organization, so that if Accenture | | 15 | does a project and they use Oracle consultants there's a | | 16 | discount on the consulting services. It's the standard | | 17 | discount that would apply for every deal that Accenture | | 18 | did. | | 19 | Q. How do you interreact with say a Bearing | | 20 | Point or an Accenture or -- who were the other -- you | | 21 | said big five. Who is included in the rest of them? | | 22 | A. So Bearing Point, Accenture, DeLoitte, CGNY, |
| 00161 | | 1 | Cap, Gemini, Ernst, Young and the big five is I guess | | 2 | now the big four because PWC was acquired by IBM. But | | 3 | we still -- we still partner with them. | | 4 | Q. All right. Now, and when you say you partner | | 5 | with them, what is it then exactly that your sales | | 6 | folks do in relation to these companies, these systems | | 7 | integrators? | | 8 | A. Okay. So, for example, Accenture may be asked | | 9 | to do an evaluation by a customer. And they typically | | 10 | will have multiple teams, they may have multiple teams | | 11 | doing evaluations demos, conference room pilots, and | | 12 | we'll work with them to help them demo the software, put | | 13 | together a solution for the customers. So that's one. | | 14 | Another opportunity is sometimes a | | 15 | customer will issue an RFP, request for proposal, to | | 16 | a variety of partners and software providers. And | | 17 | we may have an agreement with them that says okay on | | 18 | this particular deal we're going to work with you | | 19 | guys. Or we may work with many. And they may work | | 20 | exclusively with us. They may work with many | | 21 | software providers. That's how it works. | | 22 | Q. When you said in relation to the earlier -- |
| 00162 | | 1 | you know, where they might be working, not the RFP | | 2 | process, but the circumstances where they may be | | 3 | working with multiple teams, demoing and testing the | | 4 | software -- | | 5 | A. Yep. | | 6 | Q. Multiple teams meaning what in that context? | | 7 | A. At some point in the evaluation process -- and | | 8 | you know, evaluation process goes through many rounds. | | 9 | I mean, it's an exhaustive process. It takes a long | | 10 | time. Especially, you know, if you're rolling out a | | 11 | large portion of any application provider suite. Right. | | 12 | And typically what'll happen is at some | | 13 | point the customer will say okay, well, I think | | 14 | it's, you know, these guys that I want to go with, | | 15 | and so Accenture would say okay, well we're going to | | 16 | have a team to work with this vendor, a team to work | | 17 | with this vendor, a team to work with this vendor, | | 18 | and eventually you get to that stage and then | | 19 | Accenture will provide implementation bids for two | | 20 | or three or four. | | 21 | Q. Okay. So what will happen is Accenture, | | 22 | Bearing Point, whomever might set up different teams to |
| 00163 | | 1 | work with different vendors -- | | 2 | A. Uh-huh. | | 3 | Q. -- so that they can run and test the software | | 4 | of each of them against the client's requirements and | | 5 | see who the best fit is. | | 6 | A. That's generally right. | | 7 | Q. Are there circumstances where you folks are | | 8 | working with say an Accenture or a Bearing Point or a | | 9 | CGNY where you know that there are also showing and | | 10 | demoing other people's software? | | 11 | A. Yes. | | 12 | Q. Is that typical? | | 13 | A. It's not uncommon. | | 14 | Q. And then these companies will typically -- | | 15 | will bid to do the implementation work. | | 16 | A. Yes. Although, on occasion, if they do the | | 17 | evaluation, they're not asked to do the implementation | | 18 | work. | | 19 | Q. Okay. Do the Big 5 generally have people in | | 20 | there capable of doing the implementation work for most | | 21 | of the major software vendors? | | 22 | A. Yes. |
| 00164 | | 1 | Q. And that would be including you? | | 2 | A. Yes. | | 3 | Q. Can you think of any of the Big 5 who don't | | 4 | have the capability of doing implementation work for | | 5 | you, Oracle's software? | | 6 | A. No. | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00166 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | Q. Okay. And in the circumstances where the Big | | 13 | 5 are involved, typically won't there be some document | | 14 | which lays out from a technical standpoint performance | | 15 | standpoint what the customer's looking for? | | 16 | A. Yeah, typically there'll be a high level | | 17 | requirements definition. | | 18 | Q. Is that -- do -- are RFPs more detailed than | | 19 | these high level performance definitions that come | | 20 | through the Big 5? | | 21 | A. It depends on the customer. | | 22 | Q. All right, sir. And in dealing with these |
| 00167 | | 1 | circumstances, what type of information does the -- is | | 2 | the client giving you making available to you regarding | | 3 | what they want? | | 4 | A. It could be a number of things. It may be -- | | 5 | typically it's the scope of work that they're looking | | 6 | for, the scope, the functionality, the scope of work, | | 7 | where the software would be deployed. It could be -- it | | 8 | could run the whole gamut. | | 9 | Q. Well, is there -- are these things fairly | | 10 | uniform in the scope of work that you get from clients? | | 11 | A. No. | | 12 | Q. And why is that? | | 13 | A. Broadly speaking, there are probably | | 14 | categories of things that they will ask about. But | | 15 | every customer is different. | | 16 | Q. Broadly speaking -- when say they're broadly | | 17 | speaking, there are categories of things that customers | | 18 | will ask about, in doing that scope of work type of | | 19 | document, what types of things typically will be in | | 20 | such a document? | | 21 | A. Oh, it might be things like functionality. It | | 22 | may be platform that you run on. It may be we want to |
| 00168 | | 1 | see your references. It may be -- I mean, things like | | 2 | that. | | 3 | Q. All right. So typically, then, in the scope | | 4 | of work document you will get, one, from a client when | | 5 | you're going in to sell enterprise software something | | 6 | that describes the functionality they're looking for | | 7 | and the software that they want to acquire, right? | | 8 | A. Yes, at a high level. | | 9 | Q. And by high level, what do you mean? | | 10 | A. It's not detailed requirements. I mean | | 11 | typically what happens is that the customer has a | | 12 | statement, a broad statement of requirements where they | | 13 | think is -- they may think it's actually very detailed, | | 14 | but it's typically a broad statement of requirements. | | 15 | And then, you would go through, as part of | | 16 | the sales cycle, a product fit analysis, right, to | | 17 | identify what degree of fit does the product apply. | | 18 | And to do that, you typically have to do demos. You | | 19 | may have to do conference room pilots. You may have | | 20 | to have multiple workshop sections till you get a | | 21 | greater detail of their requirements. | | 22 | Q. All right. Now, when you say that, you'll do |
| 00169 | | 1 | a product fit analysis, what is that? What does that | | 2 | mean in more detail? | | 3 | A. It would be -- a customer may have a certain | | 4 | business requirement. You want to make sure that the | | 5 | software is -- if the software is able to meet that | | 6 | business requirement, either through set up and | | 7 | configuration or customization of the software. | | 8 | Q. And how do you -- and I take it you get | | 9 | information from the client regarding what their | | 10 | business requirements are for the software, what it is | | 11 | they want it to do. | | 12 | A. Yes. In that stage typically it's at a very | | 13 | high level. | | 14 | Q. All right. But then you follow up with that | | 15 | to get more detail from the client as to what it is | | 16 | they're looking for. | | 17 | A. We try to get as much detail as we can. | | 18 | Q. And how do you go about that process? | | 19 | A. Again, you do workshops. You may do | | 20 | conference room pilots. You may do demonstrations. You | | 21 | may do walk throughs of business processes. | | 22 | Q. When you say workshops in the context of |
| 00170 | | 1 | working with the client to determine what it is that | | 2 | they need functionally from software, what do you mean? | | 3 | A. We may ask them for a sample set of business | | 4 | scenarios that they want to run the software on, and | | 5 | then we would set up and configure the software. And | | 6 | the workshop may help define what those business | | 7 | scenarios are, or it may take the business scenarios, if | | 8 | they're reasonably well defined and we may load them and | | 9 | configure our software and do a demonstration and, you | | 10 | know, candidly say is this what you meant by this. It's | | 11 | a kind of give and take exercise. It's a hands on | | 12 | workshop. | | 13 | Q. Is it typical in selling application | | 14 | enterprise software to do this type of demonstration | | 15 | and workshops? | | 16 | A. Yes. | | 17 | Q. Is it typical to do this type of | | 18 | demonstration when you're selling an out of the box | | 19 | solution to smaller companies? | | 20 | A. Well, a demonstration is. Most customers want | | 21 | to see a demonstration of the software. | | 22 | Q. Is there some difference in the level of |
| 00171 | | 1 | demonstration that you do for the out of the box | | 2 | product versus your enterprise software? | | 3 | A. Well, the out of the box product doesn't exist | | 4 | yet, right. | | 5 | Q. Right. | | 6 | A. So, when we demo, a demo is a demo is a demo. | | 7 | But what we try to do is we'll try and tailor the | | 8 | business requirements to the demo. So for example, if | | 9 | we're demoing to a bank we're going to do a financial | | 10 | services demo. If we're demoing to, you know, a retail | | 11 | goods, you know somebody in the retail market, we're not | | 12 | going to do a financial services demo. We'll do some | | 13 | sort of an industry flavor to it. | | 14 | Q. All right. Now. When the -- you typically | | 15 | in selling your application software, how many of these | | 16 | workshops will you have in dealing with the client to | | 17 | see if - determine what it is they really want and | | 18 | whether your software fits it in the way of | | 19 | functionality? | | 20 | A. I'd say it's around two or three iterations | | 21 | maybe. | | 22 | Q. Okay. And when you say, in these workshops, |
| 00172 | | 1 | how many people from your side would be involved in | | 2 | putting on one of these things? | | 3 | A. It really depends. | | 4 | Q. Well, for example, if you're selling an | | 5 | application, enterprise software to a company, do you | | 6 | have teams of people that are working on those, or is | | 7 | it just one sales rep with whoever they call in? | | 8 | A. No, it's always a team. | | 9 | Q. Okay. And the team would consist typically | | 10 | of what? | | 11 | A. It could be any permutation or combination of | | 12 | the sales rep, sales consultants, partners, our own | | 13 | consultants, and the customer's people. | | 14 | Q. And your consultants would include what? | | 15 | A. We have under my responsibilities I run a | | 16 | consulting organization for commercial and government | | 17 | consulting in North America. And these are people who | | 18 | understand our products. Many of them actually are EX | | 19 | Big 5 consultants, so they understand the consulting | | 20 | industry and implementation, and they have industry | | 21 | expertise. | | 22 | Q. The product -- you say you also do something, |
| 00173 | | 1 | you sell conference room pilots? | | 2 | A. Yep. | | 3 | Q. And what is a conference room pilot? | | 4 | A. It's basically a workshop, or it's an extended | | 5 | workshop. It's a little more detailed than a workshop. | | 6 | Q. Again, working with the client to see if your | | 7 | software can match up with the needs that they think | | 8 | they have, or they're looking for functionally. I - | | 9 | A. That's generally right. | | 10 | Q. And so there would be multiple workshop | | 11 | sessions with a client to be sure that what you're | | 12 | selling matches up to what they want from a functional | | 13 | standpoint? | | 14 | A. Right. And sometimes the customer dictates. | | 15 | They want more, they want more sessions because they | | 16 | want that comfort level. | | 17 | Q. Right. Now typically, in one of these | | 18 | processing, how long does it -- are you working with | | 19 | the client in selecting an enterprise software | | 20 | application? | | 21 | A. That varies. | | 22 | Q. Well, it's been suggested by one -- I think |
| 00174 | | 1 | it was Mr. Ciandrini that the process could go from six | | 2 | to 18 months. | | 3 | A. That is not atypical. | | 4 | Q. And during that 16 to 8 -- 6 to 18 month | | 5 | period, roughly how many people would you typically | | 6 | have dedicated to the sales process with the client? | | 7 | A. Again, that really depends. But, I mean | | 8 | obviously always the sales rep would be dedicated to the | | 9 | customer. But it may be a virtual team of resources | | 10 | from, again, our sales consultant organization, our | | 11 | consultants, partners. | | 12 | Q. All right, sir. And then you said that | | 13 | the -- at the end of the day -- well, strike that. | | 14 | How do you get to the point where you can | | 15 | determine how closely your product does fit the | | 16 | client's needs? | | 17 | A. Well, again we go through these exercises. | | 18 | The customers always want to do due diligence as much as | | 19 | they possibly can because it's all about risk | | 20 | mitigation. That's certainly a big factor. So they | | 21 | want to have a high comfort level that the degree of fit | | 22 | is there. So they'll typically drive how much of the |
| 00175 | | 1 | drill down happens. But, you know, we generally get a | | 2 | feeling for what the requirement is because we've worked | | 3 | with them. They've been open and up front with us about | | 4 | what their business requirements are. And you typically | | 5 | go through that sort of a process. | | 6 | Q. And I take it the clients, generally the | | 7 | customers that you're working with are generally pretty | | 8 | forthcoming about from a functional standpoint what it | | 9 | is they've got to have. | | 10 | A. Yeah, it's in their best interest. | | 11 | Q. Is it typical in one of these situations | | 12 | where they will be going through this process with | | 13 | someone other than you while they're doing it with you? | | 14 | A. When you say someone other than -- | | 15 | Q. Another vendor. | | 16 | A. It's not atypical. | | 17 | Q. Do they -- as part of the process of doing | | 18 | this, do your salesmen attempt to learn whether or not | | 19 | there is another vendor at play in the client? | | 20 | A. We strongly encourage them to get as much | | 21 | information as possible, yes. | | 22 | Q. Including that, whether there's another |
| 00176 | | 1 | vendor at play? | | 2 | A. Sure. | | 3 | Q. And why do you want as much information as | | 4 | possible about the process, including whether there are | | 5 | other vendors at play? | | 6 | A. It helps us qualify the opportunity. It also | | 7 | helps us identify the degree of risk in the opportunity, | | 8 | what level of investment we need to make, how we need to | | 9 | adjust our sales cycle if it's applicable. | | 10 | Q. Okay. When you say to qualify the | | 11 | opportunity, what do you mean by that term? | | 12 | A. How serious the customer is about buying or if | | 13 | they're just kicking the tires. | | 14 | Q. And how do you go about qualifying a customer | | 15 | to determine if they're kicking the tires or ready to | | 16 | drive it away? | | 17 | A. There's a number of ways to do it. You ask | | 18 | them how they're going to make their decision, who the | | 19 | decision makers are. Do they have budget, is there a | | 20 | return on in investment that's already been done. | | 21 | There's typical things that you look for. And if the | | 22 | customer has done all those things, you know that |
| 00177 | | 1 | they're a qualified buyer. | | 2 | Q. And are there buyers that, because you don't | | 3 | believe that they are serious about it, that you will | | 4 | say no, we're not going to go through the process with | | 5 | you? | | 6 | Well, let me put it another way. Buyers | | 7 | that you don't qualify and therefore pursue the | | 8 | opportunity with? | | 9 | A. We typically don't want -- excuse me. We | | 10 | typically don't like to walk away from an opportunity. | | 11 | But in the qualification process if we find red flags, | | 12 | like hey, this deal's not really qualified, we'll do a | | 13 | time out and try get to a key decision maker, alleged | | 14 | key decision maker and really find out are you guys | | 15 | serious about this or not. | | 16 | Q. And that is because you don't want to spend a | | 17 | lot of resources with no potential return coming back | | 18 | to you. | | 19 | A. Well, we don't want to waste their time and we | | 20 | don't want to waste our time. | | 21 | Q. Sure. You indicated or you said something | | 22 | about an ROI, a return on investment analysis. That |
| 00178 | | 1 | you ask the client if they have done one of those. | | 2 | What is that? | | 3 | A. It's typically a study or an analysis that's | | 4 | done to determine what the benefits are of implementing | | 5 | the software, what the payback period is, and measure | | 6 | that against the costs and the risks. | | 7 | Q. And is that something typically that the | | 8 | client will share with you? | | 9 | A. Some customers do and some don't. | | 10 | Q. All right. And is there any advantage to the | | 11 | customer in sharing that information with you? | | 12 | A. I think it really depends on the relationship | | 13 | you have with the customer. | | 14 | Q. Meaning what? | | 15 | A. Meaning that if you have a straight -- if you | | 16 | have a strong partnership with a customer, and you've | | 17 | worked well with them in the past, and you've | | 18 | demonstrated a sincere interest in making that customer | | 19 | successful, and they really feel that way, a true | | 20 | partnership, people open the books. They'll tell you, | | 21 | and then you try to design a solution that fits their | | 22 | books. |
| 00179 | | 1 | Q. Do you, yourself, do a return on investment | | 2 | analysis as part of your qualifying customers? | | 3 | A. We do offer that service for those customers | | 4 | who either won't share or haven't done it. | | 5 | Q. All right. You offer that service to the | | 6 | customer, or you do it for your own purposes of | | 7 | qualifying the customer? | | 8 | A. No. We formally do it for the customer. | | 9 | Q. Okay. If the customer does not want you to | | 10 | does it does, not ask you to do it, do you typically do | | 11 | it? | | 12 | A. Sometimes we will. | | 13 | Q. And in what circumstances will you, as | | 14 | opposed to circumstances where you might not? | | 15 | A. It may be a question of confidence of whether | | 16 | or not we're going to win the deal, whether or not we | | 17 | feel that they have really done a good job justifying | | 18 | it, whether or not we feel they're really on board with | | 19 | doing this. We want to give them a compelling reason to | | 20 | buy our software. | | 21 | Q. Now, you also indicated that you do something | | 22 | to analyze the risk involved in an account, to see if |
| 00180 | | 1 | you can actually win business from the account, | | 2 | correct? | | 3 | A. That's correct. | | 4 | Q. Is that different from the qualification of | | 5 | the customer's opportunity? | | 6 | A. It's an aspect of it. | | 7 | Q. And what does that mean? | | 8 | A. What does what mean? | | 9 | Q. What you just said. It's an aspect of what. | | 10 | What is an aspect of what? | | 11 | A. It's a step in the qualification process. | | 12 | Q. So the risk analysis would be part of the | | 13 | qualification analysis. | | 14 | A. Typically. | | 15 | Q. What is it you're trying to judge when you do | | 16 | the risk analysis? | | 17 | A. Degree of success of an implementation, | | 18 | whether or not we're really going to win and whether | | 19 | it's worth expending enormous resource. | | 20 | Q. Do you, in the context of doing a risk | | 21 | analysis, try to determine who may be competing against | | 22 | you for that particular opportunity? |
| 00181 | | 1 | A. That's possible. | | 2 | Q. And why would you care about that? | | 3 | A. Because if you understand who your competition | | 4 | is you understand how to win. | | 5 | Q. How so? | | 6 | A. There may be characteristics about a | | 7 | particular software provider or the way they sell, the | | 8 | way they go to market, their messaging, the way they | | 9 | position themselves. | | 10 | Q. Okay. So there may be -- different software | | 11 | vendors may have different product and business | | 12 | characteristics that differentiate themselves from | | 13 | others. I understand that. How does that factor into | | 14 | your risk of being able to win the account? | | 15 | A. I would factor -- I would consider that more | | 16 | of a qualification. Let me give you an example. This | | 17 | would be an extreme example, but it's an existing SAP | | 18 | account on top of the sequel server data base. So in | | 19 | that particular scenario, we would look at it and say, | | 20 | well they're already a Microsoft data base customer. | | 21 | Why do we think we they're going to magically become an | | 22 | Oracle customer. And we may say well, why are you |
| 00182 | | 1 | magically SAP you may -- you're already an SAP customer. | | 2 | Why would you magically became an Oracle customer. | | 3 | Those are the kind of things that we can look at. | | 4 | Q. Do the performance and functional | | 5 | characteristics of individual vendors factor into your | | 6 | qualification process? | | 7 | For example, if you know Vendor X or Y is | | 8 | in, you know you match up well against their product | | 9 | for some reason. So that would make it a more | | 10 | attractive proposition for you? | | 11 | A. Yeah. We would typically try to look at that | | 12 | from an industry perspective. | | 13 | Q. Meaning what? | | 14 | A. Meaning that every software product has | | 15 | strengths and weaknesses in a particular industry. | | 16 | Q. Could you explain what you mean, in a | | 17 | particular industry, meaning what? | | 18 | A. Well, every industry has unique requirements. | | 19 | Q. Okay. | | 20 | A. And some software providers are uniquely | | 21 | positioned because they focus particularly on that | | 22 | industry. |
| 00183 | | 1 | Q. And so there are characteristics that they | | 2 | have built into their product which may make them more | | 3 | attractive to that industry than other vendors | | 4 | products. | | 5 | A. That's generally right. | | 6 | Q. Are there industries within Oracle where you | | 7 | think is particularly attracted to? | | 8 | A. I think we're pretty strong in most | | 9 | industries. | | 10 | Q. Well, could you give me an example of | | 11 | somebody who is particularly strong in a given industry | | 12 | that would -- you would want to factor into your | | 13 | decision whether to qualify an account? | | 14 | A. Yeah. The retail industry. There's an | | 15 | enterprise application vendor called ReTech, and their | | 16 | software is pretty much unique to the retail industry. | | 17 | It understands things like size, color, style and all | | 18 | that good stuff. And they're very good. Very strong | | 19 | player. | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00190 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | Q. Then you indicated in dealing with the | | 20 | customer on the sales cycle there would be something, | | 21 | you said information that might be requested regarding | | 22 | references. Do you recall that? |
| 00191 | | 1 | A. Yes, I do. | | 2 | Q. And what did you mean in that context by the | | 3 | term references? | | 4 | A. A reference would be a customer who's had a | | 5 | positive experience with our software. | | 6 | Q. Is it typical for customers for application | | 7 | ERP stand alone software to request information | | 8 | regarding references of people who have successfully | | 9 | run your software? | | 10 | A. It's not atypical. | | 11 | Q. It happens, the vast majority of the time | | 12 | doesn't it? | | 13 | A. It's fairly common. It's not atypical. | | 14 | Q. And do you have any understanding of why | | 15 | customers want that information? | | 16 | A. Again, going back to my earlier statements | | 17 | about risk mitigation, if a customer wants to have a | | 18 | good comfort level that the software that they're | | 19 | considering has a good reputation and other customers | | 20 | have had good experiences with it. | | 21 | Q. Have you ever, you being Oracle, been | | 22 | eliminated from a competition for a particular account |
| 00192 | | 1 | because you didn't have a reference of a particular | | 2 | application that you were selling having been run | | 3 | before? | | 4 | A. I'm sorry. Repeat the question again, please. | | 5 | Q. Sure. Is it -- have you been -- has | | 6 | Oracle -- have you at Oracle -- do you know of any | | 7 | circumstances where Oracle has been eliminated because | | 8 | you had a new application that you were trying to sell | | 9 | but you didn't have a reference for it, so the customer | | 10 | took you out of consideration? | | 11 | A. I could not give you a specific example. | | 12 | Q. Do you believe that there have been | | 13 | circumstances like that? | | 14 | A. I think it's possible. | | 15 | Q. Now, in -- doing the demonstrations that you | | 16 | talked about in the context of -- in dealing with | | 17 | customers, is a fair amount of time spent with them | | 18 | before the demonstration is done? | | 19 | I'm trying to understand what it is they | | 20 | want to achieve by acquiring the software. | | 21 | A. The demonstration is -- they're trying -- we | | 22 | try to get as much time as we possible can to understand |
| 00193 | | 1 | the business scenario that they want to see in the | | 2 | demonstration. | | 3 | Q. So there will typically be multiple meetings | | 4 | with the customer to discusswhat it is they're looking | | 5 | for in the way of business solution so that you can | | 6 | understand what it is you should show them or when you | | 7 | do do a demonstration. | | 8 | A. That happens, yes. | | 9 | Q. And typically, when these meetings occur, who | | 10 | are you dealing with at the customer side of this? | | 11 | A. Meaning? | | 12 | Q. I mean, meaning is it the people that are | | 13 | just in the -- their IT people, is it people in the | | 14 | business side of the particular operation? | | 15 | Who is it that you're interfacing with to | | 16 | understand what it is they want? | | 17 | A. It really depends on the customer. | | 18 | Q. It can be any or all of them, IT business | | 19 | personnel, fairly high up executive, just depends on | | 20 | the circumstances. | | 21 | A. That's correct, yes. | | 22 | Q. Now, when you -- if you're doing a |
| 00194 | | 1 | demonstration, what does that entail? | | 2 | A. You mean the actual demonstration? | | 3 | Q. Yes, sir. | | 4 | A. It's a re -- typically it's a reaffirmation of | | 5 | the business scenarios, a demonstration that the | | 6 | software can execute on the business scenario. | | 7 | Q. Well, for example, do you demonstrate it on | | 8 | the hardware that currently is owned by the client? | | 9 | A. Not necessarily. | | 10 | Q. Do you bring in hardware? | | 11 | A. We'll usually do demos on our laptops. | | 12 | Q. Okay. So you'll do a demo on your laptop. | | 13 | You'll have loaded your software onto the laptop. Do | | 14 | you have to configure it to match the client's business | | 15 | needs? | | 16 | A. To do the -- to demonstrate that we can | | 17 | execute on the high level business scenarios we will do | | 18 | set up and configurations, yes, of our software. | | 19 | Q. And what do you mean by set up and | | 20 | configurations of your software? | | 21 | A. All our enterprise application software is run | | 22 | by a set of rules, definitions. For example, let's say |
| 00195 | | 1 | they were going to demonstrate the order management | | 2 | process for a customer. So when you're typing in an | | 3 | order and you're in the high tech industry, for example, | | 4 | you're typing in an order and you want to type in all | | 5 | the different -- you want to be able to pick from a set | | 6 | of products, so there would be a pop up window that | | 7 | would show, you know, here's 25 different products and | | 8 | 35,000 configurations of those products that you can | | 9 | choose from. | | 10 | So we would put together a list. We would | | 11 | set up in our applications a list of those products | | 12 | and configurations that you can choose from. That's | | 13 | what I'm talking about. | | 14 | Q. Now, when you go into the sales process with | | 15 | a client, do you prepare a budget of what -- the | | 16 | resources or money that you're prepared to spend in | | 17 | order to obtain that business? | | 18 | A. Do we prepare a budget? | | 19 | Q. Yes, sir. | | 20 | A. For the customer. | | 21 | Q. For you. How much we're spending here -- | | 22 | we're going in, we're going to be -- we're going to |
| 00196 | | 1 | have multiple meetings, we're going to be dedicating | | 2 | sometime I guess dozens of people to the process, at | | 3 | least on a part-time basis? | | 4 | A. A budget is not prepared. | | 5 | Q. Okay. But it is true that in the process of | | 6 | meeting with the client, understanding what their needs | | 7 | are, that you will have multiple meetings, correct? | | 8 | A. That is typical. | | 9 | Q. And what typically -- you'll have, certainly, | | 10 | a number of people, maybe over a dozen, who are | | 11 | involved in the sales process with the client, at least | | 12 | on a part-time basis. | | 13 | A. I don't know if it's a dozen or three. I mean | | 14 | it really depends. | | 15 | Q. Depends on the client? | | 16 | A. It real does. | | 17 | Q. But that would include the sales person? | | 18 | A. Right. | | 19 | Q. It would include your demo people. | | 20 | A. Right. | | 21 | Q. A sales process would include the folks who | | 22 | have to configure the software for you to do the demo. |
| 00197 | | 1 | A. That might be the sales consultant. | | 2 | Q. Then you also have, in some cases have | | 3 | industry specific consultants within your company that | | 4 | would come in and help you talk to the client about | | 5 | what their business needs so that you can configure | | 6 | your software to meet them, correct? | | 7 | A. That's possible. | | 8 | Q. And is there any other category -- and an | | 9 | executive such as yourself, I think you indicated, | | 10 | would sit down across the table from the client in a | | 11 | lot of circumstances to talk to them about what you can | | 12 | do for them and the value enhancement of buying Oracle | | 13 | versus PeopleSoft, SAP or some other vendor, right? | | 14 | A. That typically would not be somebody like | | 15 | myself. We wouldn't do that in a demo. | | 16 | Q. No, I'm not talking about in a demo, but at | | 17 | some point along the process you would have, you may be | | 18 | involved with a lot of customers, you or some other | | 19 | executive talking to the customer trying to close the | | 20 | sale. | | 21 | A. That's correct. | | 22 | Q. And is there any other category of individual |
| 00198 | | 1 | or employee of Oracle who would be involved in the | | 2 | sales process that we have not touched upon so far? | | 3 | A. It really depends on the nature of the sale. | | 4 | Q. Well, can you give me some examples of other | | 5 | type of personnel who may be involved other than the | | 6 | ones we just discussed? | | 7 | A. I might bring -- if outsourcing was part of | | 8 | the deal I might bring in somebody from the outsourcing | | 9 | organization. | | 10 | Q. Okay. Any other type of people that you | | 11 | could think of? | | 12 | A. Other than executives? | | 13 | Q. Yes. | | 14 | A. I may bring in people from the consulting | | 15 | organization or the education organization. I mean it | | 16 | really depends on the configuration of the deal. | | 17 | Q. All right. But you may want to bring in the | | 18 | education people to explain what you can make available | | 19 | to the client and the customer in the way of training. | | 20 | A. That's correct. | | 21 | Q. And find out what they think they need in the | | 22 | way of training. |
| 00199 | | 1 | A. That's correct. | | 2 | Q. And the consulting group, what would they be | | 3 | in talking to clients about? | | 4 | A. They may be talking about our capabilities to | | 5 | do implementations, and they may talk about scenarios | | 6 | where we've done similar implementations before so we | | 7 | can talk about what we call war stories or experiences. | | 8 | Q. Now, in circumstances where the -- an outside | | 9 | systems integrator is involved in the selection | | 10 | process, is typically your interfacing with the client | | 11 | the same as you've described in an RFP setting? | | 12 | A. Who's you? | | 13 | Q. You being Oracle. | | 14 | A. It depends. | | 15 | Q. Okay. Well, then let's walk through it. In | | 16 | circumstances where you have been involved with a | | 17 | systems integrator, where you're trying to make a sale, | | 18 | are you going to have information made available to you | | 19 | regarding the functional requirements of the client? | | 20 | A. That's possible. | | 21 | Q. Isn't it typical? | | 22 | A. It depends on if we've been in that |
| 00200 | | 1 | customer -- for example, we may have been working with | | 2 | that customer for a long time and done some work with | | 3 | them before, and we may have a lot of knowledge about | | 4 | the customer and their business and their environment. | | 5 | Q. Well, in those circumstances would you | | 6 | typically be working with a systems integrator for a | | 7 | selection process? | | 8 | A. It's possible. | | 9 | Q. Okay. Well, then in -- either you would | | 10 | already have information regarding the client, or you'd | | 11 | need it in order to determine whether -- how close your | | 12 | software could get to their functional requirements, | | 13 | right? | | 14 | A. Yeah, that's true. | | 15 | Q. And is it typical in circumstances where the | | 16 | selection process is being run through a systems | | 17 | integrator such as the Big 5 that you will have | | 18 | multiple meetings with the client to discuss what it is | | 19 | they want? | | 20 | A. That's probable. | | 21 | Q. And is it typical in the selection process | | 22 | through -- involved where there is a systems integrator |
| 00201 | | 1 | involved, where you will do various types of and | | 2 | various numbers of demonstrations to show the client | | 3 | whether your software can in fact perform the business | | 4 | requirements that they're asking you to? | | 5 | A. Yes. | | 6 | Q. And would you also have involved people from | | 7 | these various support groups that you talked about, | | 8 | your industry consultants, people who haveintegrated | | 9 | your software so they can do the demonstrations, that | | 10 | type of thing where the Big 5 are involved in the | | 11 | process. | | 12 | A. It depends. | | 13 | Q. But it does happen? | | 14 | A. Yes. | | 15 | Q. Is the process of selection any shorter when | | 16 | there is -- the systems integrators are involved versus | | 17 | when you're doing it just in response to an RFP? | | 18 | A. I wouldn't say one way or the other. | | 19 | Q. Just there's no real demarcation between | | 20 | length of time and the complexity of the selection | | 21 | process between just a straight RFP versus having the | | 22 | Big 5 involved? |
| 00202 | | 1 | A. Some customers are incredibly diligent in | | 2 | their own RFP process, moreso than the Big 5. It really | | 3 | depends on the customer. | | 4 | Q. Now, earlier I -- and correct me if I'm wrong | | 5 | about this, but I thought you had something to the | | 6 | effect that each customer -- and I took it you were | | 7 | talking about customers who are looking to purchase or | | 8 | may be in the market for application stand alone | | 9 | application software, the ERP software that you sell, | | 10 | are unique. Do you recall saying something to that | | 11 | effect? | | 12 | A. I'm not sure I understand the context of the | | 13 | statement. | | 14 | Q. Well, I'm not sure either, that's why I was | | 15 | trying to go back and get us to a point where I could | | 16 | ask you what the context of the statement was. | | 17 | In the context of selling product, selling | | 18 | enterprise application software, do you believe each | | 19 | customer is unique, or there are certain basic needs | | 20 | and requirements that cut across a larger range of | | 21 | customers? | | 22 | A. I personally believe that there's degrees of |
| 00203 | | 1 | freedom here, but there's commonality within certain | | 2 | industries where the requirements are not that unique. | | 3 | But some customers like to think that they have | | 4 | something that's proprietary and confidential and | | 5 | differentiates them from the competition. | | 6 | Q. All right. When you say that there's some | | 7 | commonality across industry verticals, what do you mean | | 8 | by that? | | 9 | A. Meaning that the business requirements for | | 10 | financial services institutions are largely the same at | | 11 | a certain level. Just as an example. | | 12 | Q. And when you say at a certain level, what do | | 13 | you mean? | | 14 | A. Well, again, every customer probably believes | | 15 | that they do something unique and different and that's | | 16 | what their competitive advantage is all about. And I'm | | 17 | sure as you drill down on a customer's requirements they | | 18 | will say oh, well that's unique to my industry. Or | | 19 | excuse me. That's not unique to my industry. That's | | 20 | unique to the way I do business. That's what separates | | 21 | me from the pack. | | 22 | Q. So then, for example, if you're going in and |
| 00204 | | 1 | attempting to sell enterprise software to a financial | | 2 | services company, you don't believe -- that's pretty | | 3 | much you're selling the same product without too much | | 4 | modification across the board to these people? | | 5 | A. Well, we always sell the same product. | | 6 | Q. But the clients needs may be different. Or | | 7 | not? | | 8 | A. It's possible that at the lowest, most | | 9 | granular level of requirements that it's different. | | 10 | Q. So would you agree or not disagree with the | | 11 | statement that every buyer is unique when it comes to | | 12 | buying enterprise software? | | 13 | A. I would say that's true. | | 14 | Q. In what sense? | | 15 | A. The way they procure the software, the way | | 16 | they evaluate software, their business rules may be | | 17 | different. | | 18 | Q. So if your -- when you say their business | | 19 | rules may be different, what do you mean by that? | | 20 | A. Well, I'll give you an example. I know of a | | 21 | customer who prides itself on -- they're a manufacturing | | 22 | customer, and they pride themselves on how they do field |
| 00205 | | 1 | services, what differentiates them from their | | 2 | competition. So in that sense, they're very unique. | | 3 | They feel as though they're unique. And the business | | 4 | rules that support how they do their field services are | | 5 | unique. | | 6 | Q. So from the standpoint of your -- you, as a | | 7 | vendor, does that make them unique from the standpoint | | 8 | of what you're providing them as an application | | 9 | enterprise software? | | 10 | A. Not the software itself. | | 11 | Q. Well, is there something else that you're | | 12 | providing them from the standpoint that you believe | | 13 | that makes each instance unique, each instance of | | 14 | selling the product unique? | | 15 | A. The way that the product would be used may be | | 16 | unique. | | 17 | Q. So from that standpoint -- is what you're | | 18 | saying is that the customer's view of your product and | | 19 | whether it meets its needs may vary depending on what | | 20 | it views is the unique business processes they need to | | 21 | support it? | | 22 | A. I'd say that's fairly true. |
| 00206 | | 1 | Q. How is that the case? | | 2 | I mean, how does this, you know, the | | 3 | unique business needs, business processes needs of | | 4 | the customer play into the overall selection | | 5 | process? | | 6 | A. Well, if the customer's going to buy software | | 7 | they want to make sure that can be configured to support | | 8 | their business. | | 9 | Q. Okay. I'm with you so far. But how does | | 10 | that play into the selection process of counting -- | | 11 | since you're selling the same product to each client, | | 12 | then how does that make anything within the process | | 13 | unique to that client? | | 14 | A. The customer may have different requirements. | | 15 | For example, we may have two pharmaceutical firms that | | 16 | manufacture generic product. They use different | | 17 | manufacturing algorithms. Same product. We sell the | | 18 | same product, but they'll set up and deploy the product | | 19 | differently. They both manufacture aspirin. | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00207 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | Let me ask it this way. You're sitting | | 12 | here and using your example, you've got two or three | | 13 | pharmaceutical firms, all of who are coming to you | | 14 | and saying, I want to buy some application | | 15 | enterprise software for either HR support, human | | 16 | resources functionality, or financials or ERP | | 17 | generally. Is it your position that each of those | | 18 | customers are unique for some reason? | | 19 | A. Yes. | | 20 | Q. And what is that reason? | | 21 | A. It may vary. It may be the way that they buy, | | 22 | the way they evaluate, the way they're going to deploy, |
| 00208 | | 1 | the way they'll set up and configure the software. It | | 2 | could be the duration of the project, how they want to | | 3 | absorb the project, how many people they want to have -- | | 4 | I mean, there's a number of things. | | 5 | Q. So the individualized needs that the customer | | 6 | has or perceives it has may affect what it -- the | | 7 | vendors that it looks at as potential to satisfy those | | 8 | needs. | | 9 | A. I'd say that's probably -- that's reasonably | | 10 | true, yeah. | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00212 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | Q. All right, sir. Now, going back for a moment | | 19 | to the sales process, you indicated that you go through | | 20 | a great deal of effort to find out functionally what | | 21 | the client wants and to demonstrate to the client that | | 22 | you can meet those requirements. Do you recall that? |
| 00213 | | 1 | A. Yes. | | 2 | Q. Now, typically, in the process of doing this, | | 3 | going through the sales process with clients, do you | | 4 | begin to discuss price with them at a point in time | | 5 | prior to them determining that you can meet their | | 6 | functional needs? | | 7 | A. Define price. | | 8 | Q. Well, how much are you going to charge them | | 9 | to get the software. | | 10 | A. We really wouldn't be able to do that without | | 11 | understanding their requirements. | | 12 | Q. So you would have to go through the process | | 13 | of determining what their functional requirements are, | | 14 | how well you match up, before price was going to be | | 15 | discussed? | | 16 | A. I'd say by and large that's true. | | 17 | Q. And when you say that you really couldn't | | 18 | talk price with them before you understood « | | 19 | understanding their requirements, what do you mean by | | 20 | that? | | 21 | A. There's a number of factors, and price can | | 22 | mean -- software price, are you talking about software |
| 00214 | | 1 | price? | | 2 | Q. Well, let's start with that. In a | | 3 | circumstance where you're making a pitch for -- you're | | 4 | working with a client to try to sell them enterprise | | 5 | software -- | | 6 | A. Uh-huh. | | 7 | Q. -- would you -- the stand alone enterprise | | 8 | software that you folks sell, would you be able to | | 9 | discuss price with them in any meaningful way prior to | | 10 | going through the effort of determining what their | | 11 | requirements were and how well you fit them? | | 12 | A. Can you define meaningful? | | 13 | Q. At all. | | 14 | A. We may broadly talk about it. | | 15 | Q. Can you define broadly? | | 16 | A. If we had those conversations we may show them | | 17 | our standard pricing, maybe. But it's likely that we | | 18 | would need to understand more about their requirements. | | 19 | Q. Before you actually talked about any | | 20 | discounting from the standard price? | | 21 | A. Yes. | | 22 | Q. And quite often, is it the case that you |
| 00215 | | 1 | don't even show them your standard pricing until after | | 2 | you understand what their financial requirements are? | | 3 | A. I'd say that's more often than not. | | 4 | Q. More often than not you don't show them? | | 5 | A. That's correct. | | 6 | Q. Now, why do you need to know what their | | 7 | functional requirements are before you can actually | | 8 | just start discussing price with them this detail? | | 9 | A. Number of reasons - FPT. One is what -- if we | | 10 | understand their functionality we can decide what | | 11 | modules they need, both current in near term plans, long | | 12 | term plans, so we need to understand what the roll out | | 13 | plans are. If we understand what their return on | | 14 | investment is we can match that it to perhaps how they | | 15 | want to purchase the software. There's a number of | | 16 | things. Do we need to customize the software. | | 17 | Q. Now, in discussing price with the clients, | | 18 | customers, is it a give and take process, or is it an | | 19 | okay, here's the price, take it or leave it process? | | 20 | A. Are you speaking as the customer or as Oracle? | | 21 | Q. As Oracle. And again I'm talking when you're | | 22 | selling the -- I'm talking about the license fee for |
| 00216 | | 1 | the application software, the enterprise software, | | 2 | stand alone software. | | 3 | A. When we get to those -- that level of | | 4 | conversation, that dialogue, it's typically a give and | | 5 | take discussion. | | 6 | Q. Okay. In those discussions, does the | | 7 | potential -- does the subject of who else may be an | | 8 | option for the client come up in any way? I.e., I | | 9 | understand what your price is, but you've got to get | | 10 | here or I've got somewhere else I can go get it, that | | 11 | type of thing? | | 12 | A. That happens. | | 13 | Q. Does that happen often? | | 14 | A. It's not uncommon. | | 15 | Q. Well, what percentage of cases do you think | | 16 | that the -- where you folks have been selling the stand | | 17 | alone enterprise software has it been the case that | | 18 | you've been told that you have somebody's who you have | | 19 | to beat on a price in order to get the transaction? | | 20 | A. It depends on the circumstances of the deal. | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00218 | | 1 | | | 2 | Q. Well, let's take circumstances where you're | | 3 | selling to someone who's not an existing customer of | | 4 | yours, or they're not -- you know, where there's not a | | 5 | circumstance where they may be an existing customer but | | 6 | they don't want to just automatically buy another | | 7 | module from you. They're looking -- you know, they may | | 8 | do something besides just buy Oracle. | | 9 | In circumstances where -- like that, are | | 10 | you told over half of the time in fact you may have | | 11 | to beat somebody else's price? | | 12 | A. I'd say that's probably true. | | 13 | Q. And what's the basis of that information or | | 14 | knowledge? | | 15 | A. Meaning? | | 16 | Q. How do you know that? | | 17 | A. Usually the customer will tell us, or somebody | | 18 | will tell us. | | 19 | Q. And by the time you get to talking the price, | | 20 | isn't it true that quite often you know who it is | | 21 | you're competing with because your salesmen have picked | | 22 | up some information along the way from the client |
| 00219 | | 1 | regarding who you're going head to head with? | | 2 | A. I would be disappointed if my sales people | | 3 | didn't know who they were competing against. | | 4 | Q. When you get down to the standpoint of when | | 5 | you're talking price with the customer -- | | 6 | A. Yes. | | 7 | Q. -- because that's pretty late in the sales | | 8 | cycle, isn't it? | | 9 | A. Typically. | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00220 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | Q. All right, sir. Let me hand you a document | | 17 | which has been marked for identification purposes | | 18 | marked as Deposition Exhibit 16. Exhibit 16 is a | | 19 | multi-page document bearing identification numbers | | 20 | ORCL-EDOC-00054481 through ORCL-EDOC-00054524, and ask | | 21 | you if you've seen this document before. | | 22 | A. It's likely I saw this. |
| 00221 | | 1 | Q. All right, sir. And why do you think it's | | 2 | likely you saw this document, Exhibit 16? | | 3 | A. Because this was for my first full quarter on | | 4 | this job. | | 5 | Q. All right sir. So then as a reference to, on | | 6 | page -- the third page of the document, the one bearing | | 7 | identification numbers 54483, a chart that says win | | 8 | loss program scope and approach talking about field | | 9 | sales reps completing win loss surveys for all | | 10 | applications deals under Number 1, do you see that? | | 11 | A. Yes, I do. | | 12 | Q. What understanding if any do you have as to | | 13 | what is a win loss survey? | | 14 | A. I'm not sure I've ever seen one, so I couldn't | | 15 | give you the particular elements. But I believe it's a | | 16 | survey that the reps fill out to discuss aspects of the | | 17 | deal. | | 18 | Q. Aspects of any deal that they were involved | | 19 | in? | | 20 | A. I don't know the scope of the deals. I | | 21 | suspect it's not all deals since we do thousands of | | 22 | transactions. |
| 00222 | | 1 | Q. Well, there's -- if you would turn over to | | 2 | the 16th page of Exhibit 16, the one bearing | | 3 | identification numbers ORCL-EDOC-00054496, where | | 4 | there's a table at the top, the chart actually, which | | 5 | has at the top won 16, lost 19 to PeopleSoft. Do you | | 6 | see that? | | 7 | A. Yes, I do. | | 8 | Q. Do you have any information regarding what | | 9 | that's referring to? | | 10 | A. I believe it says, it implies that in the | | 11 | quarter, we -- in dealings where PeopleSoft was | | 12 | involved, we won 16 and lost 19. | | 13 | Q. Now, when you're in dealing with vendors, | | 14 | competing with vendors for sales of enterprise | | 15 | software -- | | 16 | A. Uh-huh. | | 17 | Q. -- do you make a effort to determine why | | 18 | you lost individual sales? | | 19 | A. Yes. | | 20 | Q. And how do you go about doing that? | | 21 | A. Our management team will either formally or | | 22 | informally do post mortems on certainly deals. |
| 00223 | | 1 | Q. Formally or informally, meaning what? | | 2 | A. Meaning depending on the deal, if it was a | | 3 | very visible deal the team we'd do a postmortem to | | 4 | determine why we won or why we lost so we can learn | | 5 | lessons. | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00224 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | You know, when you're selling the software | | 8 | to enterprise customers where you're going through | | 9 | the detailed sales process that you described | | 10 | earlier with all the meetings and demonstrations and | | 11 | what not, how important is the functionality of the | | 12 | software that they're purchasing as compared to | | 13 | other factors such as price? | | 14 | A. I think functionality is important. | | 15 | Q. In fact, is there any point in talking about | | 16 | price if you can't meet the functional requirements of | | 17 | the client? | | 18 | A. I would find it unlikely. | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | Q. And why would you find it unlikely that you'd |
| 00225 | | 1 | be talking price to the client if you can't meet their | | 2 | functional requirements? | | 3 | A. I think it really dependes on the degree of | | 4 | risk that a customer wants to take on. | | 5 | Q. And what does that mean? | | 6 | A. Well, it just doesn't seem reasonable to me | | 7 | that a customer would want to purchasesoftware that | | 8 | didn't meet its needs. | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00253 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | Q. All right, sir. Let me hand you a document | | 6 | which for identification purposes has been marked as | | 7 | Exhibit 21 to your deposition. It is a one page | | 8 | document bearing identification numbers | | 9 | ORCL-EDOC-00043147. It's an e-mail dated 5/12/2003 to | | 10 | Keith Block license approvals, KB license from Keith | | 11 | Block with a BCC to Linda McFarland. Do you see that? | | 12 | A. Yes, I do. | | 13 | Q. Who is Linda McFarland? | | 14 | A. She's my executive assistant. | | 15 | Q. All right. And this would be a request for | | 16 | approval or your response a request for approval that | | 17 | would be sent to your KBL license account? | | 18 | A. That's correct. | | 19 | Q. Now, in this case, it says here for your | | 20 | review please. Customer is getting images world | | 21 | largest collection of artistic images for sale. Paren | | 22 | Matt Mills, close paren. Old apps suite at 45 percent |
| 00254 | | 1 | for the migration from current Oracle apps. Only 230 | | 2 | thousand, 230 K. The competition is Cognos and | | 3 | business objects on business intelligence and home | | 4 | grown apps. Customer likes the integration but doesn't | | 5 | seem willing to pay a lot for it. Do you see that? | | 6 | A. Yes, I do. | | 7 | Q. Is that something you wrote, or is that | | 8 | something someone wrote to you in the context of doing | | 9 | this? | | 10 | A. This is Rich Blotner. | | 11 | Q. Mr. Blotner wrote this to you? | | 12 | A. Right. | | 13 | Q. Then he goes on to state that so the choice I | | 14 | guess is do we fight these niche guys and internal | | 15 | development one at a time, or would you take it off the | | 16 | table now? Do you know what he meant by that? | | 17 | A. Uhm- | | 18 | Q. Well, let me break the question down. Do you | | 19 | understand what he meant by niche guys? | | 20 | A. I believe I do in this context, yes. | | 21 | Q. And what is that? | | 22 | A. That we're talking about the business |
| 00255 | | 1 | intelligence market, and Cognos and business objects are | | 2 | players in that market. | | 3 | Q. And the niche being what? | | 4 | A. Business intelligence functionality. | | 5 | Q. And in this -- and it goes on here internal | | 6 | apps. What is he referring to there? | | 7 | A. Internal development you mean? | | 8 | Q. Yeah. | | 9 | A. I actually don't understand what he's talking | | 10 | about in this context. | | 11 | Q. All right. Do you understand generally what | | 12 | he's talking about, so the choice I guess is do we | | 13 | fight these niche guys and internal development one at | | 14 | a time or take it off the table now? | | 15 | A. I don't understand what he means by internal | | 16 | development one at a time. | | 17 | Q. Well, do you understand what he means by take | | 18 | it off the table now? | | 19 | A. Yes, I do. | | 20 | Q. Which is? | | 21 | A. Get the deal done. | | 22 | Q. And it goes on to say this one doesn't appeal |
| 00256 | | 1 | to me as much as a PeopleSoft direct competition. They | | 2 | are asking for 20 percent above the E-business prices | | 3 | and two years price hold at 15 and one. We can approve | | 4 | and it doesn't have to go to H Q. , which I recommend | | 5 | since this case isn't that strong. Okay. Do you see | | 6 | that? | | 7 | A. Yes. | | 8 | Q. Do you understand when he meant when he says | | 9 | this one doesn't appeal to me as much as a PeopleSoft | | 10 | direct competition? | | 11 | A. Yes. | | 12 | Q. What was your -- is your understanding of | | 13 | what he meant there? | | 14 | A. Well, the context of this is in Rich's opinion | | 15 | this is an aggressive discount for a small deal. | | 16 | Q. And what does he mean -- how does that factor | | 17 | into a PeopleSoft direct competition? | | 18 | A. In Rich's opinion, I believe, this is my | | 19 | interpretation of Rich's opinion, what Rich would | | 20 | probably say is that this is a non strategic deal. It's | | 21 | a a small deal. And against a niche player do we want | | 22 | to be aggressive in our pricing. |
| 00257 | | 1 | Q. Okay. And how does this factor into « what | | 2 | would you -- what do you understand he meant by a | | 3 | PeopleSoft direct competition. | | 4 | A. PeopleSoft plays in many functional areas, | | 5 | many modules that we compete against. Cognos and | | 6 | business objects really only play -- they're limited in | | 7 | the business intelligence space. | | 8 | Q. So based on your earlier testimony then, the | | 9 | Cognos would not be a strategic customer or account | | 10 | that you would be trying to develop as opposed to a | | 11 | strategic account where that may be the case -- well, | | 12 | strike that. | | 13 | Why would you be more willing to be | | 14 | aggressive in competing with PeopleSoft directly | | 15 | than you would be competing for this business with | | 16 | Cognos? | | 17 | A. I'm only interpreting what I think Rich is | | 18 | saying. | | 19 | Q. Sure. | | 20 | A. And again, I think it goes back to the | | 21 | aggressiveness and the discount relative to the size of | | 22 | the deal. That's certainly a factor in this e-mail. |
| 00258 | | 1 | And I believe that since Cognos and business objects | | 2 | only play in a very small slice of the market, business | | 3 | intelligence is a very small slice of the market. I | | 4 | think Rich is essentially questioning, you know, look at | | 5 | PeopleSoft or Lawson or SAP or Microsoft. You know, | | 6 | these are people who we're going to run into more often | | 7 | than not. But we're going to run into Cognos and | | 8 | business objects only in the business intelligence space | | 9 | so it's really a segmentation in Rich's opinion of where | | 10 | they are in the market. | | 11 | Q. All right. In this case, the one that he | | 12 | mentions that, I take it, is PeopleSoft as being the | | 13 | one, the reference that you take as meaning that this | | 14 | is somebody that we compete with in a lot of areas and | | 15 | we'll run into again. | | 16 | A. PeopleSoft and others, yes. | | 17 | Q. But in his document, in the document he | | 18 | doesn't refer to others. He just refers to as the | | 19 | PeopleSoft direct competition, since this is not one it | | 20 | doesn't appeal to him so much. | | 21 | A. He does refer to PeopleSoft. | | 22 | Q. And you approved this based on his rationale? |
| 00259 | | 1 | A. Yes, I did. | | 2 | (Government Exhibit 22 was | | 3 | marked for identification.) | | 4 | BY MR. SCOTT: | | 5 | Q. Now, when you go into looking at an | | 6 | opportunity to sell applications software, the stand | | 7 | alone enterprise application software that Oracle has | | 8 | as represented by your E-business suite, do you -- | | 9 | before you pursue a transaction, do you look -- you say | | 10 | you qualify them. Do you remember the testimony around | | 11 | that? | | 12 | A. Yes. | | 13 | Q. And I take it part of the qualification | | 14 | process would be to look at the client's needs, and | | 15 | what they think they want to do in the way of | | 16 | satisfying those needs to determine if your product | | 17 | matches up with those needs. | | 18 | A. Yes. | | 19 | Q. Now, are there circumstances where you look | | 20 | at what the client wants and the indications of how | | 21 | they think they want to do it and decide not to | | 22 | participate in the sales cycle? |
| 00260 | | 1 | A. Yes. | | 2 | Q. And under what circumstances would you not | | 3 | participate in the sales cycle? | | 4 | A. I'll give you a example of one -- I'd rather | | 5 | not disclose who the prospect is. Is that -- | | 6 | Q. Well, this is all confidential. | | 7 | A. Okay. They're a company out in Denver. And | | 8 | they are evaluating our software, and in my mind there | | 9 | are several issues with the evaluation that I'm | | 10 | uncomfortable with and we may not pursue it. | | 11 | Q. What type of issues? | | 12 | A. Functional fit is one. Business terms are | | 13 | another. The requirements that they have on the table | | 14 | in terms of the way they want to pay for the software | | 15 | and over what period of time. The sort of the | | 16 | guarantees and remedies that they want to see in the | | 17 | contract. It's -- they're looking for some pretty | | 18 | punitive business terms, plus we'll have to write a lot | | 19 | of customizations to the software. It's high risk. | | 20 | Plus I also know this guy personally, and I know how he | | 21 | operates, so there are a number of risk factors involved | | 22 | where it may not be worth us pursuing the deal. |
| 00515 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | Q. All right, sir. Are you familiar with the |
| 00516 | | 1 | term BPO? | | 2 | A. Yes, I am. | | 3 | Q. What is your understanding of what that | | 4 | acronym means? | | 5 | A. BPO is business process outsourcing. It is | | 6 | the outsourcing of a business function, company or an | | 7 | entity to an outsourcing provider. | | 8 | Q. All right, sir. And can you give us | | 9 | examples of companies that provide that type of | | 10 | service? | | 11 | A. EDS, Ecenture, Deloite, ASC, Perot, I can | | 12 | probably give you more if you want. | | 13 | Q. Now from your perspective do those companies | | 14 | the service they offer give advantages over the | | 15 | service or the product that you offer for Stand Alone | | 16 | Application Enterprise Software? | | 17 | A. Could you rephrase the question? | | 18 | Q. Sure. You're going into an account to sell | | 19 | your Stand Alone Enterprise Application Software for | | 20 | Human Resources, Financial Management or ERP Suite. | | 21 | What do you tell the customer why they should buy | | 22 | that as opposed to going to BPO? |
| 00517 | | 1 | A. The difference between purchasing the | | 2 | software and the BPO is that BPO you physically, for | | 3 | example, if you wanted to take accounts payable | | 4 | rather than a company or an entity having their own | | 5 | accounts payable clerks you would take that function | | 6 | and give that function to Ecenture or EDS. So it's | | 7 | as much a labor component as it is a software | | 8 | component. I don't know if I make myself clear or | | 9 | not. | | 10 | Q. I understand. Well, why, would you tell a | | 11 | customer as to why they should purchase your software | | 12 | as opposed to outsourcing to a BPO? | | 13 | A. Well, they could purchase our software and | | 14 | outsource through a BPO. | | 15 | Q. How is that? | | 16 | A. They can actually own the software and have | | 17 | the physical labor associated with the BPO performed | | 18 | by Ecenture or EDS, anybody else they would just use | | 19 | our software platform. | | 20 | Q. Does that happen, does that happen often? | | 21 | A. Although I can't point to one example it's | | 22 | possible. |
| 00518 | | 1 | Q. All right, sir. Are there circumstances | | 2 | where people have relationships with BPOs an they do | | 3 | not purchase software such as yours? | | 4 | A. Absolutely. | | 5 | Q. If you were in a situation like that what | | 6 | would you tell customers as to why the option of | | 7 | buying your software, your Enterprise Stand Alone | | 8 | Application Enterprise Software is a better option | | 9 | than going through a BPO route? | | 10 | A. It would just be a function of control. | | 11 | Q. Meaning what? | | 12 | A. Control of the resources, control of the | | 13 | technology platform. | | 14 | Q. Now for some customers is it important to | | 15 | maintain control of the resources and technology | | 16 | platform nearby the information? | | 17 | A. Some customers it is more important than | | 18 | others, no question about it. | | 19 | Q. Under what and why is it to the extent you | | 20 | know based on the experience in the industry, why is | | 21 | it more important to some customers than others to | | 22 | maintain the control over the data and the resources |
| 00519 | | 1 | and manage it? | | 2 | A. Particularly with all of the corporate | | 3 | governance that's being regulations and laws that are | | 4 | being introduced, you will see more concern over the | | 5 | confidentiality of data, financial institutions in | | 6 | particular so they are more sensitive to that | | 7 | confidentiality than perhaps you know, an industrial | | 8 | manufacturer manufacturing nuts and bolts. Who cares | | 9 | when there's nothing sensitive about that? But you | | 10 | know, your personal bank account is pretty sensitive | | 11 | information, right. | | 12 | Q. All right. Now so are there cost | | 13 | differences between going the BPO route as opposed to | | 14 | buying your software manage HR Financial or the ERP | | 15 | suites? | | 16 | A. Well, in a sense it is a little bit of | | 17 | apples and oranges. So there is a software decision, | | 18 | a platform piece to this, and then there is the | | 19 | physical labor. So is it cheaper, some customers | | 20 | would make an argument that is the total cost of | | 21 | ownership associated with BPO would be cheaper, sure. | | 22 | They would say that, yes. Because they could send |
| 00520 | | 1 | their labor off shore to India to do the accounts | | 2 | payable functions or the HR functions. They could | | 3 | make an argument. | | 4 | Others would probably come up with some | | 5 | rationale that would say it really isn't any cheaper | | 6 | and there's business risk associated with it, and I | | 7 | don't want to do it. | | 8 | Q. So the selection of your software or software | | 9 | similar to yours for managing HR, Financial | | 10 | Management, and software that the ERP Suites that | | 11 | manage a variety of things versus the BPO would | | 12 | depend upon the client's unique needs? | | 13 | A. I would say that's true. | | 14 | Q. Now are there other than the OSO data, well, | | 15 | strike that. Do you know of any circumstances where | | 16 | you folks after having gone through the demo stage, | | 17 | the functional qualification stage with your software | | 18 | when you got down to the end where you were competing | | 19 | for price primarily, where you had been head to head | | 20 | with a BPO? | | 21 | A. Are you asking me where we had been head to | | 22 | head competing on price against a BPO? |
| 00521 | | 1 | Q. Yes. | | 2 | A. Again I get involved in very limited set of | | 3 | transactions. Right. I think we talked about that | | 4 | before. But it would not be uncommon, nor would it | | 5 | surprise me. There's a growing trend toward BPO and | | 6 | outsourcing. So there's more and more of that going | | 7 | on. It is actually a very fast growing business. | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00526 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | them. so with the economy it is just very | | 7 | competitive. If I could name one in particular again | | 8 | I get involved in a limited set. So I think the last | | 9 | time we talked I think I mentioned to you that we | | 10 | competed against ADP at Huntington Bank. The real | | 11 | nitty gritty about that deal I wouldn't be close | | 12 | enough to it. | | 13 | Q. If you're going into an account to sell HR, | | 14 | Financial Management or ERP Suite and they told you | | 15 | that they were considering your product and they were | | 16 | considering an in house solution, would you tell them | | 17 | regarding why your offering was a better option for | | 18 | them? | | 19 | A. Well, for example, I would say do you really | | 20 | want to be in the software business? Do you want to | | 21 | be in the business of maintaining software? This is | | 22 | what we do. This is our core competency. Your core |
| 00527 | | 1 | competency isn't software. It's manufacturing cars, | | 2 | or you know, sewing machines, or washing machines, or | | 3 | whatever it is that you do. Why don't you spend your | | 4 | resources on that as opposed to spending your | | 5 | resources on building your own home grown systems. | | 6 | Q. Would you talk to the customer who was | | 7 | considering an in house system regarding the value of | | 8 | taking advantage of your economies and scale in | | 9 | writing software to meet their particular needs? | | 10 | A. Again I would focus more on this is what we | | 11 | do for a living. It's our expertise. So you want to | | 12 | use ERP, I use EPR as an example. We are in the | | 13 | business of ERP. We, that's all we do. Again if you | | 14 | are Ford Motor Company, you really aren't in the | | 15 | business of ERP. You're in the business of building | | 16 | Fords. So why don't you use your resources more | | 17 | strategically instead of building your own home grown | | 18 | systems. Why don't you buy off the shelf software. | | 19 | Q. Would off the shelf software generally be a | | 20 | cheaper option than building your own in house | | 21 | system? | | 22 | A. That really depends. It could be a number |
| 00528 | | 1 | of factors that go into that. | | 2 | Q. Well, as you're trying to pitch a client to | | 3 | buy your software versus building their own, are you | | 4 | going to try to convince them that the total cost of | | 5 | ownership of buying your product has already been | | 6 | developed versus building their own, is a better | | 7 | option for them? | | 8 | A. Absolutely. | | 9 | Q. Is when you're in do you generally try to | | 10 | take that argument to clients, considering an in | | 11 | house option? | | 12 | A. Well, we always try to sell, we'll always go | | 13 | to market around the TCO story in almost any | | 14 | situation. | | 15 | Q. Why would the total cost of ownership buying | | 16 | your product as opposed to building in house solution | | 17 | be lower? | | 18 | A. Why would the TCO be lower by what we have? | | 19 | Q. Yes. | | 20 | A. Well, for example over time if you want to | | 21 | maintain your legacy system you have to maintain an | | 22 | IT staff, you have to maintain them. That means you |
| 00529 | | 1 | have to keep them trained. It may mean that you are, | | 2 | that it would require you to use old technology. Old | | 3 | technology could be software, it could be networking, | | 4 | it could be hardware. And so if you wrote something | | 5 | in Cobalt, for example in 1970 while there aren't | | 6 | many Cobalt programmers left unfortunately. So at | | 7 | some point you're going to have to migrate your | | 8 | Legacy Cobalt System to something else, because | | 9 | nobody is going to be left to maintain it. You want | | 10 | to make a change because your business changes. | | 11 | There is not going to be a person left on earth with | | 12 | Cobalt skills. | | 13 | Q. When you folks are looking at, talking to | | 14 | customers about buying your software as opposed to | | 15 | going with an in house solution, is that in house | | 16 | solution generally staying with the legacy system as | | 17 | opposed to building something new? | | 18 | A. It depends. It could be patching an old | | 19 | legacy system. It could be building a new module in | | 20 | house on top of that existing legacy system. | | 21 | Q. Is it, do you run into circumstances the | | 22 | client is talking about, for example, is an in house |
| 00530 | | 1 | solution building an HR comparable to what you have | | 2 | for a Financial Management Suite comparable to what | | 3 | you have or ERP comparable to what you have from the | | 4 | ground up as an option, rather than buying your | | 5 | software? | | 6 | A. I think it would be extremely rare that you | | 7 | would find any US commercial entity to build its own | | 8 | ERP system from scratch. Now they may already have | | 9 | one that they built twenty years ago, and one that | | 10 | they're going to continue to patch it. | | 11 | Q. Right. | | 12 | A. But for them to write their! own application | | 13 | software from scratch, you know, on that scale that | | 14 | is sort of mission critical scale. I can't even | | 15 | begin to think of somebody that would do that. | | 16 | Q. Why is that? | | 17 | A. It would take a very long time to do it, and | | 18 | there is already commercially available software. | | 19 | Why would you build a car from scratch when you can | | 20 | buy one off the lot? | | 21 | Q. Would it be fairly expensive to do that as | | 22 | well, building an ERP Suite or HR Suite, or |
| 00531 | | 1 | Financial Management Suite comparable to yours from | | 2 | scratch? | | 3 | A. For, you mean for a customer? | | 4 | Q. Yes. | | 5 | A. Somebody who was not in the software | | 6 | business? | | 7 | Q. Right. | | 8 | A. I think it would be more expensive building | | 9 | from scratch for a customer than buying off the | | 10 | shelf, sure. | | 11 | Q. To what degree? | | 12 | A. I couldn't begin to tell you. | | 13 | Q. Well, for example, how much do you folks | | 14 | spend in R and D at Oracle each year in upgrading and | | 15 | maintaining the software that you sell for ERP or HR | | 16 | or Financial Management to the extent that you know? | | 17 | A. 1 think we spend, I'm going to rough it | | 18 | here. I think we spend 5% of our revenues in R and | | 19 | D. So it is pretty substantial. | | 20 | Q. And that is something that has been spent, | | 21 | something similar to that over a number of years in | | 22 | building up and improving your software packages |
| 00532 | | 1 | to the point that they are what they are today, | | 2 | correct? It is not just a one shot deal where you're | | 3 | building something from the ground up now? | | 4 | A. No, I mean that's true. A. comment, I think | | 5 | you asked the question, I'm not sure if this is the | | 6 | answer to the question that you asked earlier, but I | | 7 | think it is important to understand. There have been | | 8 | so many changes in technology over the last three | | 9 | years, five years, ten years, that the ability to | | 10 | deploy and build applications is so much easier and | | 11 | so much faster than it was twenty or thirty years | | 12 | ago. And as technology continues to evolve the | | 13 | ability to rapidly build and deploy will become | | 14 | faster and faster and faster. | | 15 | There are all sorts of tools available now | | 16 | that were never available before. You know that is | | 17 | why you see a lot of software companies that spring | | 18 | up. | | 19 | Q. All right, but you, okay. When you're | | 20 | talking about this Legacy System, you use the | | 21 | example, you said a lot of these are old technology | | 22 | that would have to be patched, what did you mean by |
| 00533 | | 1 | that, the term patched? | | 2 | A. Well, there is a change in legislation. | | 3 | There is a new accounting requirement, a generally | | 4 | accepted accounting principle. So to be compliant | | 5 | with the new government regulations you might apply a | | 6 | patch which is you know, an additional piece of | | 7 | software code written to comply with, you know, | | 8 | whatever the government wants you to do for | | 9 | accounting principles. | | 10 | Q. All right. So the initial system that may | | 11 | have been there, may have been there twenty years and | | 12 | they have a variety of patches that have been in | | 13 | addition to the main system and the patches have to | | 14 | be maintained as well? | | 15 | A. That's correct. | | 16 | Q. So you would have to keep IT staff on | | 17 | available to deal with maintaining the system as well | | 18 | as doing whatever patching needs to be done in order | | 19 | to address new requirements? | | 20 | A. That's correct. | | 21 | Q. And when you sell software to a customer if | | 22 | there are new requirements in general accounting |
| 00534 | | 1 | principles or some type of government reporting | | 2 | requirement, that's generally part of upgrades that | | 3 | become available to the client through maintenance | | 4 | contracts, correct? | | 5 | A. That's correct. | | 6 | Q. So that would be built in, those | | 7 | improvements would be built into the price that they | | 8 | are paying you for the software when they initially | | 9 | buy it? | | 10 | A. That's correct. | | 11 | Q. Now when you said that technology you would | | 12 | get to the point where you may not be able to get | | 13 | people for the Legacy Systems, you can actually | | 14 | support it, you used Cobalt for an example. Would | | 15 | that be true of systems other than something that | | 16 | would be Cobalt supported? | | 17 | A. Well, there are technologies out there that | | 18 | are, that were done in the 1960s, you know, most of | | 19 | them written on main frames with Cobalt, and Cobalt | | 20 | is a programming language is one of the original | | 21 | programming languages. So you know there are others, | | 22 | there is stuff that is written in things like |
| 00535 | | 1 | Assembly Language, PIC, Fortran, and again that is | | 2 | circa sixties, seventies. So when you think about | | 3 | the population of people that are going to service | | 4 | that over time, it's going to go away. I'm trying to | | 5 | be politically correct here, but I think you know | | 6 | what I'm talking about. So there are other | | 7 | technologies, sure. | | 8 | Q. And because those technologies are not | | 9 | current and they're not being taught or commercially | | 10 | being pursued does that generally mean that at some | | 11 | point most of these people have these older Legacy | | 12 | Systems are going to have to switch over to something | | 13 | else? | | 14 | A. I think eventually that is probably true. | | 15 | Q. For software applications, Stand Alone | | 16 | Software Applications, the Enterprise Applications | | 17 | that you testified about earlier, how often do you | | 18 | see Microsoft as a competitor? | | 19 | A. I couldn't give you an exact number, but I | | 20 | will tell you we're seeing more and more of them. | | 21 | Q. Seeing more and more of them means what? | | 22 | A. Well, you know, 12 to 18 months ago you |
| 00536 | | 1 | really wouldn't see them. But you know, now they're | | 2 | starting to compete and they're building a direct | | 3 | sales force. So now they're really starting to | | 4 | compete and they have made some acquisitions. You | | 5 | know they've got enormous resources. | | 6 | Q. They built a direct sales force for what? | | 7 | A. They're building a direct sales force in | | 8 | general now, whether it is segmented applications or | | 9 | technology or if they can sell any Microsoft product, | | 10 | 1 have no idea. As you probably know Microsoft | | 11 | traditionally has gone with an all indirect model | | 12 | going through, you know, what you buy on your PC. | | 13 | Well now they're actually building a direct sales | | 14 | force just like things like Oracle. | | 15 | Q. Do you folks use an all indirect model | | 16 | selling software? | | 17 | A. We have direct and indirect. | | 18 | Q. , For selling the Stand Alone Enterprise | | 19 | Software Applications the HR, the FM the Financial | | 20 | Management, the ERP, they usually do that in a direct | | 21 | model through direct sales? | | 22 | A. Primarily direct. |
| 00537 | | 1 | Q. And why is that? i | | 2 | A. To be able to sell applications. Selling | | 3 | applications, although you can sell it indirect, we | | 4 | do sell some of our applications as you have seen in | | 5 | some of those reports, we do sell them through | | 6 | indirect channels. A lot of it is you have to be in | | 7 | front of the customer. You have to explain business | | 8 | functions to the people you sell, When you sell | | 9 | applications that are different than the people you | | 10 | sell to in technology. | | 11 | Q. Why do you need when you say you have to be | | 12 | in front of them to sell the applications, what does | | 13 | that mean? | | 14 | A. When you're selling application software | | 15 | you're typically selling it to a director of | | 16 | procurement, you may be selling it to the Chief | | 17 | Financial Officer or Vice President of the supply | | 18 | chain, because they want to have a business | | 19 | discussion. They don't want to just say here is the | | 20 | shrink wrapped software, boom. All right. They're | | 21 | talking about running their business, so they want to | | 22 | make sure that whatever you're selling is going |
| 00538 | | 1 | to run your business. So that requires face to face | | 2 | dialog. | | 3 | Q. They want to have these business discussions | | 4 | so they can determine if your software can actually | | 5 | be configured in such a way to match a particular | | 6 | business processes that they want supported? | | 7 | A. That's correct. | | 8 | Q. As opposed to the shrink wrap which is what? | | 9 | A. Shrink wrap would be Microsoft's historical | | 10 | business, Excel spreadsheets, Word in your laptop or | | 11 | PC. You can slide a disc in an boom. You know, you | | 12 | can do whatever you want. AOL is shrink wrapped if | | 13 | you use AOL. But for running businesses, that's not | | 14 | a shrink wrap software. | | 15 | Q. By shrink wrap software you're talking about | | 16 | software that has preconfigured setups for general | | 17 | ledger and other functions that would be supported as | | 18 | part of the software application? | | 19 | A. When I, the example I gave you about shrink | | 20 | wrap software, I'm thinking of the very, very, very | | 21 | simple running your business stuff that you can use | | 22 | in your house. |
| 00539 | | 1 | Q. Got you. The out of the box solution has | | 2 | the stuff, has the preset configuration, right? | | 3 | A. Yes, you can do that, you can call that off | | 4 | the shelf software, yes. You could refer to it that | | 5 | way if you wanted to. | | 6 | Q. For the product that fits between Enterprise | | 7 | Application Software that you call out of the box, | | 8 | what do you call it? | | 9 | A. Well, we sell the same set of software | | 10 | period, no matter who we sell it to. | | 11 | Q. But some of it has preset configurations in | | 12 | it that the Enterprise Applications that you sell do | | 13 | not, right? | | 14 | A. To be, yes. To be available soon. That's | | 15 | the offering that we're looking at now. | | 16 | Q. And that offering that you're looking at now | | 17 | is there a term for it? | | 18 | A. We haven't come out with an official name. | | 19 | Q. Well, just as a generic term what would you | | 20 | call it? | | 21 | A. It is a solution that is geared towards | | 22 | small to medium size entities. |
| 00540 | | 1 | Q. That solution I believe you testified in | | 2 | your prior time we were together is directed at | | 3 | entities whose needs are simpler than the companies | | 4 | who buy the Application Enterprise Software, correct? | | 5 | A. I would say that that is by and large true. | | 6 | Q. When you say that they're, these companies | | 7 | needs are simpler that those that buy the Application | | 8 | Enterprise Software, simpler in what sense? | | 9 | A. If you run a 40 million dollar company that | | 10 | is a very simply business process, it doesn't require | | 11 | a lot of complex business rules, you know, a very | | 12 | simple turn of accounts functions different product | | 13 | codes that are very simple, that's the kind of thing | | 14 | that I'm talking about. | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | |
| 00542 | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 8 | | | 9 | | | 10 | | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | Q. Before we get into the document, Mr. Block, | | 16 | let me ask you going back to outsourcing for a | | 17 | minute, are there particular types of customers that | | 18 | seem to be drawn to that type of solution? | | 19 | A. Particular type of customers that are drawn | | 20 | towards outsourcing? | | 21 | Q. Yes, sir. | | 22 | A. I think it really is pretty much a, it's a |
| 00543 | | 1 | unique customer. There's a number of things. It's | | 2 | pretty unique. I mean it is a customer driven | | 3 | situation, so it depends on the customer. | | 4 | Q. So whether or not a customer would look at | | 5 | an outsourcer solution for running its business | | 6 | processes for HR, Financial Management, or for ERP | | 7 | would be an individualized determination by that | | 8 | part, by that customer based on their perceived | | 9 | business needs? | | 10 | A. Yes. | | 11 | | | 12 | | | 13 | | | 14 | | | 15 | | | 16 | | | 17 | | | 18 | | | 19 | | | 20 | | | 21 | | | 22 | | |