Due to the lapse in appropriations, Department of Justice websites will not be regularly updated. The Department’s essential law enforcement and national security functions will continue. Please refer to the Department of Justice’s contingency plan for more information.

U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Anthem, Inc. and Cigna Corp.

Related pages:


Appellate Court Opinion (April 28, 2017)

Brief of Appellees the United States of America and Plaintiff States Public Copy-Sealed Material Deleted [Redacted] (March 13, 2017)

Memorandum Opinion [Redacted] (February 21, 2017)

Response of the United States and Plaintiff States in Opposition to Defendant-Appellant's Motion to Expedite [Redacted] (February 15, 2017)

Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings of Fact: Phase II [Redacted] (January 17, 2017)

Plaintiffs' Proposed Conclusions of Law: Phase II (January 6, 2017)

Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact: Phase I [Redacted] (December 20, 2016)

Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum on the Buy-Side Case (December 19, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Proposed Conclusions of Law  (December 15, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Opening Statement Phase II [Redacted] (December 14, 2016)

Order (December 07, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Opening Statement [Redacted] (November 21, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Pretrial Brief (November 10, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Defendants' Declarations and Testimony from Defendants' Expert Witnesses Relying upon Those Declarations (Redacted) (November 9, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Purported Benefits Outside the Relevant Markets (Redacted) (November 7, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinion Testimony in Senator Benjamin Nelson's Declaration and Testimony from Defendants' Experts Relying upon that Declaration (Redacted)  (November 7, 2016)

Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude the Declaration of Anthem's Efficiencies Expert, Shubham Singhal, and Testimony from Defendants' Experts Relying upon That Declaration (Redacted) (November 7, 2016)

Complaint (July 21, 2016)

Case Open Date: 
Tuesday, September 1, 2015
Case Name: 
United States and the State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, District of Columbia, State of Georgia, State of Iowa, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of New Hampshire, State of New York, State of Tennessee and Commonwealth of Virginia v. Anthem, Inc., and Cigna Corp.
Case Type: 
Civil Merger
Case Violation: 
Horizontal Merger
Topic: 
Antitrust
Market: 
Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
Industry Code: 
Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
Component: 
Antitrust Division
Updated July 18, 2017