Skip to main content

EOIR News

Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review


Wednesday, July 27, 2011

EOIR Announces Latest Disciplinary Actions Under Rules of Professional Conduct
Three Attorneys Immediately Suspended; One Receives a Final Order

FALLS CHURCH, Va. - The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) has recently taken disciplinary action against three attorneys for violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for immigration attorneys and representatives.

EOIR announces these disciplinary actions to inform the public about attorneys and representatives who are no longer authorized to represent clients before an immigration tribunal. These names will be added to the list of disciplined immigration attorneys and representatives, which is available here. The list includes links to immediate suspension orders, final orders, and reinstatement orders issued in each disciplinary case.

Disciplinary proceedings begin when the Office of the General Counsel of either EOIR or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, files a Petition for Immediate Suspension and/or a Notice of Intent to Discipline with EOIR's Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The disciplinary action can result in the public censure, suspension, or expulsion of an attorney or representative before the immigration courts, the BIA, and DHS. Before a suspended or expelled attorney can resume the practice of law before the immigration courts, the BIA, or DHS, the BIA must reinstate that attorney.

EOIR has recently taken the following disciplinary actions:

Immediate Suspensions

The BIA ordered the immediate suspension of the following attorney:

  • Parmesh Dixit: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia convicted Mr. Dixit of conspiracy to harbor aliens.  The BIA granted the government's petition for immediate suspension on July 13, 2011, based on Mr. Dixit’s conviction in Georgia and pending final disposition of his case.


  • Sarah J.M. Jones: Ms. Jones resigned from the bar of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit while disciplinary proceedings were pending. The BIA granted the government's petition for immediate suspension on July 13, 2011, based on Ms. Jones’s resignation from the bar of the Ninth Circuit and pending final disposition of her case.


  • Ann Adele Ruben: The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania suspended Ms. Ruben from the practice of law for one year and one day for violating the commonwealth’s professional conduct rules involving lack of diligence and communication, and conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. The BIA granted the government's petition for immediate suspension on July 13, 2011, based on Ms. Ruben’s suspension for one year and one day in Pennsylvania and pending final disposition of her case.

Final Order of Discipline

  • Robbie M. Levin: A final order of July 13, 2011, suspends Mr. Levin from practice before immigration tribunals for 24 months, effective June 6, 2011, based on his 24-month suspension in Georgia.

Background

The Rules of Professional Conduct appear in Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (8 C.F.R. '' 1003 and 1292). They include provisions specifying grounds for disciplinary action, requirements for receiving and investigating complaints, and procedures for conducting hearings. The rules also authorize the BIA to suspend immediately an attorney or representative who has been subject to disbarment, suspension or resignation with an admission of misconduct as imposed by a federal or state court, or who has been convicted of a serious crime, pending a summary proceeding and final sanction. The Rules of Professional Conduct are available at http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/fedreg/2000_2001/fr27jn00R.pdf and http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/fedreg/2008_2009/fr18dec08c.pdf.

Additional information about the Attorney Discipline Program can be found here and at http://www.justice.gov/eoir/press/09/AttorneyDisciplineFactSheet.pdf.

- EOIR -

The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is an agency within the Department of Justice. Under delegated authority from the Attorney General, immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals interpret and adjudicate immigration cases according to United States immigration laws. EOIR's immigration judges conduct administrative court proceedings in immigration courts located throughout the nation. They determine whether foreign-born individuals—whom the Department of Homeland Security charges with violating immigration law—should be ordered removed from the United States or should be granted relief from removal and be permitted to remain in this country. The Board of Immigration Appeals primarily reviews appeals of decisions by immigration judges. EOIR's Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer adjudicates immigration-related employment cases. EOIR is committed to ensuring fairness in all of the cases it adjudicates.


Executive Office for Immigration Review

Updated August 31, 2015