|This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff, United States of America, filed its complaint on September 11, 2000. Plaintiff and defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law. This Final Judgment shall not be evidence against or an admission by any party of any issue of fact or law.
Therefore, before the taking of any testimony, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein and upon consent of the parties hereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:I. JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this action. The complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted under Section l of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Venue is proper in the District Court for the District of Columbia.II. DEFINITIONS
As used in this Final Judgment:
This Final Judgment applies to each defendant and to each of its officers, directors, governors, successors, and assigns and to any employee or agent, including exchange members of any committee of defendant whose duties or responsibilities include selecting option classes to be listed, developing new option products or surveillance, enforcement or ensuring compliance with laws and regulations, and applies to all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them who shall have received actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise. Nothing in this Final Judgment creates any rights for, or gives standing to, any person not a party to this action.IV. PROHIBITED CONDUCT
A. Except as provided in Section V, each defendant is enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly:
B. Except as provided by Section V, no defendant shall maintain any rule, policy, practice, or interpretation that directly prohibits, or that has a purpose and an effect of indirectly prohibiting, it from listing any equity option class because that option class is listed on another exchange.
C. Except as provided in Section V, each defendant is enjoined and restrained from threatening to retaliate, retaliating against, harassing or intimidating any exchange or any member of any exchange because it:
For purposes of this Section, listing an option that is listed on another exchange or exchanges shall not constitute retaliation, harassment or intimidation against such exchange or exchanges.V. EXCEPTIONS
Nothing in this Final Judgment shall be construed to:
A. Enjoin or prohibit conduct expressly permitted by statute, SEC rule, SEC order, or exchange rule made legally effective by formal filing with the SEC and satisfaction of appropriate SEC process, or authorized by SEC personnel.
B. Enjoin or prohibit any defendant from making unilateral business decisions, reflecting independent business judgment based upon factors set forth in SEC approved rules, regarding whether to list or delist an option class, whether to introduce a new option product, or whether to increase or decrease capacity to list option classes.
C. Address the legality of a merger, or acquisition of another exchange, or a legitimate joint venture between a defendant exchange and a non-defendant.
D. Enjoin or prohibit conduct protected by the doctrine established in Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961), and its progeny.
E. Enjoin or prohibit any exchange member or market maker from unilaterally setting the spreads, quantities or prices at which such member or market maker will trade any option.
F. Enjoin or prohibit any exchange member or market maker from communicating to any person the spreads, quantities or prices at which it is willing to trade any option, for the purpose of exploring the possibility of a purchase or sale of such option, or to negotiate for or agree to such purchase or sale.
G. Enjoin or prohibit any defendant from engaging in actions necessary to surveillance and enforcement activities undertaken pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement, dated June 20, 1994, defining, governing, and regulating the Intermarket Surveillance Group and any amendment or successor to the Intermarket Surveillance Group agreement.
Each defendant is ordered to initiate and maintain an antitrust compliance program which shall include designating, within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Final Judgment, an Antitrust Compliance Officer, who shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining an antitrust compliance program designed to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with this consent judgment and with the federal antitrust laws by the defendant in connection with operating a venue for options trading. The Antitrust Compliance Officer shall also:
A. Distribute, within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Final Judgment or designation of the Antitrust Compliance Officer, whichever is later, a copy of this Final Judgment to:
B. Distribute within thirty (30) days of appointment or assignment a copy of this Final Judgment to:
C. Brief annually those persons designated in paragraphs A and B of this subsection on the meaning and requirements of the federal antitrust laws in connection with operating a venue for trading options and of this Final Judgment and inform them that the Antitrust Compliance Officer or a designee of the Antitrust Compliance Officer is available to confer with them regarding compliance with such laws and with this Final Judgment;
D. Obtain from each person designated in paragraphs A and B of this subsection an annual written certification that he or she:
E. Maintain a record of persons to whom this Final Judgment has been distributed and from whom the certification required by paragraph D of this Section has been obtained.VII. CERTIFICATIONS
Within ninety (90) days after entry of this Final Judgment, each defendant shall certify to the Court and to the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division that the defendant:
A. For the sole purpose of determining or securing compliance with this Final Judgment, or of determining whether the Final Judgment should be modified or vacated, and subject to any legally recognized privilege, from time to time duly authorized representatives of the Department of Justice shall, upon written request of the Attorney General or of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, and on reasonable notice to any defendant at its principal office, be permitted:
B. Upon the written request of the Attorney General or the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division made to any defendant, such defendant shall submit such written reports, under oath if requested, relating to any of the matters contained in this Final Judgment as may be requested.
C. Each defendant shall submit an annual report, in a form acceptable to the Antitrust Division, identifying:
D. Each defendant shall submit a semi-annual report, in a form acceptable to the Antitrust Division, setting out each listing of a new option and each delisting of an option that occurred during that period.
E. Each defendant shall submit to the Antitrust Division a copy of any filing or submission to the SEC that relates to compliance (including any request for extension of time or for additional time for compliance) with Section IV, above, or Sections IV.B.(a), (b), (c), (h), or (j) of the Order Instituting Public Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions against defendants, Release No. 43268, issued by the SEC on September 11, 2000.
F. No information or document obtained by the means provided in Section VIII shall be divulged by any representative of the Department of Justice to any person other than a duly authorized representative of the Executive Branch of the United States, or the SEC, except in the course of legal proceedings to which the United States is a party, or for the purpose of securing compliance with this Final Judgment, or as otherwise required by law.
G. If at the time information or documents are furnished by any defendant to the United States, such defendant represents and identifies in writing the material in any such information or documents to which a claim of protection may be asserted under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and such defendant marks each pertinent page of such material, "Subject to claim of protection under Rule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure," then the United States shall give such defendant ten (10) calendar days notice prior to divulging such material in any legal proceeding (other than a grand jury proceeding).
H. Each defendant shall have the right to claim protection from public disclosure, under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.§552, or any other applicable law or regulation, for any material submitted to the Antitrust Division under this Final Judgment. After appropriate consideration of such claim of protection, the Antitrust Division will either assert that the material is protected from disclosure under law or give such defendant ten (10) calendar days notice of its intent to disclose the material.IX. JURISDICTION RETAINED
Jurisdiction is retained by this Court to enable any of the parties to this Final Judgment to apply to this Court at any time for such further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction or implementation of this Final Judgment, for the enforcement or modification of any of its provisions, and for the punishment of any violation hereof.X.
EXPIRATION OF FINAL JUDGMENT
This Final Judgment shall expire ten (10) years from the date of entry.XI. PUBLIC INTEREST DETERMINATION
Entry of this Final Judgment is in the public interest.