This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact if you have any questions about the archive site.

1450. Tainting A Consumer Product

Subsection (b) of 18 U.S.C. § 1365 makes it an offense to taint a consumer product which affects interstate or foreign commerce, or to render materially false or misleading the labeling of, or the container for, such a product, with intent to cause serious injury to the business of any person (i.e, cause commercial harm to a business). The term "taints" is not defined in the Act but is meant to be broader than "tampers." S.Rep. No. 69 on S. 216, 98th Congress, 1st Sess., at 7 defines "to taint" as meaning "to modify with a trace of something offensive or deleterious, or infect, contaminate, or corrupt. Such an contaminating' result would be the addition of an unsightly or nauseating substance, as well as a dangerous substance."

Whether the commerce nexus (i.e, the tainted consumer product "affects" interstate or foreign commerce) is met is a question of fact. United States v. Levine, 41 F.3d 607, 614 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Nukida, 8 F.3d 665, 672 (9th Cir. 1993). In Levine, 41 F.3d at 614-15, the Tenth Circuit held that the effect may be established in three ways:

(1) . . . the product was in interstate commerce at the time of the tainting . . . (2) . . . the product was not in interstate commerce at the time of the tainting, [but] after the tainting it was returned to interstate commerce; we are persuaded that if a "consumer product" is taken off the shelf, tainted, and then returned to the shelf, it would still be in interstate commerce when the tainting occurred; or (3) . . . there was an actual impact on interstate commerce as a result of the tainting of the product.

[cited in JM 9-63.1100]

Updated January 17, 2020