Appellees' Joint Response to Motions Regarding Amicus Participation
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group. |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 00-5212 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant No. 00-5213 STATE OF NEW YORK, EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL ELIOT SPITZER ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO MOTIONS REGARDING AMICUS PARTICIPATION The Court's Order of October 26, 2000, directed that the parties file any responses to the motions for leave to participate as amicus curiae by Monday, October 30, 2000. In light of the importance of the case, the United States and the State Plaintiffs gave consent to all movants who sought it prior to filing. We support the Court's permitting any amicus filings that it would find helpful. In the interest of full disclosure, we note that one movant, Dr. Lee A. Hollaar, provided compensated consulting services to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice in 1995 in connection with a matter involving Microsoft Corporation. Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 30th day of October, 2000, I served a copy of the foregoing APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO MOTIONS REGARDING AMICUS PARTICIPATION on the following:
|