You are here

Justice News

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Southern District of California

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, April 21, 2017

Government Contractors Indicted in $11 Million Veteran Set-Aside Fraud Scheme

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Rebecca S. Kanter (619-546-7304) and Aaron P. Arnzen (619-546-8384)

 

NEWS RELEASE SUMMARY – April 21, 2017

SAN DIEGO, CA – Owners of local construction and telecommunications companies were arraigned in federal court today on charges that they fraudulently obtained more than $11 million in federal contracts specifically set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned businesses.

Andrew Otero, Roger Ramsey, and their companies – A&D General Contracting, Inc. (“A&D”) and Action Telecom, Inc. (“Action”) – were named in a fourteen-count indictment returned April 7 by a federal grand jury in San Diego.

The indictment alleges that the defendants participated in a conspiracy to defraud the government by forming a joint venture – Action-A&D, A Joint Venture (“the JV”) – and falsely representing that Action and the JV qualified as service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (“SDVOSB”). Based on the false claim to SDVOSB eligibility, the conspirators fraudulently obtained approximately $11 million in federal government construction contracts or task orders with the Department of Veteran Affairs (“VA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“ACE”).

According to the indictment, the fraudulent conspiracy involved set-aside contracts that could only be bid upon by legitimate service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses – a designation that did not apply to Otero or A&D. To appear qualified, Otero (on behalf of A&D) and Ramsey (on behalf of Action) initially executed an agreement to create the JV (“the JV Agreement”), which stated that Ramsey’s company (Action) would be the managing venturer, employ a project manager for each of the set-aside contracts, and receive the majority of the JV’s profits.

However, six months later, Otero and Ramsey signed a secret side agreement that made clear the JV was ineligible under the SDVOSB program. For example, the side agreement said the parties created the JV so that A&D could simply “use the Disabled Veteran Status of Action Telecom” to bid on contracts. The side agreement also stated that A&D – not Action – would run the construction jobs. They also agreed that “A&D will keep 98% of every payment; Action Telecom will receive 2% of every payment.”

In addition to the secret side agreement, the indictment describes a variety of ways in which the JV did not operate as a legitimate SDVOSB, but was essentially controlled by Otero and A&D. For example, although Ramsey (a service-disabled veteran) nominally served as president of Action and the JV, he actually worked full-time for another telecommunications company. Otero and A&D, not Ramsey, controlled the day-to-day management, daily operation and long-term decision making of the JV. Among other things, Otero and A&D appointed an A&D employee as the project manager for every contract and task order. Consistent with their side agreement, Action received just a small fee for using Rasmey’s status as a disabled veteran.

The indictment also alleges several examples of the conspirators deceiving government agencies about the true nature of the JV. For example, on two separate occasions, A&D submitted the JV Agreement to (and withheld the side agreement from) the government in response to requests for information about the joint venture – despite the fact that the side agreement said on its face that it superseded the original JV Agreement.

Today’s indictment cites three contracts or task orders which the VA or ACE awarded to the JV, each worth over a million dollars, and one as high as $8.2 million. In addition to the conspiracy charge, all defendants were also charged with three counts of wire fraud relating to the payment of invoices on the three contracts or task orders, and with one or more counts of major government program fraud and false statements in connection with fraudulent certifications to the government. Today’s indictment also contains forfeiture allegations, which would require the defendants to forfeit to the government any property derived from the proceeds of the fraud scheme.

Acting United States Attorney Robinson said “One important way in which our country tries to repay the debt of gratitude we owe to our veterans is by setting aside some government contracts for those who have been disabled during their service. But unscrupulous contractors have abused this program through ‘rent-a-vet’ schemes, such as the one described in today’s indictment. The Department of Justice will work to ensure that criminals who abuse important contracting programs such as the SDVOSB are held to account.”

Rebeccalynn L. Staples, Resident Agent-in-Charge of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General, San Diego Resident Agency, stated, “This investigation demonstrates the OIG’s continued commitment to aggressively pursue individuals and companies that misrepresent themselves as Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses and deny legitimate disabled veterans the opportunity to be awarded VA set-aside contracts. The VA OIG will continue to work these cases in order to protect the integrity of the program. I urge anyone with knowledge of such an ongoing fraud to call the VA OIG’s Hotline at 1-800-488-8244.”

All four defendants are also facing civil charges in United States v. Otero, et al., Case No. 15CV0441-JAH, a case alleging violations of the false claims act based on the similar misconduct.

All defendants were ordered to appear before U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez for a motion hearing at 2 p.m. on June 5.

CORPORATE DEFENDANTS

 

A&D General Contracting, Inc., Santee, California

Action Telecom, Inc., Santee, California

 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

 

Andrew Otero Age: 54 El Cajon, CA

Roger Ramsey Age: 57 Spring Valley, CA

 

Criminal Case No. 17CR0879-BEN

 

SUMMARY OF CHARGES

 

Count 1 (All): Conspiracy to defraud and commit offenses (18 U.S.C. § 371)

Maximum penalties: 5 years’ imprisonment; 3 years’ supervised release; a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or gross loss resulting from the offense, whichever is greatest; and a mandatory special assessment of $10

 

Count 2 (Otero and A&D)

and Counts 3-4 (All): Major fraud against the United States (18 U.S.C. § 1031)

Maximum penalties: 10years’ imprisonment; supervised release; a fine of $1,000,000 per count ($5,000,000 total); and a mandatory special assessment of $100

 

Counts 5-7 (All): Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)

Maximum penalties: 20 years’ imprisonment; a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or gross loss resulting from the offense, whichever is greatest; and a mandatory special assessment of $100

 

Counts 8-9 and 11-13

(Ramsey and Action),

10 (All), 14 (A&D): False statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001)

Maximum penalties: 5 years’ imprisonment; a fine; and a mandatory special assessment of $100

 

AGENCIES

 

Department of Veteran Affairs, Office of Inspector General

 

*The charges contained in this indictment are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence.

Topic(s): 
Financial Fraud
Press Release Number: 
CAS17-0421-Otero
Updated April 21, 2017