Skip to main content
Case

U.S. and State of Michigan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Stipulated Motion and Brief to Dismiss Without Prejudice (March 25, 2013)

United States’ and State of Michigan’s Motion for a Protective Order and Supporting Brief (November 19, 2012)

Plaintiffs the United States and the State of Michigan’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel a Response to Plaintiffs’ First and Third Interrogatories and to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiff’s Document Request No. 50 (September 14, 2012)

Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [194] (August 24, 2012)

Plaintiff United States’ Response to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order (August 23, 2012)

Plaintiffs’ Redacted Motion to Compel a Response to Plaintiffs’ First and Third Interrogatories and to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Document Request No. 50 (August 14, 2012)

Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Document Request No. 51 (August 1, 2012)

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Document Request 51 (July 5, 2012)

Order Denying BCBS’s Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories [80] and Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory [100] (May 30, 2012)

Case-Management Order (May 29, 2012)

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order and Issuing Scheduling Order (May 17, 2012)

Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Their Proposed Case-Management Order (April 12, 2012)

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of a Case-Management Order, Memorandum in Support of Motion, and Exhibits (March 15, 2012)

Plaintiffs United States of America’s and State of Michigan’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s "Omnibus" Motion for a 90–day Stay of Depositions (March 15, 2012)

Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Sealed Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Second Request for Production of Documents (March 12, 2012)

[Redacted] Plaintiffs’ Sealed Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Second Request for Production of Documents (February 10, 2012)

Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory (January 3, 2012)

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant to Answer Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory (December 6, 2011)

Plaintiff the United States’ Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel a Response to Its First Two Interrogatories (November 4, 2011)

Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief In Support Of Their Motion To Compel Production Of Documents (April 7, 2011)

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ First Request for Documents (March 18, 2011)

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (February 16, 2011)

Plaintiff United States of America’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint with Prejudice (January 20, 2011)

Complaint (October 18, 2010)

Case Open Date
Case Name
United States and State of Michigan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Case Type
Civil Non Merger
Case Violation(s)
  • Exclusive Dealings and Requirements Contracts
Industry Code(s)
  • Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
Component
Antitrust Division
Case Documents
Stipulated Motion and Brief to Dismiss Without Prejudice   [PDF, ]
United States’ and State of Michigan’s Motion for a Protective Order and Supporting Brief   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs the United States and the State of Michigan's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel a Response to Plaintiffs' First and Third Interrogatories and to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiff's Document Request No. 50   [PDF, ]
Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [194]   [PDF, ]
Plaintiff United States Response to Defendants Motion for a Protective Order   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Redacted Motion to Compel a Response to Plaintiffs’ First and Third Interrogatories and to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Document Request No. 50   [PDF, ]
Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Document Request No. 51   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Document Request 51   [PDF, ]
Order Denying BCBS’s Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories [80] and Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory [100]   [PDF, ]
Case-Management Order   [PDF, ]
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order and Issuing Scheduling Order   [PDF, ]
Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Their Proposed Case-Management Order   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of a Case-Management Order, Memorandum in Support of Motion, and Exhibits   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs United States of America’s and State of Michigan’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s “Omnibus” Motion for a 90-day Stay of Depositions   [PDF, ]
Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Sealed Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ Second Request for Production of Documents   [PDF, ]
[Redacted] Plaintiffs' Sealed Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs' Second Request for Production of Documents   [PDF, ]
Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant to Answer Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory   [PDF, ]
Plaintiff the United States' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel a Response to Its First Two Interrogatories   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief In Support Of Their Motion To Compel Production Of Documents   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Plaintiffs’ First Request for Documents   [PDF, ]
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss   [PDF, ]
Plaintiff United States of America's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint with Prejudice   [PDF, ]
Complaint   [PDF, ]
Updated July 8, 2015