Skip to main content
Case Document

Scheduling Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court

Document Type
Scheduling Motions, Memoranda, and Orders
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

U.S. Department of Justice Seal
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Solicitor General

  Washington, DC 20530
June 22, 2000

Honorable William K. Suter
Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20543

  Re: United States v. Microsoft Corporation: State of New York et al. v. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft Corporation v. Spitzer (D.D.C. Civil Action Nos. 98-1232 & 98-1233 (TPJ))

Dear Mr. Suter:

On June 20, 2000, the district court certified the above-captioned actions for direct appeal to the Supreme Court, pursuant to the Expediting Act, 15 U.S.C. 29(b). I am authorized by counsel to state that the parties have agreed to a briefing schedule pursuant to which appellant will file its Jurisdictional Statement on July 26, 2000; appellees will respond on August 15, 2000; and appellant will file its reply (if any) on August 22, 2000.

Thank you for your assistance.


Seth P. Waxman
Solicitor General
cc: John L. Warden, Esq.
Sullivan & Cromwell
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Kevin J. O'Connor, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General of Wisconsin
123 West Washington Avenue
Madison, Wisconsin 53703-7857
William Neukom, Esq.
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, Washington 98052
Richard L. Schwartz, Esq.
Preeta D. Bansal, Esq.
New York State Attorney General's Office
120 Broadway
New York, New York 10271
Updated April 18, 2023